1
|
Huguet F, Riou O, Pasquier D, Modesto A, Quéro L, Michalet M, Bordron A, Schipman B, Orthuon A, Lisbona A, Vendrely V, Jaksic N. Radiation therapy of the primary tumour and/or metastases of digestive metastatic cancers. Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:66-74. [PMID: 37806823 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
Metastatic gastrointestinal cancer is not an uncommon situation, especially for pancreatic, gastric, and colorectal cancers. In this setting, few data are available on the impact of the treatment of the primary tumour. Oligometastatic disease is associated with longer survival in comparison with more advanced disease. Metastasis-directed therapy, such as stereotactic body radiotherapy, seems related to better outcomes, but the level of evidence is low. In most tumour locations, prospective data are very scarce and inclusion in ongoing trials is strongly recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Huguet
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, DMU Orphé, Sorbonne université, Paris, France; Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Therapeutics, centre de recherche Saint-Antoine, U938, Inserm, Paris, France.
| | - O Riou
- Institut de recherche en cancérologie de Montpellier, U1194, Inserm, université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Fédération universitaire d'oncologie radiothérapie d'Occitanie Méditerranée, ICM, institut régional du cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - D Pasquier
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Oscar-Lambret, Lille, France; Université de Lille, CNRS, école centrale de Lille, UMR 9189 - CRIStAL, Lille, France
| | - A Modesto
- Département de radiothérapie, institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre de recherche du cancer de Toulouse, UMR 1037, Inserm, université Toulouse-III Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - L Quéro
- Service de cancérologie-radiothérapie, hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP Nord, DMU Icare, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, U1160, Inserm, Paris, France
| | - M Michalet
- Institut de recherche en cancérologie de Montpellier, U1194, Inserm, université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Fédération universitaire d'oncologie radiothérapie d'Occitanie Méditerranée, ICM, institut régional du cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - A Bordron
- Département de radiothérapie, centre hospitalier universitaire de Brest, Brest, France
| | - B Schipman
- Institut de cancérologie de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - A Orthuon
- Institut de cancérologie de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - A Lisbona
- Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, centre René-Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - V Vendrely
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - N Jaksic
- Institut de cancérologie et radiothérapie Brétillien, Saint-Malo, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Piron L, Deshayes E, Escal L, Souche R, Herrero A, Pierredon-Foulongne MA, Assenat E, le Lam N, Quenet F, Guiu B. [Portal vein embolization: Present and future]. Bull Cancer 2017; 104:407-416. [PMID: 28477870 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2017.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2017] [Revised: 03/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Portal vein embolization consists of occluding a part of the portal venous system in order to achieve the hypertrophy of the non-embolized liver segments. This technique is used during the preoperative period of major liver resection when the future remnant liver (FRL) volume is insufficient, exposing to postoperative liver failure, main cause of death after major hepatectomy. Portal vein embolization indication depends on the FRL, commonly assessed by its volume. Nowadays, FRL function evaluation seems more relevant and can be measured by 99mTc labelled mebrofenin scintigraphy. Portal vein embolization procedure is mostly performed with percutaneous trans-hepatic access by using ultrasonography guidance and consists of embolic agent injection, such as cyanoacrylate, in the targeted portal vein branches with fluoroscopic guidance. It is a safe and well-tolerated technique, with extremely low morbi-mortality. Portal vein embolization leads to sufficient FRL hypertrophy in about 80% of patients, allowing them to undergo surgery from which they were initially rejected. The two main reasons of non-resection are tumor progression (≈15% of cases) and FRL insufficient hypertrophy (≈5% of cases). When portal vein embolization is not enough to obtain adequate FRL regeneration, hepatic vein embolization may potentiate its effect (liver venous deprivation technique).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauranne Piron
- Saint-Éloi University Hospital, Department of Radiology, 80, avenue Augustin-Fliche, 34090 Montpellier, France.
| | - Emmanuel Deshayes
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Department of Nuclear Medicine, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier, France; Inserm U1194, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Laure Escal
- Saint-Éloi University Hospital, Department of Radiology, 80, avenue Augustin-Fliche, 34090 Montpellier, France
| | - Regis Souche
- Saint-Éloi University Hospital, Department of Surgery, 80, avenue Augustin-Fliche, 34090 Montpellier, France
| | - Astrid Herrero
- Saint-Éloi University Hospital, Department of Surgery, 80, avenue Augustin-Fliche, 34090 Montpellier, France
| | | | - Eric Assenat
- Saint-Éloi University Hospital, Department of Oncology, 80, avenue Augustin-Fliche, 34090 Montpellier, France
| | - Ngo le Lam
- Bach Mai University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Hanoi, Viet Nam
| | - François Quenet
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Department of Surgery, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Boris Guiu
- Saint-Éloi University Hospital, Department of Radiology, 80, avenue Augustin-Fliche, 34090 Montpellier, France; Inserm U1194, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Janoray G, Chapet S, Ruffier-Loubière A, Bernadou G, Pointreau Y, Calais G. Robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy for tumors of the liver: radiation-induced liver disease, incidence and predictive factors. Cancer Radiother. 2014;18:191-197. [PMID: 24837351 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy is a new option to treated unresecable liver tumours. The objectives were to assess the tolerance of this technique, to identify predictive factors for toxicity and evaluate the efficiency of this treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS From June 2010 to November 2012, robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy was proposed for 56 patients with unresecable hepatocellular carcinomas (23 patients) or hepatic metastases (41 patients). Two or less hepatic lesions, lesion size under 75 mm and WHO score under 3 were selection criteria. The prescribed dose was 45 Gy/3 fractions or 60 Gy/3 fractions. The primary end-point was toxicity, using the radiation-induced liver disease definition and to identify predictive factors. Secondary end-points were in-field local control and overall survival. RESULTS The median follow-up was 12.5 months. The one-year local control rate and the one-year overall survival rate were 64% [CI95%: 48.2 to 76.5%] and 89% [CI95%: 76 to 95%], respectively. For patient treated with a total dose of 60 Gy, no one experienced recurrence. According to the definition we took, radiation-induced liver disease rate was 0 or 9%. A lesion size at least 35 mm was a predictive factor to liver toxicity (P=0.01). CONCLUSION Using robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy, the incidence of radiation-induced liver disease is weak and spontaneously reversible. Prospective studies are required to put in evidence other predictive factors of radiation-induced liver disease and confirm the optimal dose treatment.
Collapse
|
4
|
Janoray G, Chapet S, Ruffier-Loubière A, Bernadou G, Pointreau Y, Calais G. Robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy for tumors of the liver: radiation-induced liver disease, incidence and predictive factors. Cancer Radiother 2014; 18:191-7. [PMID: 24837351 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2014.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2014] [Revised: 03/13/2014] [Accepted: 03/26/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy is a new option to treated unresecable liver tumours. The objectives were to assess the tolerance of this technique, to identify predictive factors for toxicity and evaluate the efficiency of this treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS From June 2010 to November 2012, robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy was proposed for 56 patients with unresecable hepatocellular carcinomas (23 patients) or hepatic metastases (41 patients). Two or less hepatic lesions, lesion size under 75 mm and WHO score under 3 were selection criteria. The prescribed dose was 45 Gy/3 fractions or 60 Gy/3 fractions. The primary end-point was toxicity, using the radiation-induced liver disease definition and to identify predictive factors. Secondary end-points were in-field local control and overall survival. RESULTS The median follow-up was 12.5 months. The one-year local control rate and the one-year overall survival rate were 64% [CI95%: 48.2 to 76.5%] and 89% [CI95%: 76 to 95%], respectively. For patient treated with a total dose of 60 Gy, no one experienced recurrence. According to the definition we took, radiation-induced liver disease rate was 0 or 9%. A lesion size at least 35 mm was a predictive factor to liver toxicity (P=0.01). CONCLUSION Using robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy, the incidence of radiation-induced liver disease is weak and spontaneously reversible. Prospective studies are required to put in evidence other predictive factors of radiation-induced liver disease and confirm the optimal dose treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Janoray
- Oncology-Radiotherapy Department, Henry S. Kaplan Cancer Center, CHRU de Tours, 2 boulevard Tonnellé, 37000 Tours, France.
| | - S Chapet
- Oncology-Radiotherapy Department, Henry S. Kaplan Cancer Center, CHRU de Tours, 2 boulevard Tonnellé, 37000 Tours, France
| | - A Ruffier-Loubière
- Oncology-Radiotherapy Department, Henry S. Kaplan Cancer Center, CHRU de Tours, 2 boulevard Tonnellé, 37000 Tours, France
| | - G Bernadou
- Oncology-Radiotherapy Department, Henry S. Kaplan Cancer Center, CHRU de Tours, 2 boulevard Tonnellé, 37000 Tours, France
| | - Y Pointreau
- Oncology-Radiotherapy Department, Henry S. Kaplan Cancer Center, CHRU de Tours, 2 boulevard Tonnellé, 37000 Tours, France
| | - G Calais
- Oncology-Radiotherapy Department, Henry S. Kaplan Cancer Center, CHRU de Tours, 2 boulevard Tonnellé, 37000 Tours, France
| |
Collapse
|