Comparison of the clinical outcomes of VBE-TLIF versus MIS-TLIF for single-level degenerative lumbar diseases

OBJECTIVE

This research aims to compare the clinical outcomes of VBE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF for the treatment of patients with single-level degenerative lumbar diseases.

METHODS

Ninety patients were enrolled in this study. The estimated blood loss, operation time, postoperative hospitalization days, time to functional exercise, amount of surgical drain and inflammatory index were recorded. The visual analog scale, Oswestry dysfunction index and modified MacNab criteria were used to assessed the patient's back and leg pain, functional status and clinical satisfaction rates.

RESULTS

The average operation time of the VBE-TLIF group was longer than that of the MIS-TLIF group. The time for functional exercise, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss and amount of surgical drain in the VBE-TLIF group were relative shorter than those in the MIS-TLIF group. Additionally, the levels of CRP, neutrophil, IL-6 and CPK in the VBE-TLIF group were significantly lower than those in the MIS-TLIF group at postoperative days 1 and 3, respectively (P < 0.001). Patients undergoing VBE-TLIF had significantly lower back VAS scores than those in the MIS-TLIF group on postoperative days 1 and 3 (P < 0.001). No significant differences were found in the clinical satisfaction rates (95.83 vs. 95.24%, P = 0.458) or interbody fusion rate (97.92 vs. 95.24%, P = 0.730) between these two surgical procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Both VBE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF are safe and effective surgical procedures for patients with lumbar diseases, but VBE-TLIF technique is a preferred surgical procedure with merits of reduced surgical trauma and quicker recovery.

Unintended dural tears during unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar surgery: incidence and risk factors

BACKGROUND

An unintended dural tear (DT) is the most common intraoperative complication of lumbar spine surgery. The unilateral biportal endoscopic technique (UBE) has become increasingly popular for treating various degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine; however, the DT incidence and risk factors specific to UBE remain undetermined. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of DTs in UBE.

METHOD

Data from all patients who underwent UBE for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases from November 2018 to December 2021 at our institution were used to assess the effects of demographics, diagnosis, and type of surgery on unintended DT risk.

RESULTS

Overall, 24/608 patients (3.95%) experienced DTs and were treated with primary suture repair or bed rest. Although several patients experienced mild symptoms of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, no serious postoperative sequelae such as nerve root entrapment, meningitis, or intracranial hemorrhage occurred. Additionally, no significant correlations were identified between DT and sex (P = 0.882), body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.758), smoking status (P = 0.506), diabetes (P = 0.672), hypertension (P = 0.187), or surgeon experience (P = 0.442). However, older patients were more likely to experience DT than younger patients (P = 0.034), and patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) were more likely to experience DT than patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) (P = 0.035). Additionally, DT was more common in revision versus primary surgery (P < 0.0001) and in unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus unilateral decompression (P = 0.031). Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age, LSS, ULBD, and revision surgery were significant risk factors for DT.

CONCLUSIONS

In this UBE cohort, we found that the incidence of DT was 3.95%. Additionally, older age, LSS, ULBD, and revision surgery significantly increased the risk of DT in UBE surgery.

Full Endoscopic Spine Surgery with Image-Guided Navigation System as "Hybrid Endoscopic Spine Surgery": A Narrative Review

Endoscopic surgery is adopted as a minimally invasive technique in several surgical fields. Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) was performed initially for lumbar discectomy but is currently widely utilized for various pathologies. Similar to other endoscopic techniques, ESS has a steep learning curve that has recently been a topic of discussion. Image-guided navigation systems have been developed for spine surgery. Intraoperative computed tomography enables the use of an image-guided navigation system in ESS, which is a suitable approach for managing complex lesions. Full-ESS is currently being adopted for certain cervical pathologies, and the incorporation of an image-guided navigation system will soon enable surgery for other cervical pathologies.

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by a novel two-medium compatible bichannel endoscopy system, technique note and preliminary clinical results

PURPOSE

Our team designed a novel two-medium compatible bichannel endoscopy system for spinal surgery, V-shape bichannel endoscopy (VBE) system. Hereby, this study will introduce minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with VBE system and report its preliminary clinical results.

METHODS

Fifty-two participants, who accepted VBE-assisted TLIF surgery (VBE-TLIF) in our hospital were included in this study. The duration of operation, off-bed time, and days of hospitalization were recorded. Besides, the patient's preoperative and postoperative pain were evaluated via visual analog scale (VAS), the functional status was evaluated via Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) and modified MacNab criteria. Patients were asked to follow-up in the outpatient department at the 3rd, 6th, 12th, and 24th month after surgery. X-ray or CT was examined to evaluate the internal fixation position and interbody fusion result.

RESULTS

All patients received unilateral decompression with an average operation duration of 178.49 ± 27.49 min. After the surgery, their VAS score of leg pain and back pain reduced significantly. At the last follow-up, the VAS score of leg pain and back pain was 0.80 ± 0.69 and 0.86 ± 0.75 separately. The difference shows statistically significant with p < 0.05. At the last follow-up, the ODI was 15.20 ± 5.75. According to modified MacNab criteria, 39 patients rated their function as excellent, and 10 patients were good. The overall satisfaction rate reached 94%.

CONCLUSION

The VBE system reported in the current study can complete TLIF surgery safely and effectively.

Surgical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic thoracic decompression in the treatment of multi-segment thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated satisfactory outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic thoracic decompression (PETD) for single-segment thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (TOLF). However, the clinical outcomes of PETD in patients with multi-segment TOLF (mTOLF) remain unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PETD for patients with multi-segment mTOLF.

METHODS

Eighteen consecutive patients (41 segments) with mTOLF were treated with PETD between January 2020 and December 2021. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS), whereas radiographic parameters were measured by cross-section area of the spinal canal and anteroposterior diameter of the spinal cord.

RESULTS

The follow-up period ranged from 14 to 34 months. The mean operation time and blood loss were 154.06 ± 32.14 min and 61.72 ± 12.72 ml, respectively. Hospital stay after first-stage operation was 10.89 ± 2.42 days. The mJOA score and VAS score significantly improved at the final follow-up, with a mean mJOA recovery rate of 63.3 ± 21.90%. The incidence of complications was 12.2% per level. The radiographic outcomes showed adequate decompression of the spinal cord.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates that PETD is effective and safe as a minimally invasive procedure to treat patients with mTOLF. All patients showed relief of their symptoms and improvement in neurological function.

Will ChatGPT/GPT-4 be a Lighthouse to Guide Spinal Surgeons?

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly ChatGPT/GPT-4, has led to advancements in various fields, including healthcare. This study explores the prospective role of ChatGPT/GPT-4 in various facets of spinal surgical practice, especially in supporting spinal surgeons during the perioperative management of endoscopic spinal surgery for patients with lumbar disc herniation. The AI-driven chatbot can facilitate communication between spinal surgeons, patients, and their relatives, streamline the collection and analysis of patient data, and contribute to the surgical planning process. Furthermore, ChatGPT/GPT-4 may enhance intraoperative support by providing real-time surgical navigation information and physiological parameter monitoring, as well as aiding in postoperative rehabilitation guidance. However, the appropriate and supervised use of ChatGPT/GPT-4 is essential, considering the potential risks associated with data security and privacy. The study concludes that ChatGPT/GPT-4 can serve as a valuable lighthouse for spinal surgeons if used correctly and responsibly.

Minimally invasive trans-superior articular process percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy with robot assistance

BACKGROUND

To compare the clinical outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation treated with robot-assisted percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (r-PELD) or conventional PELD under fluoroscopy guidance (f-PELD).

METHODS

Our study group included 55 patients, 22 in the r-PELD group and 33 in the f-PELD group. The following clinical and surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups: the visual analog scale for radiculopathy pain; Oswestry Disability Index; intraoperative volume of blood loss; frequency of fluoroscopy used during the procedure; and MacNab classification. The follow-up period was 6-8 months.

RESULTS

Compared with f-PELD, r-PELD was associated with a lower volume of intraoperative blood loss and frequency of fluoroscopy (p < 0.01). There were no differences in complications, MacNab classification, postoperative disability and leg pain, and duration of hospitalization between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, r-PELD provides a safe and effective alternative to conventional PELD for the treatment of lumbar disc herniations, with the accuracy for placement of punctures lowering radiation exposure.

Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy for Decompression of Extraforaminal Stenosis at the Lumbosacral Junction: Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes

Objective

The aims of this study were to describe the unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique for decompression of extraforaminal stenosis at L5–S1 and evaluate 1-year clinical outcomes. Especially, we evaluated compression factors of extraforaminal stenosis at L5–S1 and described the surgical technique for decompression in detail.

Methods

Thirty-five patients who underwent UBE decompression for extraforaminal stenosis at L5–S1 between March 2018 and February 2019 were enrolled. Clinical results were analyzed using the MacNab criteria, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Compression factors evaluated pseudoarthrosis within the transverse process of L5 and ala of sacrum, disc bulging with or without osteophytes, and the thickened lumbosacral and extraforaminal ligament.

Results

The mean back VAS was 3.7±1.8 before surgery, which dropped to 2.3±0.8 at 1-year postoperative follow-up (p<0.001). There was a significant drop in postoperative mean VAS for leg pain from 7.2±1.1 to 2.3±1.2 at 1 year (p<0.001). The ODI was 61.5 before surgery and 28.6 (p<0.001). Pseudoarthrosis between the transverse process and the ala was noted in all cases (35 of 35, 100%). Pure disc bulging was seen in 12 patients (34.3%), and disc bulging with osteophytes was demonstrated in 23 patients. The thickened lumbosacral and extraforaminal ligament were identified in 19 cases (51.4%). No complications occurred in any of the patients.

Conclusion

In the current study, good surgical outcomes without complications were achieved after UBE decompression for extraforaminal stenosis at L5–S1.

Morphological analysis of Kambin's triangle using 3D CT/MRI fusion imaging of lumbar nerve root created automatically with artificial intelligence

PURPOSE

We developed a software program that automatically extracts a three-dimensional (3D) lumbar nerve root image from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lumbar nerve volume data using artificial intelligence. The aim of this study is to evaluate the morphology of Kambin's triangle in three dimensions based on an actual endoscopic transforaminal surgical approach using three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT)/ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion images of the lumbar spine and nerve tissue.

METHODS

Three-dimensional lumbar spine/nerve images of 100 patients (31 males and 69 females; mean age, 66.8 years) were used to evaluate the relationship between the superior articular process (SAP), exiting nerve root (ENR), and dural canal at the L2/3, L3/4, and L4/5 levels at 45° and 60° approach angles.

RESULTS

The SAP-ENR distance at 60° was the greatest at L4/5 and was significantly greater at L2/3 and L4/5 than at L3/4 (P < 0.01, P < 0.01, respectively). The SAP-ENR distance at 45° was the greatest at L2/3, and it was larger in L2/3 and L4/5 than in L3/4 (P < 0.01, P < 0.01, respectively). The SAP-ENR distances at L4/5 were significantly greater at 60° than at 45° (P < 0.01). The dural canal was located within Kambin's triangle on the plane of the upper endplate of the lower vertebra at L2/3 in 41.5% of the cases and at L3/4 in 14% of the cases at 60° but not at L4/5.

CONCLUSION

The 3D lumbar spine/nerve image enabled a combined assessment of the positional relationship between the SAP, ENR, and dural canal to quantify the safety zone of practical endoscopic spinal surgery using a transforaminal approach. Three-dimensional lumbar spine/nerve images could be useful for examining parameters, including bones and nerves, to ensure the safety of surgery.

Effect of Dorsal Root Ganglion Retraction in Endoscopic Lumbar Decompressive Surgery for Foraminal Pathology: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Interlaminar Contralateral Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy and Discectomy versus Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy and Discectomy

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative dysesthesia (POD) is a common complication in surgery involving foraminal diseases, including lumbar foraminal or extraforaminal herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP). Minimal dorsal root ganglion (DRG) retraction is key to preventing POD. We compared the clinical results, safety, and efficacy between the paraspinal transforaminal approach requiring DRG retraction and the interlaminar contralateral approach without DRG retraction for foraminal and extraforaminal diseases.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed of 50 patients who underwent uniportal transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy and discectomy (TELD) and 50 patients who underwent anuniportal interlaminar contralateral endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy and discectomy (ICELF) because of lumbar foraminal HNP. The operated levels, combined degenerative diseases, postoperative complications, and POD were analyzed. The visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, modified Oswestry Disability Index, and MacNab criteria for evaluating pain disability and response were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the ICELF group (total, n = 7, 14%), there were 5 (10%) and 2 (4%) patients with POD grade 1 and 2, respectively. In the TELD group (total, n = 13, 26%), there were 7 (14%), 5 (10%), and 1 (2%) patients with POD grade 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The overall occurrence rate of grade 2 and greater POD was higher in the TELD group (n = 6, 12%) than in the ICELF group (n = 2, 4%). In the ICELF group, 3 of 9 patients (33%) with combined canal structure deforming diseases had POD, of whom none had POD of grade 2 and greater. In the TELD group, 4 of 7 patients (57%) with combined canal structure deforming diseases had POD, of whom all had POD of grade 2 and greater. Two surgical groups showed favorable clinical outcomes with the visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and MacNab criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Both TELD and ICELF were found to treat foraminal or extraforaminal HNP with good clinical outcomes. ICELF might have a lower POD rate in complicated cases such as adjacent segment disease, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and isthmic spondylolisthesis. This surgical procedure could be an alternative in complicated cases or in patients with an anatomically limited L5-S1 level. However, the procedure is technically challenging to perform.

A matched comparison of outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a 2-year retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Although open lumbar microdiscectomy (OLMD) is considered to be the gold standard method for discectomy, recent progress in endoscopic spinal surgery has increased the popularity of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) for this indication. However, one of the main drawbacks of PELD is incomplete decompression, especially at the start of the surgeon's learning curve. The functional outcomes of PELD and OLMD in patients matched for age, hernia level, and hernia location have not previously been compared.

PURPOSE

To compare OLMD with PELD in terms of the clinical outcome and the time to recovery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, matched cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Data of all patients who underwent elective spinal surgery between January 2015 and June 2017 were extracted from the local database.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical outcomes were assessed using a 0-to-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) for lower back pain (LBP) and leg pain were scored before surgery and at postoperative day 1 and at each follow-up visit (3, 12, and 24 months), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI: 0%-100%), the length of hospital stay, time to resumption of work, recurrence of Lumbar disc herniation, procedure failures, and complications.

METHODS

The participants were matched for age, disc level, and location of the herniated disk (central and paracentral vs. far-lateral). The participants' mean±standard deviation age was 47.09±12.55 (range: 28-70). We compared the various clinical outcomes between the two groups to identify which procedure had better immediate and long-term functional outcomes. The differences in mortality and occurrence of postoperative complications were also compared in patients with PELD versus controls.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were enrolled (29 with PELD and 29 with OLMD). Both groups reported significant reductions in LBP and leg pain (p<0.01) postoperatively and an improvement in the ODI at 24 months postsurgery. The intergroup difference in the VAS for LBP at 1 day and 3 months was statistically significant (1.48 vs. 3.5, and 1.62 vs. 2.72, respectively; p=0.01 and 0.026, respectively) but the intergroup difference in the ODI was not. The mean length of hospital stay and the time to resumption of work were significantly shorter in the PELD group than in the OLMD group (2.55 vs. 3.21 days, and 4.45 vs. 6.62 weeks, respectively; p=0.037 and 0.01, respectively. There were no significant intergroup differences in terms of complications, recurrence, or procedure failures.

CONCLUSIONS

Both PELD and OLMD can provide equivalent, satisfactory outcomes. However, PELD demonstrated several potential advantages, including more rapid recovery and lower LBP early on. Further large-scale, randomized studies with long-term follow-up are now warranted.

Current and Future of Endoscopic Spine Surgery: What are the Common Procedures we Have Now and What Lies Ahead?

The aging population around the world leads to increasing incidence of degenerative spinal conditions. There is a need for a minimally invasive technique in treatment for spinal conditions to meet the medical complexity and comorbidities that comes with aging. Principles of endoscopy are similar to minimally invasive surgery, which is to decrease pressure on soft tissue crushing from prolonged retraction, avoid soft tissue stripping and dissection, and bone and ligamentous preservation for optimal decompression without excessive destruction. Endoscopic spine surgery techniques started slowly in development in the 1970s to 2000s, with a rapid phase of development since the turn of the 21st century with endoscopic solutions developing in cervical, thoracic, and lumbar conditions with increasing complexity in nature of operation. Technological enhancement with progressively supportive literature is pushing boundaries of endoscopy from the early days of soft tissue procedure to current fusion procedures, endoscopic spine surgery techniques is covering more areas of spine than ever previously possible with good clinical results. We present a review on the current techniques available and postulated near future development for endoscopic spine surgery.

Dural Tears in Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Anatomical Location and Management

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rate and anatomical location of dural tears associated with spinal surgery using a percutaneous biportal endoscopic surgery (PBES) technique. We investigated the relationship between dural tears and the type of procedure and type of instrument used.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 643 PBES cases by reviewing the medical records, operative records, and operative videos. Incidental durotomy was identified in 29 cases. We analyzed the size and anatomical location of the dural tears, the surgical instrument that caused the tear, and the technique used to seal the tear.

RESULTS

The dural tear incidence was 4.5% (29 of 643 cases). Tears in the exiting nerve area (2 cases; 6.9%) had mainly been caused by curettage, tears in the thecal sac area (18 cases; 62.1%) were associated with electric drill and forceps use; and tears in the traversing nerve area were associated with the use of a Kerrison punch (9 cases; 31%). Of the 29 cases of dural tear, 12 were treated with in-hospital monitoring and bed rest, 14 were treated with a fibrin sealant, 2 were treated with a nonpenetrating titanium clip, and 1 was converted to microscopic surgery. One case of postoperative meningocele after conservative treatment required endoscopic revision surgery to close the dural tear.

CONCLUSIONS

Most cases of incidental dural tear during PBES were treated with an endoscopic procedure. The incidence of dural tear was no greater than that associated with microscopic surgery. Our management strategy for incidental dural tears during PBES has been shown to be safe and effective.

How I do it? Endoscopic discectomy using a new trocar "Endospine Plus" for lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic spine surgery is a promising minimally invasive technique and use of trocars like Metrx (Neurosurgery 51(5):S129-36, 2002), Destandau (Neurol Res 21:39-42, 1999), and Easy go (Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151:1027‑33, 2009) has revolutionized this field. However, the steep learning curve makes this procedure elusive to many parts of the world.

METHODS

The authors describe the technique of pure endoscopic discectomy using a specialized trocar devised by the senior author "Endospine Plus" which makes the technique easy to learn along with the advantages and complications of the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic lumbar discectomy is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of prolapsed intervertebral disc.

Evolution of Spinal Endoscopic Surgery

Innovations in the development of endoscopic spinal surgery were classified into different generations and reviewed. Future developments and directions for endoscopic spinal surgery were discussed. Surgical therapy for spinal disease has been gradually changing from traditional open surgery to minimally invasive spinal surgery. Recently, endoscopic spinal surgery, which initially was limited to the treatment of soft tissue lesions, has expanded to include other aspects of spinal disease and good clinical results have been reported. As the paradigm of spinal surgery shifts from open surgery to endoscopic surgery, we discussed the evolution of endoscopic spine surgery in our literature review. Through this description, we presented possibilities of future developments and directions in endoscopic spine surgery.

Percutaneous Stenoscopic Lumbar Decompression with Paramedian Approach for Foraminal/Extraforaminal Lesions

The lumbar foramen is affected by different degenerative diseases, including extraforaminal disc herniation, foraminal stenosis (FS), and degenerative or spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. The purpose of this study was to describe percutaneous stenoscopic lumbar decompression with a paramedian approach (para-PSLD) for foraminal/extraforaminal lesions. All operative procedures were performed using a complete uniportal endoscopic instrument system. The para-PSLD can be easily applied to patients with FS and narrow disc space or facet joint hypertrophy. The anatomical view of a para-PSLD is similar to that of a conventional open surgery and allows for good visualization of the foraminal/extraforaminal areas. We suggest that para-PSLD is an alternative and minimally invasive procedure to treat degenerative lumbar foraminal/extraforaminal stenoses.

Endoscopic Rescue Technique for Iatrogenic Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome caused by Sextant Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation System : A Case Report

BACKGROUND

The Sextant percutaneous pedicle screw fixation system is a commonly used technique. In this system, the pedicle screw and the sharp rod are placed through stab incisions. The unique mechanism of action of this system may cause unprecedented adverse effects, such as iatrogenic sacroiliac (SI) joint syndrome.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A patient presented with iatrogenic SI joint syndrome caused by the rod of the Sextant system at the L4-L6 level causing ilium irritation and dynamic SI joint instability. The patient was treated with an endoscopy-based technique. This is the first report of endoscopic treatment for iatrogenic SI joint syndrome as an adverse effect resulting from use of the Sextant system.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons need to be aware of iatrogenic SI joint syndrome using the Sextant system when performing percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. An endoscopy-based technique may be an effective alternative to conventional corrective surgery when treating iatrogenic SI joint syndrome using the Sextant system.

Minimally invasive spinal decompression for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis maintains stability and may avoid the need for fusion

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar stenosis and concurrent degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS), and to determine the effect of this procedure on spinal stability.

Patients and Methods

A total of 304 consecutive patients with single-level lumbar DS with concomitant stenosis underwent microendoscopic laminotomy without fusion between January 2004 and December 2010. Patients were divided into two groups, those with and without advanced DS based on the degree of spondylolisthesis and dynamic instability. A total of 242 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 101 men and 141 women. Their mean age was 68.1 years (46 to 85). Outcome was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire scores, a visual analogue score for pain and the Short Form Health-36 score. The radiographic outcome was assessed by measuring the slip and the disc height. The clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 4.6 years (3 to 7.5).

Results

There were no significant differences in the preoperative measurements between the group and no significant differences between the clinical parameters at the final follow-up. The mean percentage slip was 17.1% preoperatively and 17.7% at the final follow-up (p = 0.35). Progressive instability was noted in 13 patients (8.2%) with DS and 6 patients (7.0%) with advanced DS, respectively (p = 0.81). There was radiological evidence of restabilization of the spine in 30 patients (35%) with preoperative instability. The success rate of microendoscopic laminotomy was good/excellent in 166 (69%), fair in 49 (20%) and poor in 27 patients (11%) in both groups.

Conclusion

Microendoscopic laminotomy is an effective form of surgical treatment for patients with DS and stenosis. Preservation of the stabilizing structures using this technique prevents postoperative instability. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:499-506.

How I do it? Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS) for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis

BACKGROUND

Prevalent endoscopic spine surgeries have shown limitations especially in spinal stenosis (Ahn in Neurosurgery 75(2):124-133, 2014). Biportal endoscopic surgery is introduced to manage central and foraminal stenosis with its wide range of access angle and clear view.

METHODS

The authors provide an introduction of this technique followed by a description of the surgical anatomy with discussion on its indications and advantages. In particular, tricks to avoid complications are also presented.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective circumferential and focal decompression were achieved in most cases without damage to the spinal structural integrity with preservation of muscular and ligamentous attachments. The biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS) may be safely used as an alternative minimally invasive procedure for lumbar spinal stenosis (Figs. 1 and 2).

Endoscopy-assisted posterior lumbar interbody fusion in a single segment

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) has been routinely performed for the treatment of lumbar segmental lesions. However, traditional PLIF procedures can result in a variety of approach-related morbidities. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of endoscopy-assisted PLIF in lumbar arthrodesis. From July 2005 to May 2007, a total of 56 patients underwent PLIF, including 24 endoscopy-assisted operations (endoscopic group) and 32 traditional open operations (open group). The perioperative data, clinical outcomes and radiographic results were compared. The intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative drainage volume, intraoperative and postoperative allogeneic blood transfusion volumes, values for C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate on postoperative day 3 and postoperative hospitalization days were decreased in the endoscopic group (p<0.05), while the operative time was longer than that of the open group (p=0.026). According to the Visual Analog Scale for pain, the postoperative low back pain score in the endoscopic group was lower than that observed in the open group (p<0.05). In the endoscopic group, the excellent and good outcome rate was 87.5%, the incidence of complications was 8.3%, and the intervertebral fusion rate was 100%. There were no significant differences for these outcomes when compared with the open group (p>0.05). Endoscopy-assisted PLIF can achieve a clinical efficacy similar to that of traditional open operations while minimizing destruction to adjacent tissues. This technique is safe and is characterized by less bleeding, less tissue trauma, decreased postoperative pain, rapid recovery, and a shorter postoperative hospital stay.