[Assessment of prescribing practices in overactive bladder pharmacotherapy across different specialties of India: a prescription trend analysis]

PURPOSE

To assess the prescribing practices for overactive bladder (OAB) pharmacotherapy based on the prescription trend analysis across different specialties of India.

METHOD

s: IQVIA (Quintiles and IMS Health) secondary sales audit (SSA), as well as a prescription audit for antimuscarinics and beta-3 adrenoceptor agonists (mirabegron) from 2014 to 2021, were analyzed. The data includes SSA data of various antimuscarinics like solifenacin, oxybutynin, tolterodine, darifenacin, trospium and mirabegron change in the prescription trend of antimuscarinics and mirabegron across different specialties; prescribers overlap analysis for solifenacin and mirabegron among Indian urologists were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Urologists prescription rates of OAB drugs were 65% in 2016 and 54% in 2021. The rate of OAB medication prescription by non-urologist was highest from the surgeon (11%), followed by gynecologists (9%) and consultant physicians (8%) in 2021. In addition, among OAB medication prescription rates for antimuscarinics were 100% in 2016 and 58% in 2021 whereas for mirabegron, it was 0% in 2016 and 42% in 2021. Solifenacin was most frequently prescribed anticholinergics, followed by oxybutynin, tolterodine, darifenacin, and trospium. The proportion of prescribers of OAB medication among urologists was 38% in 2016 and 33% in 2021. Exclusive prescribers of solifenacin were 748 in 2018 and 739 in 2021 at the urologist, whereas for mirabegron, it was 961 in 2018 and 934 in 2021. The compound annual growth rate for prescription of the last 6 years (from 2016-2021) for solifenacin and mirabegron was -3% and 8% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Urology remained a top prescribing specialty for OAB drugs, although prescription share increased at surgeon and consultant physician. OAB medicines prescriptions by urologists are shifting from leading antimuscarinic solifenacin to beta-agonist mirabegron. Data from this study will ultimately lead to the OAB medication preference by the specialist that could lead to more advanced OAB management.

Use of glucagon in severe hypoglycemia is scarce in most countries, and has not been expanded by new ready-to-use glucagons

Glucagon (traditional kits for intramuscular administration, Glucagon and Glucagen), although recommended as a remedy for severe hypoglycemia (SH), has been reported to be under-utilized, likely because of technical problems. The aims of this study were to evaluate the use of glucagon in persons with type 1 diabetes in several countries, and to investigate if the availability of new ready-to-use glucagons (Baqsimi, Gvoke, Zegalogue, years 2019 to 2021) has expanded the overall use of glucagon. The source of data was IQVIA-MIDAS (units of glucagon sold), while data on persons with type 1 diabetes in countries were derived from IDF Diabetes Atlas. The use of glucagon has been steady from 2014 to 2019, with a small but significant increase from 2019 to 2021, paradoxically only in countries where new ready-to-use glucagons were not available. The use of glucagon has always been ten fold greater in countries where new ready-to-use glucagons became available than in the other countries (population 108,000,000 vs 28,100,000, 480,291 vs 182,018 persons with type 1 diabetes). A significant correlation was observed in all years between units of glucagon and persons with type 1 diabetes. Availability of new ready-to-use glucagons was associated with a small increase of sales, due only to new ready-to-use glucagons themselves. The use of glucagon (any type) remains low, approximately 1/10 of persons with type 1 diabetes. We conclude that use of glucagon is scarce in most countries, and so far has not been expanded by new ready-to-use glucagons such as the ones considered in this study.