Evaluation of the sensory environment in a large tertiary ICU

BACKGROUND

ICU survival is improving. However, many patients leave ICU with ongoing cognitive, physical, and/or psychological impairments and reduced quality of life. Many of the reasons for these ongoing problems are unmodifiable; however, some are linked with the ICU environment. Suboptimal lighting and excessive noise contribute to a loss of circadian rhythms and sleep disruptions, leading to increased mortality and morbidity. Despite long-standing awareness of these problems, meaningful ICU redesign is yet to be realised, and the 'ideal' ICU design is likely to be unique to local context and patient cohorts. To inform the co-design of an improved ICU environment, this study completed a detailed evaluation of the ICU environment, focussing on acoustics, sound, and light.

METHODS

This was an observational study of the lighting and acoustic environment using sensors and formal evaluations. Selected bedspaces, chosen to represent different types of bedspaces in the ICU, were monitored during prolonged study periods. Data were analysed descriptively using Microsoft Excel.

RESULTS

Two of the three monitored bedspaces showed a limited difference in lighting levels across the day, with average daytime light intensity not exceeding 300 Lux. In bedspaces with a window, the spectral power distribution (but not intensity) of the light was similar to natural light when all ceiling lights were off. However, when the ceiling lights were on, the spectral power distribution was similar between bedspaces with and without windows. Average sound levels in the study bedspaces were 63.75, 56.80, and 59.71 dBA, with the single room being noisier than the two open-plan bedspaces. There were multiple occasions of peak sound levels > 80 dBA recorded, with the maximum sound level recorded being > 105 dBA. We recorded one new monitor or ventilator alarm commencing every 69 s in each bedspace, with only 5% of alarms actioned. Acoustic testing showed poor sound absorption and blocking.

CONCLUSIONS

This study corroborates other studies confirming that the lighting and acoustic environments in the study ICU were suboptimal, potentially contributing to adverse patient outcomes. This manuscript discusses potential solutions to identified problems. Future studies are required to evaluate whether an optimised ICU environment positively impacts patient outcomes.

Variability of environmental sound levels: An observational study from a general adult intensive care unit in the UK

Background

Intensive care units are significantly louder than WHO guidelines recommend. Patients are disturbed by activities around them and frequently report disrupted sleep. This can lead to slower recovery and long-term health problems. Environmental sound levels are usually reported as LAeq24, a single daily value that reflects mean sound levels over the previous 24-h period. This may not be the most appropriate measure for intensive care units (ICUs) and other similar areas. Humans experience sound in context, and disturbance will vary according to both the individual and acoustic features of the ambient sounds. Loudness is one of a number of measures that approximate the human perception of sound, taking into account tone, duration, and frequency, as well as volume. Typically sounds with higher frequencies, such as alarms, are perceived as louder and more disturbing.

Methods

Sound level data were collected from a single NHS Trust hospital general adult intensive care unit between October 2016 and May 2018. Summary data (mean sound levels (LAeq) and corresponding Zwicker calculated loudness values) were subsequently analysed by minute, hour, and day.

Results

The overall mean LAeq24 across the study duration was 47.4 dBA. This varied by microphone location. We identified a clear pattern to sound level fluctuations across the 24-h period. Weekends were significantly quieter than weekdays in statistical terms but this reduction of 0.2 dB is not detectable by human hearing. Peak loudness values over 90 dB were recorded every hour.

Conclusions

Perception of sound is sensitive to the environment and individual characteristics and sound levels in the ICU are location specific. This has implications for routine environmental monitoring practices. Peak loudness values are consistently between 90 and 100 dB. These may be driven by alarms and other sudden high-frequency sounds, leading to more disturbance than LAeq24 sound levels suggest. Addressing sounds with high loudness values may improve the ICU environment more than an overall reduction in the 24-h mean decibel value.

Conflict Sources and Management in the ICU Setting before and during COVID-19: A Scoping Review of the Literature

Introduction. Conflicts are an inherent part of work within any organisation. They can arise between members of an interdisciplinary team (or between teams representing different departments), between patients and team members/family members, and patients’ families and team members. Various conflict situations among employees may occur, therefore it is very important to identify their causes and take preventive or targeted corrective measures. The aim of this study was to review the available literature concerning conflicts arising in ICUs—their types, methods of expression as well as their management and mitigation. In addition, we reviewed the available literature on the impact of the pandemic on the ICU environment caring for COVID-19 patients. Methods. The databases were searched. Single key words or their combinations using AND or OR operators were entered. Eventually, 15 articles were included in our review, which included two identical papers. Results. Conflicts occurred occasionally or rarely; researchers describing ethical conflicts demonstrated a moderate level of exposure to conflicts. The pandemic created many challenges and ethical dilemmas that are a source of ethical conflict. Conclusions. As conflict by nature remains inevitable, adequate procedures in conflict management should be developed and the leadership of managing personnel should be reinforced, because team members frequently expect guidance from their supervisors. The importance of training in interpersonal communication and crisis situation management in healthcare should therefore be emphasised.

Intensive Care Unit Environment and Sleep

Patients undergoing treatment in intensive care unit are in an extremely vulnerable state and require a complex multidisciplinary approach. Adequate sleep is required to maintain physiologic functions of the human body. Good sleep quality plays a vital role in the process of recovery. Sleep disruption in intensive care settings is a well-known fact. The consequences of sleep deprivation can cause numerous complications including delayed mechanical ventilation wean, neurocognitive dysfunction, decreased immune function and increased mortality rates. This review describes how the intensive care unit environment impacts sleep architecture.

Mapping sources of noise in an intensive care unit

Excessive noise in hospitals adversely affects patients' sleep and recovery, causes stress and fatigue in staff and hampers communication. The World Health Organization suggests sound levels should be limited to 35 decibels. This is probably unachievable in intensive care units, but some reduction from current levels should be possible. A preliminary step would be to identify principal sources of noise. As part of a larger project investigating techniques to reduce environmental noise, we installed a microphone array system in one with four beds in an adult general intensive care unit. This continuously measured locations and sound pressure levels of noise sources. This report summarises results recorded over one year. Data were collected between 7 April 2017 and 16 April 2018 inclusive. Data for a whole day were available for 248 days. The sound location system revealed that the majority of loud sounds originated from extremely limited areas, very close to patients' ears. This proximity maximises the adverse effects of high environmental noise levels for patients. Some of this was likely to be appropriate communication between the patient, their caring staff and visitors. However, a significant proportion of loud sounds may originate from equipment alarms which are sited at the bedside. A redesign of the intensive care unit environment to move alarm sounds away from the bed-side might significantly reduce the environmental noise burden to patients.

Rethinking the intensive care environment: considering nature in nursing practice

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

With consideration of an environmental concept, this paper explores evidence related to the negative impacts of the intensive care unit environment on patient outcomes and explores the potential counteracting benefits of 'nature-based' nursing interventions as a way to improve care outcomes.

BACKGROUND

The impact of the environment in which a patient is nursed has long been recognised as one determinant in patient outcomes. Whilst the contemporary intensive care unit environment contains many features that support the provision of the intensive therapies the patient requires, it can also be detrimental, especially for long-stay patients.

DESIGN

This narrative review considers theoretical and evidence-based literature that supports the adoption of nature-based nursing interventions in intensive care units.

METHODS

Research and theoretical literature from a diverse range of disciplines including nursing, medicine, psychology, architecture and environmental science were considered in relation to patient outcomes and intensive care nursing practice.

CONCLUSION

There are many nature-based interventions that intensive care unit nurses can implement into their nursing practice to counteract environmental stressors. These interventions can also improve the environment for patients' families and nurses.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Intensive care unit nurses must actively consider and manage the environment in which nursing occurs to facilitate the best patient outcomes.