Open Treatment with Ultrasound Activated Resorbable Pins Versus Closed Treatment of Adult Mandible Condylar Head Fractures

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to investigate whether open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with ultrasound activated resorbable pins (UARPs) is superior to closed treatment of condylar head (CH) fractures. The investigators hypothesized that fixation with UARPs is superior to closed treatment of CH fracture.

Methods

It was a prospective pilot study on CH fracture patients. Patients in closed group were managed conservatively with arch bar fixation and elastic guidance. Fixation in open group was done with UARPs. Assessment was done for primary objective of stability of fixation by UARPs and secondary objectives of functional outcome and complications.

Results

The study sample included 20 patients (10 in each group). 10 patients (11 joints) in closed group and 9 patients (10 joints) in open group were available for final follow-up. 5 joints showed re-dislocation of fractured segment, 1 joint showed slightly imperfect but adequate fixation and 4 joints showed adequate fixation in open group. In the closed group, displaced fragment was fused with mandible at displaced position in all the joints. All the joints showed resorption of medial condylar head at 3 months follow-up in open group. There was minimal resorption of condyle in closed group. Occlusion was deranged in 3 patients in open group and 1 patient in closed group. MIO, pain scores and lateral excursions were equal in both the groups.

Conclusion

The results of the present study rejected the hypothesis that fixation of CH with UARPs was superior than closed treatment. There was resorption of medial CH fragment in open group as compared to closed group.

Radiographic evaluation in three dimensions of condylar fractures with closed treatment in children and adolescents

The study aimed at investigating a new three-dimensional classification of healing morphology in condylar fractures in children and adolescents after closed treatment, and establish its association with fracture type and clinical outcomes. The medical records of children and adolescents with condylar fracture were reviewed, retrospectively. The clinical outcomes were assessed by mandibular deviation during mouth opening, Helkimo anamnestic index (Ai), and Helkimo clinical dysfunction index (Di). The condylar healing morphology was evaluated through three-dimensional CT images after 1-2 years of follow-up. In total, 96 patients with 142 condylar fracture sites were included in the study. Condylar healing morphology was classified into three main patterns: unchanged (21.13%), spherical (62.68%), and irregular (16.19% - including the three subtypes triangular, L-shaped, and Y-shaped). There was a significant difference in the distribution of the three main healing patterns among various fracture types (p = 0.0227). Irregular patterns occurred more frequently in adolescents than in children. In unilateral fractures, no obvious association was found between condylar healing morphology and clinical outcomes, including mandibular deviation during mouth opening (p = 0.162), Ai (p = 0.0991) and Di (p = 0.25). Most patients healing in different condylar patterns reached a good clinical outcome after 1-2 years. Although the healing morphology of condylar fractures in children and adolescents remained abnormal, good clinical outcome was achieved over the 2-year follow-up. Therefore, closed treatment remains a good approach.

Comparison of outcome of open reduction and internal fixation versus closed treatment in pediatric mandible fractures-a retrospective study

The aim of the study was to compare the outcome and complications of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with closed treatment, as well as to review the literature. This was a retrospective study on pediatric patients with mandible fracture. The primary objective was a comparison of outcomes in terms of bone healing, maximal incisal opening (MIO), and occlusion, and the secondary objective was to review complications. A total of 77 pediatric patients (age <12 years) were managed with closed treatment and 23 with ORIF. In all, 62 patients were found with a single fracture (22 patients with parasymphysis fracture and 21 with condyle fracture, followed by symphysis, angle, and body fracture) and 38 patients with more than one fracture, with symphysis and bilateral condyle fracture being the most common. Bone healing was observed in all the patients. Mean MIO was 26.9 ± 2.8 mm and 29.3 ± 1.7 mm in the closed and ORIF group, respectively, and the difference was statistically nonsignificant (p = 0.5). One patient (1.3%) had deranged occlusion, and mobility was observed in one patient (1.3%) in the closed treatment group. Infection and nerve paresthesia were not seen in any patient at follow-up. Although closed treatment is preferred, as it preserves the soft tissue and periosteum, a displaced mandible fracture especially with co-existing condylar fracture should be treated by ORIF.

Classification and treatment strategies for condylar fractures in children

In this study, we aimed to describe a classification method (position and displacement (PD) classification) and the corresponding treatment strategies for condylar fractures in children, based on the anatomical position and displacement of the fractures. Moreover, we aimed to explore the effect of the treatment strategies for condylar fractures in children. Such fractures were classified into the following three types by PD classification: condylar head fracture (type A), mildly displaced condylar neck and base fracture (type B), and severely displaced condylar neck and base fracture (type C). According to this classification, we proposed the corresponding treatment strategy of closed treatment for types A and B fractures and open treatment for type C fractures. Eighty-four patients who had 123 condylar fractures (type A = 97, type B = 16, type C = 10) were included in this study. Type A fractures showed the restoration of normal function with favourable remodelling in the condyles. Types B and C fractures had good function and symmetry in the condylar angle and height of the condylar neck. The PD classification and corresponding treatment strategies may serve as a better option for the clinical treatment of condylar fractures in children.