NOBLE trial-is it time to revise the guidelines?

The Nordic-Baltic-British left main revascularization trial (NOBLE) is a prospective, randomized, multicentre, non-inferiority trial comparing percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for revascularization of patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis. The primary outcome was a combined endpoint of all-cause mortality, stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization. CABG was found to be superior to PCI with respect to the 5-year MACCE rates (28% vs. 19%) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.58 (95% CI 1.24-2.01). All-cause mortality rates were similar, but PCI was associated with increased occurrence of non-procedural myocardial infarction (p = 0.0002) and repeat revascularization (p = 0.0009). There was no difference in the stroke rates (p = 0.11) at 5 years. Currently, European Society of Cardiology and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (ESC/EACTS) guidelines on myocardial revascularization assign a class 1A recommendation to PCI in patients with unprotected LMCA stenosis with a SYNTAX score < 23. The findings of the NOBLE trial challenge this premise.

Percutaneous or surgical revascularization for left main stem disease: NOBLE ideas, but do they EXCEL?

Introduction: Although coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has traditionally been the standard treatment for significant left main stem (LMS) disease, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using drug-eluting stents (DES) is now considered an acceptable alternative. Areas covered: This article aims to summarise the key findings of the landmark clinical trials on LMS revascularization and the recently published ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization related to LMS disease. Expert opinion: It is unlikely that there will be a further large randomized trial aimed at addressing the issue of the optimum method of revascularization for LMS disease. Both PCI and CABG are reasonable revascularization options for appropriately selected patients with LMS disease. 'Heart Team' approach is vital to guide the management of patients with LMS disease, when there is obvious clinical equipoise and a mandate for complete revascularization. With an aging and increasing co-morbid patient population, clinical equipoise may not always be obvious, making extrapolation of clinical trial results to the 'real world' difficult.

Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Management in the Post NOBLE and EXCEL Era

The optimal management of unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease is currently a debated topic. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has seen an increased adoption for the management of ULMCA disease after numerous small-scale randomised trials and cohort studies showed equipoise with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for low complexity lesions. The recently published NOBLE and EXCEL trials are two of the largest international randomised clinical trials comparing PCI and CABG in patients with ULMCA disease. In lieu of all the available evidence, PCI appears to be equivalent to CABG in regard to mortality in patients with ULMCA disease. In non-diabetic patients with low complexity coronary disease (SYNTAX score ≤32), PCI appears to be a reasonable alternative to CABG, especially for ostial and midshaft left main coronary lesions. CABG is preferable in the presence of diabetes, multivessel coronary disease in addition to ULMCA or complex coronary lesions (SYNTAX score >33) including distal left main lesions.