Can Patients Rely on ChatGPT to Answer Hand Pathology-Related Medical Questions?

BACKGROUND

In recent years, ChatGPT has become a popular source of information online. Physicians need to be aware of the resources their patients are using to self-inform of their conditions. This study investigates physician-graded accuracy and completeness of ChatGPT regarding various questions patients are likely to ask the artificial intelligence (AI) system concerning common upper limb orthopedic conditions.

METHODS

ChatGPT 3.5 was interrogated concerning 5 common orthopedic hand conditions: carpal tunnel syndrome, Dupuytren contracture, De Quervain tenosynovitis, trigger finger, and carpal metacarpal arthritis. Questions evaluated conditions' symptoms, pathology, management, surgical indications, recovery time, insurance coverage, and workers' compensation possibility. Each topic had 12 to 15 questions and was established as its own ChatGPT conversation. All questions regarding the same diagnosis were presented to the AI, and its answers were recorded. Each question was then graded for both accuracy (Likert scale of 1-6) and completeness (Likert scale of 1-3) by 10 fellowship trained hand surgeons. Descriptive statistics were performed.

RESULTS

Overall, the mean accuracy score for ChatGPT's answers to common orthopedic hand diagnoses was 4.83 out of 6 ± 0.95. The mean completeness of answers was 2 out of 3 ± 0.59.

CONCLUSIONS

Easily accessible online AI such as ChatGPT is becoming more advanced and thus more reliable in its ability to answer common medical questions. Physicians can anticipate such online resources being mostly correct, however incomplete. Patients should beware of relying on such resources in isolation.

Small Joint Denervation of the Hand and Thumb Base: History, Anatomy, Technique, and Outcomes

Painful arthritis of the small joints of the hand is a common condition affecting older adults, with distal interphalangeal joint and thumb carpometacarpal joint being the two most common locations. Younger adults may also develop painful arthritis after trauma and with inflammatory arthropathy. Traditional surgical approaches address the structure of the joints with either arthrodesis or arthroplasty with or without an implant. In recent decades, denervation has been reported as an alternative treatment for painful small joints that are mobile and stable. Publications on denervation often report faster surgery and recovery times than traditional surgeries that manipulate the small joint bony structures. This article reviews the history, anatomy, surgical techniques, and outcomes of denervation of the small joints of the hand.

Trapeziectomy with Ligament Reconstruction/ Suspensionplasty Compared to Suture Tape Suspensionplasty for the Surgical Treatment of Advanced Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis

Purpose

Trapeziectomy with tendon reconstruction/suspensionplasty (TRS) is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in the United States for treatment of thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA). Trapeziectomy with suture tape suspensionplasty (STS) has been used recently at the study institution as an alternative surgical treatment option with perceived benefits of earlier return to function and reduced operative time. The purpose of this study was to compare patient outcomes following TRS versus STS for treatment of thumb CMC OA.

Methods

All patients who underwent primary, isolated TRS or STS for treatment of thumb CMC OA between 1/1/2014 and 9/1/2020 were analyzed. We assessed demographics and preoperative and postoperative patient-rated outcome scores including Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system scores as well as pain outcomes, satisfaction, and appearance at a mean of 2.6 years after surgery (minimum 6 months). Time to return to work and activities was compared between groups. Bivariate statistics compared outcomes between groups.

Results

Ninety-four patients were included in the final study cohort, of which 53 underwent TRS and 41 underwent STS. There were no differences in preoperative, postoperative, or final patient-rated outcome scores between groups. Patients reported high global and appearance satisfaction scores at final follow-up in both groups. Mean tourniquet time was 15 minutes (26%) shorter and return to work was on average 3 weeks faster for the STS group.

Conclusions

There were no differences in postoperative patient-rated outcome scores between the STS and TRS groups. The STS group had a shorter surgical time and faster return-to-work after surgery.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic III.

Selective Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Denervation Versus Trapeziectomy and Ligament Reconstruction With Tendon Interposition for Painful Arthritis: A Prospective Study With 2 Years of Follow-Up

PURPOSE

Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint denervation is a relatively novel method for the management of osteoarthritis-associated pain by selective transection of articular nerve branches of the CMC joint. This study compared functional/patient-reported outcomes after CMC denervation with those after trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition (T + LRTI) over a 2-year follow-up period. We hypothesized that the outcomes of denervation and T + LRTI would be similar over the course of the study and at the final 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

Adults with Eaton stage 2-4 disease, no evidence of CMC subluxation, and no history of thumb injury/surgery were included. Pain scores, brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire (bMHQ), Kapandji score, 2-point discrimination, and grip/key/3-point pinch strength were measured at 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-months after surgery. On average, T + LRTI patients underwent 7 weeks of splinting, with release to full activity at 3 months; denervation patients were placed in a soft postoperative dressing for 2 weeks, with release to full activity as tolerated at 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty-three denervation and 20 T + LRTI patients were included. Preoperative characteristics were similar between both groups. Two denervation patients underwent secondary T + LRTI during the study period; one denervation patient underwent fat grafting to the CMC joint at an outside institution. Data prior to secondary surgeries were included in the analysis. The average tourniquet times (minutes) for denervation and T + LRTI were 43.5 ± 11.8 and 82.7 ± 14.2 minutes, respectively. For denervation and T + LRTI, the postoperative bMHQ scores were significantly higher than those at baseline at all time points. No significant differences were found between both groups for bMHQ, sensation, or strength measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Carpometacarpal denervation is well tolerated, with shorter tourniquet times and faster return to full activity than T + LRTI. For the study cohort, the conversion rate to T + LRTI at 2 years was 9%. Both procedures demonstrated durable improvement in bMHQ compared with the preoperative state with similar long-term outcomes over 2 years of follow-up.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

Cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis: a value of information study

BACKGROUND

Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthritis is one of the most prevalent arthritic conditions commonly treated with trapeziectomy alone or trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI). We evaluate the cost-effectiveness and value of perfect and sample information of trapeziectomy alone, LRTI, and non-operative treatment.

METHODS

A societal perspective decision tree was modeled. To understand the value of future research in comparing quality-of-life after trapeziectomy, LRTI, and non-operative management we characterized uncertainty by fitting distributions to EQ-5D utility data published from the United Kingdom hand surgery registry. We used Monte Carlo simulation for the probabilistic sensitivity analysis and to evaluate the value of perfect and sample information.

RESULTS

Both trapeziectomy alone and LRTI were cost-effective compared to non-operative management ($2,540 and $3,511/QALY respectively). Trapeziectomy alone (base case total cost $8,251, QALY 14.08) was dominant compared to LRTI (base case total cost $8,798, QALY 13.34). However, probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested there is a 12.5% chance LRTI may be preferred at a willingness-to-pay of $50,000/QALY. Sensitivity analysis revealed postoperative utilities are the most influential factors in determining cost-effectiveness. The value of perfect information was approximately $1,503/person. A study evaluating the quality-of-life of 1,000 patients in each arm undergoing trapeziectomy alone or LRTI could provide an expected $1,117 of information value. With approximately 40,000 CMC arthroplasties performed each year in the U.S., the annual value is close to $45 million.

CONCLUSIONS

Trapeziectomy without LRTI appears to be the most cost-effective procedure in treating late-stage CMC arthritis and should be considered as first-line surgical treatment. There is substantial societal value in conducting additional research to better understand the relative quality-of-life improvements gained from these two common hand surgeries.

Outcomes of Secondary Trapeziectomy Following Carpometacarpal Pyrocarbon Prosthetic Arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Pyrocarbon implant hemiarthroplasty is a treatment option for select patients with trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis. The long-term revision rates after implant arthroplasty can be as high as 30%. Revision to trapeziectomy has been described for patients who require implant removal; however, few studies have assessed outcomes in patients in this subgroup.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent the conversion of a pyrocarbon carpometacarpal implant to trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty from 2003 to 2019. Patients who met the criteria were then compared with a matched cohort who underwent primary trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty. Patients were matched based on the revision procedure, age, and duration of follow-up. Data regarding demographic information, range of motion, grip and pinch strengths, and the need for subsequent procedures were collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients underwent the removal of their pyrocarbon carpometacarpal implant. The patients underwent revision to Thompson suspensionplasty (n = 14), the Weilby procedure (n = 5), ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (n = 2), or a suture-based suspension procedure (n = 4). The age, sex, and preoperative range of motion and strength measures were similar between the 2 groups. All the patients complained of moderate-to-severe pain prior to surgery, which improved in both groups after surgery. Patients who underwent the removal of a pyrocarbon arthroplasty implant lost 6.4° of palmar abduction after surgery. The postoperative grip, opposition strength, apposition pinch strength, and radial and palmar abduction were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The removal of a pyrocarbon carpometacarpal implant using subsequent trapeziectomy successfully relieves pain in patients in whom pyrocarbon arthroplasty has failed. After revision, patients may lose abduction motion but have similar strength compared with those who undergo primary trapeziectomy.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

Surgical Treatment of Advanced Carpometacarpal Joint Arthritis: Trapeziectomy with Hematoma Arthroplasty

Osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint is common. When nonoperative measures fail, surgery may provide long-term pain relief. There are many surgical options in the management of carpometacarpal joint arthritis. Trapeziectomy with hematoma arthroplasty is technically simple, inexpensive, and has withstood the test of time. It is an excellent option for advanced carpometacarpal joint arthritis with multiple high-quality studies showing equivalent outcomes between this technique and ligament reconstruction tendon interposition techniques. This article reviews trapeziectomy with hematoma arthroplasty for treatment of carpometacarpal joint arthritis, including the indications for the procedure, the authors' preferred technique, and the current literature.

Combined Treatment of Trapeziometacarpal Joint Arthritis and Scapholunate Advanced Collapse Wrist

PURPOSE

The combined treatment of trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis and scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) wrist presents unique challenges. The consequences of the loss of radial column support caused by scaphoidectomy and trapeziectomy are not well known. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the simultaneous and staged treatment of trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis and SLAC wrist.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent surgery for both trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis and SLAC wrist was performed. The wrist and thumb range of motion; grip and pinch strength; pain; quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores; and radiographs were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients who underwent both trapeziectomy and 1 of 3 procedures for SLAC wrist (4-corner fusion [n = 10]), proximal row carpectomy [n = 9], and total wrist arthroplasty [n = 5]) in a single stage (n = 10) or in 2 stages (n = 14) were included. The median age was 63 years. The median follow-up period was 35 months. Twelve (50%) patients underwent complete scaphoidectomy, and 12 (50%) patients underwent partial scaphoidectomy. All 3 procedures resulted in an improvement in pain at rest, pain during activity, and quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores. The final range of motion, grip and pinch strength, and complication rates were consistent with those reported in the literature for isolated procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis and SLAC wrist may be treated either simultaneously or in stages.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic V.

Surgical approaches to the trapeziometacarpal joint for the insertion of implants and prostheses (non-arthroscopy)

The two approaches most often used for placing implants and trapeziometacarpal prostheses are the laterodorsal approach and the lateropalmar approach. The advantages and disadvantages of these two approaches are set out. Each one allows optimal joint exposure while preserving or repairing the peritrapezial musculotendinous structures. They allow the insertion of partial or total trapeziometacarpal implants and modern coupled trapeziometacarpal prostheses. Each approach must be practiced and mastered on cadaver specimens before being used for trapeziometacarpal surgery.

Scaphometacarpal Space and Postoperative Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Background  A common notion is that more complex techniques for treating trapeziometacarpal arthritis such as ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) better preserve the scaphometacarpal (SMC) space compared to a simple trapeziectomy and that this leads to superior functional outcomes. Purpose  The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the relationship between scaphometacarpal space and objective outcomes such as grip and pinch strength as well as subjective patient-reported outcomes. Methods  A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting SMC space and outcomes after surgery for carpometacarpal arthritis. The primary outcomes of these studies included any measure of postoperative scaphometacarpal space (trapezial height/trapezial index) as well as key pinch strength, grip strength, or lateral pinch strength. Studies that did not assess for association between SMC space and outcomes were excluded. Results  Fourteen studies were included in this systematic review. Three (21.4%) studies found a statistically significant correlation between postoperative SMC space and postoperative pinch or grip strength. The correlation was weakly positive in one study (key pinch vs. scaphometacarpal space, r  = 0.13), positive but unlisted in another (lateral pinch vs. trapezial ratio), and negative in the third study (key pinch vs. trapezial space ratio, r  = -0.47). Conclusion  Preservation of the SMC space postoperatively is not associated with postoperative outcomes. Further research is necessary to better characterize the importance of maintaining the SMC space in patients undergoing LRTI in order to substantiate claims by proponents of the procedure.

Diamond Stress View Radiograph for Thumb Metacarpophalangeal Hyperextension

BACKGROUND

Successful surgical management of thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis requires treatment of coexisting metacarpophalangeal (MCP) hyperextension deformity when present. The surgeon's decision to offer thumb CMC arthritis patients the option of no additional treatment, MCP capsulodesis, or MCP arthrodesis relies on the severity of the MCP deformity measured in clinic. The authors present a novel patient-performed radiographic stress view to measure MCP hyperextension.

METHODS

Fifty-seven thumbs in 30 consecutive patients offered thumb CMC arthroplasty were enrolled. Clinic goniometer measurements, patient-performed stress view radiographs, and intraoperative manual stress views of each MCP joint were documented for study. Paired samples t test was used to compare the differences between the preoperative measurements and intraoperative measurements of the right and left thumb groups.

RESULTS

The clinic goniometer measurements were significantly different ( P = .0001) than the MCP stress view obtained while the patient was under anesthesia. The difference in the new patient-derived x-ray stress view was not statistically significant compared with the stress view under anesthesia in the left ( P = .91) or right ( P = .53) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This new patient-performed stress view of the MCP joint allows accurate, objective measurement of hyperextension to aide in the decision making and patient education for the need of additional MCP joint surgery when addressing thumb CMC arthritis.

Surgeon Preference, Influence, and Treatment of Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate current surgical practice patterns, the factors that influence these patterns, and overall trends in the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis.

METHODS

An online survey containing 14 questions was sent to all active members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Information on demographics and treatments was collected. Results were anonymously uploaded to an online spreadsheet.

RESULTS

A total of 823 responses were recorded. Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) using whole flexor carpi radialis was the most popular technique at 37.44%. In all, 26.38% of surgeons with fewer than 5 years of experience utilize trapeziectomy with suture suspension (bone anchor based or tendon based); 55.76% choose a particular procedure because of "Personal Clinical Experience" over "Current Evidence" and "Training." In addition, 24.17% of surgeons who have been practicing for longer than 5 years have changed procedures in the last 5 years. In the United States, 97.2% of hand surgeons prescribe either oxycodone or hydrocodone postoperatively compared with just 23.75% of international hand surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that trapeziectomy with LRTI remains the most popular treatment of choice. The use of trapeziectomy with suture suspension is on the rise, particularly in younger surgeons. International hand surgeons rely more on current evidence, utilize less postoperative therapy and opioid medications, and change procedures more often than US hand surgeons.

Little finger carpometacarpal arthroplasty technique and result in 3 cases

PURPOSE

To present our surgical technique and results for the treatment of posttraumatic arthritis of the little finger carpometacarpal (CMC) joint.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 3 patients who underwent our surgical technique. All patients had previously sustained intra-articular fractures of the base of the little finger metacarpal and presented with painful posttraumatic arthritis of the fifth metacarpal-hamate joint. Patients were treated with little finger CMC arthroplasty and extensor carpi ulnaris suspensionplasty.

RESULTS

We observed the 3 patients in the office over a mean of 21 months and by telephone for a mean for 51 months postoperatively. They had improvements in wrist motion and grip strength. Finger motion remained stable. Pain and tenderness at the little finger CMC joint were eliminated.

CONCLUSIONS

Our technique provided satisfactory pain relief and motion preservation for posttraumatic arthritis of the little finger CMC joint.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Quality of internet health information on thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis

INTRODUCTION

The Internet has become a heavily used source of health information. No data currently exists on the quality and characteristics of Internet information regarding carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis.

METHODS

The search terms "cmc arthritis," "basal joint arthritis," and "thumb arthritis" were searched using Google and Bing. Search results were evaluated independently by four reviewers. Classification and content specific review was performed utilizing a weighted 100-point information quality scale.

RESULTS

Of the 60 websites reviewed, 27 were unique pages with 6 categorized as academic and 21 as non- academic. Average score on content specific review of academic websites was 56.8 and for non-academic was 42.7 (p=0.054). Average Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level for academic websites was 12.4, and for non-academic was 9.9 (p=0.015).

CONCLUSION

Internet health information regarding thumb CMC arthritis is primarily non-academic in nature, of generally poor quality, and at a reading level far above the U.S. average reading level of 6th grade. Higher-quality websites with more complete content and appropriate readability are needed.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The quality of Internet health information regarding thumb CMC arthritis is suboptimal.

Trapezial topography in thumb carpometacarpal arthritis

Objective Contradictory reported arthritic patterns of the metacarpal surface of the trapezium include preferential volar wear, radial wear, and dorsal-ulnar sparing. We investigated whether a predominant wear pattern exists in surgical trapeziectomy for advanced thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis. Methods We examined 36 intact trapezia from 34 thumb CMC arthroplasty patients over an 18-month period. The first metacarpal articular surface revealed three consistent morphology patterns: (1) saddle, (2) dish, and (3) cirque. The saddle represented cartilage loss with preservation of the normal trapezial morphology. The dish shape represented concave curvature, with loss of the normal saddle configuration. The cirque shape represented preferential volar concave wear, disrupting the convex volardorsal arc. Two surgeons classified the randomized specimens twice, blinded to patient identity and each other's categorization. Radiographic Eaton staging was correlated retrospectively for 35 of 36 of the trapezial specimens. Eight specimens were further quantified with micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Results Thirty-six trapezia were classified as follows: 17 (47%) saddle, 12 (33%) dish, and 7 (19%) cirque. Intra-rater reliability was 0.97 and 0.95; inter-rater reliability in the second round was 0.95. The 36 trapezia represented 27 female (75%) and 9 male (25%) patients; 18 (50%) represented the dominant hand. Age at surgery averaged 64 (33-76). Complete cartilage loss of the entire metacarpal surface was seen in 15 (42%) of all specimens. Osteophyte presence was typically minimal in the saddle group; the dish group had characteristic extensive rimming osteophytes in a 91% female population (11/12), and the cirque group had volar osteophytes. Radiographic severity ranged from Eaton stage II to IV; less severe radiographic staging (Eaton II) predominated in the saddle configuration; advanced Eaton III-IV disease predominated in both cirque and dish shapes. Micro-CT verified the three discrete shapes with volardorsal and radioulnar orientation measurements. Conclusion The metacarpal surface of the trapezium demonstrates three distinct patterns of wear in arthritic surgical specimens. Sex, dominance, age distribution, and Eaton stage varied across the different shapes. Level of Evidence Level 3 Study Type Observational.