The role of the α-tubulin acetyltransferase αTAT1 in the DNA damage response

Lysine 40 acetylation of α-tubulin (Ac-α-tubulin), catalyzed by the acetyltransferase αTAT1, marks stabilized microtubules. Recently, there is growing evidence to suggest crosstalk between the DNA damage response (DDR) and microtubule organization; we therefore investigated whether αTAT1 is involved in the DDR. Following treatment with DNA-damaging agents, increased levels of Ac-α-tubulin were detected. We also observed significant induction of Ac-α-tubulin after depletion of DNA repair proteins, suggesting that αTAT1 is positively regulated in response to DNA damage. Intriguingly, αTAT1 depletion decreased DNA damage-induced replication protein A (RPA) phosphorylation and foci formation. Moreover, DNA damage-induced cell cycle arrest was significantly delayed in αTAT1-depleted cells, indicating defective checkpoint activation. The checkpoint defects seen upon αTAT1 deficiency were restored by expression of wild-type αTAT1, but not by αTAT1-D157N (a catalytically inactive αTAT1), indicating that the role of αTAT1 in the DDR is dependent on enzymatic activity. Furthermore, αTAT1-depleted direct repeat GFP (DR-GFP) U2OS cells had a significant decrease in the frequency of homologous recombination repair. Collectively, our results suggest that αTAT1 may play an essential role in DNA damage checkpoints and DNA repair through its acetyltransferase activity.

DNA resection proteins Sgs1 and Exo1 are required for G1 checkpoint activation in budding yeast

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) in budding yeast trigger activation of DNA damage checkpoints, allowing repair to occur. Although resection is necessary for initiating damage-induced cell cycle arrest in G2, no role has been assigned to it in the activation of G1 checkpoint. Here we demonstrate for the first time that the resection proteins Sgs1 and Exo1 are required for efficient G1 checkpoint activation. We find in G1 arrested cells that histone H2A phosphorylation in response to ionizing radiation is independent of Sgs1 and Exo1. In contrast, these proteins are required for damage-induced recruitment of Rfa1 to the DSB sites, phosphorylation of the Rad53 effector kinase, cell cycle arrest and RNR3 expression. Checkpoint activation in G1 requires the catalytic activity of Sgs1, suggesting that it is DNA resection mediated by Sgs1 that stimulates the damage response pathway rather than protein-protein interactions with other DDR proteins. Together, these results implicate DNA resection, which is thought to be minimal in G1, as necessary for activation of the G1 checkpoint.