Negativity Spreads More than Positivity on Twitter After Both Positive and Negative Political Situations.
AFFECTIVE SCIENCE 2021;
2:379-390. [PMID:
36043036 PMCID:
PMC9383030 DOI:
10.1007/s42761-021-00057-7]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
What type of emotional language spreads further in political discourses on social media? Previous research has focused on situations that primarily elicited negative emotions, showing that negative language tended to spread further. The current project extends existing knowledge by examining the spread of emotional language in response to both predominantly positive and negative political situations. In Study 1, we examined the spread of emotional language in tweets related to the winning and losing parties in the 2016 US elections, finding that increased negativity (but not positivity) predicted content sharing in both situations. In Study 2, we compared the spread of emotional language in two separate situations: the celebration of the US Supreme Court approval of same-sex marriage (positive) and the Ferguson unrest (negative), finding again that negativity spread further. These results shed light on the nature of political discourse and engagement.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42761-021-00057-7.
Collapse