The effect of antiarrhythmic medications on the risk of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

While current guidelines recommend amiodarone and dronedarone for rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD), there was no comparative study of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) on the cardiovascular outcomes in general practice.

METHODS

This study included patients with AF and CAD who received their first prescription of amiodarone, class Ic AADs (flecainide, propafenone), dronedarone or sotalol between January 2016 and December 2020. The primary outcome was a composite of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), stroke, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and cardiovascular death. We used Cox proportional regression models, including with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), to estimate the relationship between AADs and cardiovascular outcomes.

RESULTS

Among the AF cohort consisting of 8752 patients, 1996 individuals had CAD, including 477 who took dronedarone and 1519 who took other AADs. After a median follow-up of 38 months, 46.3% of patients who took dronedarone and 54.4% of patients who took other AADs experienced cardiovascular events. Compared to dronedarone, the use of other AADs was associated with increased cardiovascular events after adjusting for covariates (hazard ratio [HR] 1.531, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.112-2.141, p = 0.023) and IPTW (HR 1.491, 95% CI 1.174-1.992, p = 0.012). The secondary analysis showed that amiodarone and class Ic drugs were associated with an increased risk of HHF. The low number of subjects in the sotalol group limits data interpretation.

CONCLUSION

For patients with AF and CAD, dronedarone was associated with better cardiovascular outcomes than other AADs. Amiodarone and class Ic AADs were associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events, particularly HHF.

Dronedarone for the Treatment of Atrial Arrhythmias in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

Atrial tachyarrhythmias are common and difficult to treat in adults with congenital heart disease. Dronedarone has proven effective in patients without congenital heart disease, but data are limited about its use in adults with congenital heart disease of moderate to great complexity.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective chart review of 21 adults with congenital heart disease of moderate to great complexity who were treated with dronedarone for atrial tachyarrhythmias was performed.

RESULTS

The median (IQR) age at dronedarone initiation was 35 (27.5-39) years. Eleven patients (52%) were male. Ten patients (48%) had New York Heart Association class I disease, 10 (48%) had class II disease, and 1 (5%) had class III disease. Ejection fraction at initiation was greater than 55% in 11 patients (52%), 35% to 55% in 9 patients (43%), and less than 35% in 1 patient (5%). Prior treatments included β-blockers (71%), sotalol (38%), amiodarone (24%), digoxin (24%), and catheter ablation (38%). Rhythm control was complete in 5 patients (24%), partial in 6 (29%), and inadequate in 10 (48%). Two patients (10%) experienced adverse events, including nausea in 1 (5%) and cardiac arrest in 1 (5%), which occurred 48 months after initiation of treatment. There were no deaths during the follow-up period. The median (IQR) follow-up time for patients with complete or partial rhythm control was 20 (1-54) months.

CONCLUSION

Dronedarone can be effective for adult patients with congenital heart disease and atrial arrhythmias for whom more established therapies have failed, and with close monitoring it can be safely tolerated.

Amiodarone and Dronedarone Causes Liver Injury with Distinctly Different Clinical Presentations

OBJECTIVE

To describe hepatotoxicity due to amiodarone and dronedarone from the DILIN and the US FDA's surveillance database.

METHODS

Hepatotoxicity due to amiodarone and dronedarone enrolled in the U.S. Drug Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) from 2004 to 2020 are described. Dronedarone hepatotoxicity cases associated with liver biopsy results were obtained from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2009 to 2020.

RESULTS

Among DILIN's 10 amiodarone and 3 dronedarone DILIN cases, the latency for amiodarone was longer than with dronedarone (388 vs 119 days, p = 0.50) and the median ALT at DILI onset was significantly lower with amiodarone (118 vs 1191 U/L, p = 0.05). Liver biopsies in five amiodarone cases showed fibrosis, steatosis, and numerous Mallory-Denk bodies. Five patients died although only one from liver failure. One patient with dronedarone induced liver injury died of a non-liver related cause. Nine additional cases of DILI due to dronedarone requiring hospitalization were identified in the FAERS database. Three patients developed liver injury within a month of starting the medication. Two developed acute liver failure and underwent urgent liver transplant, one was evaluated for liver transplant but then recovered spontaneously, while one patient with cirrhosis died of liver related causes.

CONCLUSION

Amiodarone hepatotoxicity resembles that seen in alcohol related liver injury, with fatty infiltration and inflammation. Dronedarone is less predictable, typically without fat and with a shorter latency of use before presentation. These differences may be explained, in part, by the differing pharmacokinetics of the two drugs leading to different mechanisms of hepatotoxicity.

Dronedarone Attenuates Ang II-Induced Myocardial Hypertrophy Through Regulating SIRT1/FOXO3/PKIA Axis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Long-term pathological myocardial hypertrophy (MH) seriously affects the normal function of the heart. Dronedarone was reported to attenuate left ventricular hypertrophy of mice. However, the molecular regulatory mechanism of dronedarone in MH is unclear.

METHODS

Angiotensin II (Ang II) was used to induce cell hypertrophy of H9C2 cells. Transverse aortic constriction (TAC) surgery was performed to establish a rat model of MH. Cell size was evaluated using crystal violet staining and rhodamine phalloidin staining. Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blot were performed to detect the mRNA and protein expressions of genes. JASPAR and luciferase activity were conducted to predict and validate interaction between forkhead box O3 (FOXO3) and protein kinase inhibitor alpha (PKIA) promoter.

RESULTS

Ang II treatment induced cell hypertrophy and inhibited sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) expression, which were reversed by dronedarone. SIRT1 overexpression or PKIA overexpression enhanced dronedarone-mediated suppression of cell hypertrophy in Ang II-induced H9C2 cells. Mechanistically, SIRT1 elevated FOXO3 expression through SIRT1-mediated deacetylation of FOXO3 and FOXO3 upregulated PKIA expression through interacting with PKIA promoter. Moreover, SIRT1 silencing compromised dronedarone-mediated suppression of cell hypertrophy, while PKIA upregulation abolished the influences of SIRT1 silencing. More importantly, dronedarone improved TAC surgery-induced MH and impairment of cardiac function of rats via affecting SIRT1/FOXO3/PKIA axis.

CONCLUSIONS

Dronedarone alleviated MH through mediating SIRT1/FOXO3/PKIA axis, which provide more evidences for dronedarone against MH.

Utilizing Drug Amorphous Solid Dispersions for the Preparation of Dronedarone per os Formulations

Dronedarone (DRN), an antiarrhythmic drug, exhibits potent pharmacological effects in the management of cardiac arrhythmias. Despite its therapeutic potential, DRN faces formulation challenges due to its low aqueous solubility. Hence, the present study is dedicated to the examination of amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) as a strategic approach for enhancing the solubility of DRN. Initially, the glass forming ability (GFA) of API was assessed alongside its thermal degradation profile, and it was revealed that DRN is a stable glass former (GFA III compound) that remains thermally stable up to approximately 200 °C. Subsequently, five commonly used ASD matrix/carriers, i.e., hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), povidone (PVP), copovidone (PVP/VA), Soluplus® (SOL), and Eudragit® E PO (EPO), were screened for the formation of a DRN-based ASD using film casting and solvent shift methods, along with miscibility evaluation measurements. SOL proved to be the most promising matrix/carrier among the others, and, hence, was used to prepare DRN ASDs via the melt-quench method. The physicochemical characterization of the prepared systems (via pXRD) revealed the complete amorphization of the API within the matrix/carrier, while the system was physically stable for at least three months after its preparation. In vitro release studies for the ASDs, conducted under non-sink conditions, revealed the sustained supersaturation of the drug for at least 8 h. Finally, the use of attenuated total reflectance (ATR) FTIR spectroscopy showed the formation of a strong molecular interaction between the drug molecules and SOL.

Cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation concomitantly treated with antiarrhythmic drugs and non-vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants

AIMS

Limited data compared antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) with concomitant non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients, hence the aim of the study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

National health insurance database were retrieved during 2012-17 for study. We excluded patients not taking AADs, bradycardia, heart block, heart failure admission, mitral stenosis, prosthetic valve, incomplete demographic data, and follow-up <3 months. Outcomes were compared in Protocol 1, dronedarone vs. non-dronedarone; Protocol 2, dronedarone vs. amiodarone; and Protocol 3, dronedarone vs. propafenone. Outcomes were acute myocardial infarction (AMI), ischaemic stroke/systemic embolism, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), major bleeding, cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) (including AMI, ischaemic stroke, and cardiovascular death). In Protocol 1, 2298 dronedarone users and 6984 non-dronedarone users (amiodarone = 4844; propafenone = 1914; flecainide = 75; sotalol = 61) were analysed. Dronedarone was associated with lower ICH (HR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.38-0.99, P = 0.0436), cardiovascular death (HR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.16-0.37, P < 0.0001), all-cause mortality (HR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.27-0.42, P < 0.0001), and MACE (HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.45-0.70, P < 0.0001). In Protocol 2, 2231 dronedarone users and 6693 amiodarone users were analysed. Dronedarone was associated with significantly lower ICH (HR = 0.53, 95%=CI 0.33-0.84, P = 0.0078), cardiovascular death (HR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.13-0.31, P < 0.0001), all-cause mortality (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.22-0.34, P < 0.0001), and MACE (HR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.43-0.66, P < 0.0001), compared with amiodarone. In Protocol 3, 812 dronedarone users and 2436 propafenone users were analysed. There were no differences between two drugs for primary and secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The use of dronedarone with NOACs was associated with cardiovascular benefits in an Asian population, compared with non-dronedarone AADs and amiodarone.

Effect of Prolonged Use of Dronedarone on Recurrence in Patients with Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation After Radiofrequency Ablation (DORIS): Rationale and Design of a Randomized Multicenter, Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Prolonged use of anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD) beyond the post-ablation blanking period to maintain sinus rhythm has been adopted in clinical practice but without sufficient evidence. Dronedarone is an AAD valid for maintaining sinus rhythm with fewer side effects than other AAD for long-term use.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate the effect of prolonged use of dronedarone on the recurrence of non-paroxysmal AF patients beyond 3 months within the first year after ablation.

METHODS

Non-paroxysmal AF patients will receive dronedarone for 3 months after radiofrequency ablation. Patients without drug side effects and atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) recurrence will then be randomly divided into dronedarone and placebo groups and followed up until 1 year after ablation. The primary endpoint is the cumulative nonrecurrence rate post 3 months to 1 year after ablation. Patients will receive 7-day Holter monitoring (ECG patch) at 6, 9, and 12 months after ablation to evaluate AT recurrence. Secondary endpoints include dronedarone withdrawal due to side effects or intolerance of AT recurrence, time to the first recurrence, repeat ablation, electrical cardioversion, unscheduled emergency room visit, or re-hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

This trial will evaluate whether prolonged use of dronedarone effectively reduces the recurrence rate after ablation in non-paroxysmal AF patients. The result of this trial will provide evidence for optimizing post-ablation anti-arrhythmic therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ; NCT05655468, 19-December-2022.

Effect of dronedarone vs. placebo on atrial fibrillation progression: a post hoc analysis from ATHENA trial

AIMS

This post hoc analysis of the ATHENA trial (NCT00174785) assessed the effect of dronedarone on the estimated burden of atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter (AFL) progression to presumed permanent AF/AFL, and regression to sinus rhythm (SR), compared with placebo.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The burden of AF/AFL was estimated by a modified Rosendaal method using available electrocardiograms (ECG). Cumulative incidence of permanent AF/AFL (defined as ≥6 months of AF/AFL until end of study) or permanent SR (defined as ≥6 months of SR until end of study) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. A log-rank test was used to assess statistical significance. Hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a Cox model, adjusted for treatment group. Of the 4439 patients included in this analysis, 2208 received dronedarone, and 2231 placebo. Baseline and clinical characteristics were well balanced between groups. Overall, 304 (13.8%) dronedarone-treated patients progressed to permanent AF/AFL compared with 455 (20.4%) treated with placebo (P < 0.0001). Compared with those receiving placebo, patients receiving dronedarone had a lower cumulative incidence of permanent AF/AFL (log-rank P < 0.001; HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.56-0.75), a higher cumulative incidence of permanent SR (log-rank P < 0.001; HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.09-1.29), and a lower estimated AF/AFL burden over time (P < 0.01 from Day 14 to Month 21).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that dronedarone could be a useful antiarrhythmic drug for early rhythm control due to less AF/AFL progression and more regression to SR vs. placebo, potentially reflecting reverse remodeling.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00174785.

Clinical significance of the rivaroxaban-dronedarone interaction: insights from physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling

Patients with atrial fibrillation may require rhythm control therapy in addition to anticoagulation therapy for the prevention of stroke. Since 2012, the European Society of Cardiology and European Heart Rhythm Association guidelines have recommended non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, including rivaroxaban, for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. During the same period, these guidelines have also recommended dronedarone or amiodarone as second-line rhythm control agents in certain patients with atrial fibrillation and no contraindications. Amiodarone and dronedarone both strongly inhibit P-glycoprotein, while dronedarone is a moderate and amiodarone a weak inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). Based on these data and evidence from physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling, amiodarone and dronedarone are expected to have similar effects on rivaroxaban exposure resulting from P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4 inhibition. However, the rivaroxaban label recommends against the concomitant use of dronedarone, but not amiodarone, citing a lack of evidence on the concomitant use of rivaroxaban and dronedarone as the reason for the different recommendations. In this report, we discuss evidence from clinical studies and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling on the potential for increased rivaroxaban exposure resulting from drug-drug interaction between rivaroxaban and dronedarone or amiodarone. The current evidence supports the same clinical status and concomitant use of either amiodarone or dronedarone with rivaroxaban, which could be considered in future recommendations.

Predicting drug-drug interactions with physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling and optimal dosing of apixaban and rivaroxaban with dronedarone co-administration

BACKGROUND

The concurrent administration of dronedarone and oral anti-coagulants is common because both are used in managing atrial fibrillation (AF). Dronedarone is a moderate inhibitor of the cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) enzyme and P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Apixaban and rivaroxaban are P-gp and CYP3A4 substrates. This study aims to investigate the impact of exposure and bleeding risk of apixaban or rivaroxaban when co-administered with dronedarone using physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis.

METHODS

Modeling and simulation were conducted using Simcyp® Simulator. The parameters required for dronedarone modeling were collected from the literature. The developed dronedarone physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was verified using reported drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between dronedarone and CYP3A4 and P-gp substrates. The model was applied to evaluate the DDI potential of dronedarone on the exposure of apixaban 5 mg every 12 h or rivaroxaban 20 mg every 24 h in geriatric and renally impaired populations. DDIs precipitating major bleeding risks were assessed using exposure-response analyses derived from literature.

RESULTS

The model accurately described the pharmacokinetics of orally administered dronedarone in healthy subjects and accurately predicted DDIs between dronedarone and four CYP3A4 and P-gp substrates with fold errors <1.5. Dronedarone co-administration led to a 1.29 (90 % confidence interval (CI): 1.14-1.50) to 1.31 (90 % CI: 1.12-1.46)-fold increase in the area under concentration-time curve for rivaroxaban and 1.33 (90 % CI: 1.15-1.68) to 1.46 (90 % CI: 1.24-1.92)-fold increase for apixaban. The PD model indicated that dronedarone co-administration might potentiate the mean major bleeding risk of apixaban with a 1.45 to 1.95-fold increase. However, the mean major bleeding risk of rivaroxaban was increased by <1.5-fold in patients with normal or impaired renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

Dronedarone co-administration increased the exposure of rivaroxaban and apixaban and might potentiate major bleeding risks. Reduced apixaban and rivaroxaban dosing regimens are recommended when dronedarone is co-administered to patients with AF.

Clove Oil Endorsed Transdermal Flux of Dronedarone Hydrochloride Loaded Bilosomal Nanogel: Factorial Design, In vitro Evaluation and Ex vivo Permeation

The goal of this study was to develop a bilosomal gel formulation to enhance transdermal permeability of dronedarone hyrdrochloride (DRN) which suffers from poor oral absorption and limited bioavailability. To overcome this obstacle, bilosomes were successfully prepared using 2³ full-factorial design. Span®40, cholesterol, sodium deoxycholate (bile salt), clove oil (permeability enhancer), and either Tween® 60 or Tween® 80 (edge activator) were used in bilosome preparation by ethanol injection method. In this design, independent variables were X1, edge activator type; X2, edge activator amount (mg); and X3, permeability enhancer concentration (% w/v). Optimal formula (B2) of the highest desirability of (0.776) demonstrated minimum vesicle size (VS) of 312.4 ± 24.42 nm, maximum absolute value of zeta potential (ZP) - 36.17 ± 2.57 mV, maximum entrapment efficiency (EE %) of 80.95 ± 3.01%, maximum deformability Index (DI) of 8.24 ± 1.26 g and maximum drug flux after 12 h (J₁₂) of 21.23 ± 1.54 µg/cm² h upon ex vivo permeation study. After 12 h, 70.29 ± 6.46% of DRN was released from B2. TEM identification of B2 showed spherical shaped nanosized vesicles which were physically stable for 3 months at different temperatures. B2 was incorporated into carboxymethylcellulose gel base for easiness of dermal application. B2 gel demonstrated good physical properties, non-Newtonian psuedoplastic flow, and enhanced release (57.0 ± 8.68% of DRN compared to only 13.3 ± 1.2% released from drug suspension after 12 h) and enhanced skin permeation.

Impact of dronedarone on patients with atrial fibrillation and diabetes: A sub-analysis of the ATHENA and EURIDIS/ADONIS studies

AIM

This post hoc analysis evaluated efficacy and safety of dronedarone in atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) patients with/without diabetes.

METHODS

Patients were categorized according to baseline diabetes status. Time-to-event analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard-ratios were assessed using Cox models.

RESULTS

945/4628 (dronedarone = 482; placebo = 463) patients in ATHENA and 215/1237 (dronedarone = 148; placebo = 67) patients in EURIDIS/ADONIS studies had diabetes. In ATHENA, there were higher rates of CV hospitalization/death in patients with diabetes (39.5%) than without diabetes (34.7%). Incidence of first CV hospitalization/death was lower in patients with diabetes treated with dronedarone (35.1%) than placebo (44.1%), and time to this event was longer in those treated with dronedarone than placebo (log-rank p = 0.005). Median AF/AFL recurrence time was longer in patients treated with dronedarone than placebo in patients with diabetes (ATHENA: 722 vs 527 days, log-rank p = 0.004; EURIDIS/ADONIS: 100 vs 23 days, log-rank p = 0.15) or without diabetes (ATHENA: 741 vs 492 days, log-rank p < 0.0001; EURIDIS/ADONIS: 120 vs 59 days, log-rank p = 0.0002). Occurrence of any treatment-related adverse events with dronedarone was similar for patients with/without diabetes and was comparable to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Dronedarone reduced incidence of CV hospitalization/death, AF/AFL recurrence and increased time to these events in AF/AFL patients with/without diabetes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable, as it was a post hoc analysis. This article is based on previously conducted studies (ATHENA: NCT00174785, EURIDIS: NCT00259428, and ADONIS: NCT00259376).

International cohort study on the effectiveness of dronedarone and other antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation in real-world practice (EFFECT-AF)

Aims

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dronedarone compared with other commonly used antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) for preventing atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences.

Methods and results

An international observational cohort study in Germany, Spain, Italy, and the USA enrolling patients with AF receiving AAD therapy. Patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV heart failure were excluded. Participants were followed for up to 18 months, regardless of discontinuation or subsequent AAD switches. Atrial fibrillation recurrence was captured by hospitalization, emergency room visit, or electrocardiogram-based documentation of AF. Confounding bias was controlled for in the analysis of AF recurrence using multivariate models of 19 variables for adjustment. A total of 1009 participants [mean age 67.2 (10.8) years, male to female ratio 1.3] were recruited from 170 centres, 693 (69%) of which were from across Europe and the remaining 316 (31%) from the USA. At the time of enrolment, participants were taking dronedarone (51%) or other AADs (49%) [flecainide or propafenone (42%), sotalol (11%), and amiodarone (47%)]. No significant differences in the risk of first confirmed AF recurrence with dronedarone vs. other AADs [crude hazard ratio (HR) 1.10 (95% confidence interval 0.85–1.42); adjusted HR 1.16 (0.87–1.55)] were found, irrespective of whether univariate or multivariate models were used. Reported safety events were in accordance with the known safety profile of dronedarone.

Conclusion

In this population of patients from either Europe or the USA receiving dronedarone or another AAD, the effectiveness of dronedarone was comparable to that observed for other AADs in preventing first AF recurrence.

Comparison of dronedarone vs. flecainide in the maintenance of sinus rhythm, following electrocardioversion in adults with persistent atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

To compare flecainide and dronedarone for sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance following electrocardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), in patients with minimal or no structural heart disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic search of publications using EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and MEDLINE (1989-2019), identified a total of 595 articles. No limitations were applied. Nine articles met the inclusion criteria [five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and four cohort studies], encompassing 1349 persistent AF candidates. Two retrospective studies compared flecainide with dronedarone, indicating a 6% reduced risk of AF recurrence with flecainide; however, results were not statistically significant [risk ratio (RR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-1.24; P = 0.66]. One RCT compared dronedarone to placebo, demonstrating a 28% reduced risk of AF recurrence at 6 months (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.90; P = 0.004). Two RCTs compare flecainide to placebo, when a 16% decreased risk of AF recurrence at 6-12 months was indicated; however, these results were not statistically significant (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.66-1.07; P = 0.16). Within a 6- to 12-month follow-up period, a combined recurrence rate of AF was examined, in which flecainide and dronedarone maintained SR in 50% and 42%, respectively. Four articles satisfied quality appraisal, one of which focused on flecainide data.

CONCLUSION

Dronedarone and flecainide displayed similar efficacy in maintaining SR in patients following electrocardioversion for persistent AF. The SR maintenance was numerically but not statistically significant in the flecainide group. Side effects uncovered similar pro-arrhythmic activity. However, in light of the deficiency of volume and quality of available evidence, the writer acknowledges the requirement for future research.

Dronedarone hydrochloride enhances the bioactivity of endothelial progenitor cells via regulation of the AKT signaling pathway

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and its complications are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the world. Because of the side effects and incomplete recovery from current therapy, stem cell therapy emerges as a potential therapy for CVD treatment, and endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) is one of the key stem cells used for therapeutic applications. The effect of this therapy required the expansion of EPC function. To enhance the EPC activation, proliferation, and angiogenesis using dronedarone hydrochloride (DH) is the purpose of this study. DH received approval for atrial fibrillation treatment and its cardiovascular protective effects were already reported. In this study, DH significantly increased EPC proliferation, tube formation, migration, and maintained EPCs surface marker expression. In addition, DH treatment up-regulated the phosphorylation of AKT and reduced the reactive oxygen species production. In summary, the cell priming by DH considerably improved the functional activity of EPCs, and the use of which might be a novel strategy for CVD treatment.

Efficacy and safety of dronedarone across age and sex subgroups: a post hoc analysis of the ATHENA study among patients with non-permanent atrial fibrillation/flutter

AIMS

Age and sex may impact the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs on cardiovascular outcomes and arrhythmia recurrences in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We report on a post hoc analysis of the ATHENA study (NCT00174785), which examined cardiovascular outcomes in patients with non-permanent AF treated with dronedarone vs. placebo.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Efficacy and safety of dronedarone were assessed in patients according to age and sex. Baseline characteristics were comparable across subgroups, except for cardiovascular comorbidities, which were more frequent with increasing age. Dronedarone significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular hospitalization or death due to any cause among patients 65-74 [n = 1830; hazard ratio (HR) 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.83; P < 0.0001] and ≥75 (n = 1925; HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65-0.88; P = 0.0002) years old and among males (n = 2459; HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.64-0.84; P < 0.00001) and females (n = 2169; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67-0.89; P = 0.0002); outcomes were similar for time to AF/AFL recurrence. Among patients aged <65 years (n = 873), cardiovascular hospitalization or death due to any cause with dronedarone vs. placebo was associated with an HR of 0.89 (95% CI 0.71-1.11; P = 0.3). The incidence of all treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation was comparable among males and females, and increased with increasing age.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the use of dronedarone for the improvement of clinical outcomes among patients aged ≥65 years and regardless of sex.

Antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation: lessons from the past and opportunities for the future

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a highly prevalent and troublesome cardiac arrhythmia, associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm (rhythm-control therapy) is an important element of AF management in symptomatic patients. Despite significant advances and increasing importance of catheter ablation, antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) remain a cornerstone of rhythm-control therapy. During the past 50 years, experimental and clinical research has greatly increased our understanding of AADs. As part of the special issue on paradigm shifts in AF, this review summarizes important milestones in AAD research that have shaped their current role in AF management, including (i) awareness of the proarrhythmic potential of AADs; (ii) increasing understanding of the pleiotropic effects of AADs; (iii) the development of dronedarone; and (iv) the search for AF-specific AADs. Finally, we discuss short- and long-term opportunities for better AF management through advances in AAD therapy, including personalization of AAD therapy based on individual AF mechanisms.

Discovery of dronedarone and its analogues as NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitors with potent anti-inflammation activity

Inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome activation is a prospective therapeutic strategy for uncontrolled inflammatory diseases. It is the first time that dronedarone, a multiply ion channel blocker, was identified as a NLRP3-inflammasome inhibitor with an IC₅₀ value of 6.84 μM against IL-1β release. A series of novel 5-amide benzofuran derivatives were designed and synthesized as NLRP3-inflammasome inhibitors. Compound 8c showed slightly increased activity (IC₅₀ = 3.85 μM) against IL-1β release. Notably, treatment with 8c could significantly inhibit NLRP3-mediated IL-1β release and ameliorate peritoneal inflammation in a mouse model of sepsis. Collectively, 8c is a promising lead compound for further chemical development as a NLRP3 inhibitor with anti-inflammation effects.

Investigation of the arcane inhibition of human organic anion transporter 3 by benzofuran antiarrhythmic agents

The combination of antiarrhythmic agents, amiodarone or dronedarone, with the anticoagulant rivaroxaban is used clinically in the management of atrial fibrillation for rhythm control and secondary stroke prevention respectively. Renal drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between amiodarone or dronedarone and rivaroxaban were previously ascribed to inhibition of rivaroxaban secretion by P-glycoprotein at the apical membrane of renal proximal tubular epithelial cells. Benzbromarone, a known inhibitor of organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3), shares a benzofuran scaffold with amiodarone and dronedarone. However, inhibitory activity of amiodarone and dronedarone against OAT3 remains arcane. Here, we conducted in vitro transporter inhibition assays in OAT3-transfected HEK293 cells which revealed amiodarone, dronedarone and their respective major pharmacologically-active metabolites N-desethylamiodarone and N-desbutyldronedarone possess inhibitory activity against OAT3, with corrected K_i values of 0.042, 0.019, 0.028 and 0.0046 μM respectively. Protein binding effects and probe substrate dependency were accounted for in our assays. Static modelling predicted 1.29-, 1.01-, 1.29- and 1.16-fold increase in rivaroxaban exposure, culminating in a predicted 1.29-, 1.01-, 1.28- and 1.15-fold increase in major bleeding risk respectively, suggesting potential OAT3-mediated DDI between amiodarone and rivaroxaban. Future work involving physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling is crucial in holistically predicting the complex DDIs between the benzofuran antiarrhythmic agents and rivaroxaban.

Atrial resting membrane potential confers sodium current sensitivity to propafenone, flecainide and dronedarone

BACKGROUND

Although atrial fibrillation ablation is increasingly used for rhythm control therapy, antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) are commonly used, either alone or in combination with ablation. The effectiveness of AADs is highly variable. Previous work from our group suggests that alterations in atrial resting membrane potential (RMP) induced by low Pitx2 expression could explain the variable effect of flecainide.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess whether alterations in atrial/cardiac RMP modify the effectiveness of multiple clinically used AADs.

METHODS

The sodium channel blocking effects of propafenone (300 nM, 1 μM), flecainide (1 μM), and dronedarone (5 μM, 10 μM) were measured in human stem cell-derived cardiac myocytes, HEK293 expressing human Na_V1.5, primary murine atrial cardiac myocytes, and murine hearts with reduced Pitx2c.

RESULTS

A more positive atrial RMP delayed I_Na recovery, slowed channel inactivation, and decreased peak action potential (AP) upstroke velocity. All 3 AADs displayed enhanced sodium channel block at more positive atrial RMPs. Dronedarone was the most sensitive to changes in atrial RMP. Dronedarone caused greater reductions in AP amplitude and peak AP upstroke velocity at more positive RMPs. Dronedarone evoked greater prolongation of the atrial effective refractory period and postrepolarization refractoriness in murine Langendorff-perfused Pitx2c^+/- hearts, which have a more positive RMP compared to wild type.

CONCLUSION

Atrial RMP modifies the effectiveness of several clinically used AADs. Dronedarone is more sensitive to changes in atrial RMP than flecainide or propafenone. Identifying and modifying atrial RMP may offer a novel approach to enhancing the effectiveness of AADs or personalizing AAD selection.

An exploratory analysis of effects of poyendarone, a deuterated analogue of dronedarone, on the canine model of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Poyendarone, a deuterated analogue of dronedarone, is expected to reduce the onset of cardiovascular adverse events of dronedarone, including congestive heart failure and excessive QT-interval prolongation. Since information is still lacking on the anti-atrial fibrillatory property of poyendarone, we assessed it along with effects on the inter-atrial conduction time (IACT) and atrial effective refractory period (AERP) using the canine paroxysmal atrial fibrillation model. Poyendarone hydrochloride (n = 4) and dronedarone hydrochloride (n = 4) in intravenous doses of 0.3 and 3 mg/kg/30 s were cumulatively administered. Poyendarone hardly altered sinoatrial rate, but dronedarone decreased it in a dose-related manner, whereas both drugs slightly but significantly reduced idioventricular rate. Poyendarone shortened duration of burst pacing-induced atrial fibrillation, whereas such abbreviation was not observed by dronedarone. Poyendarone and dronedarone similarly prolonged IACT in a frequency-dependent manner, indicating that their I_Na inhibitory actions may be similar. The high dose of poyendarone prolonged AERP in a reverse frequency-dependent manner, extent of which at basic pacing cycle lengths of 300 and 400 ms was comparable to that of dronedarone. However, the extent at a basic pacing cycle length of 200 ms was tended to be greater in poyendarone than in dronedarone, suggesting greater I_Ks inhibitory action of poyendarone. The deuteration of dronedarone attenuated the inhibition of sinus automaticity and prolonged the AERP with keeping the blood pressure and ventricular rate stable. Thus, poyendarone may have both more potent anti-atrial fibrillatory action and wider cardiovascular safety margin than dronedarone.

Safety and efficacy of dronedarone from clinical trials to real-world evidence: implications for its use in atrial fibrillation

Efficacy and safety of dronedarone was shown in the ATHENA trial for paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Further trials revealed safety concerns in patients with heart failure and permanent AF. This review summarizes insights from recent real-world studies and meta-analyses, including reports on efficacy, with focus on liver safety, mortality risk in patients with paroxysmal/persistent AF, and interactions of dronedarone with direct oral anticoagulants. Reports of rapidly progressing liver failure in dronedarone-prescribed patients in 2011 led to regulatory cautions about potential liver toxicity. Recent real-world evidence suggests dronedarone liver safety profile is similar to other antiarrhythmics and liver toxicity could be equally common with many Class III antiarrhythmics. Dronedarone safety concerns (increased mortality in patients with permanent AF) were raised based on randomized controlled trials (RCT) (ANDROMEDA and PALLAS), but comedication with digoxin may have increased the mortality rates in PALLAS, considering the dronedarone-digoxin pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction. Real-world data on apixaban-dronedarone interactions and edoxaban RCT observations suggest no significant safety risks for these drug combinations. Median trough plasma concentrations of dabigatran 110 mg during concomitant use with dronedarone are at acceptable levels, while PK data on the rivaroxaban-dronedarone interaction are unavailable. In RCTs and real-world studies, dronedarone significantly reduces AF burden and cardiovascular hospitalizations, and demonstrates a low risk for proarrhythmia in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF. The concerns on liver safety must be balanced against the significant reduction in hospitalizations in patients with non-permanent AF and low risk for proarrhythmias following dronedarone treatment.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between dronedarone and ticagrelor following oral administration in rats

Dronedarone and ticagrelor have high co-administration potential in patients with both acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation. The objective of the present in vivo study was to investigate the potential interaction between dronedarone (5 and 10 mg/kg) and ticagrelor (5 and 10 mg/kg) when administered orally to rats. Forty Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly distributed into eight groups; consisting of a dronedarone only group, a ticagrelor only group, a dronedarone with ticagrelor-pretreatment group, and a ticagrelor with dronedarone-pretreatment group. Pharmacokinetic exposure (AUC_inf = 1472 ng·h/mL) associated with administration of 10 mg/kg of dronedarone increased significantly, with delayed T _max in the group that received ticagrelor-pretreatment when compared to the dronedarone only group (AUC_inf = 723 ng·h/mL). In addition, pharmacokinetic exposure (AUC_inf = 2391 ng·h/mL) associated with administration of 10 mg/kg of ticagrelor increased significantly, with increased K _el (0.31 h^-1) and decreased V _z/F (14.6 L/kg) in the dronedarone-pretreatment group when compared to the ticagrelor only group (AUC_inf = 1616 ng·h/mL; K _el = 0.21 h^-1; V _z/F  =  31.3 L/kg). Results of our study suggest that further investigation of a potential interaction between dronedarone and ticagrelor in humans is justified and that caution may need to be exercised when dronedarone and ticagrelor pharmacotherapies concomitantly.

Voriconazole-induced Severe Hyperkalemia Precipitated by Multiple Drug Interactions

Voriconazole, a triazole antifungal agent used to treat serious fungal infections, has a pharmacokinetic characteristic of undergoing hepatic metabolism by the cytochrome P450 system. Few cases of hyperkalemia have been reported, which presented only when the serum voriconazole level was exceptionally elevated by drug-drug interactions. Additionally, azole antifungals may interfere with the biosynthesis of adrenal steroids and therefore can predispose patients to aldosterone deficiency. However, it is unclear whether voriconazole itself can induce hypoaldosteronism or hyperkalemia. Here, we report a case of voriconazole-induced hyperkalemia in a patient administered concurrent medications to treat comorbidities. Voriconazole was orally administered for pulmonary aspergillosis, and three episodes of severe hyperkalemia recurred, which improved with emergency treatment. In the first episode, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors were associated. We found that dronedarone might have increased the voriconazole level in the second episode. At that time, severe hypercalcemia was concurrent, which improved with acute hemodialysis and eliminating dronedarone. Finally, severe hyperkalemia recurred without concurrent medications known to interact with voriconazole. Upon switching from voriconazole to itraconazole, the hyperkalemia was resolved. Drug level monitoring is necessary when voriconazole is used. Genetic susceptibility, such as through CYP2C19 polymorphism, may be investigated for patients with adverse reactions to voriconazole.

How the Deuteration of Dronedarone Can Modify Its Cardiovascular Profile: In Vivo Characterization of Electropharmacological Effects of Poyendarone, a Deuterated Analogue of Dronedarone

Since deuterium replacement has a potential to modulate pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and toxicity, we developed deuterated dronedarone; poyendarone, and assessed its cardiovascular effects. Poyendarone hydrochloride in doses of 0.3 and 3 mg/kg over 30 s was intravenously administered to the halothane-anesthetized dogs (n = 4), which provided peak plasma concentrations of 108 ± 10 and 1120 ± 285 ng/mL, respectively. The 0.3 mg/kg shortened the ventricular repolarization period. The 3 mg/kg transiently increased the heart rate at 5 min but decreased at 45 min, and elevated the total peripheral vascular resistance and left ventricular preload, whereas it reduced the mean blood pressure at 5 min, left ventricular contractility and cardiac output. The transient tachycardic action is considered to be induced by the hypotension-induced, reflex-mediated increase of sympathetic tone. The 3 mg/kg delayed both intra-atrial and intra-ventricular conductions, indicating Na⁺ channel inhibitory action. Moreover, the 3 mg/kg transiently shortened the ventricular repolarization period at 5 min. No significant change was detected in the late repolarization by poyendarone, indicating it might not hardly significantly alter rapidly activating delayed-rectifier K⁺ current (I_Kr). Poyendarone prolonged the atrial effective refractory period greater than the ventricular parameter. When compared with dronedarone, poyendarone showed similar pharmacokinetics of dronedarone, but reduced β-adrenoceptor blocking activity as well as the cardio-suppressive effect. Poyendarone failed to inhibit I_Kr and showed higher atrial selectivity in prolonging the effective refractory period of atrium versus ventricle. Thus, the deuteration may be an effective way to improve the cardiovascular profile of dronedarone. Poyendarone is a promising anti-atrial fibrillatory drug candidate.

Cardioprotective Effects of Dronedarone Mediated by the Influence on the Expression of Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor

PURPOSE

Dronedarone is a multichannel-blocking antiarrhythmic drug for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Observational data hypothesized a cardioprotective effect. In an in vitro endothelial cell-platelet model, we evaluated the molecular atheroprotective effects of dronedarone.

METHODS

Following a 24-h incubation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) with dronedarone (concentration 50, 100, and 150 ng/mL), they were then stimulated for 1 h with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and were subsequently incubated in direct contact with thrombin-activated platelets. After incubation, the expression of CD40L and CD62P on platelets, and the expression of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), and membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) on endothelial cells were measured by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Preincubation with 150 ng/mL of dronedarone reduced the expression of uPAR on endothelial cells after proinflammatory stimulation with LPS and also by direct endothelial contact with activated platelets (p = 0.0038). In contrast, the expression of CD40L and CD62P on platelets after proinflammatory stimulation with thrombin was significantly increased through direct preincubation with 50/100/150 ng/mL of dronedarone. However, dronedarone had no effects on the expression of MT1-MMP and ICAM-1 in HUVECs.

CONCLUSION

In this in vitro analysis, dronedarone directly increased platelet activation but showed significant direct effects on endothelial cells and indirect effects on platelets on selected markers of atherosclerosis.

Dronedarone (a multichannel blocker) enhances the anticonvulsant potency of lamotrigine, but not that of lacosamide, pregabalin and topiramate in the tonic-clonic seizure model in mice

Accumulating experimental evidence indicates that some recently licensed antiarrhythmic drugs, including dronedarone (a multichannel blocker) play a crucial role in initiation of seizures in both, in vivo and in vitro studies. Some of these antiarrhythmic drugs elevate the threshold for maximal electroconvulsions and enhance the anticonvulsant potency of classical antiepileptic drugs in preclinical studies. This study was aimed at determining the influence of dronedarone (an antiarrhythmic drug) on the anticonvulsant potency of four novel antiepileptic drugs (lacosamide, lamotrigine, pregabalin and topiramate) in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure model in mice. To exclude any potential pharmacokinetic contribution of dronedarone to the observed interactions, total brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs were measured. Dronedarone (50 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly enhanced the anticonvulsant potency of lamotrigine, by reducing its ED₅₀ value from 7.67 mg/kg to 4.19 mg/kg (P < 0.05), in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure test in mice. On the contrary, dronedarone (50 mg/kg, i.p.) did not affect the anticonvulsant properties of lacosamide, pregabalin or topiramate in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure test in mice. Measurement of total brain concentrations of lamotrigine revealed that dronedarone did not significantly alter total brain concentrations of lamotrigine in experimental animals. Additionally, the combination of dronedarone with pregabalin significantly impaired motor coordination in animals subjected to the chimney test. In contrast, the combinations of other studied antiepileptic drugs with dronedarone had no negative influence on motor coordination in mice. It is advisable to combine dronedarone with lamotrigine to enhance the anticonvulsant potency of the latter drug. The combinations of dronedarone with lacosamide, pregabalin and topiramate resulted in neutral interactions in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure test in mice. However, a special caution is advised to patients receiving both, pregabalin and dronedarone due to some possible adverse effects that might occur with respect to motor coordination.

Dronedarone induces regression of coronary artery remodeling related to better global antioxidant status

Our group previously demonstrated that dronedarone induces regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). We assessed changes in vascular remodeling and oxidative stress following short-term use of this agent. The coronary artery was isolated from 10-month-old male SHRs treated with 100 mg kg^-1 dronedarone once daily for 14 days (SHR-D group), and age-matched untreated SHRs were used as hypertensive controls. We analyzed the geometry and composition of the artery and constructed dose-response curves for acetylcholine and serotonin (5-HT). We calculated a global score (OXY-SCORE) from plasma biomarkers of oxidative status: carbonyl levels, thiol levels, reduced glutathione levels, total antioxidant capacity, and superoxide anion scavenging activity. Finally, we analyzed asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) concentrations in plasma. Dronedarone significantly decreased wall thickness (medial and adventitial layer thickness and cell count) and the cross-sectional area of the artery. Dronedarone significantly improved endothelium-dependent relaxation and reduced the contraction induced by 5-HT. The OXY-SCORE was negative in the SHR model group (suggesting an enhanced oxidative status) and was positive in the SHR-D group (suggesting enhanced antioxidant defense). Dronedarone significantly decreased the concentrations of ADMA. We conclude that dronedarone improves coronary artery remodeling in SHRs. The better global antioxidant status after treatment with dronedarone and decreased plasma ADMA levels could contribute to the cardiovascular protective effect of dronedarone.

Influence of dronedarone (a class III antiarrhythmic drug) on the anticonvulsant potency of four classical antiepileptic drugs in the tonic-clonic seizure model in mice

Increasing evidence indicates that some antiarrhythmic drugs play a pivotal role in seizures, not only in vivo studies on animals, but also in clinical trials. Some of these antiarrhythmic drugs potentiate or alleviate the anticonvulsant action of the classical antiepileptic drugs. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of dronedarone (DRO-a multichannel blocker belonging to the class III of antiarrhythmic drugs) on the anticonvulsant effects of four standard antiepileptic drugs (carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin and valproate) in the tonic-clonic seizure model in mice. Potential acute adverse effects exerted by the antiepileptic drugs combined with DRO were evaluated in three behavioral tests (chimney, grip-strength and passive avoidance). To confirm the nature of interaction, total brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs were measured. DRO (50 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly reduces the anticonvulsant potency of phenytoin (P < 0.05), having no impact on that of carbamazepine, phenobarbital and valproate in the tonic-clonic seizure model in mice. DRO (50 mg/kg) neither changed total brain concentrations of phenytoin in mice, nor affected normal behavior in experimental animals subjected to the chimney, grip-strength and passive avoidance tests. In conclusion, DRO should not be combined with phenytoin because it reduced the anticonvulsant effects of the latter drug in experimental animals. The combined administration of DRO with carbamazepine, phenobarbital and valproate resulted in neutral interaction between these drugs in the tonic-clonic seizure model in mice.

Emerging role of amiodarone and dronedarone, as antiarrhythmic drugs, in treatment of leishmaniasis

Leishmaniasis is a group of human and animal diseases causing 20,000-40,000 annual deaths and its etiological agents belong to the Leishmania genus. The most current treatment against leishmaniasis is chemotherapy. Pentavalent antimonials such as glucantime and pentostam have been administrated as the first-line drugs in treatment of various forms of leishmaniasis. The second-line drugs such as amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B, miltefosine, pentamidine, azole drugs and paromomycin are used in resistant cases to pentavalent antimonials. Because of drawbacks of the first-line and second-line drugs including adverse side effects on different organs, increasing resistance, high cost, need to hospitalization and long-term treatment, it is necessary to find an alternative drug for leishmaniasis treatment. Several investigations have reported the effectiveness of amiodarone, the most commonly used antiarrhythmic drug, against fungi, Trypanosomes and Leishmania spp. in vitro, in vivo and clinical conditions. Moreover, the beneficial effects of dronedarone, amiodarone analogues, against Trypanosoma cruzi and Leishmania mexicana have recently been demonstrated and such treatment regimens resulted in lower side effects. The anti- leishmanial and anti- trypanosomal effectiveness of amiodarone and dronedarone has been attributed to destabilization of intracellular Ca²⁺ homeostasis, inhibition of sterol biosynthesis and collapse of mitochondrial membrane potential. Because of relative low cost, excellent pharmacokinetic properties, easy accessibility and beneficial effects of amiodarone and dronedarone on leishmaniasis, they are proper candidates to replace the current drugs used in leishmaniasis treatment.

The role of hepatic cytochrome P450s in the cytotoxicity of dronedarone

Dronedarone is used to treat patients with cardiac arrhythmias and has been reported to be associated with liver injury. Our previous mechanistic work demonstrated that DNA damage-induced apoptosis contributes to the cytotoxicity of dronedarone. In this study, we examined further the underlying mechanisms and found that after a 24-h treatment of HepG2 cells, dronedarone caused cytotoxicity, G1-phase cell cycle arrest, suppression of topoisomerase II, and DNA damage in a concentration-dependent manner. We also investigated the role of cytochrome P450s (CYPs)-mediated metabolism in the dronedarone-induced toxicity using our previously established HepG2 cell lines expressing individually 14 human CYPs (1A1, 1A2, 1B1, 2A6, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C18, 2C19, 2D6, 2E1, 3A4, 3A5, and 3A7). We demonstrated that CYP3A4, 3A5, and 2D6 were the major enzymes that metabolize dronedarone, and that CYP3A7, 2E1, 2C19, 2C18, 1A1, and 2B6 also metabolize dronedarone, but to a lesser extent. Our data showed that the cytotoxicity of dronedarone was decreased in CYP3A4-, 3A5-, or 2D6-overexpressing cells compared to the control HepG2 cells, indicating that the parent dronedarone has higher potency than the metabolites to induce cytotoxicity in these cells. In contrast, cytotoxicity was increased in CYP1A1-overexpressing cells, demonstrating that CYP1A1 exerts an opposite effect in dronedarone's toxicity, comparing to CYP3A4, 3A5, or 2D6. We also studied the involvement of topoisomerase II in dronedarone-induced toxicity, and demonstrated that the overexpression of topoisomerase II caused an increase in cell viability and a decrease in γ-H2A.X induction, suggesting that suppression of topoisomerase II may be one of the mechanisms involved in dronedarone-induced liver toxicity.

Effect of dronedarone on the pharmacokinetics of carvedilol following oral administration to rats

Dronedarone is a CYP2D6 inhibitor; therefore, it is prudent to exercise caution when concurrently administering CYP2D6-metabolized β-blockers because of a lack of published data on potential drug interactions. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of dronedarone on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered carvedilol in rats. Twenty male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into two groups and 10mg/kg carvedilol was administered to the rat with or without dronedarone pretreatment in a parallel design. Blood samples were collected before and after 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24h of drug administration. The plasma concentration of carvedilol was determined using LC-MS/MS. The systemic exposure to carvedilol was significantly increased and elimination of carvedilol was significantly decreased in the dronedarone-pretreated rats than in the vehicle-pretreated rats. The one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination was sufficient to explain the pharmacokinetic characters after single oral administration of carvedilol to both vehicle-pretreated and dronedarone-pretreated rats. This study suggests that dronedarone inhibits CYP2D6-mediated carvedilol metabolism, and dose adjustment is needed in carvedilol and dronedarone combination therapy. Further studies are needed to clarify the effect of dronedarone on carvedilol and CYP2D6 substrates in clinical use.

The use of dronedarone for recurrent ventricular tachycardia: a case report and review of the literature

Background

Dronedarone is a benzofuran derivative resembling amiodarone that was intended to reduce the iodine-associated tissue deposition and organ toxicity seen with the latter. The utility of dronedarone for patients with ventricular arrhythmias has not been thoroughly evaluated. We present our experience with its use to treat refractory ventricular tachycardia storm and review the literature.

Case presentation

An 85 year-old gentleman with multiple medical comorbidities including ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with severe biventricular systolic dysfunction presented with ventricular tachycardia storm. Therapeutic options were limited given his frail medical status, failures of sotalol, mexilitine, and catheter ablation therapies along with drug-toxicities from amiodarone. Dronedarone was thus considered as off-label use following informed consent. The patient unfortunately developed fatal multisystem organ failure including acute severe hepatotoxicity from dronedarone.

Conclusion

Novel therapies for drug-refractory ventricular arrhythmias are long overdue given the limitations of available pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic options. Off-label use of antiarrhythmic agents such as dronedarone is considered a treatment of last-resort in patients who otherwise have no therapeutic options. Given the paucity of reported cases regarding dronedarone for the treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, no conclusive recommendations can be made at this time aside from words of caution. Despite the potential ventricular antiarrhythmic effects of dronedarone, careful patient evaluation is required to identify those at greatest risk of drug-related adverse events particularly in those patients with significant comorbidities such as advanced hepatic, renal, and cardiovascular disease.

Dronedarone: Basic Pharmacology and Clinical Use

Dronedarone is the newest antiarrhythmic drug approved for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with nonpermanent atrial fibrillation (AF). It is a multi-channel blocker with diverse electrophysiologic properties. Dronedarone decreases the incidence of AF recurrence and the ventricular rate during recurrence. Dronedarone decreases rates of cardiovascular hospitalizations in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. Dronedarone increases mortality in patients with permanent AF and those with moderate-severe heart failure, and should thus be avoided in these populations. Dronedarone is less effective than amiodarone but also has less toxicity. Direct comparison with other antiarrhythmic drugs is not available.

The combined effects of ranolazine and dronedarone on human atrial and ventricular electrophysiology

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacological rhythm control of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with structural heart disease is limited. Ranolazine in combination with low dose dronedarone remarkably reduced AF-burden in the phase II HARMONY trial. We thus aimed to investigate the possible mechanisms underlying these results.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patch clamp experiments revealed that ranolazine (5μM), low-dose dronedarone (0.3μM), and the combination significantly prolonged action potential duration (APD90) in atrial myocytes from patients in sinus rhythm (prolongation by 23.5±0.1%, 31.7±0.1% and 25.6±0.1% respectively). Most importantly, in atrial myocytes from patients with AF ranolazine alone, but more the combination with dronedarone, also prolonged the typically abbreviated APD90 (prolongation by 21.6±0.1% and 31.9±0.1% respectively). It was clearly observed that neither ranolazine, dronedarone nor the combination significantly changed the APD or contractility and twitch force in ventricular myocytes or trabeculae from patients with heart failure (HF). Interestingly ranolazine, and more so the combination, but not dronedarone alone, caused hyperpolarization of the resting membrane potential in cardiomyocytes from AF. As measured by confocal microscopy (Fluo-3), ranolazine, dronedarone and the combination significantly suppressed diastolic sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+) leak in myocytes from sinus rhythm (reduction by ranolazine: 89.0±30.7%, dronedarone: 75.6±27.4% and combination: 78.0±27.2%), in myocytes from AF (reduction by ranolazine: 67.6±33.7%, dronedarone: 86.5±31.7% and combination: 81.0±33.3%), as well as in myocytes from HF (reduction by ranolazine: 64.8±26.5% and dronedarone: 65.9±29.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Electrophysiological measurements during exposure to ranolazine alone or in combination with low-dose dronedarone showed APD prolongation, cellular hyperpolarization and reduced SR Ca(2+) leak in human atrial myocytes. The combined inhibitory effects on various currents, in particular Na(+) and K(+) currents, may explain the anti-AF effects observed in the HARMONY trial. Therefore, the combination of ranolazine and dronedarone, but also ranolazine alone, may be promising new treatment options for AF, especially in patients with HF, and merit further clinical investigation.

Concomitant use of dronedarone with dabigatran in patients with atrial fibrillation in clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

Dronedarone is a strong P-glycoprotein inhibitor with a potential to increase bioavailability of dabigatran. We sought to measure and report plasma concentrations of dabigatran in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on concomitant dronedarone treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort of 33 patients (mean age 64 years, 16 men) concomitantly treated with dabigatran at a dose of 110 mg twice a day (bid) and dronedarone at a dose of 400mg bid at the discretion of the patient's cardiologist were followed prospectively.

RESULTS

Median trough plasma concentration of dabigatran at one week and one month after the concomitant treatment start was 102.0 (range 8-251) ng/ml and 84 (range 27-302) ng/ml respectively. Median treatment length was 13 (range 1-21) months. There was one major bleeding event (2,8% per patient-year) and no thrombotic events during a total of 35.5 patient-years.

CONCLUSIONS

Median trough plasma concentration of dabigatran in our study was observed to be similar to median trough plasma concentration of dabigatran at a dose of 150 mg bid without concomitant dronedarone in earlier studies with low reported rate of bleeding and thrombosis. Since concomitant treatment offers potential benefits to patients with AF, larger future trials that might refute the current contraindication are warranted.

Structural basis of drugs that increase cardiac inward rectifier Kir2.1 currents

AIMS

We hypothesize that some drugs, besides flecainide, increase the inward rectifier current (IK1) generated by Kir2.1 homotetramers (IKir2.1) and thus, exhibit pro- and/or antiarrhythmic effects particularly at the ventricular level. To test this hypothesis, we analysed the effects of propafenone, atenolol, dronedarone, and timolol on Kir2.x channels.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Currents were recorded with the patch-clamp technique using whole-cell, inside-out, and cell-attached configurations. Propafenone (0.1 nM-1 µM) did not modify either IK1 recorded in human right atrial myocytes or the current generated by homo- or heterotetramers of Kir2.2 and 2.3 channels recorded in transiently transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells. On the other hand, propafenone increased IKir2.1 (EC50 = 12.0 ± 3.0 nM) as a consequence of its interaction with Cys311, an effect which decreased inward rectification of the current. Propafenone significantly increased mean open time and opening frequency at all the voltages tested, resulting in a significant increase of the mean open probability of the channel. Timolol, which interacted with Cys311, was also able to increase IKir2.1. On the contrary, neither atenolol nor dronedarone modified IKir2.1. Molecular modelling of the Kir2.1-drugs interaction allowed identification of the pharmacophore of drugs that increase IKir2.1.

CONCLUSIONS

Kir2.1 channels exhibit a binding site determined by Cys311 that is responsible for drug-induced IKir2.1 increase. Drug binding decreases channel affinity for polyamines and current rectification, and can be a mechanism of drug-induced pro- and antiarrhythmic effects not considered until now.

Marked prolongation of QRS duration after initiation of dronedarone therapy

Dronedarone is a relatively new antiarrhythmic drug and is held to be less proarrhythmic than comparable compounds, although its proarrhythmia potential in humans has not been sufficiently evaluated. We describe a so far unreported dronedarone effect, namely a significant alteration of both the morphology and the duration of the QRS complex on the electro cardiogram in a 41-year old patient with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Hepatic toxicity of dronedarone in mice: role of mitochondrial β-oxidation

Dronedarone is an amiodarone-like antiarrhythmic drug associated with severe liver injury. Since dronedarone inhibits mitochondrial respiration and β-oxidation in vitro, mitochondrial toxicity may also explain dronedarone-associated hepatotoxicity in vivo. We therefore studied hepatotoxicity of dronedarone (200mg/kg/day for 2 weeks or 400mg/kg/day for 1 week by intragastric gavage) in heterozygous juvenile visceral steatosis (jvs(+/-)) and wild-type mice. Jvs(+/-) mice have reduced carnitine stores and are sensitive for mitochondrial β-oxidation inhibitors. Treatment with dronedarone 200mg/kg/day had no effect on body weight, serum transaminases and bilirubin, and hepatic mitochondrial function in both wild-type and jvs(+/-) mice. In contrast, dronedarone 400mg/kg/day was associated with a 10-15% drop in body weight, and a 3-5-fold increase in transaminases and bilirubin in wild-type mice and, more accentuated, in jvs(+/-) mice. In vivo metabolism of intraperitoneal (14)C-palmitate was impaired in wild-type, and, more accentuated, in jvs(+/-) mice treated with 400mg/kg/day dronedarone compared to vehicle-treated mice. Impaired β-oxidation was also found in isolated mitochondria ex vivo. A likely explanation for these findings was a reduced activity of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1a in liver mitochondria from dronedarone-treated mice. In contrast, dronedarone did not affect the activity of the respiratory chain ex vivo. We conclude that dronedarone inhibits mitochondrial β-oxidation in and ex vivo, but not the respiratory chain. Jvs(+/-) mice are slightly more sensitive for the effect of dronedarone on mitochondrial β-oxidation than wild-type mice. The results suggest that inhibition of mitochondrial β-oxidation is an important mechanism of hepatotoxicity associated with dronedarone.

Reversible acute kidney injury requiring haemodialysis five days after starting dronedarone in a stable 71-year-old man at risk of cardiovascular polypharmacy

We present a case of severe acute kidney injury (AKI) occurring shortly after the initiation of dronedarone therapy, which we suspect was the result of an adverse drug reaction. The mechanism of AKI cannot be definitively determined. The most probable mechanism however involves dehydration secondary to diarrhoea, and medications causing hypotension, both precipitating AKI, further exacerbated by reduced excretion of medications reducing tissue perfusion. This case adds to the growing number of reports submitted to pharmacovigilance authorities regarding the association between dronedarone and AKI. It serves as a reminder of the risks of cardiovascular polypharmacy likely to be prevalent in patients considered for dronedarone (which causes diarrhoea as a common side-effect).

Risk of Cardiovascular Events, Stroke, Congestive Heart Failure, Interstitial Lung Disease, and Acute Liver Injury: Dronedarone versus Amiodarone and Other Antiarrhythmics

No published studies have evaluated the risks of cardiovascular (CV) events, stroke, congestive heart failure (CHF), interstitial lung disease (ILD), and severe acute liver injury (ALI) related to antiarrhythmics treatment in real-world clinical practice setting. We examined the relationship between the above events and the selected antiarrhythmics in the real-world setting in the US. Using a retrospective cohort design, the hazard ratios of the outcome events were analyzed from 10,455 adult patients with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter and a new treatment with dronedarone (comparison drug), amiodarone, sotalol, flecainide, or propafenone between 07/20/2009 and 12/31/2010 from the Clinformatics Data MartTM database. The patients were followed until: 1) switch to another antiarrhythmic drug, 2) occurrence of the outcome event, 3) end of enrollment, or 4) end of the study period, whichever occurred first. No significant differences were observed in the hazard ratios of the outcome events between dronedarone, amiodarone, and the other antiarrhythmics, except that amiodarone was associated with a higher risk of CV events (adjusted HR = 1.7, 95%CI: 1.1-2.4) and stroke (adjusted HR = 2.0, 95%CI: 1.33.2), compared to dronedarone, especially amongst patients without a CHF history (adjusted HR = 2.4, 95%CI: 1.4-3.8 and 2.2, 95%CI: 1.23.9). A higher risk of CHF was also associated with amiodarone in patients without history of CHF at baseline (adjusted HR = 2.7, 95%CI: 2.03.6). In this real-world investigation, no difference in risk was observed between dronedarone, sotalol, and propafenone initiators for CV events, stroke, CHF, ILD, and ALI. Amiodarone was associated with higher risks of CV events, stroke, and CHF than dronedarone in patients without a CHF history, indicating dronedarone could be an alternative therapy option with lower risk of CV events than amiodarone for the above patients.

Effect of dronedarone on clinical end points in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary heart disease: insights from the ATHENA trial

AIMS

This study aimed to assess safety and cardiovascular outcomes of dronedarone in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) with coronary heart disease (CHD). Coronary heart disease is prevalent among AF patients and limits antiarrhythmic drug use because of their potentially life-threatening ventricular proarrhythmic effects.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This post hoc analysis evaluated 1405 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF and CHD from the ATHENA trial. Follow-up lasted 2.5 years, during which patients received either dronedarone (400 mg twice daily) or a double-blind matching placebo. Primary outcome was time to first cardiovascular hospitalization or death due to any cause. Secondary end points included first hospitalization due to cardiovascular events. The primary outcome occurred in 350 of 737 (47%) placebo patients vs. 252 of 668 (38%) dronedarone patients [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.62-0.86; P = 0.0002] without a significant increase in number of adverse events. In addition, 42 of 668 patients receiving dronedarone suffered from a first acute coronary syndrome compared with 67 of 737 patients from the placebo group (HR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.46-0.99; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

In this post hoc analysis, dronedarone on top of standard care in AF patients with CHD reduced cardiovascular hospitalization or death similar to that in the overall ATHENA population, and reduced a first acute coronary syndrome. Importantly, the safety profile in this subpopulation was also similar to that of the overall ATHENA population, with no excess in proarrhythmias. The mechanism of the cardiovascular protective effects is unclear and warrants further investigation.

Efficacy and safety profile of dronedarone in clinical practice. Results of the Magdeburg Dronedarone Registry (MADRE study)

BACKGROUND

Dronedarone is a new antiarrhythmic agent that has only recently been approved for the therapy of atrial fibrillation (AF). Results regarding a broader spectrum of patients and experience accumulated in clinical practice are still very scarce. Therefore, we prospectively investigated the efficacy and tolerance of dronedarone in a real life setting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study included 191 patients (85 women) aged 63 ± 9.9 years with a history of paroxysmal or persistent AF. Follow-up time was 14.3 ± 4.9 months. In patients with persistent AF, sinus rhythm was restored using electrical cardioversion prior to dronedarone administration. Each patient underwent standard ECG on a daily basis during the first 4 days of treatment, and on days 7, 30 and 90, resp. After that, the patients had a follow-up visit every three months. Creatinine, creatine kinase, and hepatic enzymes were closely monitored. Clinical history was meticulously taken at multiple follow-up visits. Dronedarone maintained sinus rhythm in 33.5% (95% CI: 27%-40%), and AF recurrence rate was high: 66.5% (95% CI: 60%-73%). Adverse effects occurred in 31.9% (95% CI: 27%-38%) of the patients and necessitated permanent discontinuation of dronedarone in 22% (95% CI: 17%-27%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that dronedarone may not be superior to available antiarrhythmic agents and caution against its use as a first line therapy in AF.

Dronedarone for recurrent ventricular tachycardia: a real alternative?

Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an important cause of morbidity and sudden death in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Although ICD effectively terminate VT episodes and improve survival, shocks reduce quality of life, and episodes of VT predict increased risk of heart failure and death despite effective therapy. Patients suffering recurrent VT episodes remain a challenge. Antiarrhytmic therapy reduces VT episodes, but it is associated with serious adverse events, and disappointing efficacy. Catheter ablation has emerged as an important option to control recurrent VT, but major procedure-related complications, and even death, are still issues to concern. And even with these armamentaria, some patients still have recurrent VT episodes and ICD shocks. We report on a patient with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and recurrent ventricular tachycardia resistant to multiple antiarrhytmic agents, in whom dronedarone was effective in completely suppressing ventricular tachycardia episodes.