You & Me: Test and Treat study protocol for promoting COVID-19 test and treatment access to underserved populations

BACKGROUND

Infections and deaths from the COVID-19 pandemic have disproportionately affected underserved populations. A community-engaged approach that supports decision making around safe COVID-19 practices is needed to promote equitable access to testing and treatment. You & Me: Test and Treat (YMTT) will evaluate a systematic and scalable community-engaged protocol that provides rapid access to COVID-19 at-home tests, education, guidance on next steps, and information on local resources to facilitate treatment in underserved populations.

METHODS

This direct-to-participant observational study will distribute at-home, self-administered, COVID-19 testing kits to people in designated communities. YMTT features a Public Health 3.0 framework and Toolkit prescribing a tiered approach to community engagement. We will partner with two large community organizations, Merced County United Way (Merced County, CA) and Pitt County Health Department (Pitt County, NC), who will coordinate up to 20 local partners to distribute 40,000 COVID tests and support enrollment, consenting, and data collection over a 15-month period. Participants will complete baseline questions about their demographics, experience with COVID-19 infection, and satisfaction with the distribution event. Community partners will also complete engagement surveys. In addition, participants will receive guidance on COVID-19 mitigation and health-promoting resources, and accessible and affordable therapeutics if they test positive for COVID-19. Data collection will be completed using a web-based platform that enables creation and management of electronic data capture forms. Implementation measures include evaluating 1) the Toolkit as a method to form community-academic partnerships for COVID-19 test access, 2) testing results, and 3) the efficacy of a YMTT protocol coupled with local resourcing to provide information on testing, guidance, treatment, and links to resources. Findings will be used to inform innovative methods to address community needs in public health research that foster cultural relevance, improve research quality, and promote health equity.

DISCUSSION

This work will promote access to COVID-19 testing and treatment for underserved populations by leveraging a community-engaged research toolkit. Future dissemination of the toolkit can support effective community-academic partnerships for health interventions in underserved settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05455190 . Registered 13 July 2022.

Engaging the community through a longitudinal, interprofessional, interinstitutional experiential learning collaboration

Background Interprofessional education (IPE) and training in community settings is not commonly described in the literature. Studies primarily focus on clinical education of interprofessional teams in clinical practice and primary care. This is a description of a longitudinal, collaborative interinstitutional IPE project that engages community partners (CP) while delivering core IPE competencies. Interprofessional Education Activity: Twenty-seven students from five universities representing ten healthcare academic programs participated in the project. Participating CP were non-profit agencies developed to meet the needs of specific vulnerable, underserved populations. Students were divided into teams and then paired with CP. This was a six-month project, with students committing to 30 hours over two semesters. At the end of the project, students presented project deliverables to CP, faculty collaborative and other students. Interprofessional education collaborative (IPEC) domains were qualitatively assessed and students completed the Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale (ISVS) at the beginning and conclusion of the project. Students provided written reflections at the conclusion of the project. Faculty completed the Team Observed Structured Clinical Encounter (TOSCE). Discussion" Twenty-seven students (100%) students completed the project and twenty-one students (77.8%) completed the evaluation tools. Students demonstrated a statistically significant difference between pre- and post-project ISVS total scores (5.81 +/- 0.64 vs. 6.51 +/- 0.37). Teamwork, communication skills, and increased comfort with those from other professions were common themes in the student reflections. Implications: Community-based IPE provides a venue for healthcare professionals to engage and partner with community organizations. This project demonstrates an effective inter-institutional, interprofessional method of delivering IPE.

Costs of implementing and sustaining enhanced collaborative care programs involving community partners

BACKGROUND

Collaborative care is an evidence-based program for treating depression in primary care. We sought to expand this model by recruiting clinics interested in incorporating community partners (i.e., community-based organizations (CBO) and/or family members) in the care team. Seven sites implemented evidence-based collaborative care programs with community partners while collecting information on costs of implementing and sustaining programs.

METHODS

Sites retrospectively collected data on planning and implementation costs with technical assistance from study researchers. Sites also prospectively collected cost of care activities over a 1-month period once the program was implemented to determine resources needed to sustain programs. Personnel salary costs were adjusted, adding 30% for benefits and 30% for administrative overhead.

RESULTS

The programs implemented varied considerably in staffing, involvement of care partners, and allocation of costs. Total planning and implementation costs varied from $39,280 to $60,575. The largest implementation cost category involved workflow development and ranged from $16,325 to $31,375 with the highest costs in this category attributed to the most successful implementation among clinic-CBO programs. Following implementation, cost per patient over the 1-month period ranged from $154 to $544. Ongoing strategic decision-making and administrative costs, which were included in cost of care, ranged from $284 to $2328 for the month.

CONCLUSIONS

Sites implemented collaborative care through differing partnerships, staffing, and related costs. Costs to implement and sustain programs developed in partnership are often not collected but are crucial to understanding financial aspects of developing sustainable partnerships. Assessing such costs is feasible and can inform future partnership efforts.

Utilizing public health core competencies to share data effectively with community organizations to promote health equity

OBJECTIVES

This article utilizes an adapted model for research transfer to highlight the important role of Local Public Health Agencies (LPHAs) to share data more effectively with local community organizations to advance health equity.

METHODS

A literature review related to public health data sharing with local community partners was conducted using Medline, Embase, and CINAHL databases and grey literature sources with 12 articles included for analysis. Six LPHAs distributed an online survey to 405 local community organizations to define their current data uses and needs. Survey and literature review findings informed a one-day deliberative dialogue event with 19 participants who brought multiple perspectives together on the barriers and potential solutions for data sharing.

RESULTS

Results are discussed utilizing the three stages of data sharing: awareness, communication, and collaboration. Awareness of the barriers and needs of community partners related to data, and the public health core competency of assessment and analysis is the first stage. More effective is the second stage, where LPHAs proactively communicate to understand and meet the needs of community partners. Data sharing is the most effective when LPHAs use the third stage of collaboration to work with community partners to mutually benefit from data sharing.

CONCLUSION

When LPHAs utilize their core competencies of assessment and analysis, communication, and collaboration to share data with community partners, they are able to share data more effectively. This allows community partners to modify programs to better serve priority populations and improve population health.

Research altruism as motivation for participation in community-centered environmental health research

Protection of human subjects in research typically focuses on extrinsic rather than intrinsic motivations for participation in research. Recent sociological literature on altruism suggests that multiple kinds of altruism exist and are grounded in a sense of connection to common humanity. We interviewed participants in eight community-centered research studies that sampled for endocrine disrupting compounds and that shared research findings with participants. The results of our analysis of participation in these studies indicate that altruistic motivations were commonly held. We found that these sentiments were tied to feeling a sense of connection to society broadly, a sense of connection to science, or a sense of connection with the community partner organization. We develop a new concept of banal altruism to address mundane practices that work towards promoting social benefits. Further, we offer that research altruism is a specific type of banal altruism that is a multi-faceted and important reason for which individuals choose to participate in community-centered research.