Surgical treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis: Technique and results

Background

Surgical management of high-grade spondylolisthesis is not only challenging but also controversial, from in situ fusion to complete reduction. We report our results of a safe three-stage spinal procedure in a single surgical session with seven patients diagnosed high-grade spondylolisthesis.

Hypothesis

Posterior fixation combined with interbody fusion is effective on reduction, ossification and clinical outcomes in high-grade spondylolisthesis.

Patients and methods

This study is a retrospective review of patients who underwent surgery between 2016 and 2018. The surgical method involved specific installation for deformity reduction, pedicle screw fixation, correction of lumbosacral kyphosis with a specific distraction maneuver, wide decompression, gradual reduction of the deformity, and sometimes maintenance of the reduction with interbody fusion. Patients were checked out at 2, 6 and 12 months and yearly after the procedure. Clinical, radiological, Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) outcomes measures were collected.

Results

Seven patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 (2 patients grade II, 4 patients grade IV and 1 patient grade V), with a median age of 37 years [17; 72] were included. Median follow-up was 24 months [12; 25 months]. All patients have a fused joint at 6 months except one. Median lumbosacral angle (LSA) improved from 76°[59; 85] to 94°[76; 104]. Meyerding grade of 2 cases was stable after surgery, 3 cases with loss of two ranks and 2 cases with loss of one rank. The radiological parameters showed statistically significant difference (p = 0.036) postoperatively. There was not deep infection. Medians VAS and ODI showed improved pain and disability scores.

Conclusion

This procedure allows correct reduction rate of high-grade spondylolisthesis with good clinic-radiologic outcomes. Though surgically demanding, it was safe and reproducible.

Level of evidence

IV, retrospective.

Cervical sagittal alignment in adolescent high dysplastic developmental spondylolisthesis: how does the cervical spine respond to the reduction of spondylolisthesis?

Background

Although pelvic and related parameters have been well stated in lumbar developmental spondylolisthesis, cervical sagittal alignment in these patients is poorly studied, especially in high dysplastic developmental spondylolisthesis (HDDS). The purpose of this study is to investigate the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in HDDS and how the cervical spine responds to reduction of spondylolisthesis.

Methods

Thirty-three adolescent patients with lumbar developmental spondylolisthesis who received preoperative and postoperative whole-spine x-rays were reviewed. They were divided into the HDDS group (n = 24, 13.0 ± 2.2 years old) and the low dysplastic developmental spondylolisthesis (LDDS) group (n = 9, 15.6 ± 1.9 years old). Spinal and pelvic sagittal parameters, including cervical lordosis (CL), were measured and compared between groups. In the HDDS group, the postoperative parameters were measured and compared with those before surgery.

Results

HDDS group had a higher proportion of cervical kyphosis (70.8% vs. 22.2%, P = 0.019), and there was a significant difference in CL between the two groups (− 8.5° ± 16.1° vs. 10.5° ± 11.8°, P = 0.003). CL was correlated with the Dubousset’s lumbosacral angle (Dub-LSA), pelvic tilt (PT), and thoracic kyphosis (TK). In the HDDS group, CL in patients with a kyphotic cervical spine was significantly improved after reduction of spondylolisthesis (− 16.4° ± 5.9° vs. − 3.6° ± 9.9°, P < 0.001). In the HDDS group, 46% (6/13) of the patients with postoperative Dub-LSA < 90° still had sagittal imbalance (sagittal vertical axis, [SVA] > 5 cm), while no sagittal imbalance was observed in patients with postoperative Dub-LSA > 90° (46% [6/13] vs. 0% [0/11], P = 0.016).

Conclusions

HDDS can lead to cervical kyphosis through a series of compensatory mechanisms. Reduction of spondylolisthesis and correction of lumbosacral kyphosis may correct the cervical kyphosis and normalize the overall spinal sagittal profile. Correction of Dub-LSA to above 90° might be used as an objective to better improve the sagittal alignment of the spine.

Treatment of L5-S1 Spondyloptosis with Multiple Pedicle Defects Through a Combined Anterior and Posterior Approach

BACKGROUND

An anterior dislocation of the L5 vertebral body from the sacrum and decent into the pelvis is considered as spondyloptosis. The surgical treatment of L5-S1 spondyloptosis remains challenging and controversial. We present a case of lumbosacral spondyloptosis with multiple pedicle defects treated through a combined anterior and posterior approach.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 38-year-old female patient suffering from L5-S1 spondyloptosis with multiple pedicle defects without any history of trauma presented with lower back pain and bilateral lower leg radiating pain. A 3-stage procedure involving L5 spondylectomy, assisted by intraoperative 3-dimensional (3D) navigation, through a retroperitoneal approach at the first stage was performed. At the second stage, decompression was performed, and pedicle screws and iliac screws were placed into L1-S2, which was assisted by intraoperative 3D navigation. At the third stage, slippage reduction was achieved by placing L4 over onto S1, where a mesh was stuffed with bone from the spondylectomy and was placed into the L4/S1 intervertebral space. The patient experienced transient lower leg weakness but returned to preoperative status soon. Radiography revealed that internal fixation was in good position. No dural tears, postoperative infections, and implantation failure were reported after 3 months of postoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

The L5 spondylectomy shortens the spine to reduce the strain on the neural elements and facilitates correction of the lumbosacral kyphosis. When long instrumentation is mandatory, such as in multiple pedicle defects, sacropelvic fixation is recommended. Intraoperative 3D navigation is helpful in such a complex case.

Current Evidence Regarding the Diagnostic Methods for Pediatric Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Report From the Scoliosis Research Society Evidence Based Medicine Committee

STUDY DESIGN

Structured literature review.

OBJECTIVES

The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) requested an assessment of the current state of peer-reviewed evidence regarding pediatric lumbar spondylolisthesis with the goal of identifying what is known and what gaps remain in further understanding the diagnostic methods for pediatric spondylolisthesis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spondylolisthesis in the lumbar spine is common among children and adolescents and no formal synthesis of the published literature regarding diagnostic methods has been previously performed.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed. Abstracts were reviewed and data from included studies were analyzed by the committee. From 6600 initial citations with abstract, 663 articles underwent full-text review. The best available evidence for the clinical questions regarding diagnostic methods was provided by 26 included studies. Six of the studies were graded as Level III (retrospective comparative), and represent the current best available evidence whereas 20 of the studies were graded as Level IV (retrospective case series) evidence. No Level V (expert opinion) studies were included in the final list. None of the studies were graded as Level I or Level II.

RESULTS

Plain radiography is the workhorse imaging modality for diagnosing spondylolisthesis. No association between radiologic grade of spondylolisthesis and clinical presentation were noted; however, grade III and IV slips more often required surgery, and increasing slip angles were associated with worse baseline outcome scores. There is Level III evidence that the Meyerding grade appears to be more accurate for measuring slip percentage whereas the Lonstein Slip angle and Dubousset Lumbosacral Kyphosis angles are the best for measuring lumbosacral kyphosis in spondylolisthesis. In addition, higher sacral table index, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, and lower sacral table angle were associated with spondylolisthesis. True incidence could not be determined by the current literature available. However, studies in adolescent athletes demonstrated an incidence of 6% to 7% across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The current "best available" evidence to guide the diagnosis and characterization of pediatric spondylolisthesis is presented. Future studies are needed to provide more high-quality evidence to answer these clinically relevant questions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, review of Level III studies.

L5 incidence: an important parameter for spinopelvic balance evaluation in high-grade spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND

In high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGSPL), the pelvic incidence (PI) is not a reliable measurement because of doming of the sacrum. Measurement of L5 incidence (L5I) was described as a tool to measure pelvic morphology in HGSPL and for surgical follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate L5I in HGSPL and its relationship to other spinopelvic parameters.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study of a cohort of 184 patients with HGSPL was carried out.

METHODS

Whole spine radiographs were analyzed for PI, pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope, lumbar lordosis (LL), L5I, L5 tilt (L5T), L5 slope, lumbosacral kyphosis, and slip percentage. Statistical analysis and correlation were made (Pearson correlation test; p<.05). In accordance to Cohen, statically significant correlation were considered strong if R>0.5, moderate if 0.3<R<0.5, and small if R<0.3.

RESULTS

A total of 184 cases were analyzed, with a female-to-male ratio of 2.35 and a mean age of 20.1 years. Sacral doming was present in 73% of the cases. Mean L5I incidence was 65.2° and strongly correlated to other sagittal parameters, especially PT (R=0.7), LL (R=0.7), L5T (R=0.77), and L5 slope (R=0.83). There was less but still strong correlation to Dubousset lumbosacral kyphosis (Dub-LSK) angle (R=-0.63) and percentage of slippage (R=0.56). L5 tilt showed nearly perfect correlation to PT (R=0.95). Forty-four percent of the cases were balanced HGSPL, whereas 56% of the cases were unbalanced HGSPL. L5 incidence was found to be a good predictor of local imbalance with a cutoff of L5I=61.

CONCLUSION

This paper describes L5I, which is a positional parameter in HGSPL. L5 incidence is a simple and reliable measure in the preoperative setting in HGSPL. Its correlation with spinal sagittal parameters (especially PT and LL) is strong and was found to be better than Dub-LSK. There is also a good correlation between L5I and HGSPL pelvic parameters (slip percentage and lumbosacral kyphosis). We recommend its use for evaluation of surgical correction and recommend the value of 60° as cutoff value to define spinopelvic balance in HGSPL.

Radiological and functional outcomes of high-grade spondylolisthesis treated by intrasacral fixation, dome resection and circumferential fusion: a retrospective series of 20 consecutive cases with a minimum of 2 years follow-up

PURPOSE

Major concern during surgery for high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) is to reduce lumbosacral kyphosis and restore sagittal alignment. Despite the numerous methods described, lumbosacral fixation in HGS is a challenging technique associated with high complication rate. Few series have described outcomes and most of the results are limited to lumbosacral correction without global sagittal alignment analysis. This study aims at analyzing clinical and radiological outcomes of HGS patients treated with intrasacral rods on full spine radiographs.

METHODS

HGS patients (Meyerding III or higher) operated between 2004 and 2014 were reviewed. All patients underwent full spine stereoradiographic images. After L5 and S1 decompression, reduction and circumferential fusion with intrasacral rod fixation and fusion up to L4 were performed under fluoroscopy. The entry points for S1 screws were located 3-5 mm above and 5 mm lateral to the first sacral hole, toward the promontory. The two short distal fusion rods were then positioned into the sacrum guided by anteroposterior fluoroscopy using Jackson's technique. Then, sacral dome resection was performed and a PEEK cage was impacted in L5S1 after reduction. Postoperatively, the hip and knee were kept flexed at 45° for 1 week and extended progressively. Preoperative, 3 months postoperative and last follow-up (> 2 years minimum) clinical and radiographic data were collected. Sagittal parameters included lumbosacral angle (LSA), olisthesis, T1 spinopelvic inclination (T1SPi) and spinopelvic parameters.

RESULTS

20 HGS patients were included (8 ptosis, 5 Meyerding IV). The mean age was 14 years. At final FU (7.2 years ± 3), LSA kyphosis and olisthesis were reduced (65° ± 14 vs 99° ± 11, p < 0.001 and 81% ± 19 vs 45% ± 18, p < 0.001, respectively). While L1L5 lordosis decreased, T1T12 kyphosis increased. At FU, global alignment with T1SPi was - 6° ± 3. No significant loss of correction was observed. Regarding complications, ten patients presented transient L5 motor deficit that occurred when patients were put in standing position. However, all recovered before 3 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Intrasacral rod fixation appears to be an effective technique to correct LSA kyphosis, compensatory hyperlordosis and restore global sagittal alignment with a postoperative T1SPi corresponding to the value of the asymptomatic subject and achieve fusion. However, it remains a demanding technique with high risk of transient neurologic complications.

Bilateral vascularized rib grafts to promote spinopelvic fixation in patients with sacral agenesis and spinopelvic dissociation: a new surgical technique

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Sacral agenesis is a rare congenital disorder that may have spinopelvic instability due to sacroiliac joint malformation. Surgical indication in patients with sacral agenesis is to improve their sitting balance and protect the visceral organs. Achieving solid arthrodesis across this congenital malformation is challenging and prone to non-union.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to describe a novel surgical technique with vascularized ribs for management of sacral agenesis and complex spinopelvic dissociation.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Six patients with sacral agenesis were reviewed and followed for a mean of 8.5 years after spinopelvic fusion augmented with vascularized rib graft spanning the lumbo-pelvic junction.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the presence or absence of a stable spinopelvic junction and fusion across the spine-vascular rib grafts-pelvis interface. The secondary outcome measures were maintenance of pelvic obliquity, lumbosacral kyphosis, and overall sagittal balance.

METHODS

The surgical procedure consisted of two-stage surgeries performed 6-12 weeks apart. The first stage consisted of spinal instrumentation and correction of the deformity via a posterior approach and impaction of one of the vascularized ribs from the spine to the iliac crest. The second stage consisted of an anterior thoraco-lumbar approach for spinal fusion and the second vascularized rib spanning the spine to the iliac crest.

RESULTS

All six patients eventually achieved a solid spinal and spinopelvic fusion. All vascularized ribs increased in diameter over time. A high complication rate consisted mainly of spinal infections and prominent hardware requiring revision surgeries (a total of seven procedures in four patients). Two patients had decreased mobility secondary to spinopelvic surgery at last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinopelvic fusion can be successfully achieved with this novel surgical technique using vascularized rib grafts. This technique allows for biological long-term maintenance of the sagittal deformity correction. Fusion across the lumbosacral junction in patients with sacral agenesis may place them at risk of losing the ability to mobilize independently. Recent lower profile implants have prevented implant-related complications.