Predictors of re-attendance at biennial screening mammography following a false positive referral: A study among women in the south of the Netherlands

AIM

A false positive (FP) referral after screening mammography may influence a woman's likelihood to re-attend the screening program. The impact of having a FP result in the first or subsequent screening round on re-attendance after a FP result was investigated. In addition, we aimed to study differences in re-attendance rates between women who underwent non-invasive and invasive additional examinations as part of the diagnostic work-up following a FP referral.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 13,597 women with a FP referral following biennial screening mammography in the south of the Netherlands between 2009 and 2019 was included.

RESULTS

The screening re-attendance rate was 81.2% after a FP referral, and 91.3% when also including women who had clinical mammographic follow-up. Women who received a FP referral in the first screening round were less likely to re-attend the screening programme in the following three years, compared to those with a FP test in any subsequent round (odds ratio (OR): 0.59, 95%-confidence interval (CI): 0.51-0.69). Women with a FP referral who underwent invasive examinations after referral were less likely to re-attend the screening programme than those who only received additional imaging (OR, 0.48; 95% CI 0.36-0.64).

CONCLUSION

Women with a FP referral are less likely to re-attend the screening programme if this referral occurs at their first screening round or when they undergo invasive diagnostic workup. Hospitals and screening organizations should prioritize informing women about the importance of re-attending the programme following a FP referral.

Hypercalcitoninemia is not pathognomonic of medullary thyroid carcinoma

Hypercalcitoninemia has frequently been reported as a marker for medullary thyroid carcinoma. Currently, calcitonin measurements are mostly useful in the evaluation of tumor size and progression, and as an index of biochemical improvement of medullary thyroid carcinomas. Although measurement of calcitonin is a highly sensitive method for the detection of medullary thyroid carcinoma, it presents a low specificity for this tumor. Several physiologic and pathologic conditions other than medullary thyroid carcinoma have been associated with increased levels of calcitonin. Several cases of thyroid nodules associated with increased values of calcitonin are not medullary thyroid carcinomas, but rather are related to other conditions, such as hypercalcemias, hypergastrinemias, neuroendocrine tumors, renal insufficiency, papillary and follicular thyroid carcinomas, and goiter. Furthermore, prolonged treatment with omeprazole (>2-4 months), beta-blockers, glucocorticoids and potential secretagogues, have been associated with hypercalcitoninemia. An association between calcitonin levels and chronic auto-immune thyroiditis remains controversial. Patients with calcitonin levels >100 pg/mL have a high risk for medullary thyroid carcinoma (approximately 90%-100%), whereas patients with values from 10 to 100 pg/mL (normal values: <8.5 pg/mL for men, <5.0 pg/mL for women; immunochemiluminometric assay) have a <25% risk for medullary thyroid carcinoma.In multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2), RET mutation analysis is the gold-standard for the recommendation of total preventive thyroidectomy to relatives at risk of harboring a germline RET mutation (50%). False-positive calcitonin results within MEN2 families have led to incorrect indications of preventive total thyroidectomy to RET mutation negative relatives. In this review, we focus on the differential diagnosis of hypercalcitoninemia, underlining its importance for the avoidance of misdiagnosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma and consequent incorrect recommendation for thyroid surgery.