Endovascular trends in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in a Peruvian reference center

Objectives

Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) has evolved in recent years and is currently the preferred treatment worldwide. We analyzed the trends in the number of patients, number of aneurysms, aneurysm characteristics, and techniques used in a pure endovascular cohort of patients treated in a reference center.

Materials and Methods

Between 2010 and 2020, a retrospective data collection of patients who underwent endovascular intervention of IAs was performed. We used the Mann-Kendal test to evaluate the trends. In addition, the moving-average technique was used to assess smoother curves.

Results

Eight hundred and forty-five aneurysms were treated in 765 patients, the mean age was 53.9 ± 14.6 years and 81% were women. The number of patients (P = 0.016) and aneurysms (P = 0.003) increased significantly. Unruptured (P = 0.029) and posterior communicating artery aneurysms increased their frequency of treatment (P = 0.042). Balloon remodeling (P = 0.01) and the use of flow diverters showed a positive trend (P = 0.016).

Conclusion

There have been an increased number of patients and aneurysms treated endovascularly at our institution, including unruptured and posterior communicating aneurysms. Advanced endovascular techniques also increased. Comparative studies including surgical cases must be done in our region to determine the best approach.

Coiling Variations for Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Meta-Analytical Comparison of Comaneci-, Stent-, and Balloon-Coiling Assistance Techniques

BACKGROUND

Wide-necked aneurysms represent a challenge for treatment in the setting of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stent-assisted coiling (SAC) and balloon-assisted coiling (BAC) are well-known techniques for treating wide-necked aneurysms. Comaneci-assisted coiling (CAC) is a newer technique involving temporary stent deployment to assist aneurysm coiling. We aim to present the first meta-analysis comparing these treatments of ruptured aneurysms.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed and Embase databases were queried from earliest records to July 2022 for literature reporting SAC, BAC, or CAC of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. A meta-analysis of identified articles was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 571 articles queried, 64 articles were included. One study reported BAC and SAC, 8 reported BAC, 52 reported SAC, and 3 reported CAC. These studies comprised 3153 patients with 3207 ruptured aneurysms treated with CAC (161 patients and aneurysms), BAC (330 patients and aneurysms), and SAC (2662 patients, 2716 aneurysms). Rates of periprocedural thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications, overall or procedure-related mortality, immediate complete occlusion, retreatment, and length of angiographic follow-up did not differ significantly between SAC and BAC. Periprocedural thromboembolic (P = 0.03) and hemorrhagic (P = 0.01) complication rates were higher with BAC than CAC. Periprocedural thromboembolic (P = 0.03) and hemorrhagic (P < 0.0001) complication rates were higher with SAC than CAC. Complete aneurysm occlusion rates (P = 0.033) were higher with CAC than BAC. No significant differences were present in CAC versus BAC or SAC retreatment rates.

CONCLUSIONS

CAC was associated with lower hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complication rates and demonstrated similar complete occlusion and residual retreatment rates to those for BAC and SAC.

Cervical spinal extradural arteriovenous fistula successfully treated using transarterial balloon-assisted coil embolization

We present the case of a patient who developed compressive radiculopathy that was found to be associated with a spinal extradural arteriovenous fistula. The fistula was successfully obliterated with transarteiral balloon-assisted coiling, after which the patient was symptom-free. Although spinal extradural arteriovenous fistula is rare, this pathology should be considered in the differential diagnosis of spinal radiculopathy or myelopathy. Endovascular treatment appears to have been successful in resolving the symptoms associated with this pathology.

Acute Coils Migration Causing Significant M3 Branch Occlusion: A Case Report of Rescue Surgery with Superficial Temporal Artery-Middle Cerebral Artery Bypass

We describe an uncommon case of acute coils migration with significant occlusion of M3 branch and our management of this complication. Ballon-assisted coil placement was performed for an unruptured intracavernous internal carotid artery aneurysm in a 62-year-old woman. After coil placement and balloon deflection, we observed coils migration with significant occlusion of M3 branch. After early clinical deterioration without other neurological symptoms, we decided to perform superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass to ensure blood flow distal to the occlusion. The patient was discharged without neurological deficit. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report about STA-MCA bypass to treat acute coils migration. This technique could represent a successful rescue therapy in case of acute coils migration that cannot be retrieved by endovascular tools or in case where distal and deep location of migrated coils controindicate surgical removal.

Initial Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification but not Packing Density Defines Risk for Recurrence after Aneurysm Coiling

Purpose

After coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms, it is currently not well understood whether the initial coil packing density or the type of aneurysm residual perfusion, depicted by the modified Raymond-Roy occlusion classification, primarily effects the rate of aneurysm recurrence. We hypothesized that these factors interact and only one remains an independent risk factor.

Methods

In this single center retrospective study, 440 patients with intracranial ruptured and unruptured aneurysms between 2010 and 2017 were screened. A total of 267 patients treated with stand-alone coiling, with or without stent or balloon assistance were included (age 54.1 ± 12.2 years, sex 70.4% female). Flow diverter or Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device implantation were exclusion criteria.

Results

Using a binary logistic regression model, independent risk factors for aneurysm recurrence were postinterventional modified Raymond-Roy occlusion classification class (Odds ratio [OR] 1.747, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.231–2.480) and aneurysm diameter (OR 1.145, CI 1.032–1.271). A trend towards a higher recurrence in ruptured aneurysms did not reach significance (OR 1.656, CI 0.863–3.179). Aneurysm localization, packing density, and neck width were not independently associated with aneurysm recurrence.

Conclusion

Independent risk factors for aneurysm recurrence after coil embolization with and without stent or balloon assistance were aneurysm diameter and postinterventional grading within the modified Raymond-Roy occlusion classification. Packing density interacted with the latter and was not independently associated to recurrence.

Comparison of Flow Diversion and Coiling for the Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

To systematically assess the efficacy and safety between flow diversion and coiling for patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

Potential academic articles were identified from Cochrane Library, Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, and other databases. The time range we retrieved from was the inception of electronic databases to February 2019. Gray studies were identified from the references of included literature reports. STATA version 11.0 was used to analyze the pooled data.

RESULTS

A total of 11 articles (10 retrospective studies and 1 prospective study) were involved in our study. The overall participants of the coiling group were 611, whereas 576 were in the flow diversion group. Our meta-analysis showed that flow diversion was preferable for unruptured intracranial aneurysms as its lower value of total cost per case (weighted mean difference, 5705.906; 95% confidence interval [CI], [4938.536, 6473236]; P < 0.001), fluoroscopy time per case (weighted mean difference, 25.786; 95% CI, 17.169-34.377; P < 0.001), and retreatment rates (odds ratio [OR], 7.127; 95% CI, [3.525, 14.410]; P < 0.001), at the same time, a higher rate of immediate completed occlusion (OR, 0.390; 95% CI, [0.224, 0.680]; P = 0.001) and follow-up completed occlusion (OR, 0.173; 95% CI, [0.080, 0.375]; P < 0.001) was demonstrated in the flow diversion group. There was no difference on intraoperative complication rates (P = 0.070), procedure-related mortality (P = 0.609) and rupture rates (P = 0.408), modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at discharge (P = 0.077), and mRS 0-2 at follow-up (P = 0.484).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of flow diversion for the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms may reduce total cost per case, fluoroscopy time per case, retreatment rates, and increases immediate completed occlusion and follow-up completed occlusion rates without affecting the results of mRS and intraoperative complication.

A Prospective Multicenter Trial of the TransForm Occlusion Balloon Catheter: Trial Design and Results

Background and Purpose

Adjunctive treatments like balloon-assisted coil embolization (BACE) and stent-assisted coil embolization play a major role in the treatment of wide-neck and large intracranial aneurysms. The TransForm™ Occlusion Balloon Catheter (TOBC) registry is intended to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and efficiency of BACE using the TOBC.

Method and Study Design

The TOBC registry is a prospective multicenter registry trial. Seven sites in the USA and 1 site in Spain participated and enrolled 81 patients.

Results

The performance and safety of the TOBC was evaluated based on scoring for different variables. Scores were measured using a semiquantitative rating scale (1 = excellent, 5 = poor). The mean scores for these variables were as follows: visibility under fluoroscopy, 1.8; ability to reach the intended site, 1.6; stability during first positioning, 1.5; stability during inflation, 1.6; stability during deflation, 1.6; ability to temporarily stop flow, 1.6; and ability to assist in coil embolization, 1.7. The mean inflation and deflation times were 4.9 and 5.6 s, respectively. Complete obliteration of the aneurysm (Raymond class I) was achieved in 69.4% of the BACE cases. Thrombus formation occurred in 4/81 (4.8%) of the cases. In all cases, the thrombus resolved with medications, no patient suffered an infarction, and an underlying hypercoagulable state from subarachnoid hemorrhage was considered a contributing factor. Vessel rupture occurred in 1/81 (1.2%) of the cases, but was unrelated to TOBC use.

Conclusion

BACE using the TOBC is safe and effective. All variables assessed for performance showed good-to-excellent results.

Comparison of Stent-Assisted Coiling and Balloon-Assisted Coiling in the Treatment of Ruptured Wide-Necked Intracranial Aneurysms in the Acute Period

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy, stability, and safety of stent-assisted coiling (SAC) and balloon-assisted coiling (BAC) in the treatment of ruptured wide-necked aneurysms in the acute period.

METHODS

Consecutive patients including 65 cases treated with SAC and 32 with BAC were reviewed at the authors' institution between November 2011 and December 2014. The efficacy of these 2 approaches and the incidence of periprocedural complications were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Morphologic analysis showed a lower fundus/neck ratio (1.2 vs. 1.6) in the aneurysms treated with SAC versus BAC (P < 0.001). The mean neck width of aneurysms was 4.0 mm in the patients treated with SAC versus 3.4 mm in those treated with BAC (P < 0.04). Coil protrusion into the parent vessels during embolization was an independent risk factor for cerebral ischemic events (odds ratio [OR], 4.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-16.2). Neck width (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44-0.97) and aneurysm perforation during procedure (OR, 6.24; 95% CI, 1.21-32.3) were independent predictors of complete occlusion (Raymond 1) by immediate postembolization angiography. There was no statistical difference between the 2 techniques regarding the rate of aneurysm occlusion at the end of procedure, periprocedural complications, and favorable outcome at discharge and follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggested that SAC was more appropriate than BAC for ruptured wide-necked aneurysms with lower fundus/neck ratio or wider neck size. However, periprocedural complications, occlusion rates, and favorable outcomes did not differ between the 2 techniques.

Stent-assisted coiling and balloon-assisted coiling in the management of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review & meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Stent-assisted coiling and balloon-assisted coiling are well-established minimally invasive techniques for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The aim of this study was to use meta-analysis methods to compare clinical outcomes of aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coiling versus balloon-assisted coiling.

METHODS

We searched for two-arm prospective studies and retrospective studies that compared the clinical outcomes in patients that received stent-assisted or balloon-assisted aneurysm treatment. Database search was performed through May 2015. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to compare the clinical outcomes in patients that underwent either stent-assisted or balloon-assisted coiling for intracranial aneurysms management.

RESULTS

Complete occlusion rates at the end of the coiling procedure were similar between patients that received stent-assisted and balloon-assisted aneurysm treatment (OR=0.763, 95% CI=0.47 to 1.23, P=0.270). However, complete occlusion rates were higher with stent-assisted coiling at 6months or later after the procedure (OR=1.82, 95% CI=1.21 to 2.74). The overall complication rates and retreatment rates in patients with recurrence were similar between stent-assisted and balloon-assisted aneurysm treatments.

CONCLUSION

Stent-assisted coiling achieved better complete occlusion rates of aneurysms at 6months or later after the procedure compared to balloon-assisted coiling, without being associated with a higher risk of intraprocedural complications and retreatment.