Elevated liver fibrosis-4 index predicts recurrence after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

The fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index is a noninvasive scoring system that is used to assess the progression of liver fibrosis. This study aimed to assess whether the FIB-4 index is associated with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation in patients with and without heart failure (HF).

METHODS

We included 1,184 patients who underwent initial AF catheter ablation between 2016 and 2021. The patients were classified into low-risk (< 1.3), intermediate-risk (1.3-2.67), and high-risk (> 2.67) groups based on their FIB-4 indices at baseline. The patients were divided into HF (n = 552) and non-HF groups (n = 632); the HF group was further divided into paroxysmal AF (PAF) and non-PAF groups. AF recurrence after catheter ablation was then compared among the groups.

RESULTS

In the non-HF group, no significant differences in recurrence after ablation were observed between the low-(n = 219), intermediate-(n = 364), and high-risk (n = 49) groups. In contrast, in the HF group, the intermediate-(n = 341) and high-risk (n = 112) groups had significantly higher recurrence rates than the low-risk group (n = 99) (log-rank test, p = 0.005). This association remained significant after multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR]:1.374; p = 0.027). The FIB-4 index increased incrementally as the brain natriuretic peptide levels and severity of tricuspid regurgitation increased. The FIB-4 index was an independent predictor of recurrence in the non-PAF HF group (HR:1.498; p = 0.007) but not in the PAF group.

CONCLUSIONS

The FIB-4 index may be a useful predictor of AF recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with HF, particularly in those with non-PAF.

Effect of Prolonged Use of Dronedarone on Recurrence in Patients with Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation After Radiofrequency Ablation (DORIS): Rationale and Design of a Randomized Multicenter, Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Prolonged use of anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD) beyond the post-ablation blanking period to maintain sinus rhythm has been adopted in clinical practice but without sufficient evidence. Dronedarone is an AAD valid for maintaining sinus rhythm with fewer side effects than other AAD for long-term use.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate the effect of prolonged use of dronedarone on the recurrence of non-paroxysmal AF patients beyond 3 months within the first year after ablation.

METHODS

Non-paroxysmal AF patients will receive dronedarone for 3 months after radiofrequency ablation. Patients without drug side effects and atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) recurrence will then be randomly divided into dronedarone and placebo groups and followed up until 1 year after ablation. The primary endpoint is the cumulative nonrecurrence rate post 3 months to 1 year after ablation. Patients will receive 7-day Holter monitoring (ECG patch) at 6, 9, and 12 months after ablation to evaluate AT recurrence. Secondary endpoints include dronedarone withdrawal due to side effects or intolerance of AT recurrence, time to the first recurrence, repeat ablation, electrical cardioversion, unscheduled emergency room visit, or re-hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

This trial will evaluate whether prolonged use of dronedarone effectively reduces the recurrence rate after ablation in non-paroxysmal AF patients. The result of this trial will provide evidence for optimizing post-ablation anti-arrhythmic therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ; NCT05655468, 19-December-2022.

Additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) has a complex pathophysiological process. The standard catheter ablation approach is pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The additional value of complex fractionated electrogram (CFAE) ablation is still unclear. We aimed to investigate the additional value of CFAE ablation for non-paroxysmal AF.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies up to May 2020. Articles comparing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus CFAE ablation and PVI alone for AF were obtained from the electronic scientific databases. The pooled mean difference (MD) and pooled risk ratio (RR) were assessed.

Results

A total of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 1034 patients were involved. Following a single catheter ablation procedure, the presence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) with or without the use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) between both groups were not significantly different (RR = 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.97–1.24; p = 0.13). Similar results were also obtained for the presence of any ATA without the use of AADs (RR = 1.08; 95% CI = 0.96–1.22; p = 0.2). The additional CFAE ablation took longer procedure times (MD = 46.95 min; 95% CI = 38.27–55.63; p = < 0.01) and fluoroscopy times (MD = 11.69 min; 95% CI = 8.54–14.83; p = < 0.01).

Conclusion

Additional CFAE ablation failed to improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal AF patients. It also requires a longer duration of procedure times and fluoroscopy times.

Early recurrence during the blanking period and left atrial reverse remodeling after catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Background

Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT) during a 90-day blanking period (BP) often occurs after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Left atrial reverse remodeling (LARR), which is the reduction in LA volume (LAV), also occurs during the BP. Both ERAT and LARR are associated with late recurrence (LR, greater than 90 days after ablation). We investigated the association between ERAT and LARR following non-paroxysmal AF (NPAF) ablation.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 330 consecutive patients undergoing initial NPAF ablation (median follow-up: 4.0 years). Based on the timing of the final ERAT, we divided the patients into No-ERAT (N = 154, without ERAT), Early (N = 39, 0–7 days after ablation), Intermediate (N = 67, 8–30), and Late-ERAT (N = 70, 31–90) groups. We assessed the extent of LARR, defined as the percentage of decrease in LAV (%ΔLAV). The %ΔLAV cutoff value was determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis, and incorporated into a multivariate analysis to assess the association between ERAT and LARR.

Results

Late-ERAT was associated with LR (hazard ratio: 6.31, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.21–9.47, p = 0.0001). The %ΔLAV in the Late-ERAT group was significantly smaller than the other groups (p < 0.0001). The predictive power of %ΔLAV for LR was slight (AUC, 0.604; best cutoff, 18.8% decrease; p = 0.0011). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, Late-ERAT was associated with poor LARR (%ΔLAV < 18.8% decrease) (odds ratio, 0.13; 95%CI, 0.06–0.27; p < 0.001), whereas Early- and Intermediate-ERAT did not show any correlation.

Conclusions

Late-ERAT was strongly associated with poor LARR after NPAF ablation. Both Late-ERAT and poor LARR might reflect a residual arrhythmogenic substrate causing LR.

Clinical efficacy of "ICE-FIRE" ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

Catheter ablation is less successful for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (NPAF) according to numerous follow-up studies. The choice of ablation strategy for patients with NPAF remains controversial. The objective of the study was to explore the clinical efficacy of the "ICE-FIRE" ablation.

METHODS

Ninety NPAF patients were enrolled. Patients were randomly divided into RF (treated with circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) and additional substrate modification by radiofrequency ablation) group and I-F (treated with CPVI by cryoablation and additional substrate modification by radiofrequency ablation) group. After CPVI and cardioversion to sinus rhythm, high-density mapping was performed. Eight-one of 90 participants restored to sinus rhythm. Seventy-four of 81 NPAF patients showed low-voltage zone. Substrates with low-voltage zone were targeted for further modification. Participants were followed at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the initial ablation.

RESULTS

The I-F group shared more X-ray exposure (I-F, 264.4 ± 97.4 mGy; RF, 224.9 ± 62.0 mGy; P = 0.039) and less duration of the procedure (I-F, 150.3 ± 27.5 min; RF, 174.2 ± 38.5 min; P = 0.003) compared to RF group. The freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months post-ablation was similar between the RF and I-F groups (RF, 57.1%; I-F, 71.8%; P = 0.197). However, I-F group experienced lower rehospitalization rate of AF recurrence (RF, 42.9%; I-F, 20.5%; P = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

In NPAF patients requiring substrate mapping and modification, the "ICE-FIRE" ablation demonstrated non-inferior clinical efficacy and lower rehospitalization rate of AF recurrence when compared with pure radiofrequency ablation strategy.