Midwives' experiences of professional learning when practicing collegial midwifery assistance during the active second stage of labour: data from the oneplus trial

BACKGROUND

Learning is a lifelong process and the workplace is an essential arena for professional learning. Workplace learning is particularly relevant for midwives as essential knowledge and skills are gained through clinical work. A clinical practice known as 'Collegial Midwifery Assistance' (CMA), which involves two midwives being present during the active second stage of labour, was found to reduce severe perineal trauma by 30% in the Oneplus trial. Research regarding learning associated with CMA, however, is lacking. The aim was to investigate learning experiences of primary and second midwives with varying levels of work experience when practicing CMA, and to further explore possible factors that influence their learning.

METHODS

The study uses an observational design to analyse data from the Oneplus trial. Descriptive statistics and proportions were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Stratified univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1430 births performed with CMA were included in the study. Less experienced primary midwives reported professional learning to a higher degree (< 2 years, 76%) than the more experienced (> 20 years, 22%). A similar but less pronounced pattern was seen for the second midwives. Duration of the intervention ≥ 15 min improved learning across groups, especially for the least experienced primary midwives. The colleague's level of experience was found to be of importance for primary midwives with less than five years' work experience, whereas for second midwives it was also important in their mid to late career. Reciprocal feedback had more impact on learning for the primary midwife than the second midwife.

CONCLUSIONS

The study provides evidence that CMA has the potential to contribute with professional learning both for primary and second midwives, for all levels of work experience. We found that factors such as the colleague's work experience, the duration of CMA and reciprocal feedback influenced learning, but the importance of these factors were different for the primary and second midwife and varied depending on the level of work experience. The findings may have implications for future implementation of CMA and can be used to guide the practice.

Women's experiences of being assisted by two midwives during the active second stage of labour: Secondary outcomes from the Oneplus trial

BACKGROUND

'Collegial Midwifery Assistance' (CMA) is a clinical practice aiming to reduce severe perineal trauma (SPT) during childbirth. This practice involves two midwives being present during the active second stage of labour rather than one, which is the case in standard care. The effectiveness of CMA was evaluated in the Oneplus trial and a 30% reduction in SPT was shown.

AIM

The aim was to investigate the experience of women who received the CMA intervention in the trial and to explore factors influencing their experiences.

METHODS

A cohort study using data from the Oneplus trial and a one-month postpartum follow-up questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1050 women who received the CMA intervention responded to the questionnaire. Of these, 35.8% reported that they strongly agreed with feeling safe during the second stage of labour and 42.6% were inclined to have an additional midwife present at a subsequent birth. The intervention was favourably received by women who experienced fear of birth, who were non-native Swedish speakers, and had lower educational attainment. Furthermore, women were more positive towards CMA the longer the intervention lasted.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that the CMA intervention is accepted well by women and can be safely implemented into standard care. The duration of the CMA intervention was an important factor that influenced women's experiences and should be used to guide future practice.

Vacuum extraction for non-rotational and rotational assisted vaginal birth

Vacuum-assisted birth is a safe mode of birth in the presence of a skilled provider. Vacuum extraction can avoid prolonged second stage of labour, birth asphyxia in the presence of foetal distress or maternal pushing where contraindicated. Vacuum-assisted births - particularly those in midpelvic rotational births - have been increasingly traded for caesarean births, although the latter are generally associated with potentially a greater risk to women and (future) children. In this article, (contra)indications and the basics of vacuum technique are elaborated. A specific section is dedicated to vacuum extraction for rotational birth. If these techniques are known, trained and practiced by obstetric care givers, then vacuum extraction has tremendous potential to make childbirth safer.