subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator insertion

AIMS

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) patients develop ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) responsive to anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP). However, VA episodes have not been characterized in accordance with the device therapy, and with the emergence of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD), the appropriate device prescription in ARVC remains unclear. Study aim was to characterize VA events in ARVC patients during follow-up in accordance with device therapy and elicit if certain parameters are predictive of specific VA events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a retrospective single-centre study utilizing prospectively collated registry data of ARVC patients with ICDs. Forty-six patients were included [54.0 ± 12.1 years old and 20 (43.5%) secondary prevention devices]. During a follow-up of 12.1 ± 6.9 years, 31 (67.4%) patients had VA events [n = 2, 6.5% ventricular fibrillation (VF), n = 14], 45.2% VT falling in VF zone resulting in ICD shock(s), n = 10, 32.3% VT resulting in ATP, and n = 5, 16.1% patients had both VT resulting in ATP and ICD shock(s). Lead failure rates were high (11/46, 23.9%). ATP was successful in 34.5% of patients. Severely impaired right ventricular (RV) function was an independent predictor of VT resulting in ATP (hazard ratio 16.80, 95% confidence interval 3.74-75.2; P < 0.001) with a high predictive accuracy (area under the curve 0.88, 95%CI 0.76-1.00; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

VA event rates are high in ARVC patients with a majority having VT falling in the VF zone resulting in ICD shock(s). S-ICDs could be of benefit in most patients with ARVC with the absence of severely impaired RV function which has the potential to avoid consequences of the high burden of lead failure.

Electrocardiogram in arrhytmogenic cardiomyopathy

Criteria for diagnosis of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) were first proposed in 1994 and subsequently revised in 2010 and in 2020 by an international task force. According to the last consensus of 2020, ACM is defined as a heart muscle disease affecting right ventricle, left ventricle or both, whose principal pathologic feature is fibrofatty myocardial replacement that impairs systolic ventricular function and predisposes to lethal ventricular arrhythmias. ECG findings not only could help to early recognize affected patients but also could identify the ones with maximum risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death.

A case report of arrhythmogenic ventricular cardiomyopathy presenting with sustained ventricular tachycardia arising from the right and the left ventricles before structural changes are documented

Background

Arrhythmogenic ventricular cardiomyopathy (AC) is a genetic progressive disease characterized by fibro-fatty replacement of either ventricles in isolation or in combination. Arrhythmogenic ventricular cardiomyopathy is frequently associated with ventricular tachycardia (VT) having a left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology and much more rarely with VT having right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology even when the left ventricle is involved. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging plays a key role in the diagnosis of AC. Sustained VT in AC may occur in the concealed stage of the disease before the manifestation of morphological abnormalities on echocardiogram; however, they almost always are accompanied by structural abnormalities of the ventricles on CMR.

Case summary

A 54-year-old man presented with sustained VT of LBBB configuration consistent with the diagnosis of AC but with no right ventricular (RV) anomalies at repeat CMR. Ten years later, he developed sustained VT with RBBB morphology and structural changes at CMR compatible with RV involvement in the setting of AC. Two years later, he suffered from recurrent identical sustained RBBB-VT with typical CMR signs of left ventricular involvement. Genetic analysis was negative for any known mutation.

Discussion

In the present report, we describe a patient with AC who first exhibited LBBB- and 10 years later RBBB-sustained VT. Contrasting with what is usually observed in patients with AC, documentations of the VT's arising from either ventricle were found to precede the structural anomalies in the respective cardiac chambers. This case highlights that normal CMR does not exclude underlying AC contrary to the perceptions of many clinicians. In addition, it strongly encourages repeating CMR after 1-2 years when the diagnosis of AC is highly suspected.

Diagnosis of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: Progress and Pitfalls

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited cardiomyopathy that predominantly affects the right ventricle. With a prevalence in the range of 1:5000 to 1:2000 persons, ARVC is one of the leading causes of sudden cardiac death in young people and in athletes. Although early detection and treatment is important, the diagnosis of ARVC remains challenging. There is no single pathognomonic diagnostic finding in ARVC; rather, current international task force criteria specify diagnostic major and minor criteria in six categories: right ventricular imaging (including echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)), histology, repolarisation abnormalities, depolarisation and conduction abnormalities, arrhythmias and family history (including genetic testing). Combining findings from differing diagnostic modalities can establish a "definite", "borderline" or "possible" diagnosis of ARVC. However, there are limitations inherent in the current task force criteria, including the lack of specificity for ARVC; future iterations may be improved, for example, by enhanced imaging protocols able to detect subtle changes in the structure and function of the right ventricle, incorporation of electro-anatomical data, response to adrenergic challenge, and validated criteria for interpreting genetic variants.