Sinergy between drugs and devices in the fight against sudden cardiac death and heart failure

The impact of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in heart failure (HF) patients is important and prevention of SCD is a reasonable and clinically justified endpoint if associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality. According to literature, in HF with reduced ejection fraction, only three classes of agents were found effective in reducing SCD and all-cause mortality: beta-blockers, mineralcorticoid receptor antagonists and, more recently, angiotensin-receptor neprilysin-inhibitors. In the PARADIGM trial that tested sacubitril/valsartan vs. enalapril, the 20% relative risk reduction in cardiovascular deaths obtained with sacubitril/valsartan was attributable to reductions in the incidence of both SCD and death due to HF worsening and this effect can be added to the known positive effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in appropriately selected patients. In order to maximize the implementation of all the available treatments, patients with HF should be included in virtuous networks with a dialogue between all the physician involved, with commitment by all these physicians for appropriate decision-making on application of pharmacological and device treatments according to available evidence, as well as commitment for drug titration before and after device implant, taking advantage from remote monitoring, and with the safety of back up device therapy when indicated. There are potential synergistic effects of drug therapy, with all the therapies acting on neuro-hormonal and sympathetic activation, but specifically with sacubitril/valsartan, and device therapy, in particular cardiac resynchronization therapy, with added incremental benefits on positive cardiac remodelling, prevention of HF progression, and prevention of ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Triple therapy at discharge from internal medicine wards in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction: results from an observational study

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend triple therapy (TT) with ACE inhibitors or ARBs, beta-blockers and mineralcorticoid receptor antagonists in symptomatic heart failure patients with ejection fraction <35 % (HFrEF). Nevertheless, many patients remain untreated. This study was aimed to evaluate the use of TT in HFrEF patients discharged from internal medicine wards of Tuscany, Italy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed the database of a multicenter observational study which included 770 patients consecutively hospitalized for HF in 32out of 36 Internal Medicine Units of Tuscany, Italy. The value of ejection fraction was available in 490 of the 725 patients discharged alive. Of the 117 patients with HFrEF, only 46 (39.3%) were on TT at discharge while 71 (60.7%) were not. In the latter group we observed a significantly greater percentage of patients with cognitive deficit (25.3% vs 10.8%, p=0.05). In the same group there was a slightly greater percentage of patients with hypertension (61.9% vs 58.6%), diabetes (43.6% vs 36.9%), GFR<60 ml/min (74.6% vs 67.3%), anemia (52.1% vs 45.6%) and atrial fibrillation (40.8% vs 34.7%), but the differences were not statistically significant.

CONSLUSIONS

These results indicate that TT is underutilized in internal medicine wards of Tuscany. Untreated patients had a greater rate of cognitive deficit and were probably sicker, more complex and fragile.

The role of aldosterone antagonism agents in diabetic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Diabetic kidney disease is a common consequence of the development of diabetes. In the United Kingdom 18-30% of chronic kidney disease cases and 44% of end-stage renal disease cases in the United States have been attributed to complications of diabetic kidney disease. Angiotensin blockade using angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers is the standard for slowing the progression of diabetic kidney disease. Evidence suggests that aldosterone antagonism added to standard therapy may be beneficial.

AIM OF REVIEW

This paper aims to explore the pathophysiological contribution of aldosterone in diabetic kidney disease and review available literature for aldosterone antagonism through mineralocorticoid receptor blockade.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted. Results were analysed and summarised.

RESULTS

Nine trials evaluating a total of 535 patients with diabetic kidney disease were identified that evaluated the use of aldosterone antagonists for reducing the signs of diabetic kidney disease. All trials demonstrated a marked decrease in urinary protein excretion when compared to, or added to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition or angiotensin receptor blockade. The most commonly reported side effect in all of the trials was hyperkalaemia, which occurred in 6.1% of all patients evaluated. Aldosterone antagonists were generally well tolerated in the evaluated patient populations.

CONCLUSION

Aldosterone antagonism may represent a safe and effective complimentary therapy to the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition, or angiotensin receptor blockade, for slowing the progression of diabetic kidney disease.