Prothrombin complex concentrate administration timing in warfarin-associated intracranial hemorrhage

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines recommend "rapid" and "urgent" reversal of anticoagulation for warfarin-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) treatment; however, they do not specify goals for time-to-administration. There are limited studies evaluating time to reversal, or international normalized ratio (INR) correction, on hematoma expansion and outcomes in intervals of <4 h. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of 4-factor prothrombin concentrate (4F-PCC) time-to-administration on rates of achieving effective hemostasis, determined by hematoma expansion, for treatment of warfarin-associated ICH.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational, single center study performed at a large community teaching hospital. Patients were stratified into three groups based on time of CT diagnosis of ICH to administration of 4F-PCC: <45 min, 45-90 min, and >90 min. The primary outcome was rates of achieving effective hemostasis in each group defined as a ≤20% increase in hematoma volume as estimated by a radiologist.

RESULTS

A total of 227 patients were screened for inclusion with ultimately 39 being included. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The primary outcome was not significantly different among groups stratified by time to 4F-PCC administration of <45 min, 45-90 min, and >90 min (85.7% vs 73.3% vs 90%, p value 0.514). There was no difference among secondary outcomes between groups including in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), and intensive care unit LOS.

CONCLUSION

There was no association with time-to-administration of 4F-PCC on rates of hemostasis achievement, defined as hematoma expansion of ≤20%, identified in this study.

Management of traumatic cervical epidural hematoma in patients on Xa-inhibitors: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Cervical epidural hematoma (CEH) is defined as a collection of blood in the suprameningeal space. Mechanisms of this rare pathology include spontaneous, postsurgical, and traumatic as the main subtypes. This unique case of traumatic CEH represents an even smaller subset of these cases. Management varies by symptom presentation, mechanism of injury, and other contraindications.

CASE PRESENTATION

This case presents a 32 year old African American female on an oral anticoagulant sustaining traumatic cervical hematoma after a motor vehicle collision. Patient complained of neck, abdominal, and back pain. Imaging revealed a cervical spinal hematoma at the level of C3-C6. This case discusses the management of CEH for the general population and in the setting of anticoagulation.

CONCLUSION

Management of each case of CEH must be carefully considered and tailored based on their symptom presentation and progression of disease. As the use of anticoagulation including factor Xa inhibitors becomes more prevalent, there is greater need to understand the detailed pathophysiological aspect of the injuries. Targeted reversal agents such as Prothrombin Concentrate can be used for conservative treatment. Adjunct testing such as thromboelastogram can be used to help guide management.

OKL-1111, A modified cyclodextrin as a potential universal reversal agent for anticoagulants

BACKGROUND

Antithrombotic therapy is inevitably associated with a risk for bleeding and these bleeding complications can be life-threatening. Recently, specific reversal agents were developed for the direct factor Xa and thrombin inhibitors (DOACs). However, next to the fact that these agents are relatively expensive, the use of selective reversal agents complicates treatment of bleeding patients in practice. In a series of screening experiments, we discovered a class of cyclodextrins with procoagulant properties. In this study we characterize a lead compound, OKL-1111, and demonstrate its potential use as a universal reversal agent.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the anticoagulant reversal properties of OKL-1111, in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

The effect of OKL-1111 on coagulation in the absence and presence of DOACs was investigated in a thrombin generation assay. Its reversal effect on a variety of anticoagulants in vivo was investigated in a rat tail cut bleeding model. A possible prothrombotic action of OKL-1111 was assessed in a Wessler model in rabbits.

RESULTS

OKL-1111 concentration-dependently reversed the in vitro anticoagulant effects of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban in the thrombin generation assay. Also in the absence of a DOAC, OKL-1111 concentration-dependently accelerated coagulation in this assay, but did not initiate coagulation. The reversal effect was also seen for all DOACs in the rat tail cut bleeding model. In addition, when tested with other anticoagulants, OKL-1111 also reversed the anticoagulant effect of the vitamin K antagonist warfarin, the low molecular weight heparin enoxaparin, the pentasaccharide fondaparinux and the platelet inhibitor clopidogrel in vivo. OKL-1111 did not have prothrombotic effects in the Wessler model.

CONCLUSION

OKL-1111 is a procoagulant cyclodextrin with a currently unknown working mechanism that has potential to become a universal reversal agent for anticoagulants and platelet inhibitors.

Reduced Time to Procedure for Gastrointestinal Bleeding After Warfarin Reversal With Four-Factor Complex Concentrate as Compared to Plasma

Background

Bleeding is a serious adverse effect of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Anticoagulation reversal is required in some acute cases. This is usually accomplished by plasma transfusion or four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC). The aim of this study was to gain insight into the clinical course of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding who require VKA reversal.

Methods

Medical records were collected from two centers from patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) for GI bleeding and received 4F-PCC or plasma for VKA reversal between January 2015 and December 2020. ED, hospital, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) as well as time from admission to GI procedure were determined.

Results

4F-PCC patients (n = 49) as compared to plasma (n = 63) patients were found to have a greater number of comorbidities (average of 4.2 vs. 2.7 comorbidities/patient) and more ICU admissions (47% vs. 21%). Time to GI procedure was significantly decreased in the 4F-PCC group (median (interquartile range (IQR)) 19.47 (9.23 - 30.25) vs. 27.88 (21.38 - 45.00) h; P = 0.01). When adjusting for comorbidities, differences in time to GI procedures were also significant in favor of 4F-PCC regardless of any comorbidities (P = 0.014), in atrial fibrillation (P = 0.045) and in hypertension (P = 0.02). The 4F-PCC patients had shorter LOS in the ED and ICU.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that compared to plasma, 4F-PCC was utilized in more acutely ill patients with higher rates of comorbidities and ICU admission. Nevertheless, the patients who received 4F-PCC had faster access to GI procedure and shorter ED and ICU LOS.

Risk and Management of Bleeding Complications with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism: a Narrative Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) are highly prevalent conditions with a significant healthcare burden, and represent the main indications for anticoagulation. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the first choice treatment of AF/VTE, and have become the most prescribed class of anticoagulants globally, overtaking vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Compared to VKAs, DOACs have a similar or better efficacy/safety profile, with reduced risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), while the risk of major bleeding and other bleeding harms may vary depending on the type of DOAC. We have critically reviewed available evidence from randomized controlled trials and observational studies regarding the risk of bleeding complications of DOACs compared to VKAs in patients with AF and VTE. Special patient populations (e.g., elderly, extreme body weights, chronic kidney disease) have specifically been addressed. Management of bleeding complications and possible resumption of anticoagulation, in particular after ICH and gastrointestinal bleeding, are also discussed. Finally, some suggestions are provided to choose the optimal DOAC to minimize adverse events according to individual patient characteristics and bleeding risk.

Comparison of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate and andexanet alfa for reversal of apixaban and rivaroxaban in the setting of intracranial hemorrhage

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare clinical outcomes in patients who experienced intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) while taking apixaban or rivaroxaban and were reversed with four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCC) or andexanet alfa (AA). This retrospective cohort included adult patients that received 4F-PCC or AA for the initial management of an apixaban- or rivaroxaban-associated ICH. A primary outcome of excellent or good hemostatic efficacy at 12 h post-reversal was assessed. Secondary outcomes evaluated were change in hematoma volume size at 12 h, functional status at discharge, need for surgical intervention or additional hemostatic agents post-reversal, new thrombotic event within 28 days, 28-day all-cause mortality, discharge disposition, and hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay. A total of 70 patients were included (4F-PCC, n = 47; AA, n = 23). For the primary outcome analysis, 21 patients were included in the 4F-PCC group and 12 in the AA group. The rate of effective hemostasis was similar between the 4F-PCC and AA groups (66.7% vs 75%, p = 0.62). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for secondary outcomes, including 28-day mortality (40.4% vs 39.1%, p = 0.92) and thrombotic complications within 28 days of reversal (17.0% vs 21.7%, p = 0.63). In patients who experienced an ICH while taking apixaban or rivaroxaban, 4F-PCC and AA were found to have similar rates of excellent or good hemostatic efficacy.

Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate administration after expanding intracranial hemorrhage status post administration of andexanet alfa

BACKGROUND

With respect to reversal of life threatening bleeds associated with the use of oral factor Xa inhibitors, current guidelines provide few recommendations for a preferred reversal agent. When the initial reversal agent fails to achieve the desired hemostatic response, there is little to no recommendations for the use of additional reversal agents.

CASE REPORT

An 86-year-old female on apixaban (ELIQUIS) for atrial fibrillation, presented from an outside hospital due to a spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Computed tomography (CT) scan revealed multifocal left sided sICH. Due to use of apixaban in the setting to sICH, patient received andexanet alfa (AA) for reversal. Patient was then transferred and upon arrival to receiving emergency department (ED), repeat CT scans showed an expanding sICH, progression of midline shift, and low-molecular weight heparin levels that were ≥ 2 international units (IU) per milliliter (mL), indicating therapeutic apixaban activity. The patient was subsequently given four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC). WHY AN EMERGENCY MEDICINE PHYSICIAN SHOULD BE AWARE OF THIS INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING KEY POINTS.

Emergent Reversal of Antithrombotics and Treatment of Life-Threatening Bleeding from Coagulopathies: A Clinical Review

BACKGROUND

Reversal of antithrombotic agents and treatment of life-threatening bleeding episodes from coagulopathies can be a stressful scenario for clinicians, especially when the selection of treatment options should occur quickly. Understanding the options available for these agents requires emergency physicians to be familiar with the current data surrounding new therapies and dosing strategies for the treatment of bleeding from reversible and nonreversible antithrombotics and coagulopathic conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To provide quick resource guides for the reversal of major or life-threatening bleeding caused by antithrombotic agents or in the setting of coagulopathies.

METHODS

A literature search for articles published through September 2021 related to antithrombotic reversal and treatment of acute bleeding from coagulopathies was conducted using the PubMed clinical database. Selected articles were used to generate 5 guidance tables in this clinical review.

DISCUSSION

Four guidance tables for how to treat major or life-threatening bleeding from antithrombotic agents and 1 table for how to manage life-threatening bleeding for coagulopathies are presented as a quick reference tool for the emergency physician. Additional information on upcoming reversal agents and possible treatment options are provided herein.

CONCLUSIONS

In this clinical review, a series of 5 tables were created to provide quick and comprehensive guidance for the emergency physician when treating major or life-threatening bleeding caused by antithrombotic agents or coagulopathies. © 2022 Elsevier Inc.

Use of the CytoSorb® filter for elimination of residual therapeutic argatroban concentrations during heparinized cardiopulmonary bypass for heart transplantation

INTRODUCTION

No antidote or established extracorporeal elimination strategy is available for argatroban. Hemadsorption facilitates elimination of smaller drugs.

CASE REPORT

A 34-year-old patient underwent urgent heart transplantation. Because of a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, preoperative anticoagulation was performed with argatroban. Despite ceasing of the continuous infusion of argatroban 2 h before surgery, concentration only declined from 0.60 μg/ml to 0.58 μg/ml before surgery, and the activated clotting time (ACT) value shortly was 223 s. Microvascular bleeding had been observed when starting surgery. A CytoSorb® absorption column was integrated into the system of the heparin-anticoagulated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit and a flow of 400 mL/min provided during the 2 h of extracorporeal circulation. The argatroban concentration after weaning from CPB was 0.04 μg/ml and satisfying hemostasis had been achieved after protamine administration.

CONCLUSION

Data indicate that the CytoSorb® absorption column might be an effective tool for quick extracorporeal removal of therapeutic concentrations of argatroban.

Point-of-care testing of coagulation in patients treated with edoxaban

Edoxaban, alongside other direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), is increasingly used for prevention of thromboembolism, including stroke. Despite DOAC therapy, however, annual stroke rate in patients with atrial fibrillation remains 1–2%. Rapid exclusion of relevant anticoagulation is necessary to guide thrombolysis or reversal therapy but, so far, no data exists on the effect of edoxaban on available point-of-care test systems (POCT). To complete our previous investigation on global coagulation-POCT for the detection of DOAC, we evaluated whether CoaguChek®-INR (CC-INR) is capable of safely ruling out edoxaban concentrations above the current treatment thresholds of 30/50 ng/mL in a blood sample. We studied patients receiving a first dose of edoxaban; excluding subjects receiving other anticoagulants. Six blood samples were collected from each patient: before drug intake, 0.5, 1, 2 and 8 h after intake, and at trough (24 h). CC-INR and mass spectrometry for edoxaban concentrations were performed for each time-point. One hundred and twenty blood samples from 20 patients contained 0–302 ng/mL of edoxaban. CC-INR ranged from 0.9 to 2.3. Pearson’s correlation coefficient showed strong correlation between CC-INR and edoxaban concentrations (r = 0.73, p < 0.001). Edoxaban concentrations > 30 and > 50 ng/mL were ruled out by CC-INR ≤ 1.0 and ≤ 1.1, respectively, with high specificity (> 95%), and a sensitivity of 44% (95%-confidence interval: 30–59%) and 86% (74–93%), respectively. Our study represents the first evaluation of coagulation-POCT in edoxaban-treated patients. CC-POCT is suitable to safely exclude clinically relevant edoxaban concentrations prior to thrombolysis, or guide reversal therapy in stroke patients.

Impact of a pharmacist driven anticoagulation reversal program at a large academic medical center

In major/life-threatening bleeding, administration of timely and appropriate reversal agents is imperative to reduce morbidity and mortality. Due to complexities associated with the use of reversal agents, a clinical pharmacist-driven anticoagulation reversal program (ARP) was developed. The goal of this program was to ensure appropriateness of reversal agents based on the clinical scenario, optimize selection and avoid unintended consequences. This study describes the impact of a pharmacist-driven anticoagulation program on patient outcomes and cost. A single center retrospective chart review of adult patients whom the ARP was consulted from October 2018 to January 2020 was performed. Patients were included in the efficacy analysis if they were > 18 years of age and presented with acute bleeding. Patients were excluded from the efficacy analysis if the recommended reversal agent was not administered, if a repeat head CT was not available for patients who presented with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), or if the patient was not bleeding. All patients were included in the economic evaluation. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who achieved effective hemostasis within 24 h of anticoagulation reversal. Secondary outcomes include incidence of thromboembolic events, in-hospital mortality, and cost avoidance. One hundred twenty-one patients were evaluated by the ARP with 92 patients included in the efficacy analysis. The primary sites of bleeding were ICH in 46% and gastrointestinal (GI) in 29%. Hemostasis was achieved in 84% of patients. Thrombotic events occurred in 7.4% of patients and in-hospital mortality was 26.4%. Total cost avoidance was $1,005,871.78. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-driven ARP on clinical and economic outcomes. Implementation of a pharmacist-driven ARP was associated with favorable outcomes and cost savings.

The outcomes of three-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (3F-PCC) in warfarin anticoagulation reversal: a prospective, single-arm, open-label, multicentre study

There is a wide variation on the efficacy of three-factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate (3F-PCC) in warfarin reversal. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of 3F-PCC in warfarin reversal. This multicentre prospective study analysed data from adult patients on warfarin who received 3F-PCC (Prothrombinex-VF®) for anticoagulation reversal between June 2019 to October 2020. Purposive sampling was used in this study. Study endpoints included target INR achievement, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and in-hospital all-cause mortality. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess independent predictors of study endpoints. One-hundred thirty-seven patients with a median age of 68 (59-76) years were recruited, who were predominantly male (59.9%, n = 82). A total of 102 patients required 3F-PCC for life-threatening (40.9%, n = 56) and clinically significant bleeding (33.6%, n = 46). Initial INRs ranged from 1.55 to undetectable high (> 26). All patients had INR reduction, of which 62% (n = 85) achieved target INR, whereas 12.4% (n = 17) achieved INR below the target range. Median INR was reduced from 4.76 (3.14-8.32) to 1.54 (1.27-1.88) post-3F-PCC (p < 0.001). The use of adjunctive reversal agents and initial INR < 3.6 were the significant predictors for target INR achievement. Six (4.4%) ADRs were observed. Two (1.5%) cases with the suspected acute coronary syndrome were associated with mortality. Ischemic stroke occurred in one (0.7%) patient. The incidence of in-hospital all-cause mortality was 21.2% (n = 29). The rate of INR achievement was 62% in our study without apparent increased risk of thromboembolic events and in-hospital all-cause mortality.

Comparison of high- and low-dose 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for the emergent reversal of oral Factor Xa inhibitors

Even though there are several reversal strategies available for oral Factor Xa inhibitor associated coagulopathies, 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) is used commonly as the primary reversal agent at many institutions. A dose of 50 units/kg is recommended as safe and effective with growing data suggesting that a lower dosing strategy may be sufficient. This retrospective study included adult patients who received either high-dose (50 units/kg; maximum dose: 5000 units) or low-dose (25 units/kg; maximum dose: 2500 units) 4F-PCC for the emergent reversal of oral Factor Xa inhibitor-related life threatening bleeding. The primary outcome was the attainment of hemostatic effectiveness. Secondary outcomes were rates of thromboembolic events and inpatient mortality. 47 patients were included in the analysis of which 24 patients received high-dose and 23 patients received low-dose 4F-PCC. Overall hemostatic effectiveness was 87.5% in the high-dose group and 91.3% in the low-dose group. Thromboembolic event rate was 8.3% in the high-dose group compared to 4.4% within the low-dose group and inpatient mortality rate was 8.3% in the high-dose group and 4.4% in the low-dose group. Low-dose 4F-PCC (25 units/kg, maximum dose: 2500 units) for the reversal of oral Factor Xa inhibitors is a cost-effective alternative to high-dose 4F-PCC (50 units/kg; maximum dose: 5000 units) and provides effective hemostasis without increased rates of thromboembolic events or inpatient mortality.

Point-of-care testing for emergency assessment of coagulation in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants including edoxaban

Background

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) including edoxaban are increasingly used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Despite treatment, annual stroke rate in these patients remains 1–2%. Rapid assessment of coagulation would be useful to guide thrombolysis or reversal therapy in this growing population of DOAC/edoxaban-treated stroke patients. Employing the Hemochron™ Signature Elite point-of-care test system (HC-POCT), clinically relevant plasma concentrations of dabigatran and rivaroxaban can be excluded in a blood sample. However, no data exists on the effect of edoxaban on HC-POCT results.

We evaluated whether edoxaban plasma concentrations above the current treatment thresholds for thrombolysis or anticoagulation reversal (i.e., 30 and 50 ng/mL) can be ruled out with the HC-POCT.

Methods

We prospectively studied patients receiving a first dose of edoxaban. Six blood samples were collected from each patient: before, 0.5, 1, 2, 8, and 24 h after drug intake. HC-POCT-based INR (HC-INR), activated clotting time (HC-ACT+ and HC-ACT-LR), activated partial thromboplastin time (HC-aPTT), and mass spectrometry for edoxaban plasma concentrations were performed at each time-point. We calculated correlations, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and test-specific cut-offs for ruling out edoxaban concentrations > 30 and > 50 ng/mL in a blood sample.

Results

One hundred twenty blood samples from 20 edoxaban-treated patients were analyzed. Edoxaban plasma concentrations ranged from 0 to 512 ng/mL. HC-INR/HC-ACT+/HC-ACT-LR/HC-aPTT ranged from 0.7–8.3/78–310 s/65–215 s/19–93 s, and Pearson’s correlation coefficients showed moderate to very strong correlations with edoxaban concentrations (r = 0.95/0.79/0.70/0.60). With areas under the ROC curve of 0.997 (95% confidence interval: 0.991–0.971) and 0.989 (0.975–1.000), HC-INR most reliably ruled out edoxaban concentrations > 30 and > 50 ng/mL, respectively, and HC-INR results ≤1.5 and ≤ 2.1 provided specificity/sensitivity of 98.6% (91.2–99.9)/98.0% (88.0–99.9) and 96.8% (88.0–99.4)/96.5% (86.8–99.4).

Conclusions

Our study represents the first systematic evaluation of the HC-POCT in edoxaban-treated patients. Applying sufficiently low assay-specific cut-offs, the HC-POCT may not only be used to reliably rule out dabigatran and rivaroxaban, but also very low edoxaban concentrations in a blood sample. Because the assay-specific cut-offs were retrospectively defined, further investigation is warranted.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT02825394, registered on: 07/07/2016, URL

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42466-021-00105-4.

Idarucizumab (PRAXBIND®) as a sole reversal agent in an unstable hemorrhagic shock patient on an unknown anticoagulant with elevated protime/international normalized ratio (PT/INR)

Dabigatran is a direct oral anticoagulant thrombin inhibitor approved for stroke prophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and prophylaxis or treatment of venous thromboembolism. Since approval, there has been increasing concern regarding bleeding risk, predominantly in the elderly population and those with renal disease. We present a case of an 85-year-old female with an unknown medication history, shortness of breath and severe anemia due to an upper gastrointestinal bleed. Laboratory abnormalities were significant for INR 6.43 and serum creatinine 2.21 mg/dL. While in the emergency department the patient decompensated requiring intubation, aggressive crystalloid resuscitation, blood products and initiation of vasopressors. The inability to distinguish between warfarin- and dabigatran-induced coagulopathies paired with the lack of medical information complicated selection of the appropriate anticoagulation reversal agent. In an attempt to prevent a prothrombotic state, prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) were held and reversal was accomplished with idarucizumab alone, although warfarin-induced coagulopathy remained a possibility. 30 min after administration, repeat PT/INR was 16.1 s and 1.55, respectively. It was later confirmed that the patient was on sole dabigatran therapy. This case highlights the potential for dabigatran to cause extreme elevation in PT/INR in patients with acute renal failure, which may mimic warfarin-induced coagulopathy. Further, it demonstrates significant, rapid correction of abnormal coagulation assays following administration of idarucizumab in a patient with severe INR elevation and suspected dabigatran use.

Emergency intensive care unit pharmacist's intervention may reduce time to four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate administration: a retrospective study

Background

Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) must be administered as soon as possible, and in our emergency intensive care unit (EICU), pharmacists are available on weekdays for consultation on expediting 4F-PCC administration. Although recent reports have described a reduction in time to 4F-PCC administration, few studies have addressed if this is because of EICU pharmacist’s intervention, and there are no such studies in Japan. Therefore, we aimed to examine whether EICU pharmacist’s intervention reduced time to 4F-PCC administration.

Methods

This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted from December 2017 to May 2019. We enrolled patients who received 4F-PCC due to major bleeding or requirement of urgent surgical/invasive procedures (n = 10). Patients were divided into two groups, namely, the intervention group (n = 5), in which EICU pharmacists consulted on weekdays, and the nonintervention group (n = 5), in which an intervention was not possible because of the absence of the EICU pharmacist.

Results

The median time from patient presentation to the EICU to 4F-PCC administration (103 min vs. 111 min, p = 0.4) was similar between the two groups; however, the median time from 4F-PCC prescription ordering to administration was significantly shorter in the intervention group than in the nonintervention group (21 min vs. 60 min, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

EICU pharmacist’s intervention improves the process from 4F-PCC prescription to administration and can reduce time to 4F-PCC administration.

The Development and Impact of Hemostatic Stewardship Programs

The approval of several new clotting factor concentrates and anticoagulation antidotes has resulted in increased complexity and cost of care. A multidisciplinary hemostatic stewardship program is essential to optimize utilization of these resources. This article summarizes the authors' approach to the stewardship of clotting factor concentrates and anticoagulation antidotes.

Reversal of oral anticoagulation in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage

In light of an aging population with increased cardiovascular comorbidity, the use of oral anticoagulation (OAC) is steadily expanding. A variety of pharmacological alternatives to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have emerged over recent years (direct oral anticoagulants, DOAC, i.e., dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) which show a reduced risk for the occurrence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Yet, in the event of ICH under OAC (OAC-ICH), hematoma characteristics are similarly severe and clinical outcomes likewise substantially limited in both patients with VKA- and DOAC-ICH, which is why optimal acute hemostatic treatment in all OAC-ICH needs to be guaranteed. Currently, International Guidelines for the hemostatic management of patients with OAC-ICH are updated as several relevant large-sized observational studies and recent trials have established treatment approaches for both VKA- and DOAC-ICH. While the management of VKA-ICH is mainly based on the immediate reversal of elevated levels of international normalized ratio using prothrombin complex concentrates, hemostatic management of DOAC-associated ICH is challenging requiring specific antidotes, notably idarucizumab and andexanet alfa. This review will provide an overview of the latest studies and trials on hemostatic reversal agents and timing and summarizes the effects on hemorrhage progression and clinical outcomes in patients with OAC-ICH.

Diagnostic and therapeutic approach in adult patients with traumatic brain injury receiving oral anticoagulant therapy: an Austrian interdisciplinary consensus statement

There is a high degree of uncertainty regarding optimum care of patients with potential or known intake of oral anticoagulants and traumatic brain injury (TBI). Anticoagulation therapy aggravates the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage but, on the other hand, patients take anticoagulants because of an underlying prothrombotic risk, and this could be increased following trauma. Treatment decisions must be taken with due consideration of both these risks. An interdisciplinary group of Austrian experts was convened to develop recommendations for best clinical practice. The aim was to provide pragmatic, clear, and easy-to-follow clinical guidance for coagulation management in adult patients with TBI and potential or known intake of platelet inhibitors, vitamin K antagonists, or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. Diagnosis, coagulation testing, and reversal of anticoagulation were considered as key steps upon presentation. Post-trauma management (prophylaxis for thromboembolism and resumption of long-term anticoagulation therapy) was also explored. The lack of robust evidence on which to base treatment recommendations highlights the need for randomized controlled trials in this setting.

Not all head injured patients on antiplatelet drugs need platelets: Integrating platelet reactivity testing into platelet transfusion guidelines

INTRODUCTION

Antiplatelet medication use continues to rise in an aging population, and these agents can have a deleterious effect for patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH). The purpose of the current investigation is to assess the safety and efficacy of using platelet reactivity testing (PRT) to direct platelet transfusion for tICH patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A Level I trauma center adopted a targeted platelet transfusion guideline using PRT to determine whether platelets were inhibited by an antiplatelet medication (aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitors). Non-inhibited patients were monitored without platelet transfusion, regardless of severity of the head injury. The guideline was analyzed retrospectively to evaluate patient outcomes during the study period (June 2014-December 2016). All patients sustained blunt tICH and received a PRT for known or suspected antiplatelet medication use. Differences were assessed with Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's Exact tests.

RESULTS

166 patients met study inclusion criteria. PRT results indicated that 48 patients (29%) were not inhibited by an antiplatelet medication, and 92% of those patients (n = 44) were spared platelet transfusion. Seven percent (n = 11) of all patients had a clinically significant progression of the head bleed, but this did not differ by inhibition or transfusion status. Implementation of this guideline reduced platelet transfusions by an estimated 30-50% and associated healthcare costs by 42%.

CONCLUSIONS

A targeted platelet transfusion guideline using PRT reduced platelet usage for patients with tICH. If appropriately tested, results suggest that not all tICH patients taking or suspected of taking antiplatelet drugs need platelet transfusion. Platelet reactivity testing can significantly reduce healthcare costs and resource usage.

Proposal for the Rapid Reversal of Coagulopathy in Patients with Nonoperative Head Injuries on Anticoagulants and/or Antiplatelet Agents: A Case Study and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Emergency room physicians, trauma teams, and neurosurgeons are seeing increasing numbers of head-injured patients on anticoagulants, many of whom are nonoperative. Head injury and anticoagulation can lead to devastating consequences. These patients need immediate evaluation and often reversal of anticoagulation in order to decrease their high rates of morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To review data on the prevalence, risks, treatment, and complications of head-injured anticoagulated patients and provide a proposal for their anticoagulant management, and imaging requirements.

METHODS

A PubMed database search was performed for articles on the prevalence, risks, treatment, and complications of patients who have sustained a head injury while on anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents.

RESULTS

A total of 1877 articles were found, of which 64 were selected for use based on direct relevance, information quality, and contribution of the article to the current understanding of anticoagulated head injury patients.

CONCLUSION

There are very few guidelines for the management of nonoperative head-injured patients. Rapid reversal guided by international normalized ratio values, Platelet Function Assays, computed tomography imaging of the head, and physical exam is suggested. The proposal presented in this paper enables patient management to begin quickly in a systematic approach, with the goal of achieving a significant decrease in the morbidity and mortality for the anticoagulated head-injured patient. Rapid reversal can potentially decrease mortality by as much as 38%.

Safety of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for emergent reversal of factor Xa inhibitors

Background

Although factor Xa inhibitors have become a popular choice for chronic oral anticoagulation, effective drug reversal remains difficult due to a lack of specific antidote. Currently, 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) is considered the treatment of choice for factor Xa inhibitor-related major bleeding. However, safety of 4F-PCC and its risk of thrombosis when used for this off-label purpose remain unclear. The purpose of this retrospective study is to determine the rate of thromboembolism when 4F-PCC is used for the emergent reversal of factor Xa inhibitors.

Methods

We conducted a single-center retrospective review of medical records between 2013 and 2017. Patients were included if they received 4F-PCC to reverse rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban for emergent invasive procedures or during episodes of major bleeding defined as bleeding with hemodynamic instability, fall in hemoglobin of 2 g/dL, or bleeding requiring blood transfusion. Thrombotic events including myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, cerebral vascular accident, and arterial thrombosis of the limb or mesentery were recorded if they occurred within 14 days of 4F-PCC administration. Data was analyzed using point and interval estimation to approximate the rate and confidence interval of thromboembolic events.

Results

Forty-three patients were identified in our review. Doses of 4F-PCC were determined by the treating physician and mainly ranged from 25 to 50 IU/kg. Twenty-two patients (51.2%) received both sequential compression devices (SCDs) and subcutaneous heparin for DVT prophylaxis. Twenty-one patients (48.8%) were placed on SCDs only. Three patients received concomitant FFP. Thrombotic events within 14 days of 4F-PCC administration occurred in 1 out of 43 patients (2.1%, 95% CI [0.1–12.3]). This thrombotic event was an upper extremity DVT which occurred 1 day after the patient received 1325 IU (25 IU/kg) of 4F-PCC to reverse rivaroxaban for traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. The patient was taken for emergent decompressive craniotomy after rivaroxaban reversal. In patients who did not undergo surgery or who underwent minor invasive procedures, no thrombotic events were noted.

Conclusion

Based on our preliminary data, the thromboembolic rate of 4F-PCC when given at a dose of 25–50 IU/kg to emergently reverse rivaroxaban and apixaban appears acceptable. Since many patients who require 4F-PCC to emergently reverse factor Xa inhibitors will be at high risk of developing thrombotic events, practitioners should be highly vigilant of these complications. Large, multicenter prospective trials are needed to further determine this risk.

Activated prothrombin complex concentrate for warfarin reversal in traumatic intracranial hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (TIH) anticoagulated with warfarin are at an increased risk of mortality. Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and vitamin K have been the standard treatment for warfarin reversal; however, guidelines now recommend the use of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) for warfarin reversal in patients with life-threatening bleeding. Our protocol uses one vial (∼1000 units) of activated PCC (aPCC) for warfarin reversal, regardless of the weight or presenting international normalized ratio (INR). The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of using fixed, low-dose aPCC for warfarin reversal in patients with TIH.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review that included patients with an Abbreviated Injury Scale Head score of ≥3, TIH, and initial INR ≥ 1.5 on warfarin. Patients aged <18 years and those with no repeat INR were excluded. The primary outcome was to compare the percentage of patients with INR ≤ 1.4 after receiving aPCC versus FFP within 24 hours.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients were in the FFP group and 31 patients in the aPCC group. The INR was reversed more effectively in the aPCC group compared with the FFP group (90.3% versus 69.7%, P = 0.029). The median time (hours) to reversal was also significantly shorter in the aPCC group compared with the FFP group (3.75 versus 6.75, P = 0.003). However, there was no difference in mortality (35.5% aPCC versus 22.2% control, P = 0.162) or incidences of thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

Fixed, low-dose aPCC is safe and more effective at reversing the effects of warfarin than FFP in patients with TIH.

Indications and Methods of Anticoagulation Reversal

The use of anticoagulation in the prevention of strokes due to atrial fibrillation or the treatment of venous thromboembolic disease has been on the rise. With the advent and proliferation of direct oral anticoagulation medications, the management of anticoagulation reversal has become increasingly complex, especially when urgent or emergent reversal is required. This review details the commonly used parenteral and oral anticoagulants, the treatment strategies necessary for their reversal, and therapies still in development.

Real-life experience with the specific reversal agent idarucizumab for the management of emergency situations in dabigatran-treated patients: a series of 11 cases

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have a favorable benefit-risk profile compared with vitamin K antagonists. However, the lack of specific reversal agents has made the management of some patients receiving long-term treatment with NOACs problematic in emergency situations such as major bleeding events or urgent procedures. Idarucizumab, a fully humanized Fab antibody fragment that binds specifically and with high affinity to dabigatran, was recently approved for use in adult patients treated with dabigatran when rapid reversal of its anticoagulant effect is required. Clinical experience with idarucizumab is currently limited. We report 11 real-life clinical cases in which idarucizumab was used after multidisciplinary consultation in a variety of emergency situations including severe postoperative bleeding, emergency high-bleeding-risk surgery (hip/spine surgery and neurosurgery), invasive diagnostic testing (lumbar puncture), intracranial bleeding (pre-pontine subarachnoid hemorrhage and lobar intracerebral hemorrhage) and thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. This case series illustrates the role of idarucizumab in improving patient safety in rare emergency situations requiring rapid reversal of the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran, while highlighting the importance of information and education about the availability and appropriate use of this recently approved specific reversal agent.

Point-of-care testing for emergency assessment of coagulation in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants

Background

Point-of-care testing (POCT) of coagulation has been proven to be of great value in accelerating emergency treatment. Specific POCT for direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is not available, but the effects of DOAC on established POCT have been described. We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of Hemochron® Signature coagulation POCT to qualitatively rule out relevant concentrations of apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran in real-life patients.

Methods

We enrolled 68 patients receiving apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran and obtained blood samples at six pre-specified time points. Coagulation testing was performed using prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and activated clotting time (ACT+ and ACT-low range) POCT cards. For comparison, laboratory-based assays of diluted thrombin time (Hemoclot) and anti-Xa activity were conducted. DOAC concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Results

Four hundred and three samples were collected. POCT results of PT/INR and ACT+ correlated with both rivaroxaban and dabigatran concentrations. Insufficient correlation was found for apixaban. Rivaroxaban concentrations at <30 and <100 ng/mL were detected with >95% specificity at PT/INR POCT ≤1.0 and ≤1.1 and ACT+ POCT ≤120 and ≤130 s. Dabigatran concentrations at <30 and <50 ng/mL were detected with >95% specificity at PT/INR POCT ≤1.1 and ≤1.2 and ACT+ POCT ≤100 s.

Conclusions

Hemochron® Signature POCT can be a fast and reliable alternative for guiding emergency treatment during rivaroxaban and dabigatran therapy. It allows the rapid identification of a relevant fraction of patients that can be treated immediately without the need to await the results of much slower laboratory-based coagulation tests.

Trial registration

Unique identifier, NCT02371070. Retrospectively registered on 18 February 2015.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1619-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Administration of 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate as an Antidote for Intracranial Bleeding in Patients Taking Direct Factor Xa Inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

Direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban are efficacious alternatives to warfarin and confer a lower risk of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (ICH); however, they lack a validated reversal strategy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) administration on rivaroxaban- and apixaban-mediated coagulopathy in patients with traumatic and spontaneous ICH.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients presenting with traumatic and spontaneous ICH and concurrent use of rivaroxaban or apixaban. Demographic factors, reason for anticoagulation, hemorrhage type and location, Glasgow coma scale score, and when appropriate, ICH score, were included. Patient charts were reviewed for in-hospital mortality, thromboembolic events, pulmonary complications, worsening of hemorrhage, hemorrhagic complications after neurosurgical intervention, and 90-day modified Rankin scale score.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients met inclusion criteria; 16 used rivaroxaban and 2 used apixaban. Eight patients presented with traumatic ICH, 8 with hemorrhagic stroke, 1 with subarachnoid hemorrhage, and 1 patient with tumoral hemorrhage. Mean Glasgow coma scale score was 12.6 (range, 6-15) and mean ICH score was 2.3 (range, 0-4). After reversal with PCC, 1 patient (5.6%) demonstrated worsening of ICH on follow-up head computed tomography. PCCs were administered before emergent placement of an external ventricular drain in 1 individual, with no hemorrhagic complications. Six patients (33.3%) experienced in-hospital mortality: family withdrew care in 4 and 2 died due to pneumonia. There was 1 (5.6%) thromboembolic complication. Favorable outcomes at 90 days were seen in 6 patients (33.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite no studies demonstrating the efficacy of 4-factor PCC administration for reversal of coagulopathy in patients on direct factor Xa inhibitors, our early experience demonstrates it to be safe, yet potentially reducing hemorrhagic complications and hematoma expansion in this critically ill population.

Management of anticoagulation in patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding represents the most common adverse event associated with the use of oral anticoagulant therapy. Due to increasing prescription of anticoagulants worldwide, gastroenterologists are more and more called to deal with bleeding patients taking these medications. Their management is challenging because several issues have to be taken into account, such as the severity of bleeding, the intensity of anticoagulation, the patient's thrombotic risk and endoscopy findings. The recent introduction into the marketplace of new direct oral anticoagulants, for whom specific reversal agents are still lacking, further contributes to make the decision-making process even more demanding. Available evidence on this topic is limited and practice guidelines by gastroenterology societies only marginally address key issues for clinicians, including when and how to reverse coagulopathy, the optimal timing of endoscopy and when and how to resume anticoagulation thereafter. The present paper reviews the evidence in the literature and provides practical algorithms to support clinicians in the management of patients on anticoagulants who present with acute gastrointestinal bleeding.

Global assays and the management of oral anticoagulation

Coagulation tests range from global or overall tests to assays specific to individual clotting factors and their inhibitors. Whether a particular test is influenced by an oral anticoagulant depends on the principle of the test and the type of oral anticoagulant. Knowledge on coagulation tests applicable in monitoring status and reversal of oral anticoagulation is a prerequisite when studying potential reversal agents or when managing anticoagulation in a clinical setting. Specialty tests based on the measurement of residual activated factor X (Xa) or thrombin activity, e.g., are highly effective for determining the concentration of the new generation direct factor Xa- and thrombin inhibitors, but these tests are unsuitable for the assessment of anticoagulation reversal by non-specific prohemostatic agents like prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) and recombinant factor VIIa (FVIIa). Global coagulation assays, in this respect, seem more appropriate. This review evaluates the current status on the applicability of the global coagulation assays PT, APTT, thrombin generation and thromboelastography in the management of oral anticoagulation by vitamin K antagonists and the direct factor Xa and thrombin inhibitors. Although all global tests are influenced by both types of anticoagulants, not all tests are useful for monitoring anticoagulation and reversal thereof. Many (pre)analytical conditions are of influence on the assay readout, including the oral anticoagulant itself, the concentration of assay reagents and the presence of other elements like platelets and blood cells. Assay standardization, therefore, remains an issue of importance.

A Phase 2, randomized, partially blinded, active-controlled study assessing the efficacy and safety of variable anticoagulation reversal using the REG1 system in patients with acute coronary syndromes: results of the RADAR trial

AIMS

We sought to determine the degree of anticoagulation reversal required to mitigate bleeding, and assess the feasibility of using pegnivacogin to prevent ischaemic events in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients managed with an early invasive approach. REG1 consists of pegnivacogin, an RNA aptamer selective factor IXa inhibitor, and its complementary controlling agent, anivamersen. REG1 has not been studied in invasively managed patients with ACS nor has an optimal level of reversal allowing safe sheath removal been defined.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Non-ST-elevation ACS patients (n = 640) with planned early cardiac catheterization via femoral access were randomized 2:1:1:2:2 to pegnivacogin with 25, 50, 75, or 100% anivamersen reversal or heparin. The primary endpoint was total ACUITY bleeding through 30 days. Secondary endpoints included major bleeding and the composite of death, myocardial infarction, urgent target vessel revascularization, or recurrent ischaemia. Enrolment in the 25% reversal arm was suspended after 41 patients. Enrolment was stopped after three patients experienced allergic-like reactions. Bleeding occurred in 65, 34, 35, 30, and 31% of REG1 patients with 25, 50, 75, and 100% reversal and heparin. Major bleeding occurred in 20, 11, 8, 7, and 10% of patients. Ischaemic events occurred in 3.0 and 5.7% of REG1 and heparin patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

At least 50% reversal is required to allow safe sheath removal after cardiac catheterization. REG1 appears a safe strategy to anticoagulate ACS patients managed invasively and warrants further investigation in adequately powered clinical trials of patients who require short-term high-intensity anticoagulation.