Evaluating and sustaining
Coordinated Specialty Care for a recent onset of psychosis in non-academic-affiliated community mental healthcare settings.
EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING 2023;
98:102268. [PMID:
36931120 DOI:
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102268]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE
To improve sustainability of Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) for a recent onset of psychosis, a better understanding is needed regarding how non-academic-affiliated community mental health centers blend CSC service elements and select key performance metrics to evaluate their approach.
METHODS
A quality and evaluation team embedded within a large community mental health center partnered with CSC site leadership to implement CSC and design a program evaluation strategy informed by CSC research literature. Clinical, family, vocational, and psychiatry services participation, exits, key performance indicators, and standardized measures were examined for participants (n = 47) enrolled for 12-months.
RESULTS
Mean service participation was 55 h (SD = 23.5) in the first 12-months (approximately 4.70 h/month). All participated in clinical; 87% in psychiatry; 67% in vocational; and 57% in family services. Sixty-one percent had planned service exits; 39% had unplanned exits. Across the 12-months, 83% were employed or in school; 72% were not psychiatric hospitalized.
CONCLUSIONS
CSC participation and outcomes were similar to the limited research examining both together. Understanding service participation and provider adjustments to sustain CSC is critical in community mental healthcare settings that rely on fee-for-service billing mechanisms. Findings have implications for national CSC data harmonization and sustainability efforts.
Collapse