1
|
Lim H, Park JK, Chung H, Lee SH, Park JM, Park JH, Kim GH, Shin SK, Hong SJ, Lee KJ, Park MI, Jung HK, Kim HS, Sung JK, Jeon SW, Choi SC, Moon JS, Kim N, Park JJ, Hong SH, Kim NY, Jung HY. Efficacy and safety of HIP1601 (dual delayed-release esomeprazole) 40 mg in erosive esophagitis compared to HGP1705 (delayed-release esomeprazole) 40 mg: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:447. [PMID: 38110901 PMCID: PMC10729464 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-03087-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most effective drugs for treating acid-related disorders. However, once-daily dosing with conventional PPIs fail to fully control acid secretion over 24 h. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of HIP1601 (dual delayed-release esomeprazole) and HGP1705 (delayed-release esomeprazole) in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE). METHODS We enrolled 213 patients with EE randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 40 mg HIP1601 (n = 107) or HGP1705 (n = 106) once daily for 4 or 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the EE healing rate, confirmed by endoscopy up to week 8. GERD-related symptoms and treatment-emergent adverse events were compared between both groups. RESULTS By week 8, the estimated healing rates of EE were 97.8% and 96.8% in the HIP1601 and HGP1705 groups, respectively, with a 95% confidence interval of -4.7 to 7.2. After 4 or 8 weeks of treatment, the EE healing rate at week 4, complete resolution rate of symptoms, time to sustained resolution of symptoms, and number of rescue medications used were similar in both groups. The proportion of heartburn- and acid regurgitation-free nights by week 4 were higher in the HIP1601 group compared to the HGP1705 group, but the difference did not reach clinical significance (87.7% vs. 85.8%, P = 0.514, 87.5% vs. 85.8%, P = 0.774). The number of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy and safety of HIP1601 40 mg were comparable to those of HGP1705 40 mg for the treatment of EE and symptomatic improvement of GERD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04080726 ( https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS gov/ct2/show/NCT04080726 ), registration date: 25/10/2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Lim
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Hallym College of Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Kyu Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital, Gangneung, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyunsoo Chung
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Si Hyung Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Myung Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Ho Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Gwang Ha Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Kwan Shin
- Division of Gastroenterology, Institute of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Su Jin Hong
- Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang Jae Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Moo In Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Hye-Kyung Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun-Soo Kim
- Department of internal medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Kyu Sung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Woo Jeon
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Suck Chei Choi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Research Institute, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Seop Moon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Nayoung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong-Jae Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Hee Hong
- Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Na Young Kim
- Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hwoon-Yong Jung
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|