Effectiveness of closed blood sampling systems in intensive care patients: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Anemia associated with blood extraction for diagnostic purposes is a highly prevalent entity in intensive care units (ICU) for adults. The evidence recommends its prevention through different strategies, among which we can find the use of closed blood sampling systems (CBSS). Different experimental studies support the use of these devices.

OBJECTIVE

To identify knowledge gaps regarding the effectiveness of CBSS in ICU patients.

METHODS

Scoping review with search in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library and Joanna Briggs Institute databases, between September-2021 and September-2022. No time, language, or other limits were applied to ensure the recovery of all relevant studies. Gray literature sources: DART-Europe, OpenGrey and Google Scholar. Two researchers independently reviewed titles and abstracts and assessed full texts against the inclusion criteria. The following data was extracted for each study: design and sample, inclusion and exclusion criteria, variables, type of CBSS, results and conclusions.

RESULTS

18 articles were included in the final review, 11 clinical trials (RCTs) published between 1992 and 2014. Three systematic reviews were found, but they only analyzed the effect of CBSS in reducing blood loss, hemoglobin stabilization, and the need for transfusion. Five of the RCTs analyzed the risk of infection, one catheter complications, and two alterations in blood pressure readings.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of CBSS is recommended to reduce blood loss in ICUs. However, there are discrepancies about their ability to prevent anemia and/or the need for blood transfusion. Its use does not increase catheter-related infection rates or alter the measurement of mean arterial pressure.

[Predictive factors of response to erytrhocytapheresis in patients with biochemical iron overload with or without hereditary hemochromatosis type 1]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Progressive increase of iron stores leads to the development of varied diseases, some of them irreversible. Until now, phlebotomy has been the cornerstone in the treatment of iron overload. Nevertheless, each erytrhocytapheresis procedure removes more than twice the volume of red cells and iron than phlebotomy, allowing to achieve iron depletion in shorter time. Our aim was to describe clinical features and analytical tests parameters of patients with iron overload, to analyze global and subsets results, to suggest predictive factors of response and to evaluate security of the procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Descriptive, longitudinal and prospective study of 663 procedures corresponding to 35 patients (December 2002 to October 2011). Response was defined as a serum ferritine value lower than 50 ng/mL during two months. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS(®) v 17.0 and the minimum level of statistical significance was defined as p-value < 0,05.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven percent of patients reached response with 11 (interquartile range 1-42) erytrhocytapheresis procedures and at 11 (1-108) months. Eighty-seven point five percent of patients who did not achieve response had their ferritine values reduced in more than 50%. The decrease of all iron metabolism parameters was statistically significant. Statistically significant predictive factors of response to erytrhocytapheresis were: patients younger than 60 years-old, hereditary hemochromatosis cases, and patients who had received treatment with phlebotomies prior to erytrhocytapheresis.

CONCLUSIONS

Erytrhocytapheresis is a secure and effective procedure for iron depletion in patients with iron overload, especially in high risk hereditary hemochromatosis cases that do not respond to phlebotomies.