Neurophobia: A Side Effect of Neuroanatomy Education?

Neuroanatomy in the medical curriculum tends to be challenging for both lecturers and students. Students and lecturers perceive the relevance and importance of neuroanatomy differently. If not taught sufficiently, students develop a dislike or fear (termed neurophobia) for the subject. This fear prevents them from being receptive to the teaching and consequently applying the neuroanatomy knowledge in the clinical environment. Information on the approach and perception of undergraduate neuroanatomy lecturers in South Africa regarding neuroanatomy in the medical curriculum is scarce and inconclusive. A study was undertaken to explore the attitudes and perceptions of neuroanatomy lecturers towards the relevance of neuroanatomy, as well as the teaching techniques and approach thereof, in the medical curriculum. In order to determine whether the lecturers' teaching approach and attitudes could be a contributing factor to neurophobia. In a cross-sectional qualitative study, neuroanatomy lecturers from the nine South African medical schools were invited to complete an anonymous online questionnaire. Results were thematically analysed and grouped. Lecturing staff from seven of the medical schools participated in this study and included fourteen respondents. The respondents classified themselves mainly as either proficient (78.6%) or experts (15.8%) in their neuroanatomy teaching experience. All the respondents acknowledged that neuroanatomy is important in their students' medical training. A lecturer's perceptions and attitude towards the subject or content, greatly affect the facilitation approaches and techniques used. This might have far- reaching consequences for students as it might impact on their attitude towards the content.

A constructivist approach to teach neuroanatomy lab: Students' perceptions of an active learning environment

BACKGROUND

A recent trend in medical education is developing a more dynamic and integrated curriculum. Team-based learning (TBL) increases students' engagement and the active construction of anatomical knowledge. This initial study aimed to empirically observe medical students' perceptions of their achievement of learning outcomes and the construction of their neuroanatomy knowledge, critical thinking, and problem-solving using an interactive whiteboard (IWB) as a teaching strategy.

METHODS

An independent neuroanatomy lab survey collected students' perceptions and comments about their learning experiences using the IWB on a questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Student participants felt that using the IWB has facilitated their learning experience. 94.2% of student participants endorsed feelings that new technology has helped them achieve their learning outcomes, helped them integrate both their basic science and clinical science/skills knowledge (90.4%), enhanced their problem-solving skills (92.3%), facilitated their interaction with the neuroanatomy faculty (96.2%) and increase their critical thinking (88.4%).

CONCLUSION

Collecting such empirical data about students' perceptions and their learning environment should help neurosciences faculty in medical schools better outline their activities to faculty at other medical institutions. Applying these methods may enhance the learning process, save time during neuroanatomy lab, and it could also help overcome the shortage of qualified neuroanatomy educators.

TEL Methods Used for the Learning of Clinical Neuroanatomy

Ubiquity of information technology is undoubtedly the most substantial change to society in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries and has resulted in a paradigm shift in how business and social interactions are conducted universally. Information dissemination and acquisition is now effortless, and the way we visualise information is constantly evolving. The face of anatomy education has been altered by the advent of such innovation with Technology-Enhanced Learning (TEL) now commonplace in modern curricula.With the constant development of new computing systems, the temptation is to push the boundaries of what can be achieved rather than addressing what should be achieved. As with clinical practice, education in healthcare should be evidence driven. Learning theory has supplied educators with a wealth of information on how to design teaching tools, and this should form the bedrock of technology-enhanced educational platforms. When analysing resources and assessing if they are fit for purpose, the application of pedagogical theory should be explored and the degree to which it has been applied should be considered.