[Flap harvest training on a new ultrarealistic simulation model: In-training operator feedback about a pulsating reperfused and reventilated cadaver Simlife®]

INTRODUCTION

The anatomical subject is still a key element to learn complex procedures in plastic surgery. We present here the evaluation of an in-training operator on a SIMLIFE® model, hyper realistic model consisting in human bodies donated to science equipped with pulsating recirculation and reventilation device.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From February 2019 to October 2019, 8 forearm flaps with radial proximal pedicle were harvested by the learner on a SIMLIFE® model. Conditions were as close as possible to the operating room : asepsy, sterile draping, assistant and instrumentation including electrocoagulation.

RESULTS

The procedure was decomposed in 13 distinct steps. Mean total surgery time was 90,5±11,62minutes. There was only one case of arterial pedicle lesion resulting in major blood leak. Bleeding was measured by fake blood loss from the SIMLIFE® console. Mean intraoperatoy bleeding was 171±108 milliliters. We review pros and cons of this new technology particulary suited for complex plastic and reconstructive surgery training.

CONCLUSION

Using SIMLIFE® technology we have a new mean to train for complex procedures in plastic and reconstructive surgery. This new technology could be applied to numerous other surgical procedures. Broader applications are still limited by cost and cadaver use legislation.

[Phalloplasty: Microsurgical options and management algorithm]

The free radial forearm flap is considered as the gold standard in penile reconstruction for good functional and aesthetic results. The scar on donor site could be considered as pathognomonic of their situation by transsexual patients. The development of microsurgical flaps provides new therapeutic options. This options are discussed and a therapeutic algorithm is presented. The main techniques used are the pedicled anterolateral thigh perforator flap and free muscle sparing latissimus dorsi flap. Principal criteria are listed, the choice of patient and the local anatomical conditions are the most important. Antebrachial flap stay the first choice. In case of non-feasibility of this flap, phalloplasty with pedicle ALT flap or free MSLD flap will be proposed. Urethral reconstruction will be done by a narrow free forearm flap or by a delayed thin skin graft or buccal mucosa graft. Microsurgical phalloplasty options are not limited to the forearm flap. Satisfactory results can be obtained using alternative procedure. The use of a therapeutic algorithm allows to choose the most optimal solution for each patient.