[Application of neuroendoscope combined with minimal-access for elderly patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia in enhanced recovery after surgery of microvascular decompression]

Objective: To explore the value of neuroendoscope and minimal-access in enhanced recovery after surgery of microvascular decompression (MVD) for treatment elderly patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia (ITN). Methods: The clinical data of 62 elderly patients with ITN who undergoing neuroendoscope-assisted minimal-access microvascular decompression were analyzed retrospectively, including operative data and follow-up results. Results: In 62 cases, the effective rate was 96.8%, with 88.7% complete cure and 8.1% little residual pain. Sixty successful cases were followed-up for an average of 61 months.Three cases recurred within 3 years after operation.Eight cases had complications after MVD. Conclusions: There was no serious complications that could be ascribed to old age and the operative result was satisfactory compared with younger age cases.Endoscope and minimal-access can help shorten operation time, raise the effectiveness of MVD, reduce postoperative recurrence rate, and enhanced recovery after surgery for elderly patients.

[Reevaluation of the methodological quality in meta-analyses of accelerated rehabilitation on recovery after surgery for colorectal cancer]

Objective: To evaluate the methodological quality and impacts on outcomes for systematic reviews (SRs) of accelerated rehabilitation versus traditional control for colorectal surgery. Methods: We comprehensively searched six databases and additional websites to collect SRs, or meta-analysis from inception to July 2016. The Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire (OQAQ) was applied for quality assessment of the included studies, the tools recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration was applied for quality assessment for RCT and CCT and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was applied to assess observational study. The relative ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were integrated using Review Manager 5.3 software. Results: Fourteen meta-analyses were included in total. The mean OQAQ score was 3.8 with 95% CI 3.2 to 4.3. Only three meta-analyses were assessed as good quality. Two studies misused statistical models. A total of 42 primary studies referenced by meta-analyses were included, of which, 25 RCTs were levelled grade B and 1 CCT was levelled grade C. An estimated mean NOS score of 16 observation studies was 6.75 (totally scored 9 with 95% CI 6.4 to 7.1), of which, 10 studies scored ≥7 were high quality, 6 studies scored 6 were moderate quality. Conclusions: Currently, the overall quality of meta-analyses about comparing the effects and safety between accelerated rehabilitation and traditional control for colorectal surgery is fairly poor and the evidence level is lower. Health providers should apply the evidence with caution in clinical practice.