Symptoms and signs did not predict outcome after surgery: a prospective study of 143 patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

OBJECTIVE

To determine the utility of symptoms, signs, comorbidities and background variables for the prediction of outcome of treatment in iNPH.

METHODS

A prospective observational study of consecutively included iNPH patients, who underwent neurological, physiotherapeutic and neuropsychological assessments before and after shunt surgery. The primary outcome measure was the total change on the iNPH scale, and patients were defined as improved postoperatively if they had improved by at least five points on that scale.

RESULTS

143 iNPH patients were included, and 73% of those were improved after surgery. None of the examined symptoms or signs could predict which patients would improve after shunt surgery. A dominant subjective complaint of memory problems at baseline was predictive of non-improvement. The reported comorbidities, duration of symptoms and BMI were the same in improved and non-improved patients. Each of the symptom domains (gait, neuropsychology, balance, and continence) as well as the total iNPH scale score improved significantly (from median 53 to 69, p < 0.001). The proportions of patients with shuffling gait, broad-based gait, paratonic rigidity and retropulsion all decreased significantly.

DISCUSSION

This study confirms that the recorded clinical signs, symptoms, and impairments in the adopted clinical tests are characteristic findings in iNPH, based on that most of them improved after shunt surgery. However, our clinical data did not enable predictions of whether patients would respond to shunt surgery, indicating that the phenotype is unrelated to the reversibility of the iNPH state and should mainly support diagnosis. Absence of specific signs should not be used to exclude patients from treatment.

Behr syndrome with homozygous C19ORF12 mutation

OBJECTIVE

Behr syndrome, first described in 1909 by the ophthalmologist Carl Behr, is a clinical entity characterised by a progressive optic atrophy, ataxia, pyramidal signs and mental retardation. Some reported cases have been found to carry mutations in the OPA1, OPA3 or C12ORF65 genes which are known causes of pure optic atrophy or optic atrophy complicated by movement disorder.

METHODS

We present the long-term observation of two Turkish sisters with Behr syndrome. We performed neurophysiological, imaging and molecular genetic studies to identify the underlying genetic cause in our patients.

RESULTS

Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed bilateral hypointense signals in the basal ganglia which prompted us to consider neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation (NBIA) as a differential diagnosis. Molecular genetic studies revealed a homozygous mutation in the C19ORF12 gene which has been previously reported in patients with a subtype of NBIA, mitochondrial membrane protein-associated neurodegeneration (MPAN).

CONCLUSION

We expand the spectrum of genetic causes of Behr syndrome. Genetic testing of patients presenting with Behr syndrome should include C19ORF12 mutation screening.