Serum hepatitis B core-related antigen is more accurate than hepatitis B surface antigen to identify inactive carriers, regardless of hepatitis B virus genotype

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) levels are useful to identify inactive carriers among HBeAg-negative patients infected by different hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes.

METHODS

In all, 202 consecutive HBeAg-negative patients with chronic hepatitis B, 135 inactive carriers and 67 with HBV activity, were prospectively followed for 1 year.

RESULTS

In HBeAg-negative patients, HBsAg levels differed across the different genotypes (p <0.001). The highest levels were observed in genotypes F or H (4.2 ± 0.6 logIU/mL), followed by genotype E (3.4 ± 1.1 logIU/mL), genotype A (3.4 ± 0.8 logIU/mL), and the lowest in genotype D (2.7 ± 1.1 logIU/mL). Variations in HBsAg levels were similar in inactive carriers and patients with HBV activity. HBsAg <3 logIU/mL showed good performance for identifying genotype D inactive carriers: 76% of genotype D inactive carriers met this cut-off versus ≤31% for genotypes A, E, F or H. However, in patients with genotype A, HBsAg levels ≤3.7 logIU/mL better classified inactive carriers. The combination of a single measurement of HBcrAg ≤3 logU/mL plus HBV DNA ≤2000 IU/mL yielded a positive predictive value and diagnostic accuracy >85% in all HBV genotypes, except genotype H or F, with values of 62.5% and 72.7%, respectively, for the two parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

HBsAg levels varied across genotypes in HBeAg-negative patients. HBsAg levels <3 logIU/mL were only useful for identifying genotype D inactive carriers. A single HBcrAg measurement ≤3 logU/mL plus HBV DNA ≤2000 IU/mL was highly accurate for identifying inactive carriers, regardless of their HBV genotype.

Combination treatment in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) represents an important public health problem. HBeAg-negative CHB is frequently associated with advanced liver disease and its prevalence is increasing. Monotherapy with either interferon (conventional or pegylated) or nucleoside/nucleotide analogues has its limitations. It has been suggested that a combination of these agents might increase antiviral efficacy. However, existing data do not support this hypothesis, even though combination treatment appears to reduce the risk for emergence of lamivudine resistance. Nevertheless, most existing combination studies are small, and it is possible that they have not been designed to detect significant differences between combination treatment and monotherapies. Another limitation of these studies is that, in most of them, lamivudine treatment was discontinued after 1 year, a strategy that is not followed in clinical practice. It was thought to be interesting to evaluate the combination of a short course of interferon (particularly pegylated) with the long-term administration of nucleotide or nucleoside analogues. The efficacy of combining pegylated interferon with the newer nucleotide or nucleoside analogues or of nucleotide with nucleoside analogues could also be evaluated. However, findings show that until more data are available, combination therapy cannot be recommended as first-line treatment in patients with CHB. On the other hand, add-on therapy with adefovir or tenofovir is the treatment of choice in patients who develop resistance to lamivudine. In patients with cirrhosis, a combination of lamivudine/adefovir may also be used as initial treatment; another option would be to add tenofovir in patients with an insufficient response to entecavir.

Pegylated IFN-α 2b added to ongoing lamivudine therapy in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B

AIM: To investigate the role of pegylated-interferon (IFN) α-2b in the management of patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS: Twenty consecutive anti-HBe positive patients were treated with pegylated IFN α-2b (100 μg sc once weekly) for 12 mo. There was no interruption in lamivudine therapy. Hematology, liver biochemistry, serum HBV DNA levels were detected by PCR, and vital signs were also assessed. Liver histology was assessed in some patients at entry and at wk 52 for comparison.

RESULTS: Nine patients (45%) had a partial virological end-treatment response; seven patients (35%) showed complete virological end-treatment response. Eight patients (40%) showed biochemical end-treatment response. There was a trend for higher virological response rates in patients who had previously responded to IFN and relapsed compared to IFN non-responders (four out of seven patients vs none out of six patients, respectively; P = 0.1). Patients without virological end-treatment response showed significant worsening of fibrosis [median score 2 (range, 1 to 3) vs median score 3 (range, 1 to 4)], in the first and second biopsy respectively (P = 0.014), whereas necroinflammatory activity was not significantly affected. Patients with complete or partial virological end-treatment response did not show any significant changes in histological findings, possibly due to the small number of patients with paired biopsies (n = 5). Nevertheless, after 12 mo of follow-up, only one patient (5%) showed sustained virological response and only 2 patients (10%) showed sustained biochemical response. Two patients (10%) discontinued pegylated IFN both after 6 mo of treatment due to flu-like symptoms.

CONCLUSION: Pegylated IFNα-2b, when added to ongoing lamivudine therapy in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B, induces sustained responses only in a small minority of cases.