1
|
Julienne A, Donatini G, Richer JP, Brèque C, Mordon S, Faure JP, Danion J, Bertheuil N, Leclère FM. [Flap harvest training on a new ultrarealistic simulation model: In-training operator feedback about a pulsating reperfused and reventilated cadaver Simlife®]. ANN CHIR PLAST ESTH 2021; 66:126-133. [PMID: 33707027 DOI: 10.1016/j.anplas.2020.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The anatomical subject is still a key element to learn complex procedures in plastic surgery. We present here the evaluation of an in-training operator on a SIMLIFE® model, hyper realistic model consisting in human bodies donated to science equipped with pulsating recirculation and reventilation device. MATERIAL AND METHODS From February 2019 to October 2019, 8 forearm flaps with radial proximal pedicle were harvested by the learner on a SIMLIFE® model. Conditions were as close as possible to the operating room : asepsy, sterile draping, assistant and instrumentation including electrocoagulation. RESULTS The procedure was decomposed in 13 distinct steps. Mean total surgery time was 90,5±11,62minutes. There was only one case of arterial pedicle lesion resulting in major blood leak. Bleeding was measured by fake blood loss from the SIMLIFE® console. Mean intraoperatoy bleeding was 171±108 milliliters. We review pros and cons of this new technology particulary suited for complex plastic and reconstructive surgery training. CONCLUSION Using SIMLIFE® technology we have a new mean to train for complex procedures in plastic and reconstructive surgery. This new technology could be applied to numerous other surgical procedures. Broader applications are still limited by cost and cadaver use legislation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Julienne
- Laboratoire d'anatomie et de simulation de l'université de Poitiers, ABS Lab-Bât D1, 6, rue de la Miletrie TSA-51115, 86073 Poitiers cedex 9, France; Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Hand Surgery, Centre of Expertise for Sex Reassignment Surgery, University Hospital Poitiers, CHU de la Miletrie de Poitiers, 2, rue de la Milétrie, 86000 Poitiers, France.
| | - G Donatini
- Laboratoire d'anatomie et de simulation de l'université de Poitiers, ABS Lab-Bât D1, 6, rue de la Miletrie TSA-51115, 86073 Poitiers cedex 9, France; Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Poitiers, CHU de la Miletrie de Poitiers, 2, rue de la Milétrie, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - J P Richer
- Laboratoire d'anatomie et de simulation de l'université de Poitiers, ABS Lab-Bât D1, 6, rue de la Miletrie TSA-51115, 86073 Poitiers cedex 9, France; Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Poitiers, CHU de la Miletrie de Poitiers, 2, rue de la Milétrie, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - C Brèque
- Laboratoire d'anatomie et de simulation de l'université de Poitiers, ABS Lab-Bât D1, 6, rue de la Miletrie TSA-51115, 86073 Poitiers cedex 9, France
| | - S Mordon
- Inserm U1189-ONCO-THAI-Image Assisted Laser Therapy for Oncology, University Hospital Lille, Lille, France
| | - J P Faure
- Laboratoire d'anatomie et de simulation de l'université de Poitiers, ABS Lab-Bât D1, 6, rue de la Miletrie TSA-51115, 86073 Poitiers cedex 9, France; Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Poitiers, CHU de la Miletrie de Poitiers, 2, rue de la Milétrie, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - J Danion
- Laboratoire d'anatomie et de simulation de l'université de Poitiers, ABS Lab-Bât D1, 6, rue de la Miletrie TSA-51115, 86073 Poitiers cedex 9, France; Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Poitiers, CHU de la Miletrie de Poitiers, 2, rue de la Milétrie, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - N Bertheuil
- Department of plastic, reconstructive and aesthetic surgery, hospital Sud, university of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | - F M Leclère
- Laboratoire d'anatomie et de simulation de l'université de Poitiers, ABS Lab-Bât D1, 6, rue de la Miletrie TSA-51115, 86073 Poitiers cedex 9, France; Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Hand Surgery, Centre of Expertise for Sex Reassignment Surgery, University Hospital Poitiers, CHU de la Miletrie de Poitiers, 2, rue de la Milétrie, 86000 Poitiers, France; Inserm U1189-ONCO-THAI-Image Assisted Laser Therapy for Oncology, University Hospital Lille, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Acero Sanz J, Ranz Colio Á, Picón Molina M, Almeida Parra F. Revascularization of the tongue by radial forearm flow-through flap. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 50:323-326. [PMID: 32753230 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The concept of a flow-through flap refers to a free flap in which both the proximal and distal ends of the vascular pedicle are anastomosed to provide blood flow to the distal tissues. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the use of this technique, which may be useful in selected cases of head and neck reconstruction. In certain situations, like bilateral resection of the base of the tongue involving both lingual arteries, the application of a flow-through forearm free flap can provide an anatomical and functional restoration of the defect while revascularizing the anterior two-thirds of the tongue. We review this technique, which was used in a case of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the base of the tongue with excellent results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Acero Sanz
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain; Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Á Ranz Colio
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain; Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
| | - M Picón Molina
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain; Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
| | - F Almeida Parra
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain; Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Otsuki N, Furukawa T, Avinçsal MO, Teshima M, Shinomiya H, Oshikiri T, Nakamura T, Nomura T, Hashikawa K, Nibu KI. Results of free flap reconstruction for patients aged 80 years or older with head and neck cancer. Auris Nasus Larynx 2019; 47:123-127. [PMID: 31060883 DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2019.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Revised: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Free flap reconstruction in elderly patients is one of the most challenging surgeries in the treatment of head and neck cancers. The aim of this study was to examine the oncological and functional outcomes of free flap reconstruction for elderly patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed elderly patients who underwent free flap reconstruction for the treatment of head and neck cancers. All patients were 80 years or older. Clinicopathologic features, surgical procedures, oncological and functional outcomes were obtained from medical records. RESULTS Free flap reconstructions were performed in 13 patients (3 female, 10 male). The mean age was 82.6 ± 3.4 years (range: 80-91). The mean follow-up period was 23.3 months (range 4-41 months). The mean disease-free survival was 49 ± 6 months (range 4-60 months). All patients had been alive more than one year after surgery. Reconstruction was performed using free jejunum in 10 patients and radial forearm flap in 3 patients. Graft necrosis occurred in 2 patients. Other two patients experienced major postoperative medical complications. CONCLUSION Free flap reconstruction in well-selected older adults is safe and effective. Advanced age should not preclude consideration of free flap reconstruction in those patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoki Otsuki
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Furukawa
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Mehmet Ozgur Avinçsal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Masanori Teshima
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Shinomiya
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Taro Oshikiri
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Tetsu Nakamura
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Tadashi Nomura
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Kazunobu Hashikawa
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Ken-Ichi Nibu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hakim SG, Jacobsen HC, Trenkle T, Sieg P, Wieker H. Impact of body mass index, gender, and smoking on thickness of free soft tissue flaps used for orofacial reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015. [PMID: 26211724 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.06.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Donor-site selection may play an important role in the reconstruction of large orofacial defects. The thickness and structure of transplanted tissue has to fit those of the recipient site to achieve a satisfactory outcome. To evaluate the thickness of free flaps that are frequently used for orofacial reconstruction and its association with body mass index (BMI), gender, and smoking, a prospective study was conducted. A total of 122 volunteers were included in the study, and their data regarding BMI, gender, and tobacco use were documented. Ultrasonography was used to evaluate the thickness of the radial and ulnar forearm flaps (RFFF and UFFF, respectively), the scapular and parascapular flaps (SF and PSF, respectively), the anterolateral thigh flap (ALT), and the free fibular flap (FF). Correlation and regression analysis were performed to assess any relationship among parameters and to investigate their effect on flap thickness. The UFFF showed the lowest thickness (0.65 ± 0.16 cm), followed by the RFFF (0.83 ± 0.20 cm). The FF showed a comparable thickness (0.82 ± 0.26 cm), followed by the SF (0.99 ± 0.13 cm) and the PSF (1 ± 0.14 cm). The ALT flap displayed the greatest thickness (1.42 ± 0.42 cm) and correlated especially with BMI and gender, whereas the UFFF was the thinnest with relatively constant values, regardless of potential influential factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer G Hakim
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
| | | | - Thomas Trenkle
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Peter Sieg
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Henning Wieker
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|