Predictive factors affecting long-term survivorship of ASR metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

We present the outcome of 154 ASR (Articular Surface Replacement) hips performed at the P.D Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre in terms of revision rate, metal ion levels, and factors affecting survivorship. Further, determined the importance of serial metal ion estimation over single value with poorly functioning arthroplasties.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 154 ASR arthroplasties (136 patients) performed from April 2005 till March 2010 was conducted. Ninety-seven patients were available for final analysis. All patients were assessed for symptoms, radiographs, blood metal (chromium and cobalt), metal artefact reduction sequence (MARS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computerized tomography (CT).

RESULTS

Female gender, smaller femoral head, patients with a rising level of metal ion levels were more likely to have revision surgery. However, abnormal acetabular inclination/anteversion was not associated with the occurrence of raised metal ion levels, ARMD (adverse reaction to metal debris) or revision surgery. Patients with raised metal ion levels were more likely to have periprosthetic lucency, ARMD, and revision surgery. Median metal levels increased initially for the first three years. Still, patients who required revision surgery continued to have a metal ion rise until the point when revision surgery was performed. In contrast, patients who had a fall in metal ion levels did not require revision.

CONCLUSION

A single metal ion value is less predictive of failing arthroplasties; instead, a rising trend of metal ion levels can better delineate arthroplasties which will require revision. ASR hips whose blood ion levels fell after an initial rise and showed a declining trend did well.

Living with a recalled implant: a qualitative study of patients' experiences with ASR hip resurfacing arthroplasty

Background

Total hip arthroplasty is the traditional treatment for osteoarthritis in the hip joint. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty, with metal on metal bearing, is a modern concept initially developed mainly for young active people. The metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty implant, Articular Surface Replacement (ASR), was implanted in approximately 93,000 patients before it was recalled in 2010 due to a high complication rate. This study aimed to evaluate patients’ own experiences living with an implant that they knew had a high complication rate and had been recalled from the market.

Methods

A total of 14 patients, still living with the implant, of a cohort of 34 patients were available for follow-up. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 patients where a majority actively sought for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA), and subsequently underwent HRA with an ASR prosthesis between 11/21/2006 and 09/28/2009. The responses were analyzed using content analysis described by Graneheim and Lundman to compress text and identify categories and subcategories.

Results

The results showed that most patients had already decided that they wanted a metal-on-metal HRA implant before meeting the surgeon. They expressed that the implant made it possible to live an active life. A majority did not think about the fact that they had a hip implant, because they lacked subjective pain. Most of the patients were positive about the annual exams at the hospital and wanted them to continue. None of them felt that their trust towards the healthcare system had changed after the implant recall. They expressed a belief that they would need new surgery sooner than they first thought.

Conclusions

Despite all the attention when the ASR prosthesis was recalled, patients with ASR-HRA did not report themselves negatively affected by the recall in this group of patients where a majority had actively sought for an HRA procedure. The healthcare system has an obligation to continue the annual exams, even if the implant provider does not continue reimbursement.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13037-020-00278-y.

Superior patient reported outcome measures reported post Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) revision arthroplasty in the setting of an objective surgical indication

The Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) hip system displayed unexpectedly high failure rates. All patients who underwent revision arthroplasty at our institution were identified. Indications for revision were classified as objectively identifiable or performed for unexplained pain. Clinical outcomes, post ASR revision, were superior in cases where the aetiology for failure was identifiable. Pain and function improved reliably when a targeted objective indication was identified pre-revision, but failed to do so in cases of unexplained pain. Surgeons familiar with the results of this study will be empowered to discuss expectations and realistic outcomes with their patients undergoing complex revision arthroplasty cases.

Revision of ASR hip arthroplasty: analysis of two hundred and ninety six recalled patients at seven years

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to present an algorithm for the evaluation of both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

METHODS

From November 2004 to May 2010, there were performed 296 operations: 245 total hip arthroplasty and 51 resurfacing arthroplasty with the ASR DePuy system. In April 2010, there was the first Medical Device Alert regarding all MoM hip replacements in the UK and in August 2010, DePuy recall started worldwide. In March 2012, we started our recall. All patients were invited to undergo clinical investigation, X-ray evaluations, and blood chrome and cobalt level determination. For a short period of time, there were performed second level exams and subsequently, we carried out MARS MRI hip study to all symptomatic patients and there was evidence of ALVAL lesions.

RESULTS

To the patients with ALVAL lesions were proposed surgical hip revision while the others frequent follow-up controls. One hundred patients underwent hip surgical revision.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend constant MoM THA patients monitoring and early revision if necessary.

Long - term survivorship and clinical results of the navigated withdrawn ASR ™

Introduction

Primary goals of the study were to present the mid - to long - term survivorship and clinical, radiological and metal serological results of the first stem - navigated ASR™ resurfacing at our clinic. Secondary goals were to determine the influence of stem - navigation on the outcome and risk factors for revision in our cohort.

Methods

From Mai 2006 to Mai 2009 46 ASR™ resurfacing hip systems have been implanted in 43 patients with a median age of 55 years. At final follow - up (33 patients with a mean follow -up of 89,6 months) guidelines were followed and HHS and HOOS were completed. Inclination, NSA and SSA were measured on radiographs and signs of loosening were graded. Risk factors for revision were compared in the non - revision and revision group.

Results

Mean cumulative survival of the prosthesis after 99,9 Months was 81,8%. At final follow - up 8 revisions were performed. Median HHS was 97, HOOS was 87,2. Four prostheses showed signs of loosening and nine heterotopic ossifications. All shaft components, except one, were placed in minimal valgus position to avoid risk for fracture. Age and diameter of the femoral component were significantly different between the non - revision and revision group.

Discussion

Survivorship is comparable to numbers found in other studies. Patients with complete final follow - up in general had good objective and subjective scores and few signs of loosening in the radiological follow - up. Navigation might have a positive effect on reduction of risk for fracture. Age and diameter of the femoral component seem to influence the outcome.