Mannerberg A, Kügele M, Hamid S, Edvardsson A, Petersson K, Gunnlaugsson A, Bäck SÅ, Engelholm S, Ceberg S. Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients.
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2021;
19:41-45. [PMID:
34527818 PMCID:
PMC8430426 DOI:
10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.07.001]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
The aim of this study was to evaluate if surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) can decrease patient positioning time for localized prostate cancer patients compared to the conventional 3-point localization setup method. The patient setup accuracy was also compared between the two setup methods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 40 localized prostate cancer patients were enrolled in this study, where 20 patients were positioned with surface imaging (SI) and 20 patients were positioned with 3-point localization. The setup time was obtained from the system log files of the linear accelerator and compared between the two methods. The patient setup was verified with daily orthogonal kV images which were matched based on the implanted gold fiducial markers. Resulting setup deviations between planned and online positions were compared between SI and 3-point localization.
RESULTS
Median setup time was 2:50 min and 3:28 min for SI and 3-point localization, respectively (p < 0.001). The median vector offset was 4.7 mm (range: 0-10.4 mm) for SI and 5.2 mm for 3-point localization (range: 0.41-17.3 mm) (p = 0.01). Median setup deviation in the individual translations for SI and 3-point localization respectively was: 1.1 mm and 1.9 mm in lateral direction (p = 0.02), 1.8 and 1.6 mm in the longitudinal direction (p = 0.41) and 2.2 mm and 2.6 mm in the vertical direction (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS
Using SGRT for positioning of prostate cancer patients provided a faster and more accurate patient positioning compared to the conventional 3-point localization setup.
Collapse