Impact of transcription factors KLF1 and GATA1 on red blood cell antigen expression: a review

KLF transcription factor 1 (KLF1) and GATA binding protein 1 (GATA1) are transcription factors (TFs) that initiate and regulate transcription of the genes involved in erythropoiesis. These TFs possess DNA-binding domains that recognize specific nucleotide sequences in genes, to which they bind and regulate transcription. Variants in the genes that encode either KLF1 or GATA1 can result in a range of hematologic phenotypes-from benign to severe forms of thrombocytopenia and anemia; they can also weaken the expression of blood group antigens. The Lutheran (LU) blood group system is susceptible to TF gene variations, particularly KLF1 variants. Individuals heterozygous for KLF1 gene variants show reduced Lutheran antigens on red blood cells that are not usually detected by routine hemagglutination methods. This reduced antigen expression is referred to as the In(Lu) phenotype. For accurate blood typing, it is important to distinguish between the In(Lu) phenotype, which has very weak antigen expression, and the true Lunull phenotype, which has no antigen expression. The International Society of Blood Transfusion blood group allele database registers KLF1 and GATA1 variants associated with modified Lutheran expression. Here, we review KLF1 and recent novel gene variants defined through investigating blood group phenotype and genotype discrepancies or, for one report, investigating cases with unexplained chronic anemia. In addition, we include a review of the GATA1 TF, including a case report describing the second GATA1 variant associated with a serologic Lu(a-b-) phenotype. Finally, we review both past and recent reports on variations in the DNA sequence motifs on the blood group genes that disrupt the binding of the GATA1 TF and either remove or reduce erythroid antigen expression. This review highlights the diversity and complexity of the transcription process itself and the need to consider these factors as an added component for accurate blood group phenotyping.

Targeted next-generation sequencing and long-read HiFi sequencing provide novel insights into clinically significant KLF1 variants

BACKGROUND

Krüppel-like factor 1 (KLF1), a crucial erythroid transcription factor, plays a significant role in various erythroid changes and haemolytic diseases. The rare erythrocyte Lutheran inhibitor (In(Lu)) blood group phenotype serves as an effective model for identifying KLF1 hypomorphic and loss-of-function variants. In this study, we aimed to analyse the genetic background of the In(Lu) phenotype in a population-based sample group by high-throughput technologies to find potentially clinically significant KLF1 variants.

RESULTS

We included 62 samples with In(Lu) phenotype, screened from over 300,000 Chinese blood donors. Among them, 36 samples were sequenced using targeted Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), whereas 19 samples were sequenced using High Fidelity (HiFi) technology. In addition, seven samples were simply sequenced using Sanger sequencing. A total of 29 hypomorphic or loss-of-function variants of KLF1 were identified, 21 of which were newly discovered. All new variants discovered by targeted NGS or HiFi sequencing were validated through Sanger sequencing, and the obtained results were found to be consistent. The KLF1 haplotypes of all new variants were further confirmed using clone sequencing or HiFi sequencing. The lack of functional KLF1 variants detected in the four samples indicates the presence of additional regulatory mechanisms. In addition, some samples exhibited BCAM polymorphisms, which encodes antigens of the Lutheran (LU) blood group system. However, no BCAM mutations which leads to the absence of LU proteins were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

High-throughput sequencing methods, particularly HiFi sequencing, were introduced for the first time into genetic analysis of the In(Lu) phenotype. Targeted NGS and HiFi sequencing demonstrated the accuracy of the results, providing additional advantages such as simultaneous analysis of other blood group genes and clarification of haplotypes. Using the In(Lu) phenotype, a powerful model for identifying hypomorphic or loss-of-function KLF1 variants, numerous novel variants have been detected, which have contributed to the comprehensive understanding of KLF1. These clinically significant KLF1 mutations can serve as a valuable reference for the diagnosis of related blood cell diseases.

Identification of Lutheran Blood Groups and Genetic Variants within KLF1 among Thai Blood Donors

Background

Lua and Lub are inherited as codominant allelic characters resulting from a single nucleotide variant (SNV) of the basal cell adhesion molecule (BCAM) gene. Red cells of the dominantly inherited suppressor of the Lutheran antigens In(Lu) phenotypically appear as Lu(a-b-) by the haemagglutination test. In(Lu) resulted from heterozygosity for mutations within the erythroid-specific Krüppel-like factor 1 (KLF1) gene. This study aimed to determine the frequency of the Lu(a) and Lu(b) phenotypes and genotypes and genetic variants of the distinct In(Lu) among Thai blood donors.

Material and Methods

Samples from 334 Thai donors were phenotyped with anti-Lua and anti-Lub. These DNA samples and an additional 1,370 donor DNA samples with unknown Lu(a)/Lu(b) phenotypes were genotyped using an in-house PCR-SSP. In the case of the three Lu(a-b-) donors, the BCAM and KLF1 genes were analysed by PCR and sequencing.

Results

A total of 331 of the 334 donors were Lu(a-b+), while the other observed phenotype, appearing as Lu(a-b-), was found among three donors. Of those three Lu(a-b-) donors with the LU*02/02 genotype, we identified KLF1 variant alleles, consisting of two variants: c.[304T>C, 1001C>G] and c.[304T>C, 519_525dupCGGCGCC], leading to the In(Lu) phenotype, and one homozygous variant (c.304T>C) mutation. Also, only one Thai donor was genotyped as LU*01/02, confirmed by serology test and DNA sequencing.

Conclusion

In this study, we identified KLF1 variants to be included in Lutheran typing analysis in Thai populations. Therefore, the application of genotyping and phenotyping methods has simultaneously been in use to screen and confirm the rare Lu(a+) and In(Lu) phenotypes.