Diagnostic Accuracy of
Laryngeal Ultrasound for Evaluating Vocal Fold Movement Impairment in Children.
J Pediatr Surg 2024;
59:109-116. [PMID:
37845124 DOI:
10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.09.017]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE
Vocal fold movement impairment (VFMI) secondary to recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury is a common source of morbidity after pediatric cervical, thoracic, and cardiac procedures. Flexible laryngoscopy (FL) is the gold standard to diagnose VFMI yet can be challenging to perform and/or risks possible clinical decompensation in some children and is an aerosolizing procedure. Laryngeal ultrasound (LUS) is a potential non-invasive alternative, but limited data exists in the pediatric surgical population regarding its efficacy. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of LUS compared to FL in evaluating VFMI.
METHODS
A prospective, single-center, single-blinded (rater) cohort study was undertaken on perioperative pediatric patients at risk for RLN injury. Patients underwent FL and LUS. Cohen's kappa was used to determine chance-corrected agreement.
RESULTS
Between 2021 and 2023, 85 paired evaluations were performed with patients having a median (IQR) age of 10 (4, 42) months and weight of 7.5 (5.4, 13.4) kilograms. The prevalence of VFMI was 27.1%. Absolute agreement between evaluations was 98.8% (kappa 0.97, 95% CI: 0.91-1.00, P < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of LUS in detecting VFMI was 95.7% and 100%, yielding a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.4% (95% CI: 90-100%). Diagnostic accuracy was 98.8% (95% CI: 93-100%).
CONCLUSION
LUS is a highly accurate modality in evaluating VFMI in children. While FL remains the gold standard for diagnosis, LUS offers a low-risk screening modality for children at risk for VFMI such that only those with an abnormal LUS or presence of clinical symptoms discordant with LUS findings should undergo FL.
TYPE OF STUDY
Prospective, single-center, single blinded (rater), cohort study.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level II.
Collapse