Pallidal deep brain stimulation for patients with myoclonus-dystonia without SGCE mutations

BACKGROUND

Pallidal deep brain stimulation (GPi-DBS) is effective for treating myoclonus and dystonia caused by SGCE mutations (DYT-SGCE, DYT11). However, it is unknown whether GPi-DBS is effective for the treatment of myoclonus-dystonia which is not associated with the SGCE gene mutations. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of GPi-DBS in treating myoclonus-dystonia in SGCE mutation-negative cases.

METHODS

Three patients with myoclonus-dystonia without SGCE mutations who underwent GPi-DBS were evaluated preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively using the Unified Myoclonus Rating Scale (UMRS) and Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (FMDRS) for myoclonus and dystonia, respectively. In two of the three patients, myoclonus was more evident during action. Myoclonus was predominant at rest in the other patient, and he was unaware of his dystonia symptoms. The results were compared with those of the four DYT-SGCE cases.

RESULTS

The mean UMRS score in patients with myoclonus-dystonia without SGCE mutations improved from 61.7 to 33.7 pre- and postoperatively, respectively, and the mean FMDRS score improved from 7.2 to 4.5. However, the degree of improvement in myoclonus-dystonia in patients without SGCE mutations was inferior to that in patients with DYT-SGCE (the UMRS score improved by 45% and 69%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

GPi-DBS is effective for treating myoclonus-dystonia in patients with and without SGCE mutations. GPi-DBS should be considered as a treatment option for myoclonus-dystonia without SGCE mutations.

Dominant VPS16 Pathogenic Variants: Not Only Isolated Dystonia

BACKGROUND

VPS16 pathogenic variants have been recently associated with inherited dystonia. Most patients affected by dominant VPS16-related disease display early-onset isolated dystonia with prominent oromandibular, bulbar, cervical, and upper limb involvement, followed by slowly progressive generalization.

CASES

We describe six newly reported dystonic patients carrying VPS16 mutations displaying unusual phenotypic features in addition to dystonia, such as myoclonus, choreoathetosis, pharyngospasm and freezing of gait. Response to bilateral Globus Pallidus Internus Deep Brain Stimulation (GPi-DBS) is reported in three of them, associated with significant improvement of dystonia but only minor effect on other hyperkinetic movements. Moreover, five novel pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants are described.

CONCLUSIONS

This case collection expands the genetic and clinical spectrum of VPS16-related disease, prompting movement disorder specialists to suspect mutations of this gene not only in patients with isolated dystonia.

GPi DBS treatment outcome in children with monogenic dystonia: a case series and review of the literature

Introduction

Dystonia is the third most common pediatric movement disorder and is often difficult to treat. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the internal pallidum (GPi) has been demonstrated as a safe and effective treatment for genetic dystonia in adolescents and adults. The results of DBS in children are limited to individual cases or case series, although it has been proven to be an effective procedure in carefully selected pediatric cohorts. The aim of our study was to present the treatment outcome for 7- to 9-year-old pediatric patients with disabling monogenic isolated generalized DYT-THAP1 and DYT-KMT2B dystonia after bilateral GPi-DBS.

Patients and results

We present three boys aged <10 years; two siblings with disabling generalized DYT-THAP1 dystonia and a boy with monogenic-complex DYT-KMT2B. Dystonia onset occurred between the ages of 3 and 6. Significantly disabled children were mostly dependent on their parents. Pharmacotherapy was inefficient and patients underwent bilateral GPi-DBS. Clinical signs of dystonia improved significantly in the first month after the implantation and continued to maintain improved motor functions, which were found to have improved further at follow-up. These patients were ambulant without support and included in everyday activities. All patients had significantly lower Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) values, indicating >25% improvement over the first 15 months. However, there was a decline in speech and upper limb function, manifesting with bradylalia, bradykinesia, and dysphonia, which decreased after treatment with trihexyphenidyl.

Conclusion

Although reports of patients with monogenic dystonia, particularly DYT-THAP1, treated with DBS are still scarce, DBS should be considered as an efficient treatment approach in children with pharmacoresistent dystonia, especially with generalized monogenic dystonia and to prevent severe and disabling symptoms that reduce the quality of life, including emotional and social aspects. Patients require an individual approach and parents should be properly informed about expectations and possible outcomes, including relapses and impairments, in addition to DBS responsiveness and related improvements. Furthermore, early genetic diagnosis and the provision of appropriate treatments, including DBS, are mandatory for preventing severe neurologic impairments.

Differential Effects of Subthalamic Nucleus and Globus Pallidus Internus Deep Brain Stimulation on Motor Subtypes in Parkinson's Disease

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the differences in motor symptom change outcomes after bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) in well-defined motor subtypes of Parkinson's disease (PD) to improve clinical decision making.

METHODS

We included 114 patients who had undergone STN-DBS and 65 patients who had undergone GPi-DBS. The patients were classified as having akinetic-rigid type (ART), tremor-dominant type (TDT), and mixed type (MT) using the preoperative Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (MDS-UPDRS-III) scores in the no-medication state. The outcome measures included the no-medication MDS-UPDRS-III scores and subscore changes at the last follow-up after surgery. The outcomes were compared among the different motor subtypes and between STN-DBS and GPi-DBS.

RESULTS

At the last follow-up (14.92 ± 8.35 months), the TDT patients had had a greater median overall motor improvement in the no-medication MDS-UPDRS-III scores compared with the ART patients (62.90% vs. 46.67%; P < 0.001), regardless of the stimulation target. The ART patients showed greater improvement after STN-DBS than after GPi-DBS (54.44% vs. 37.21%; P < 0.001), with improvements in rigidity, akinesia, and posture and gait disorders accounting for the difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the different PD motor subtypes will have differential responses to STN-DBS and GPi-DBS, that TDT patients will experience greater improvement than ART patients, and that STN-DBS provides better effects for ART patients than does GPi-DBS. In addition, different motor symptoms among the different motor subtypes might respond differently to STN-DBS than to GPi-DBS. All these factors could reflect the heterogeneity of PD. Longer-term outcomes across the different motor subtypes and stimulation targets should be studied further.