Early atrial fibrillation recurrence post catheter ablation: Analysis from insertable cardiac monitor in the era of optimized radiofrequency ablation

BACKGROUND

Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT) is associated with ablation-induced proarrhythmogenic inflammation; however, existing studies used intermittent monitoring or nonoptimized radiofrequency (RF) applications (noncontiguous or without ablation index target value).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between ERAT and late recurrence based on insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) data.

METHODS

We compiled data from Close-To-Cure and Close Maze studies, which enrolled patients who underwent RF ablation for paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). All patients were implanted with an ICM 2-3 months before ablation.

RESULTS

We studied 165 patients (104 with paroxysmal AF, 61 with persistent AF). Over the 1-year follow-up period, 41 of the patients experienced late recurrence. The risk of late recurrence was higher in patients experiencing ERAT (hazard ratio [HR] 6.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0-13.0), with negative and positive predictive values of 90.5% and 45.7%, respectively. Median burden of AF during the blanking period was significantly higher in patients with late recurrence (7.9% [0.0%-99.6%]) compared to those without recurrence (0.0% [0.0%-6.0]; P <.001). For each 1% increase in AF burden during the blanking period, late recurrence increased by 4.6% (HR 1.046; 95% CI 1.035-1.059). The best tradeoff for predicting AF from ERAT occurrence was AF burden of 0.6% and last ERAT at 64 days.

CONCLUSION

In patients ablated for paroxysmal and persistent AF with a durable RF lesion set and implanted with a continuous monitoring device, postablation early AF recurrence and burden significantly predict late recurrence. The post-AF ablation blanking period should be reduced to 2 months.

Use of implantable and external loop recorders in syncope with unknown causes

The gold standard for diagnosing syncope is to elucidate the symptom-electrocardiogram (ECG) correlation. The ECG recordings during syncope allow physicians to either confirm or exclude an arrhythmia as the mechanism of syncope. Many studies have investigated the use of internal loop recorder (ILR), while few studies have used external loop recorder (ELR) for patients with unexplained syncope. The aim of this review is to clarify the clinical usefulness of ILR and ELR in the diagnosis and management of patients with unexplained syncope. Many observational and four randomized control studies have shown that ILR for patients with unknown syncope is a useful tool for early diagnosis and improving diagnosis rate. ILR also provides important information on the mechanism of syncope and treatment strategy. However, there is no evidence of total mortality or quality of life improvements with ILR. The diagnostic yield of ELR in patients with syncope was similar to that with ILR within the same timeframe. Therefore, ELR could be considered for long-term ECG monitoring before a patient switches to using ILR. A systematic approach and selection of ECG monitoring tools reduces health care costs and improves the selection of patients for optimal treatment possibilities.