En bloc resection of bladder tumour: the rebirth of past through reminiscence

PURPOSE

To learn about the history and development of en bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT), and to discuss its future directions in managing bladder cancer.

METHODS

In this narrative review, we summarised the history and early development of ERBT, previous attempts in overcoming the tumour size limitation, consolidative effort in standardising the ERBT procedure, emerging evidence in ERBT, evolving concepts in treating large bladder tumours, and the future directions of ERBT.

RESULTS

Since the first report on ERBT in 1980, there has been tremendous advancement in terms of its technique, energy modalities and tumour retrieval methods. In 2020, the international consensus statement on ERBT has been developed and it serves as a standard reference for urologists to practise ERBT. Recently, high-quality evidence on ERBT has been emerging. Of note, the EB-StaR study showed that ERBT led to a reduction in 1-year recurrence rate from 38.1 to 28.5%. An individual patient data meta-analysis is currently underway, and it will be instrumental in defining the true value of ERBT in treating non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. For large bladder tumours, modified approaches of ERBT should be accepted, as the quality of resection is more important than a mere removal of tumour in one piece. The global ERBT registry has been launched to study the value of ERBT in a real-world setting.

CONCLUSION

ERBT is a promising surgical technique in treating bladder cancer and it has gained increasing interest globally. It is about time for us to embrace this technique in our clinical practice.

How do endoscopic bladder tumor resection techniques affect pathology practice? EAU Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Uropathology (ESUP) survey

PURPOSE

We aimed to examine how different endoscopic bladder tumor resection techniques affect pathologists' clinical practice patterns.

METHODS

An online survey including 28 questions clustered in four main sections was prepared by the ESUT ERBT Working Group and released to the pathologists working in the institutions of experts of the ESUT Board and the working groups and experts in the uropathology working group. A descriptive analysis was performed using the collected data.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight pathologists from 23 countries responded to the survey. 37.3% of the participants stated that they always report the T1 sub-staging. Of those who gave sub-staging, 61.3% used T1a, b. 85.2% think that en bloc samples provide spatial orientation faster than piecemeal samples, and 60% think en bloc samples are timesaving during an inspection. 55.7% stated that whether the tissue sample is en bloc or piecemeal is essential. 57.4% think en bloc sample reduces turnaround time and is cost-effective for 44.1%. A large number of pathologists find that the pathology examination of piecemeal samples has a longer learning curve.

CONCLUSION

The survey shows that pathologists think that they can diagnose faster, accurately, and cost-effectively with ERBT samples, but they do not often encounter them in practice. Moreover, en bloc samples may be a better choice in pathology resident training. Evidence from real-life observational pathology practice and clinical research can reveal the current situation more clearly and increase awareness on proper treatment in endoscopic management of bladder tumors.

Transurethral en bloc resection of a bladder perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa): a case report

BACKGROUND

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) is a mesenchymal tumor with distinct histologic and immunologic features. PEComas that originate in the bladder are extremely rare clinically, with only 35 cases reported in the English literature thus far. Here, we report a case of bladder PEComa resection by transurethral en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT).

CASE PRESENTATION

A 66-year-old female with a history of poorly controlled type 2 diabetes with associated complications of frequent urinary tract infections presented to our hospital for a routine physical examination. Outpatient ultrasound examination revealed a strong echogenic mass of approximately 1.5 × 1.3 × 1.3 cm in size on the posterior wall of the bladder. The enhanced computed tomography and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging after admission both suggested a well-defined isolated nodular mass on the posterior wall of the bladder with significant enhancement on the enhanced scan. The tumor was successfully and completely resected by ERBT. Postoperative pathological examination and immunohistochemical results confirmed the mass was a bladder PEComa. No tumor recurrence was observed in the six-month postoperative follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Bladder PEComa is an extremely rare mesenchymal tumor of the urinary system. When imaging and cystoscopy reveal a nodular mass with an abundant blood supply in the bladder, PEComa should be included in the differential diagnosis of bladder tumors. Surgical resection is currently the primary option for the treatment of bladder PEComa. For a solitary, pedunculated, narrow-based, small-sized bladder PEComa, resection of the tumor by ERBT was a safe and feasible approach in our patient and may be considered for similar cases in the future.

En bloc resection of bladder tumors: challenges and unmet needs in 2021

Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer accounts for the majority of new bladder cancer diagnoses, and endoscopic transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) represents the standard-of-care. Although a relatively safe and common procedure, TURBT is often hampered by the questionable quality of resection. The evolution of surgical techniques has brought en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) to the forefront. ERBT has emerged as an alternative to conventional TURBT, incorporating a more delicate en bloc sculpting and tumor excision, in contrast to 'piecemeal' resection by conventional TURBT. ERBT appears safe, feasible and effective with demonstrably higher rates of detrusor muscle in the pathologic specimen, all while providing better staging and obviating the need for a re-TURBT in selected patients. However, the method's adoption in the field is still limited. This review summarizes the recent evidence relevant to ERBT while further highlighting the technique's limitations and unmet needs.

[Safety and efficacy of en bloc vs. conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors: a meta-analysis and systematic review]

BACKGROUND

En bloc tumor resection of bladder tumors (ERBT) is a novel alternative procedure to conventional resection of bladder tumor (cTURBT), which might help to address common problems of the standard method, such as inadequate detrusor muscle in specimens, high re-resection rates and high recurrence rates.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze current data on ERBT in efficacy and safety compared to cTURBT.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed.

STUDY SELECTION

Two independent authors identified trials based on keywords and inclusion criteria. A third author was consulted in case of discrepancies. Screening keywords: ERBT, en bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor, TURBT en bloc. A meta-analysis of 13 studies was performed. The effect size was estimated based on odds ratios and mean differences including their corresponding two-sided 95% confidence intervals.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The analyzed studies comprised a homogenous collective in terms of tumor size, tumor multiplicity and tumor stage. Operation time did not significantly differ between the methods. Differences were observed in hospitalization and catheterization time in favor of ERBT. Reported complications did not show clear differences. There was significantly more detrusor muscle in the specimens in the ERBT group. No significant differences were found in recurrence up to 2 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

ERBT is a safe alternative to conventional TURBT with promising features regarding effective resection of detrusor muscle. More standardized data on recurrence rates, different resection modalities and resection margin results are needed.

En bloc resection, is this the future of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer management? Presentation of our technique and brief review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The quality of the initial transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) plays a key role in accurate local staging thus affecting treatment decision-making and disease prognosis. TURBT is still the gold standard for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, en bloc resection of bladder tumors (ERBT) gradually expanded as a promising alternative to TURBT, aiming to overcome certain inherent limitations of conventional resection. We hereby describe a step-by-step bipolar ERBT technique and briefly review the current trends surrounding the role of various en bloc techniques in the field.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 65-year old patient undergoing bipolar ERBT for a single, approximately 2 cm, papillary bladder mass. An experienced urologist completed the procedure within 17 min and without any intra- or postoperative complications. No conversion to TURBT was needed, and an adequate specimen for histological assessment was obtained. The patient made an uneventful recovery, and no recurrence was noted at 12-months.

CONCLUSION

Our initial experience demonstrates that ERBT via bipolar current is relatively quick, safe, and reliable. Prospective comparative clinical trials will examine its efficacy, and long-term oncological superiority in managing NMIBC.

En-bloc resection of bladder tumour as primary treatment for patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: routine implementation in a multi-centre setting

PURPOSE

To investigate the technical success rate and 30-day complications of en-bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT) upon routine implementation regardless of tumour size.

METHODS

This is a prospective, multi-centre, study on routine implementation of ERBT for patients with bladder tumours requiring transurethral surgery. Surgeons were allowed to cross over to conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) when necessary. We performed an analysis for patients who had ERBT/TURBT as the definitive treatment. Study outcomes included the technical success rate of ERBT and 30-day complication rate. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate for predictors of a successful ERBT and factors associated with 30-day complications.

RESULTS

A total of 135 patients were included in this study. The majority of the patients (80.0%) had bladder tumours of ≤ 3 cm. ERBT was successful in 99 patients, resulting in an overall technical success rate of 73.3%. When stratified according to tumour size, the technical success rates of ERBT were 94.3%, 82.2%, 75%, 84.3% and 29.6% for bladder tumour sizes of < 1 cm, 1.01-2 cm, 2.01-3 cm, ≤ 3 cm and > 3 cm respectively. Upon multivariate analysis, tumour size was the only significant factor predicting the success of ERBT (OR 0.920, 95% CI 0.882-0.960, p < 0.001). Moreover, ERBT was not a significant factor associated with 30-day complications.

CONCLUSION

EBRT achieved a good technical success rate for the majority of patients with bladder tumours ≤ 3 cm. Regardless of tumour size, EBRT-first approach was safe to implement into routine clinical practice.

Bicentric Retrospective Analysis of en Bloc Resection and Muscularis Mucosae Detection Rate in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Tumors: A Real-World Scenario

Introduction

For risk stratification of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), the depth of stromal invasion can be further classified, where the lamina muscularis mucosae (MM) serves as a reference structure. While the overall identifiability of MM in standard transurethral specimens is low, en bloc resection may help in identification and overall orientation. The aims of this study were to report the detection rate of MM in en bloc resected bladder tumors (ERBT) and to provide real-world information on tissue stability and preservation of en bloc architecture during recovery and processing for histopathologic evaluation.

Methods

Thirty-four ERBT specimens were histologically re-evaluated with regard to MM detectability and structure as well as the presence of en bloc architecture and further histologic features. Associations with tumor size and energy source and within histologic parameters were assessed by standard Pearson's chi-squared analyses and Cramér’s V effect size testing (V).

Results

The first parameter assessed was MM detection rate. In 19 out of 34 samples (56%) MM was detectable: scattered in 9 cases (26%), interrupted in 8 cases (24%) and continuous in 2 cases (6%). The second parameter assessed was preservation of en bloc architecture. In 11 out of 34 samples (32%), en bloc architecture could not be confirmed, and these samples served as a reference group for the detection of MM. Preservation of en bloc architecture was associated with an increased MM detection rate (MM in en bloc preserved 16/23, 70% vs. non-preserved 3/11, 27%; p = 0.020; V = 0.398) and with tumor size (p = 0.005; V = 0.595). Medium-sized tumors (1.1–2 cm) were best preserved. The choice of energy source did not show relevant association with en bloc architecture (p = n.s.).

Conclusions

In line with recent publications, ERBT increases the MM detection rate considerably. However, a third of the ERBT specimens lost en bloc architecture during sample recovery and processing. Tumor size is a relevant factor, with optimal architecture preservation between 1 and 2 cm. Optimizing resection techniques, recovery, transport, and diagnostic processing of ERBT samples is warranted to verify the diagnostic value of MM-based substaging.