Options for Restoring Finger Extension in Mangled Forearm Injuries

Restoration of finger extension in mutilating hand injuries is crucial for restoring prehension and independent use of the hand. Patients often express desire to restore finger extension once finger flexion is achieved. However, the extensive forearm injury precludes use of any of conventional donors like the wrist or finger flexors for transfer to restore finger extension. Two patients with sequelae of mangled forearm injuries, underwent biceps and long head of triceps transfer to the finger extensors to improve opening up of the fingers. We discuss the treatment considerations while planning these transfers and provide the technical details, rehabilitation and outcome of these patients. Both the patients expressed dramatic improvement of their hand function and were satisfied with the outcome. Biceps and long head of triceps could serve as an effective second-line donor for restoration of finger extension when the conventional donors are not available. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).

Distal Nerve Transfer to Restore Wrist and Finger Extension - A Systematic Review

Background: There are numerous options available for restoration of wrist and finger extension following radial nerve palsy. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness of nerve transfer for radial nerve palsy. Methods: Electronic literature research of PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus and Lilacs database was conducted in June 2021 using the terms 'Distal nerve transfer' AND 'Radial nerve injury' 'Radial nerve palsy' OR 'Radial nerve paresis' OR 'Median nerve transfer' OR 'wrist extensor' OR 'finger extension' OR 'thumb extension' OR 'wrist motion'. The data extracted included the study details, demographic data, procedure performed and final functional outcome according to the muscle research council scale. Results: A total of 92.59% and 56.52% had satisfactory outcome following distal nerve transfer of median nerve to restore wrist and finger extension respectively. No significant correlation was found between time to injury duration and satisfactory outcomes. Conclusions: Outcomes of nerve transfers are comparable to tendon transfers. Multi-centric studies are needed to compare the results amongst various surgical procedures described. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Tendon transfers for radial nerve palsy with extensor carpi ulnaris revival: Technique and results

BACKGROUND

Nerve repair is the gold standard for treatment of radial palsy. In case of failure or contraindication, palliative techniques using tendon transfers provide good results. However, wrist extension frequently shows radial deviation, impairing grip strength.

HYPOTHESIS

Associating extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) revival avoids radial deviation.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center retrospective study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The inclusion criterion was radial nerve palsy treated by tendon transfers involving revival of the ECU. Nine patients, with a mean age of 33 years [15-60] were included. Four palsies were trauma-induced, 3 tumor-induced and 2 idiopathic. The mean time to treatment was 32 months [4.6-120].

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 51 months [3-160.7]. Eight patients could be assessed. Wrist extension was balanced in 6 cases, in ulnar deviation in 1 and in radial deviation in the other. Wrist motion was 54° [30°-80°] in extension, 46° [20°-70°] in flexion, with an active motion in the frontal plane of 21° [0°-35°]. Finger extension was possible with the wrist in extension in 6 cases. Thumb abduction was subnormal in 3 cases, incomplete but functional in 4 and barely functional in 1. Fist closure was always complete. Mean QuickDASH score was 41/100 [14-63].

CONCLUSION

This technique is reliable and reproducible, giving good functional results and avoiding the radial deviation of the wrist in extension observed with traditional techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Nerve Transfers for the Restoration of Wrist, Finger, and Thumb Extension After High Radial Nerve Injury

High radial nerve injury is a common pattern of peripheral nerve injury most often associated with orthopedic trauma. Nerve transfers to the wrist and finger extensors, often from the median nerve, offer several advantages when compared to nerve repair or grafting and tendon transfer. In this article, we discuss the forearm anatomy pertinent to performing these nerve transfers and review the literature surrounding nerve transfers for wrist, finger, and thumb extension. A suggested algorithm for management of acute traumatic high radial nerve palsy is offered, and our preferred surgical technique for treatment of high radial nerve palsy is provided.

The effects of finger extension on shoulder muscle activity

[Purpose] This study aims to examine the effects of the extension of the fingers (distal upper limb) on the activity of the shoulder muscles (proximal upper limb). [Subjects and Methods] This study involved 14 healthy male adults with no musculoskeletal disorder or pain related to the shoulders and hands. The subjects in a sitting posture abducted the angle of the shoulder joints at 60° and had their palms in the front direction. Electromyography (EMG) was comparatively analyzed to look at the activities of the infraspinatus (IS) and rhomboid major (RM) when the fingers were extended and relaxed. [Results] The activity of the IS was statistically significantly higher when the fingers were extended than when they were relaxed. [Conclusion] According to the result of this study, finger extension is considered to affect the muscles for connected shoulder joint stability.