Diagnostic performance of 3.0 T unenhanced Dixon water-fat separation coronary MR angiography in patients with low-to-intermediate risk of coronary artery disease

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of 3.0 T unenhanced compressed-sensing sensitivity encoding (CS-SENSE) Dixon water-fat separation coronary MR angiography (CMRA) in patients with low-to-intermediate risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) and its ability to grade the severity of CAD based on Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS).

METHODS

A total of 55 patients who was clinically evaluated as low-to-intermediate risk of CAD were finally included to undergo both 3.0 T CS-SENSE water-fat separation CMRA and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), and 11 of them also underwent X-ray coronary angiography (CAG). The severity of coronary artery disease was graded in patients who had completed both CCTA and CMRA examinations by the use of CAD-RADS reports for the patients with stable chest pain, and the diagnostic consistency between the two approaches was evaluated. Diagnostic performance of CMRA was assessed using the combination of CCTA and CAG as the reference standard for excluding or confirming CAD respectively.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy of 3.0 T unenhanced water-fat separation coronary MRA were 90.0%, 95.0%, 81.8%, 97.4% and 94.0% for a patient-based analysis respectively. In comparison with CCTA, 3.0 T Dixon water-fat separation CMRA demonstrated excellent consistency in grading the severity of coronary heart disease according to CAD-RADS (0.77 for kappa value).

CONCLUSION

In the group of low-to-intermediate probability for CAD, 3.0 T unenhanced CS-SENSE Dixon water-fat separation CMRA can present satisfactory diagnostic performance for the exclusion of CAD with high sensitivity and negative predictive value as well as the evaluation of grading the severity of coronary artery disease.

3.0 T unenhanced Dixon water-fat separation whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: compressed-sensing sensitivity encoding imaging versus conventional 2D sensitivity encoding imaging

This study was aimed to investigate 3.0 T unenhanced Dixon water-fat whole-heart CMRA (coronary magnetic resonance angiography) using compressed-sensing sensitivity encoding (CS-SENSE) and conventional sensitivity encoding (SENSE) in vitro and in vivo. The key parameters of CS-SENSE and conventional 1D/2D SENSE were compared in vitro phantom study. In vivo study, fifty patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) completed unenhanced Dixon water-fat whole-heart CMRA at 3.0 T using both CS-SENSE and conventional 2D SENSE methods. We compared mean acquisition time, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and the diagnostic accuracy between two techniques. In vitro study, CS-SENSE achieved better effectiveness between higher SNR/CNR and shorter scan times using the appropriate acceleration factor compared with conventional 2D SENSE. In vivo study, CS-SENSE CMRA had better performance than 2D SENSE in terms of the mean acquisition time, SNR and CNR (7.4 ± 3.2 min vs. 8.3 ± 3.4 min, P = 0.001; SNR: 115.5 ± 35.4 vs. 103.3 ± 32.2; CNR: 101.1 ± 33.2 vs. 90.6 ± 30.1, P < 0.001 for both). The diagnostic accuracy between CS-SENSE and 2D SENSE had no significant difference on a patient-based analysis (sensitivity: 97.3% vs. 91.9%; specificity: 76.9% vs. 61.5%; accuracy: 92.0% vs. 84.0%; P > 0.05 for each). Unenhanced CS-SENSE Dixon water-fat separation whole-heart CMRA at 3.0 T can improve the SNR and CNR, shorten the acquisition time while providing equally satisfactory image quality and diagnostic accuracy compared with 2D SENSE CMRA.

Clinical Application of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Dixon Water-Fat Separation Compressed SENSE Whole-Heart Coronary MR Angiography at 3.0 T With and Without Nitroglycerin

BACKGROUND

3.0 T non-contrast-enhanced nitroglycerin (NTG)-assisted whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) employing Dixon water-fat separation and compressed SENSE (CS-SENSE) acceleration is a promising method for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD).

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of this technique for detecting clinically-relevant (≥50% diameter reducing) CAD and to evaluate the difference in NTG-induced coronary vasodilation between patients with and without clinically-relevant CAD.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

Sixty-six patients with suspected CAD.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3.0 T; CSSENSE, Dixon water-fat separation, three-dimensional segmented turbo field gradient-echo sequence for whole-heart coronary MRA.

ASSESSMENT

Overall image quality of coronary MRA was calculated on the basis of all visible coronary segments. The diagnostic performance of coronary MRA for detecting a ≥50% reduction in coronary artery diameter with and without NTG was compared using X-ray coronary angiography (CAG) as the reference. According to CAG, patients were divided into a non-clinically-relevant CAD group and clinically-relevant CAD group, and the difference in NTG-induced vasodilation between the groups was evaluated.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Unpaired/paired Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test, χ² test, McNemar test. A two-tailed P value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Overall image quality was increased significantly in the coronary MRA images after NTG. The diagnostic performance of the non-NTG vs. NTG-assisted coronary MRA was as follows on a per-patient basis: sensitivity 94.3% vs. 94.3%, specificity 64.5% vs. 83.9%, positive predictive value 75.0% vs. 86.8%, negative predictive value 90.9% vs. 92.9%, and accuracy 80.3% vs. 89.4%, respectively. NTG-induced vasodilation was significantly lower in the clinically-relevant CAD group than in the non-clinically-relevant CAD group (13.7 ± 8.1% vs. 24.1 ± 16.3%).

DATA CONCLUSION

Non-contrast Dixon water-fat separation CS-SENSE coronary MRA at 3.0 T can noninvasively detect clinically-relevant CAD and sublingual NTG improved performance. Combining pre- and post-NTG coronary MRA may provide a simple noninvasive and nonionizing test to evaluate coronary vasodilation function.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.