The timing of drain removal in parotidectomies: outcomes of removal at 4 h post-operatively and a Canadian survey of practice patterns

BACKGROUND

The post-operative management of parotidectomies is highly provider dependent. No guidelines are currently available for timing of parotid drain removal. This study aimed to assess: (1) outcomes and complications after early drain removal (< 4 h, post-operative day [POD] 0) versus late drain removal (POD ≥ 1); (2) current Canadian provider practices.

METHODS

A single surgeons ten-year parotidectomy practice was reviewed, spanning his practice change from routine POD ≥ 1 drain removal to POD 0 removal, with extraction of patient demographic, disease, and complication variables. An anonymous, cross-sectional survey on parotid drain practices was distributed to Canadian Society of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery members. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon Rank Sum, and unpaired student's t-tests were calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 526 patients were included and 44.7% (235/526) had drains removed POD 0. There was no significant difference in hematoma or seroma rates between the POD 0 and POD ≥ 1 drain removal cohorts. The national survey on parotid drain management had 176 responses. The majority (67.9%) reported routinely using drains after parotidectomy and 62.8% reported using a drain output based criteria for removal. The most common cut-off output was 30 ml in 24 h (range 5-70 ml).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in hematoma or seroma rates for patients with parotid drains removed on POD 0 versus POD ≥ 1. Our national survey found significant variation in Canadian parotidectomy drain removal practices, which may be an area that can be further assessed to minimize hospital resources and improve patient care.

Borle's triangle: A reliable anatomical landmark for ease of identification of facial nerve trunk during parotidectomy

Purpose

An accurate understanding of the anatomy, identification and preservation of facial nerve is critical in performing successful functional parotidectomies. The current literature is replete with inconsistencies of various landmarks when used alone for identification of facial nerve trunk (FNT). The purpose of the paper is to introduce a new anatomical triangle, Borle's triangle (BT) for safer and reliable operative identification of FNT during parotodectomies.

Patients and methods

Between Aug 2014 and Dec 2017, twelve patients who reported with unilateral disease of the parotid gland with intact facial nerve function who underwent superficial or complete parotidecomies were included in the study. BT was conceptualized by intersection of three imaginary lines drawn along anatomical structures and forming a triangle comprising of angles a, b and c.

Results

Introperatively, BT helped reliably identify the FNT and its branches successfully in all the cases. The mean distance of FNT from angle b was found to be 12.18 ± 1.7 mm. Transient neurological deficits with one or more branches were seen in four cases whilst, one case had transient deficit with all the five peripheral branches. All of them spontaneously resolved completely by the end of three months post operatively.

Conclusions

When used in isolation, substantial variations exist in distances measured from anatomic landmarks to the main FNT in the literature. The BT utilizes three commonly used anatomical landmarks. It predictably helps in proper anatomic orientation, identification and preservation of FNT and branches with ease in parotidectomies.