Orthogeriatric co-management at a regional core hospital as a new multidisciplinary approach in Japanese hip fracture operation

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of orthogeriatric co-management of hip fractures at a regional core hospital.

METHODS

This study included patients with proximal hip fracture. Patients were divided into two groups, conventional multidisciplinary group I including patients attending the hospital between April 2015 and March 2016 and orthogeriatric group II including patients attending the hospital between April 2016 and March 2017, which were compared retrospectively. In the control group, the conventional multidisciplinary team treated patients as whole-body controls. In the intervention group, the newly recruited geriatricians performed physical examinations, laboratory tests, radioactive imaging, and physiological tests. Furthermore, they consulted ward pharmacists, rigorously conducted positive polypharmacy interventions , and evaluated the type and number of mediated drugs on admission.

RESULTS

The number of medicated drugs significantly decreased from 6.03 ± 4.3 on admission to 5.50 ± 3.59 on discharge in group II, whereas group I did not show a significant decrease. Despite the more number of hospitalized patients in group II (166 patients) than in group I (126 patients), the recovery rate from postoperative urinary retention increased significantly from 57.8% (19/30) in group I to 84.3% (32/59) in group II (p = 0.049), while the incidence of aspiration pneumonia decreased from 7.1% (9/126) in group I to 2.49% (4/166) in group II (p = 0.08). The patients received six or more prescribed drugs on admission, and the number remained constant. However, the number of medicated drugs on discharge showed a marginally significant decrease from 6.03 ± 4.3 in group I to 5.50 ± 3.59 in group II (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the conventional multidisciplinary group, the orthogeriatric team contributed to reducing the number of multi-effect drugs and perioperative complications without negatively affecting mortality despite the increased number of patients. The in-hospital mortality rate did not change between the groups. The orthogeriatric program succeeded in preventing and treating perioperative complications.

Orthogeriatric co-management for the care of older subjects with hip fracture: recommendations from an Italian intersociety consensus

BACKGROUND

Health outcomes of older subjects with hip fracture (HF) may be negatively influenced by multiple comorbidities and frailty. An integrated multidisciplinary approach (i.e. the orthogeriatric model) is, therefore, highly recommended, but its implementation in clinical practice suffers from the lack of shared management protocols and poor awareness of the problem. The present consensus document has been implemented to address these issues.

AIM

To develop evidence-based recommendations for the orthogeriatric co-management of older subjects with HF.

METHODS

A 20-member Expert Task Force of geriatricians, orthopaedics, anaesthesiologists, physiatrists, physiotherapists and general practitioners was established to develop evidence-based recommendations for the pre-, peri-, intra- and postoperative care of older in-patients (≥ 65 years) with HF. A modified Delphi approach was used to achieve consensus, and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force system was used to rate the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 120 recommendations were proposed, covering 32 clinical topics and concerning preoperative evaluation (11 topics), perioperative (8 topics) and intraoperative (3 topics) management, and postoperative care (10 topics).

CONCLUSION

These recommendations should ease and promote the multidisciplinary management of older subjects with HF by integrating the expertise of different specialists. By providing a convenient list of topics of interest, they might assist in identifying unmet needs and research priorities.