Hereditary Cancer Syndrome Carriers: Feeling Left in the Corner

OBJECTIVES

There is limited evidence on health promotion interventions in people with hereditary cancer syndromes or on their main sources of support and information. This study aimed to understand these patients' experiences and needs, including their information needs, their views on prevention and mental health, and the support they want from nurses.

METHODS

This qualitative study included 22 people (8 previvors and 14 survivors) with hereditary breast and ovarian syndrome or Lynch syndrome from 10 European countries. Participants underwent individual semi-structured interviews, which were recorded and transcribed for reflexive thematic analysis. The patient and public involvement panel provided input on study design and thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Patient experiences were similar regardless of the country and access to testing and screening. Participants reported receiving little information on the importance of health behaviors for cancer risk and expressed their wish to be followed by cancer professionals. They felt compelled to seek support and information from the internet and patient groups. The main themes identified were: (unmet) informational and support needs, seeing life in a different way, and limitations of health care providers.

CONCLUSIONS

People with hereditary cancer syndromes need professionals to be involved in their long-term management and to provide reliable information. As genomics are increasingly integrated in oncology, the need for professionals to support these populations will increase.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nurses are crucial for promoting self-management and advocating for patient decision-making; however, they need skills and knowledge to do so. There is a need for nurses to get more involved in understanding hereditary cancer syndromes and an opportunity to take the lead in the care of these people.

Cascade genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes: a review of barriers and breakthroughs

Germline genetic sequencing is now at the forefront of cancer treatment and preventative medicine. Cascade genetic testing, or the testing of at-risk relatives, is extremely promising as it offers genetic testing and potentially life-saving risk-reduction strategies to a population exponentially enriched for the risk of carrying a cancer-associated pathogenic variant. However, many relatives do not complete cascade testing due to barriers that span individual, relationship, healthcare community, and societal/policy domains. We have reviewed the published research on cascade testing. Our aim is to evaluate barriers to cascade genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes and explore strategies to mitigate these barriers, with the goal of promoting increased uptake of cascade genetic testing.

Cascade genetic counseling and testing in hereditary syndromes: inherited cardiovascular disease as a model: a narrative review

Inherited cardiovascular diseases cover the inherited cardiovascular disease familial hypercholesterolemia and inherited cardiac diseases, like inherited cardiomyopathies and inherited arrhythmia syndromes. Cascade genetic counseling and testing in inherited cardiovascular diseases have had three decades of academic attention. Inherited cardiovascular diseases affect around 1-2% of the population worldwide and cascade genetic counseling and testing are considered valuable since preventive measures and/or treatments are available. Cascade genetic counseling via a family-mediated approach leads to an uptake of genetic counseling and testing among at-risk relatives of around 40% one year after identification of the causal variant in the proband, with uptake remaining far from complete on the long-term. These findings align with uptake rates among relatives at-risk for other late onset medically actionable hereditary diseases, like hereditary cancer syndromes. Previous interventions to increase uptake have focused on optimizing the process of informing relatives through the proband and on contacting relatives directly. However, despite successful information dissemination to at-risk relatives, these approaches had little or no effect on uptake. The limited research into the barriers that impede at-risk relatives from seeking counseling has revealed knowledge, attitudinal, social and practical barriers but it remains unknown how these factors contribute to the decision-making process for seeking counseling in at-risk relatives. A significant effect on uptake of genetic testing has only been reached in the setting of familial hypercholesterolemia, where active information provision was accompanied by a reduction of health-system-related barriers. We propose that more research is needed on barriers -including health-system-related barriers- and how they hinder counseling and testing in at-risk relatives, so that uptake can be optimized by (adjusted) interventions.

Enhanced family history-based algorithms increase the identification of individuals meeting criteria for genetic testing of hereditary cancer syndromes but would not reduce disparities on their own

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to 1) investigate algorithm enhancements for identifying patients eligible for genetic testing of hereditary cancer syndromes using family history data from electronic health records (EHRs); and 2) assess their impact on relative differences across sex, race, ethnicity, and language preference.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study used EHR data from a tertiary academic medical center. A baseline rule-base algorithm, relying on structured family history data (structured data; SD), was enhanced using a natural language processing (NLP) component and a relaxed criteria algorithm (partial match [PM]). The identification rates and differences were analyzed considering sex, race, ethnicity, and language preference.

RESULTS

Among 120,007 patients aged 25-60, detection rate differences were found across all groups using the SD (all P < 0.001). Both enhancements increased identification rates; NLP led to a 1.9 % increase and the relaxed criteria algorithm (PM) led to an 18.5 % increase (both P < 0.001). Combining SD with NLP and PM yielded a 20.4 % increase (P < 0.001). Similar increases were observed within subgroups. Relative differences persisted across most categories for the enhanced algorithms, with disproportionately higher identification of patients who are White, Female, non-Hispanic, and whose preferred language is English.

CONCLUSION

Algorithm enhancements increased identification rates for patients eligible for genetic testing of hereditary cancer syndromes, regardless of sex, race, ethnicity, and language preference. However, differences in identification rates persisted, emphasizing the need for additional strategies to reduce disparities such as addressing underlying biases in EHR family health information and selectively applying algorithm enhancements for disadvantaged populations. Systematic assessment of differences in algorithm performance across population subgroups should be incorporated into algorithm development processes.

"I don't need any more unknowns hanging over my head": Views of patients with cancer on variants of uncertain significance and low/moderate risk results from genomic sequencing

PURPOSE

We sought to explore patient-reported utility of all types of cancer results from genomic sequencing (GS).

METHODS

Qualitative study, using semi-structured interviews with patients who underwent GS within a trial. Thematic analysis employing constant comparison was used. Two coders coded transcripts, with use of a third coder to resolve conflicts.

RESULTS

25 patients participated: female (22), >50 years (18), European (12), Ashkenazi Jewish (5), Middle Eastern (3), or other ethnicity (5), with breast cancer history (20). Patients' perceptions of the utility of cancer GS results hinged on whether they triggered clinical action. For example, when patients were enrolled into high-risk breast cancer surveillance programs for low/moderate risk breast cancer genes, they perceived the results to be very "useful" and of moderate-high utility. In contrast, patients receiving low/moderate risk or primary variants of uncertain significance results without clinical action perceived results as "concerning," leading to harms, such as hypervigilance about cancer symptoms. Overall, having supportive relatives or providers enhanced perceptions of utility.

CONCLUSION

Patients' perceptions of cancer GS results hinged on whether they triggered clinical management. Consequently, patients who received results without clinical action became hypervigilant, experiencing harms. Our findings call for a need to develop practice interventions to support patients with cancer undergoing GS.

Do people with hereditary cancer syndromes inform their at-risk relatives? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

To evaluate rates of familial disclosure of hereditary cancer syndrome information.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO no.: CRD42020134276). Key electronic databases were searched to identify studies evaluating hereditary cancer syndrome cascade relative disclosure. Eligible studies were subjected to meta-analysis.

Results

Thirty-four studies met inclusion criteria. Among 11,711 included relatives, 70% (95% CI 60 - 78%) were informed of their risk of carrying a cancer-associated pathogenic variant; of 2,875 relatives informed of their risk who were evaluated for uptake of cascade testing, 43% (95% CI 27 - 61%) completed testing. Rates of disclosure were higher among female vs male relatives (79% [95% CI 73% - 84%] vs 67% [95% CI 57% - 75%]) and first-degree vs second-degree relatives (83% [95% CI 77% - 88%] vs 58% [95% CI 45 - 69%]).

Conclusion

Nearly one-third of at-risk relatives remain uninformed of their risk of carrying a cancer-associated pathogenic variant. Even among those informed, fewer than half subsequently complete genetic testing, representing a critical missed opportunity for precision cancer prevention.

Innovation

Five studies evaluating interventions to improve disclosure rates were generally ineffective. Urgent work is needed to elucidate barriers to relative disclosure by probands to develop targeted interventions that can optimize proband-mediated cascade genetic testing rates.

[Pancreatic cancer-screening or surveillance?]

BACKGROUND

Despite continuous improvement of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, the number of new pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cases diagnosed annually almost equals the number of PDAC-related deaths. Prerequisite for curative treatment is a resectable tumor at the time of diagnosis. Individuals with genetic and/or familial risk profiles should therefore be screened and included in structured surveillance programs.

OBJECTIVES

Description of the status quo and usefulness of current PDAC screening and surveillance concepts.

METHODS

A selective literature search of current national and international guidelines including underlying literature was performed.

RESULTS

Nearly half of pancreatic cancer cases are missed by currently available surveillance programs, even in high-risk cohorts. Magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic ultrasound supplemented by CA19‑9 (± HbA1c) are not accurate enough to ensure robust earlier pancreatic cancer detection. Complementary biomarker panels will take on a crucial diagnostic role in the future.

Uncommon variants detected via hereditary cancer panel and suggestions for genetic counseling

OBJECTIVE

Hereditary cancer syndromes constitute 5-10% of all cancers. The development of next-generation sequencing technologies has made it possible to examine many hereditary cancer syndrome-causing genes in a single panel. This study's goal was to describe the prevalence and the variant spectrum using NGS in individuals who were thought to have a hereditary predisposition for cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Analysis was performed for 1254 who were thought to have a familial predisposition for cancer. We excluded 46 patients who were carrying BRCA1/2 variants in this study, for focusing on the rare gene mutations. Sequencing was performed using the Sophia Hereditary Cancer Solution v1.1 Panel and the Qiagen Large Hereditary Cancer Panel. The Illumina MiSeq system was used for the sequencing procedure. The software used for the data analyses was Sophia DDM and QIAGEN Clinical Insight (QCITM) Analyze. The resulting genomic changes were classified according to the current guidelines of ACMG/AMP.

RESULTS

Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were detected in 172 (13.7%) of 1254 patients. After excluding the 46 BRCA1/2-positive patients, among the remaining 126 patients; there were 60 (4.8%) breast cancer, 33 (2.6%) colorectal cancer, 9 (0.7%) ovarian cancer, 5 (0.4%) endometrium cancer, 5 (0.4%) stomach cancer, 3 (0.2%) prostate cancer patients. The most altered genes were MUTYH in 27 (2.1%) patients, MMR genes (MLH1, MSH6, MSH, MSH2, PMS2 and EPCAM) in 26 (2%) patients, and ATM in 25 (2%) patients. We also examined the genotype-phenotype correlation in rare variants. Additionally, we identified 11 novel variations.

CONCLUSION

This study provided significant information regarding rare variants observed in the Turkish population because it was carried out with a large patient group. Personalized treatment options and genetic counseling for the patients are therefore made facilitated.

Patient perspectives on risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer risk-reduction: A systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Increasing evidence suggests the fallopian tube as the site of origin of BRCA1/2-associated high-grade ovarian cancers. Several ongoing trials are evaluating salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (RRSDO) for ovarian cancer risk reduction and patients are beginning to ask their clinicians about this surgical option. This study sought to systematically review the available literature examining patient preferences regarding RRSDO and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) to provide clinicians with an understanding of patient values, concerns, and priorities surrounding ovarian cancer risk-reducing surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO No.: CRD42023400690). We searched key electronic databases to identify studies evaluating acceptance and surgical decision-making regarding RRSO and RRSDO among patients with an increased risk of ovarian cancer.

RESULTS

The search yielded 239 results, among which six publications met the systematic review inclusion criteria. Acceptance of RRSDO was evaluated in all studies and ranged from 34% to 71%. Factors positively impacting patients' acceptance of RRSDO included: avoidance of surgical menopause, preservation of fertility, concerns about sexual dysfunction, family history of breast cancer, and avoidance of hormone replacement therapy. Factors limiting this acceptance reported by patients included concerns regarding oncologic safety, surgical timing, and surgical complications.

CONCLUSION

To date, few studies have explored patient perspectives surrounding RRSDO. Collectively, the limited data available indicate a high level of acceptance among BRCA1/2 carriers, and provides insight regarding both facilitating and limiting factors associated with patient preferences to better equip clinicians in the counseling and support of their patients.

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor on a patient with a maternally inherited novel NF1 gene pathogenic germline variant: Case report

INTRODUCTION

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndrome caused by pathogenic variants in NF1, which negatively regulates the RAS pathway. Knowledge of the genotype-phenotype correlation in this disease is an important tool for prognostic evaluation and early detection of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST), present in approximately 10% of these patients. We present the case of a teenager with a left jaw MPNST and a previously unreported germline pathogenic variant on NF1.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 11-year-old female with a NF1 clinical diagnosis was referred to our hospital with a MPNST in an advanced state. A previously unreported NF1 pathogenic variant was obtained (GRCh37: NM_182493.2 c.3299C>G, p.Ser1100*). Despite great efforts from the surgical and medical teams, the tumor progression couldn't be halted, resulting in the patient's death.

DISCUSSION

As MPNSTs are refractory to current treatment regimens, early diagnosis, and development of new therapies, such as MEK inhibitors, is necessary for reducing morbidity and mortality within NF1 patients. This increases the importance of a more widespread genetic testing strategy.

CONCLUSION

The report of a novel NF1 pathogenic variant in a patient with maternally inherited neurofibromatosis type 1 and a MPNST increases the knowledge of the genotype-phenotype correlation in the disease.

The neglected role of preimplantation genetic testing for Lynch syndrome

Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic/single-gene disorders (PGT-M) is a procedure employed in the field of assisted reproductive technology to avoid the transmission of genetic diseases to the offspring. Hereditary cancer syndromes represent a diffuse and accepted indication for PGT-M, but take-up differs among the different disorders. Its use is markedly lower for the genes causing Lynch syndrome compared with the breast cancer type 1 or 2 susceptibility genes (BRCA1/2), despite the similar prevalence and severity of the two conditions. Reasons to explain this difference have not been explored. First, Lynch syndrome may be more frequently undiagnosed compared with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. In addition, the different take-up may be due to different patient perceptions of the conditions and of the management options. Finally, this distinct attitude may depend on the awareness and sensibility of the professionals caring for affected patients. The authors' considerations are, however, speculative, and specific studies aimed at disentangling the causes of the different receptions of PGT-M are warranted to understand how to tackle this gap. In the meantime, we believe that empowerment regarding PGT-M of all individuals with hereditary cancer syndromes, including Lynch syndrome, is ethically due, and plead for a more active involvement of caregivers.

Hereditary cancer syndromes

Hereditary cancer syndromes (HCSs) are arguably the most frequent category of Mendelian genetic diseases, as at least 2% of presumably healthy subjects carry highly-penetrant tumor-predisposing pathogenic variants (PVs). Hereditary breast-ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome make the highest contribution to cancer morbidity; in addition, there are several dozen less frequent types of familial tumors. The development of the majority albeit not all hereditary malignancies involves two-hit mechanism, i.e. the somatic inactivation of the remaining copy of the affected gene. Earlier studies on cancer families suggested nearly fatal penetrance for the majority of HCS genes; however, population-based investigations and especially large-scale next-generation sequencing data sets demonstrate that the presence of some highly-penetrant PVs is often compatible with healthy status. Hereditary cancer research initially focused mainly on cancer detection and prevention. Recent studies identified multiple HCS-specific drug vulnerabilities, which translated into the development of highly efficient therapeutic options.

Insurance Coverage of Prophylactic Mastectomies: A National Review of the United States

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is associated with a multitude of risk factors, such as genetic predisposition and mutations, family history, personal medical history, or previous radiotherapy. A prophylactic mastectomy (PM) may be considered a suitable risk-reducing procedure in some cases. However, there are significant discrepancies between national society recommendations and insurance company requirements for PM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of insurance policies for a PM. One-hundred companies were selected based on the greatest state enrolment and market share. Their policies were identified through a Web-based search and telephone interviews, and their medical necessity criteria were extracted.

RESULTS

Preauthorized coverage of PMs was provided by 39% of insurance policies (n = 39) and 5 indications were identified. There was consensus amongst these policies to cover a PM for BRCA1/2 mutations (n = 39, 100%), but was more variable for other genetic mutations (15%-90%). Coverage of PM for the remaining indications varied among insurers: previous radiotherapy (92%), pathological changes in the breast (3%-92%), personal history of cancer (64%) and family history risk factors (39%-51%).

CONCLUSION

There is a marked level of variability in both the indications and medical necessity criteria for PM insurance policies. The decision to undergo a PM must be carefully considered with a patient's care team and should not be affected by insurance coverage status.

Study protocol for a multi-institutional prospective surveillance study among kindreds with familial pancreatic cancer and individuals with hereditary pancreatic cancer syndrome: The Diamond Study

BACKGROUND

Family history of pancreatic cancer (PC) and some hereditary cancer syndromes are risk factors for PC. Previous studies suggest that conducting surveillance for kindreds at high risk for familial PC may be useful for diagnoses at the stage where resections can still be implemented; however, there is insufficient evidence linking surveillance and increased rates of resectable PC.

METHODS

We launched a surveillance study for kindreds with familial PC and individuals with hereditary PC syndrome, titled the "Diamond Study," in June 2020. This Japanese national multi-institutional prospective intervention study has been initiated to conduct evaluations within a prospective clinical trial format.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint is the fraction of patients with resectable PC among patients with PC found through surveillance interventions. Endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging combined with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography will be performed alternatively every 6 months for up to 15 years, with 400 as the predicted number of registered participants and a predicted registration period of 10 years.

CONCLUSION

We intend to scientifically prove the usefulness of surveillance for kindreds with familial PC and individuals with hereditary PC syndrome to improve PC prognoses.

BAP1-defficient breast cancer in a patient with BAP1 cancer syndrome

BAP1 cancer syndrome is a rare and highly penetrant hereditary cancer predisposition. Uveal melanoma, mesothelioma, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and cutaneous melanoma are considered BAP1 cancer syndrome core cancers, whereas association with breast cancer has previously been suggested but not confirmed so far. In view of BAP1 immunomodulatory functions, BAP1 alterations could prove useful as possible biomarkers of response to immunotherapy in patients with BAP1-associated cancers. We present a case of a patient with BAP1 cancer syndrome who developed a metastatic breast cancer with loss of BAP1 demonstrated on immunohistochemistry. She carried a germline BAP1 likely pathogenic variant (c.898_899delAG p.(Arg300Glyfs*6)). In addition, tumor tissue sequencing identified a concurrent somatic variant in BAP1 (partial deletion of exon 12) and a low tumor mutational burden. As her triple negative tumor was shown to be PD-L1 positive, the patient was treated with combination of atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel. She had a complete and sustained response to immunotherapy even after discontinuation of nab-paclitaxel. This case strengthens the evidence for including breast cancer in the BAP1 cancer syndrome tumor spectrum with implications for future cancer prevention programs. It also indicates immune checkpoint inhibitors might prove to be an effective treatment for BAP1-deficient breast cancer.

Physician-directed genetic screening to evaluate personal risk for medically actionable disorders: a large multi-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

The use of proactive genetic screening for disease prevention and early detection is not yet widespread. Professional practice guidelines from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) have encouraged reporting pathogenic variants that confer personal risk for actionable monogenic hereditary disorders, but only as secondary findings from exome or genome sequencing. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recognizes the potential public health impact of three Tier 1 actionable disorders. Here, we report results of a large multi-center cohort study to determine the yield and potential value of screening healthy individuals for variants associated with a broad range of actionable monogenic disorders, outside the context of secondary findings.

METHODS

Eligible adults were offered a proactive genetic screening test by health care providers in a variety of clinical settings. The screening panel based on next-generation sequencing contained up to 147 genes associated with monogenic disorders within cancer, cardiovascular, and other important clinical areas. Sequence and intragenic copy number variants classified as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, pathogenic (low penetrance), or increased risk allele were considered clinically significant and reported. Results were analyzed by clinical area and severity/burden of disease using chi-square tests without Yates' correction.

RESULTS

Among 10,478 unrelated adults screened, 1619 (15.5%) had results indicating personal risk for an actionable monogenic disorder. In contrast, only 3.1 to 5.2% had clinically reportable variants in genes suggested by the ACMG version 2 secondary findings list to be examined during exome or genome sequencing, and 2% had reportable variants related to CDC Tier 1 conditions. Among patients, 649 (6.2%) were positive for a genotype associated with a disease of high severity/burden, including hereditary cancer syndromes, cardiovascular disorders, or malignant hyperthermia susceptibility.

CONCLUSIONS

This is one of the first real-world examples of specialists and primary care providers using genetic screening with a multi-gene panel to identify health risks in their patients. Nearly one in six individuals screened for variants associated with actionable monogenic disorders had clinically significant results. These findings provide a foundation for further studies to assess the role of genetic screening as part of regular medical care.

Achieving universal genetic assessment for women with ovarian cancer: Are we there yet? A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Several professional organizations recommend universal genetic assessment for people with ovarian cancer as identifying pathogenic variants can affect treatment, prognosis, and all-cause mortality for patients and relatives. We sought to evaluate the literature on genetic assessment for women with ovarian cancer and determine if any interventions or patient characteristics drive utilization of services.

METHODS

We searched key electronic databases to identify trials that evaluated genetic assessment for people with ovarian cancer. Trials with the primary aim to evaluate utilization of genetic assessment with or without interventions were included. Eligible trials were subjected to meta-analysis and the moderating influence of health interventions on rates of genetic assessment were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 35 studies were included (19 report on utilization of genetic services without an intervention, 7 with an intervention, and 9 with both scenarios). Without an intervention, pooled estimates for referral to genetic counseling and completion of genetic testing were 39% [CI 27-53%] and 30% [CI 19-44%]. Clinician-facilitated interventions included: mainstreaming of genetic services (99% [CI 86-100%]), telemedicine (75% [CI 43-93%]), clinic-embedded genetic counselor (76% [CI 32-95%]), reflex tumor somatic genetic assessment (64% [CI 17-94%]), universal testing (57% [28-82%]), and referral forms (26% [CI 10-53%]). Random-effects pooled proportions demonstrated that Black vs. White race was associated with a lower rate of genetic testing (26%[CI 17-38%] vs. 40% [CI 25-57%]) as was being un-insured vs. insured (23% [CI 18-28%] vs. 38% [CI 26-53%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Reported rates of genetic testing for people with ovarian cancer remain well below the goal of universal testing. Interventions such as mainstreaming can improve testing uptake. Strategies aimed at improving utilization of genetic services should consider existing disparities in race and insurance status.

Clinical implementation of an oncology-specific family health history risk assessment tool

BACKGROUND

The presence of hereditary cancer syndromes in cancer patients can have an impact on current clinical care and post-treatment prevention and surveillance measures. Several barriers inhibit identification of hereditary cancer syndromes in routine practice. This paper describes the impact of using a patient-facing family health history risk assessment platform on the identification and referral of breast cancer patients to genetic counselling services.

METHODS

This was a hybrid implementation-effectiveness study completed in breast cancer clinics. English-literate patients not previously referred for genetic counselling and/or gone through genetic testing were offered enrollment. Consented participants were provided educational materials on family health history collection, entered their family health history into the platform and completed a satisfaction survey. Upon completion, participants and their clinicians were given personalized risk reports. Chart abstraction was done to identify actions taken by patients, providers and genetic counsellors.

RESULTS

Of 195 patients approached, 102 consented and completed the study (mean age 55.7, 100 % women). Sixty-six (65 %) met guideline criteria for genetic counseling of which 24 (36 %) were referred for genetic counseling. Of those referred, 13 (54 %) participants attended and eight (33 %) completed genetic testing. On multivariate logistic regression, referral was not associated with age, cancer stage, or race but was associated with clinical provider (p = 0.041). Most providers (71 %) had higher referral rates during the study compared to prior. The majority of participants found the experience useful (84 %), were more aware of their health risks (83 %), and were likely to recommend using a patient-facing platform to others (69 %).

CONCLUSIONS

65 % of patients attending breast cancer clinics in this study are at-risk for hereditary conditions based on current guidelines. Using a patient-facing risk assessment platform enhances the ability to identify these patients systematically and with widespread acceptability and recognized value by patients. As only a third of at-risk participants received referrals for genetic counseling, further understanding barriers to referral is needed to optimize hereditary risk assessment in oncology practices.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NIH Clinical Trials registry, NCT04639934 . Registered Nov 23, 2020 -- Retrospectively registered.

Two Cases of Possible Familial Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in a Family with Extensive History of Cancer

CML is defined by the presence of an oncogenic fusion protein caused by a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 9q and 22q. While our molecular understanding of CML pathogenesis has revolutionized drug development for this disease, we have yet to identify many predisposing factors for CML. Familial occurrence of CML has been rarely reported. Here, we describe 2 cases of CML in a 24-year-old woman and in her 73-year-old maternal great aunt. We describe genetic variants in these patients and report on their environmental exposures that may have contributed to CML pathogenesis. The possible familial association of these 2 cases of CML warrants further investigation into more definitive etiologies of this disease.

Enhanced endoscopic detection of occult gastric cancer in carriers of pathogenic CDH1 variants

BACKGROUND

Germline inactivating variants in the CDH1 tumor suppressor gene impart an elevated lifetime risk of diffuse gastric cancer. The current endoscopic surveillance method depends upon random gastric biopsies for early cancer detection.

METHODS

Asymptomatic adults with pathogenic or likely pathogenic CDH1 variants referred for endoscopic gastric cancer surveillance were included in this retrospective cohort. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed according to the consensus Cambridge method, in the early period, or a systematic (Bethesda) protocol as part of an ongoing natural history study. The primary outcome measure was cancer detection.

RESULTS

Collectively, 135 endoscopic surveillance procedures were performed in 120 patients. Twenty-six (19%, 26/135) procedures were performed using Cambridge method and 109 (81%) using the Bethesda protocol. Gastric signet ring cell carcinomas were detected in 15% (4/26) using the Cambridge method and 36% (40/109) using the Bethesda protocol (p < 0.05). Almost half (44.2%, 53/120) of patients later elected for prophylactic total gastrectomy, of whom 51 (96%, 51/53) had a signet ring cell carcinoma (T1a) discovered by histopathology. On a per endoscopy basis, the false-negative rates of detection using Cambridge method and Bethesda protocol were 80% (12/15) and 37.7% (17/45), respectively (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric cancer detection was more frequent with implementation of a systematic surveillance protocol in CDH1 variant carriers. Given the decision for prophylactic surgery is often made by patients in the context of family history and pathologic result of surveillance biopsies, we propose the Bethesda protocol offers patients an opportunity to make more informed decisions.

Interpretation of BRCA2 Splicing Variants: A Case Series of Challenging Variant Interpretations and the Importance of Functional RNA Analysis

A substantial proportion of pathogenic variants associated with an increased risk of hereditary cancer are sequence variants affecting RNA splicing. The classification of these variants can be complex when both non-functional and functional transcripts are produced from the variant allele. We present four BRCA2 splice site variants with complex variant interpretations (BRCA2 c.68-3T>G, c.68-2A>G, c.425G>T, c.8331+2T>C). Evidence supporting a pathogenic classification is available for each variant, including in silico models, absence in population databases, and published functional data. However, comprehensive RNA analysis showed that some functional transcript may be produced by each variant. BRCA2 c.68-3T>G results in a partial splice defect. For BRCA2 c.68-2A>G and c.425G>T, aberrant splicing was shown to produce a potentially functional, in-frame transcript. BRCA2 c.8331+2T>C may utilize a functional GC donor in place of the wild-type GT donor. The severity of cancer history for carriers of these variants was also assessed using a history weighting algorithm and was not consistent with pathogenic controls (carriers of known pathogenic variants in BRCA2). Due to the conflicting evidence, our laboratory classifies these BRCA2 variants as variants of uncertain significance. This highlights the importance of evaluating new and existing evidence to ensure accurate variant classification and appropriate patient care.

Morphological and molecular heterogeneity of epithelial ovarian cancer: Therapeutic implications

Ovarian epithelial cancer (OEC) is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. Despite current chemotherapeutic and surgical options, this high lethality can be attributed to multiple factors, including late-stage presentation. In order to optimize OEC treatment, it is important to highlight that it is composed of five main subtypes: high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC), endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (EOC), ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCOC), and mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC). These subtypes differ in their precursor lesions, as well as in epidemiological, morphological, molecular and clinical features. OEC is one of the tumours in which most pathogenic germline mutations have been identified. Accordingly, up to 20% OC show alterations in BRCA1/2 genes, and also, although with a lower frequency, in other low penetrance genes associated with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), mismatch repair genes (Lynch syndrome) and TP53. The most important prognostic factor is the 2014 FIGO staging, while older age is also associated with worse survival. HGSOC in all stages and CCC and MOC in advanced stages have the worse prognosis among histological types. Molecular markers have emerged as prognostic factors, particularly mutations in BRCA1/2, which are associated with a better outcome. Regarding treatment, whereas a proportion of HGSOC is sensible to platinum-based treatment and PARP inhibitors due to HRD, the rest of the histological types are relatively chemoresistant. New treatments based in specific molecular alterations are being tested in different histological types. In addition, immunotherapy could be an option, especially for EOC carrying mismatch repair deficiency or POLE mutations.

•

The five different histological types have different precursor lesions and epidemiological, morphological, genetic, epigenetic and clinical features.

•

Histological type is an important prognostic factor.

•

Drugs targeting homologous recombination deficiency have been approved for treatment.

•

The use of immunotherapy is limited due to lack of predictive biomarkers

Differences in cancer prevalence among CHEK2 carriers identified via multi-gene panel testing

PURPOSE

Although CHEK2 is a well-established cancer gene, questions remain including whether risks vary substantially between different variants and whether biallelic carriers have higher risks than heterozygotes. We report on a cohort of individuals with CHEK2 pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (collectively, PV) in order to better characterize this gene.

METHODS

We retrospectively queried samples submitted for multi-gene hereditary cancer testing to identify individuals with CHEK2 PVs and assessed differences in phenotypes among various genotypes.

RESULTS

CHEK2 PVs were identified in 2508 individuals, including 32 individuals with biallelic CHEK2 PVs. Breast (female, 59.9% and male, 11.8%), prostate (20.1%), and colorectal (3.5%), were among the most frequently reported cancers. Select missense PVs showed similar cancer prevalence to truncating PVs while some others showed lower prevalence. No significant differences were observed between biallelic carriers and heterozygotes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support that some, but not all, CHEK2 missense PVs demonstrate lower cancer prevalence; further studies are needed to continue characterizing possible variant specific risks. In addition, biallelic CHEK2 PVs do not appear to be associated with a more severe phenotype than single CHEK2 PVs. Furthermore, co-occurrences with PVs in other cancer risk genes are common among CHEK2 heterozygotes and often warrant additional management.

Cancer Genetics

For most individuals, cancer development is multifactorial; however, up to 10% of all cancers are related to an inherited genetic mutation. As health care shifts to having a greater emphasis on prevention, care providers, including general surgeons, will need to play a role in identifying patients at high risk for cancer development. Genetic testing provides a tool to determine those patients with a genetic mutation and to whom appropriate preventive care and treatment may be offered. It is imperative for general surgeons to understand the role genetics plays in the care of individual patients and their relatives.

Genomic profiling in oncology clinical practice

The development of high-throughput technologies such as next-generation sequencing for DNA sequencing together with the decrease in their cost has led to the progressive introduction of genomic profiling in our daily practice in oncology. Nowadays, genomic profiling is part of genetic counseling, cancer diagnosis, molecular characterization, and as a biomarker of prognosis and response to treatment. Furthermore, germline or somatic genomic characterization of the tumor may provide new treatment opportunities for patients with cancer. In this review, we will summarize the clinical applications and limitations of genomic profiling in oncology clinical practice, focusing on next-generation sequencing.

Germline mutations of SMARCA4 in small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type and in SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated uterine sarcoma: Clinical features of a single family and comparison of large cohorts

OBJECTIVE

Small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) and SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (SMARCA4-DUS) are rare and aggressive tumors, primarily affecting pre- and perimenopausal women. Inactivating SMARCA4 mutations are thought to be the driving molecular events in the majority of these tumors. Here, we report the clinical course of a family with germline SMARCA4 mutation and compare large cohorts of these rare tumor types.

METHODS

We extracted clinico-pathological medical record data for the family with germline SMARCA4 mutation. Clinico-genomic data from SCCOHT and SMARCA4-DUS cohorts were retrospectively extracted from the archives of a large CLIA-certified reference molecular laboratory.

RESULTS

We identified a single family with an inherited germline SMARCA4 mutation, in which two different family members developed either SCCOHT or SMARCA4-DUS, both of whom died within one year of diagnosis, despite aggressive surgical, chemotherapy and immunotherapy treatment. Retrospective comparative analysis of large SCCOHT (n = 48) and SMARCA4-DUS (n = 17) cohorts revealed that SCCOHT patients were younger (median age: 28.5 vs. 49.0) and more likely to have germline SMARCA4 alterations (37.5% vs. 11.8%) than SMARCA4-DUS patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Growing understanding of the role SMARCA4 plays in the pathogenesis of these rare cancers may inform recommended genetic testing and counseling in families with these tumor types.

BAP1 tumor predisposition syndrome case report: pathological and clinical aspects of BAP1-inactivated melanocytic tumors (BIMTs), including dermoscopy and confocal microscopy

BACKGROUND

BRCA1 associated-protein 1 (BAP1) tumor predisposition syndrome is associated with an increased risk for malignant mesotheliomas, uveal and cutaneous melanomas, renal cell carcinomas, and singular cutaneous lesions. The latter are referred to as BAP1-inactivated melanocytic tumors (BIMTs). When multiple BIMTs manifest, they are considered potential markers of germline BAP1 mutations.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here, we report a novel pathogenic BAP1 germline variant in a family with a history of BIMTs, cutaneous melanomas, and mesotheliomas. We also describe singular pathological aspects of the patient's BIMT lesions and their correlation with dermoscopic and reflectance confocal microscopy findings.

CONCLUSIONS

This knowledge is crucial for the recognition of BIMTs by dermatologists and pathologists, allowing the determination of appropriate management for high-risk patients, such as genetic investigations and screening for potentially aggressive tumors.

Survey of primary care physicians' views about breast and ovarian cancer screening for true BRCA1/2 non-carriers

Despite some controversy, true BRCA1/2 non-carriers are generally considered to be at an average risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Primary care physicians are then expected to encourage their non-carrier patients to adopt cancer screening practices appropriate to women of the same age in the general population. This study aimed to describe breast and ovarian cancer screening recommendations that primary care physicians would consider advisable for young true BRCA1/2 non-carriers. One hundred thirty-four family physicians and 123 gynecologists (response rate 45%) completed a cross-sectional mailed survey administered in the Province of Quebec, Canada. The survey included questions about basic genetic knowledge and screening recommendations for two fictitious cases (< 40 years), one carrier and one non-carrier, from a BRCA1/2 mutation-positive family. Screening exams considered advisable did not differ significantly between family physicians and gynecologists. More than 75% of physicians considered the cancer risks of true non-carriers to be comparable with that of the general population and 14% to be a little higher. Still, 53% would prescribe a biennial and or even an annual (27%) mammography to a non-carrier woman before the recommended starting age. Physician considerations of non-carriers' expectations or requests for screening were associated with more screening prescriptions. More than half of primary care physicians would recommend more mammography screenings than expected for a young true BRCA1/2 non-carrier. Personalized cancer risk assessment may help primary care physicians tailor screening of women from BRCA1/2 mutation-positive families and allow these women to make more informed choices regarding cancer risk management options.

The spectrum of Lynch syndrome-associated germ-line mutations in Russia

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), also known as Lynch syndrome (LS), is a common cancer-predisposing syndrome. This study aimed to investigate the spectrum of germ-line mutations in Russian LS patients. LS-related mismatch repair (MMR) genes were analyzed in 16 patients, who were forwarded to genetic testing due to strong clinical features of LS and had high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H) in the tumor (n = 14) or unknown MSI status (n = 2). In addition, 672 consecutive colorectal cancer (CRC) cases were screened for family history; 15 patients were younger than 50 years and reported 2 or more instances of LS-related cancers in 1st- or 2nd-degree relatives. Seven of these cases demonstrated MSI-H and therefore were subjected to DNA germ-line testing. Overall, 17/23 (74%) subjects carried LS-associated gene variants (MLH1: 10; MSH2: 4; MSH6: 2; PMS2: 1), with 2 alleles (MLH1 c.677G > T and MSH2 с.1906G > C) detected twice. Testing for recurrent mutations of 30 consecutive MSI-H CRCs led to the identification of 2 additional subjects with LS. The analysis of all relevant publications identified 28 unrelated LS patients presented in Russian medical literature and 3 unrelated Russian LS subjects described in international journals. Overall, 15/49 (31%) genetic defects revealed in Russian LS patients were represented by six recurrent alleles (MLH1: c.350C > T, c.677G > T, c.1852_1854del; MSH2: c.942+3A > T, c.1861C > T, с.1906G > C). We conclude that the founder effect for LS in Russia is seemingly less pronounced than the one for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome, however testing for recurrent LS mutations may be considered feasible in some circumstances.

Outcomes of disease-specific next-generation sequencing gene panel testing in adolescents and young adults with colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Adolescents and young adults with colorectal cancer (CRC) have attracted recent attention, with a hereditary syndrome identified in one-third of patients diagnosed ≤ 35. We aimed to study this population to determine if a CRC-specific gene panel increased the yield of testing.

METHODS

Patients with CRC ≤ 35 evaluated from 05/2014-11/2017 were identified from the genetic counseling database. Records were reviewed for personal/family history and genetic counseling outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-three patients with CRC ≤ 35 were included. One hundred four (72.7%) underwent CRC panel testing. Thirty-nine (27.2%) had syndrome-directed testing, declined, or were lost to follow-up. Forty-two patients had a genetic syndrome (29.4%). Twenty-four of the 42 hereditary patients (57.1%) were identified via syndrome-directed testing. Mutations identified via panel testing were consistent with patient personal/family history. Thirty-three patients had at least one variant of uncertain significance.

CONCLUSION

Hereditary syndromes were identified in 29.4% of patients. Panel testing in patients without a phenotype did not increase diagnostic yield, but identified variants in one-third. Disease-specific panel testing is of low yield in young patients without a suggestive personal/family history. Testing broader panels may increase the yield of mutation pick-up in this population, although at the expense of identifying variants.

Recent advances in Lynch syndrome

Lynch syndrome is one of the most common hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes and is associated with increased risks of colorectal and endometrial cancer, as well as multiple other cancer types. While the mechanism of mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability and its role in Lynch-associated carcinogenesis has been known for some time, there have been significant advances recently in diagnostic testing and the understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of Lynch tumors. There is also an increased awareness that the clinical phenotype and cancer risk varies by specific mismatch repair mutation, which in turn has implications on surveillance strategies for patients. Even the treatment of Lynch-associated cancers has changed with the addition of immunotherapy for advanced disease. This progress report aims to review some of the many advances in epidemiology, molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis, clinical phenotype, cancer surveillance, treatment, and chemo- and immune-prevention strategies in the Lynch syndrome field over the past 5 years.

The Influence of Adolescence on Parents' Perspectives of Testing and Discussing Inherited Cancer Predisposition

Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a highly penetrant cancer predisposition syndrome that may present with a first cancer before or during adolescence/young adulthood. Families offered LFS genetic testing for their children can inform our understanding of how the unique developmental context of adolescence influences parental perspectives about genetic testing and discussions of cancer risk. In this study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 46 parents of children at risk for LFS to capture those perspectives. Analysis utilized summary descriptive statistics and inductive qualitative content coding. Most parents (33/46; 72%) expressed beliefs that adolescence influences the importance of LFS testing and/or discussions about genetic risk. Twenty-six parents related this influence to cognitive, physical, and social changes occurring during adolescence. Aspects of adolescence perceived as promoting LFS testing/discussion included developmental appropriateness, risks of cancer in adolescence, need for medical screening decisions, influence on behaviors, transition to adult health care, and reproductive risks. Aspects of adolescence perceived as complicating LFS testing/discussions included potential negative emotional impact, misunderstanding, added burden, and negative impact on self-image or future planning. Parents recognize the complex influence that adolescence has on LFS testing and conversations surrounding results. Further research is needed to understand the actual impact of genetic testing on young people, and how to best support parents and adolescents within the broader context of heritable diseases.

Randomized Controlled Trials in Hereditary Cancer Syndromes

Conducting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with germline mutations in genes that predispose to adult-onset cancer is hampered by the rarity of these mutations, barriers to their identification, and challenges inherent to randomizing high-risk individuals as part of a clinical trial. Most of the clinically relevant RCTs have been conducted in 3 syndromes in only some of the high-risk genes for which clinical testing is currently available. This article reviews the surgical, screening, and chemoprevention RCTs in each of the syndromes in clinically relevant studies conducted in the past 10 years.

The role of screening MRI in the era of next generation sequencing and moderate-risk genetic mutations

With the advent of next-generation sequencing, the ability to rapidly analyze numerous genes simultaneously has led to the creation of large cancer gene panels. Some of these genes, like BRCA1 and BRCA2, have been heavily researched and have well-established management guidelines. Other more newly established genes, like ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2, have previously had less robust research surrounding them which has limited the ability to create accurate risk estimates. With their inclusion on gene panels, there has been more pressure to produce management guidelines for patients discovered to carry pathogenic variants in these genes. For known high-risk genes, it is recommended for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and mammogram to be offered annually. This combination has been proven to be more effective at detecting breast cancer than mammography alone, with a combined sensitivity of 94% (Leach et al. in Lancet 365(9473):1769-1778, 2005). Women with a lifetime risk of breast cancer of 20% and higher have been recommended to have both breast MRI and mammography performed (Saslow et al. in CA Cancer J Clin 57(2):75-89, 2007). For women with pathogenic variants detected in moderate risk genes with lifetime breast cancer risks of at least 20%, breast MRI should be offered as part of their management. For more newly discovered genes with suspected associated risks at or above 20%, the use of breast MRI should be considered for their management as well.

Genetics and Genomics in Oncology Nursing: What Does Every Nurse Need to Know?

In addition to the need for basic education about genetics/genomics, other approaches are suggested to include awareness campaigns, continuing education courses, policy review, and onsite clinical development. These alternative learning strategies encourage oncology nurses across the continuum of care, from the bedside/seatside to oncology nurse research, to integrate genomics into all levels of practice and research in the specialty of oncology nursing. All nurses are warriors in the fight against cancer. The goal of this article is to identify genomic information that oncology nurses, at all levels of care, need to know and use as tools in the war against cancer.

Inherited mutations in DNA repair genes and cancer risk

Although most cancer cases are due to somatic mutations, up to 10% of cases are attributable to germline mutations. This inherited cancer predisposition is mostly due to the loss of function of suppressor genes rather than the activation of oncogenes. Defects in DNA repair genes are the genetic events most commonly involved in hereditary cancers. The implementation of high-throughput sequencing in diagnostic testing has uncovered new predisposition genes. Furthermore, for some tumor types these sequencing techniques have also unveiled a prevalence of germline mutations significantly higher than previous estimations. The clinical implications of many of these repair defects are yet to be defined. Further studies will need to be conducted to establish the most appropriated management of unaffected carriers that are likely to grow in numbers. On the contrary, the presence of DNA repair defects provides a unique opportunity for the development of treatments that take advantage of a tumor feature. In this review article, we summarize not only the most common syndromes linked to DNA repair defects but also less known entities. We address the underlying genetics and the clinical implications of each DNA repair defect as well as the current recommendations for cancer surveillance.

Cowden Syndrome: Serendipitous Diagnosis in Patients with Significant Breast Disease. Case Series and Literature Review

Cowden syndrome (CS) is a multi-system disease that carries an increased lifetime risk of developing certain cancers as well as benign neoplasms. The presence of features of CS in the general unaffected population results in difficulties in the recognition and diagnosis of this condition. Early diagnosis is essential to prevent the development of malignant neoplasms, yet despite the introduction of diagnostic criteria and risk calculators, accurate diagnosis remains a challenge. We identified three patients who presented to the symptomatic breast unit of a University Teaching Hospital over a period of 12 weeks who subsequently were diagnosed with CS. In this article, we discuss their clinical presentations as well as their path to diagnosis. The short timeframe between the presentations of these patients undoubtedly expedited their diagnosis. Upon application of internationally recognized diagnostic criteria, only two out of our three patients were accurately diagnosed. The risk of breast cancer in CS is comparable with that found in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome and while a protocol for breast screening in these patients exists in most centres, no such protocol exists for patients with CS in our institution. The recommended cancer surveillance programs for patients with CS have not been found to prolong survival, however. CS consists of a vast array of diseases that span the various specialties and the subsequent varied phenotypic presentation poses diagnostic difficulties for clinicians as emphasized in our series. Continued research is required to improve recognition and diagnosis and will hopefully result in the emergence of life prolonging strategies.

Video-assisted genetic counseling in patients with ovarian, fallopian and peritoneal carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To compare the proportion of patients with ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal carcinoma who receive genetic testing after observing a genetic counseling video versus after traditional referral for genetic counseling and testing at physician discretion.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients seen at the West Cancer Center for evaluation of ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal carcinoma from 7/2014 to 8/2015. Patients seen between 7/2014 and 12/2014 were offered standard genetic counseling. We adopted a new standard of care from 3/2015 to 8/2015 involving the use of a genetic counseling video on a digital tablet. The video was shown to patients with ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal cancer, who were then given the option to undergo genetic testing at the end of the viewing. We compared the number and proportion of patients who received genetic testing in both groups.

RESULTS

The initial group of 267 patients received referral and te\sting at the physician's discretion between 8/2014 and 12/2014. 77/267 (29%) of these patients underwent genetic testing. 295 patients viewed the condensed genetic counseling video with the option to receive testing the same day between 3/2015 and 8/2015. 162/295 (55%) of these patients received testing. The transition from a referral method to the video counseling method resulted in a significant increase of patients tested (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Using a genetic counseling video and providing an immediate option for testing significantly increased the proportion of patients with ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal carcinoma who received genetic testing.

Cytotoxic and targeted therapy for hereditary cancers

There is a number of drugs demonstrating specific activity towards hereditary cancers. For example, tumors in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers usually arise via somatic inactivation of the remaining BRCA allele, which makes them particularly sensitive to platinum-based drugs, PARP inhibitors (PARPi), mitomycin C, liposomal doxorubicin, etc. There are several molecular assays for BRCA-ness, which permit to reveal BRCA-like phenocopies among sporadic tumors and thus extend clinical indications for the use of BRCA-specific therapies. Retrospective data on high-dose chemotherapy deserve consideration given some unexpected instances of cure from metastatic disease among BRCA1/2-mutated patients. Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is characterized by high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H), increased antigenicity and elevated expression of immunosuppressive molecules. Recent clinical trial demonstrated tumor responses in HNPCC patients treated by the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab. There are successful clinical trials on the use of novel targeted agents for the treatment or rare cancer syndromes, e.g. RET inhibitors for hereditary medullary thyroid cancer, mTOR inhibitors for tumors arising in patients with tuberous sclerosis (TSC), and SMO inhibitors for basal-cell nevus syndrome. Germ-line mutation tests will be increasingly used in the future for the choice of the optimal therapy, therefore turnaround time for these laboratory procedures needs to be significantly reduced to ensure proper treatment planning.

Identification of novel hereditary cancer genes by whole exome sequencing

Whole exome sequencing (WES) provides a powerful tool for medical genetic research. Several dozens of WES studies involving patients with hereditary cancer syndromes have already been reported. WES led to breakthrough in understanding of the genetic basis of some exceptionally rare syndromes; for example, identification of germ-line SMARCA4 mutations in patients with ovarian hypercalcemic small cell carcinomas indeed explains a noticeable share of familial aggregation of this disease. However, studies on common cancer types turned out to be more difficult. In particular, there is almost a dozen of reports describing WES analysis of breast cancer patients, but none of them yet succeeded to reveal a gene responsible for the significant share of missing heritability. Virtually all components of WES studies require substantial improvement, e.g. technical performance of WES, interpretation of WES results, mode of patient selection, etc. Most of contemporary investigations focus on genes with autosomal dominant mechanism of inheritance; however, recessive and oligogenic models of transmission of cancer susceptibility also need to be considered. It is expected that the list of medically relevant tumor-predisposing genes will be rapidly expanding in the next few years.

Do hereditary syndrome-related gynecologic cancers have any specific features?

Abstract

Hereditary syndromes are responsible for 10 % of gynaecologic cancers, among which hereditary breast-ovarian cancer and hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer syndromes, known as HBOC and Lynch syndromes respectively, present the highest relative risk. The latter predisposes to endometrial cancer and both contribute to ovarian cancer. Cowden syndrome-related endometrial cancer and the increased risk of ovarian, uterine and cervical cancers associated with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, are also demonstrated, while Li-Fraumeni syndrome patients are prone to develop ovarian and endometrial cancers. Despite these syndromes’ susceptibility to gynaecologic cancers being consensual, it is still not clear whether these tumours have any epidemiologic, clinical, pathologic or imaging specific features that could allow any of the intervening physicians to raise suspicion of a hereditary syndrome in patients without known genetic risk. Moreover, controversy exists regarding both screening and surveillance schemes. Our literature review provides an updated perspective on the evidence-based specific features of tumours related to each of these syndromes as well as on the most accepted screening and surveillance guidelines. In addition, some illustrative cases are presented.

Teaching Points

• HBOC syndrome is mainly associated with ovarian HGSC, which arises in fallopian fimbriae.

• LS-related endometrial tumours show histological diversity and predilection for lower uterine segment.

• LS and CS-related ovarian cancers are mostly of non-serous type, usually endometrioid.

• Ovarian SCTAT and cervical adenoma malignum are strongly associated with PJS.

• Unfortunately, hereditary gynaecologic cancers do not seem to have distinctive imaging features.

The aggregation of early-onset melanoma in young Western Australian families

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined the familial aggregation of melanoma or its co-aggregation with other cancers using whole-population based designs. This study aimed to investigate aggregation patterns in young Western Australian families, using population-based linked health data to identify individuals born in Western Australia between 1974 and 2007, their known relatives, and all incident cancer diagnoses within the resulting 1,506,961 individuals.

METHODS

Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compare the risk of melanoma for first-degree relatives of melanoma cases to that for first-degree relatives of controls, with bootstrapping used to account for correlations within families. The risk of (i) developing melanoma based on the number of first-degree relatives with other cancers, and (ii) developing non-melanoma cancers based on the number of first-degree relatives diagnosed with melanoma was also investigated.

RESULTS

First-degree relatives of melanoma cases had a significantly greater incidence of melanoma than first-degree relatives of individuals not affected with melanoma (Hazard Ratio (HR)=3.58, 95% bootstrap confidence interval (CI): 2.43-5.43). Sensitivity analyses produced a higher hazard ratio estimate when restricted to melanoma cases diagnosed before 40 years of age (HR=3.77, bootstrap 95% CI: 2.49-6.39) and a lower estimate when only later-onset cases (>40 years) were considered (HR=2.45, bootstrap 95% CI: 1.23-4.82). No significant evidence was found for co-aggregation between melanoma and any other cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicated a strong familial basis of melanoma, with the higher than expected hazard ratio observed likely to reflect early-age at onset cases in this young cohort, supported by the results of the sensitivity analyses. Exploratory analyses suggested that the determinants of melanoma causing the observed aggregation within families may be independent of other malignancies, although these analyses were limited by the young age of the sample. Determining familial aggregation patterns will provide valuable knowledge regarding improved clinical risk prediction and the underlying biological mechanisms of melanoma and other cancers.

Genetic predisposition to pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC) is the most deadly of the common cancers. Owing to its rapid progression and almost certain fatal outcome, identifying individuals at risk and detecting early lesions are crucial to improve outcome. Genetic risk factors are believed to play a major role. Approximately 10% of PC is estimated to have familial inheritance. Several germline mutations have been found to be involved in hereditary forms of PC, including both familial PC (FPC) and PC as one of the manifestations of a hereditary cancer syndrome or other hereditary conditions. Although most of the susceptibility genes for FPC have yet to be identified, next-generation sequencing studies are likely to provide important insights. The risk of PC in FPC is sufficiently high to recommend screening of high-risk individuals; thus, defining such individuals appropriately is the key. Candidate genes have been described and patients considered for screening programs under research protocols should first be tested for presence of germline mutations in the BRCA2, PALB2 and ATM genes. In specific PC populations, including in Italy, hereditary cancer predisposition genes such as CDKN2A also explain a considerable fraction of FPC.

PTEN germline mutations in patients initially tested for other hereditary cancer syndromes: would use of risk assessment tools reduce genetic testing?

PURPOSE

PTEN Hamartoma Tumor syndrome (PHTS) includes patients with Cowden syndrome or other syndromes with germline mutation of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene. The risk for breast, colorectal, and endometrial cancer and polyposis is increased, creating clinical overlap with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), Lynch syndrome (LS), and adenomatous polyposis syndromes (APS). We reviewed our series of patients with PHTS to determine how often testing criteria for these syndromes were met and how often other-gene testing was ordered before testing PTEN.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were prospectively recruited by relaxed International Cowden Consortium criteria or presence of known germline PTEN mutation. Mutations were identified by mutation scanning/multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis and confirmed by sequencing/quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Patients were excluded if they were adopted, were <18 years of age, or if they were diagnosed with Cowden syndrome before 1998. Standard risk-assessment models were applied to determine whether patients met HBOC testing criteria, LS-relevant Amsterdam II/Bethesda 2004 criteria, or had adenomatous polyps. Prior probability of PTEN mutation was estimated with the Cleveland Clinic PTEN risk calculator.

RESULTS

Of 137 PTEN mutation-positive adult probands, 59 (43.1%) met testing criteria for HBOC or LS. Of these, 45 (32.8%) were first offered HBOC, LS, or APS testing. Of those who underwent APS testing, none of the six patients met criteria. Initial risk assessment by a genetics specialist was significantly associated with immediate PTEN testing in patients also meeting HBOC testing criteria. Using this PTEN risk assessment tool could have spared gene testing for 22 unlikely syndromes, at a total cost of $66,080.

CONCLUSION

PHTS is an important differential diagnosis for patients referred for HBOC, LS, or APS. Risk assessment tools may help focus genetic analysis and aid in the interpretation of multiplex testing.