[Diagnosis and treatment of lipedema in Spain. Results of an online survey]

INTRODUCTION

Lipedema is a chronic and progressive disease. Most studies agree that it is underdiagnosed and undertreated. The aim of this study was to identify the diagnostic characteristics and types of treatment for lipedema in the Spanish population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out through an anonymous 10-item online survey in November- December 2019. The minimum sample size was calculated for a 95% confidence level and 5% margin of error. Information was collected on sociodemographic variables (age, sex, place of residence), diagnostic characteristics and perceived improvement with distinct treatment options.

RESULTS

A total of 463 valid responses were obtained. The mean age at first manifestation was 18.2 (SD: 9.0) years. Onset occurred between the ages of 10 and 19 years in 69% of the patients. It took an average of 19.9 (SD: 10.1) years to receive a diagnosis and 4.9 medical visits. Diagnosis was most frequently made in private clinics by surgeons. Most patients (78.4%) had tried at least three different types of treatment. Weight loss was the most frequent treatment (92%) and compression garments were perceived to be the most effective. Only 34% of respondents had access to financing for compression garments.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, there is no standard treatment for lipedema and patients perceive current treatments to be unsatisfactory. Better knowledge of this entity is needed to allow early diagnosis and provide adequate treatment.

[Online surveys and the false illusion of the large n. On a survey on euthanasia among medical practitioners]

The use of studies based on online surveys has expanded significantly. Despite having particularly small response rates, they allow a large sample size to be easily obtained. However, this strategy may entail a selection bias that significantly compromises the results. The results of two surveys on the regulation of euthanasia and assisted suicide are compared. One is an online survey with a self-selected sample and the other a survey with random sampling, conducted in 2018 among the members of the Medical Association of Bizkaia. The response rates were 10.4% (online survey) and 87.8% (random survey). No differences were found in sociodemographic characteristics, although there were differences in the opinion variables, so that the percentage of people who opposed euthanasia regulation was overestimated. The results of this study show that this sampling strategy generates biases in the results, some of which are difficult both to detect and to repair.