Surgeon reported treatment choices for AO type B and C thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficits: An expert survey

INTRODUCTION

Less invasive spine surgery (LISS) has become well-established for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits. However, notable controversy persists regarding the adequacy of LISS for more unstable AO type B and C injuries, as it does not allow for formal open fusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional survey experienced spine surgeons of the Dutch Spine Society were invited to participate (56 participants). They were asked to indicate the most appropriate treatment for AO type B1, B2 (L1: A1 and L1: A3), B3 and C (L1: A4) injuries at level Th12-L1. Taking into account: age, AO N0-N1, or polytrauma. Specific agreement between participants was obtained applying Variation Ratio (VR).

RESULTS

A significant level of overall agreement was observed for AO type-B1 injuries with 73.8% of participants opting for percutaneous short-segment fixation (VR 0.775). For AO type-B3 injuries, 79.4% of participants favored percutaneous long-segment fixation (VR 0.794). for AO type-B2 injuries, there was less overall agreement (VR 0.571-0.657). Nonetheless, when considering all AO type-B injuries combined, percutaneous fixation emerged as the most preferred treatment option with substantial agreement (VR 0.871-0.923). Conversely, for AO type-C injuries, there was less agreement among the participants (VI 0.411), 26.5% of them chose additional open spinal fusion.

CONCLUSION

For all AO type-B injuries there was substantial agreement to treat these fractures with percutaneous techniques. For AO type-C injuries, the survey results do not support a consensus. Nevertheless, the responses raise important questions about the necessity of spinal fusion for such injuries.

Percutaneous monoplanar screws versus hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial screws in intermediate screw fixation for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of monoplanar screws (MSs) versus hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial screws (HSs) in percutaneous short-segment intermediate screw fixation (PSISF) for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures (TTBFs) in patients without neurologic impairment.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 100 patients with single-segment TTBFs and no neurologic impairment who underwent PSISF with 6 monoplanar screws (MS group) or correct were retrospectively enrolled. The demographic data, radiologic evaluation indicators, perioperative indicators and clinical assessment indicators were analysed between the MS group and HS group.

RESULTS

The demographic data and perioperative indicators were not significantly different in the two groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative anterior vertebral height ratio (AVHR), kyphosis Cobb angle (KCA), vertebral wedge angle (VWA) and spinal canal encroachment rate (SCER) were significantly improved in both groups (*P < 0.05). The MS group obtained better correction than the HS group in terms of improvement in the AVHR, KCA and VWA after surgery (*P < 0.05). At the last follow-up, the MS group had less correction loss of AVHR, KCA and VWA (*P < 0.05). The MS group presented greater improvement in the SCER at the last follow-up (*P < 0.05). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of all patients were significantly better postoperatively than those preoperatively (*P < 0.05), and the scores collected at each follow-up visit did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05). In the MS group, no internal fixation failure was observed during the follow-up period, but, in the HS group, two cases of internal fixation failure were observed at the last follow-up (one case of rod loosening and one case of screw breakage).

CONCLUSIONS

Both MSs and HSs fixation are effective treatments for TTBFs and have comparable clinical outcomes. In contrast, MSs fixation can improve the correction effect, better improve the SCER, and further reduce correction loss as well as reduce the incidence of instrumentation failure. Therefore, MSs fixation might be a better option for treating TTBFs in patients without neurological deficits.

Clinical, Radiographic and Fusion Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) stand-alone and OLIF with posterior pedicle screw fixation in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes and characteristics of oblique lumbar interbody fusion stand-alone (OLIF-SA) and OLIF with posterior pedicle screw fixation (OLIF-PPS) in the treatment of Grade I or Grade II degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2019 and May 2022, 139 patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis were treated with OLIF-SA (n = 85) or OLIF-PPS (n = 54). The clinical and radiographic records were reviewed.

RESULTS

The clinical and radiographic outcomes were similar in both groups. The operative time and intraoperative blood loss in the OLIF-SA group were lower than those in the OLIF-PPS group (P < 0.05). However, the OLIF-PPS group had significantly better disc height (DH) and postoperative forward spondylolisthesis distance (FSD) improvement at 6 months (P < 0.05). The OLIF-PPS group had a significantly lower cage subsidence value than the OLIF-SA group (P < 0.05). Improvement of the lumbar lordotic angle (LA) and fusion segmental lordotic angle (FSA) in the OLIF-PPS group was significantly better than that in the OLIF-SA group (P < 0.05). In terms of fusion types, the OLIF-SA group tended to undergo fusion from the edge of the vertebral body. Fusion in the OLIF-PPS group began more often in the bone graft area of the central cage of the vertebral body. The fusion speed of the OLIF-SA group was faster than that of the OLIF-PPS group.

CONCLUSION

OLIF-SA has the advantages of a short operative time, less intraoperative blood loss, and reduced financial burden, while PPS has incomparable advantages in the reduction of spondylolisthesis, restoration of lumbar physiological curvature, and long-term maintenance of intervertebral DH. In addition, the SA group had a unique vertebral edge fusion method and faster fusion speed.

[Analysis of the clinical effect of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined with transpedicular bone grafting in the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous screw fixation combined with minimally invasive transpedicular bone grafting and non-bone grafting in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

METHODS

From Janury 2021 to June 2022, 40 patients with thoracolumbar fracture were divided into the experimental group and the control group. There were 26 patients in the experimental group, including 21 males and 5 females with an aberage age of (47.3±12.3) years old, who underwent percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined with transpedicular autogenous bone grafting. In the control group, 14 patients received percutaneous pedicle screw fixation only. including 7 makes and 7 females with an average age of (50.2±11.2) years old. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, anterior height ratio of injured vertebrae, Cobb angle, visual analogue score (VAS), MacNab scores, loosening or broken of the implants. were compared and analyzed.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, VAS and anterior height ratio of injured vertebrae between the two groups. Compared with the preoperative results, VAS and anterior height ratio of injured vertebrae were improved statistically(P<0.05). For Cobb angle of injured vertebra, there was no significant difference between the two groups before surgery (P=0.766). While at 1 week, 3 months and 12 months after surgery, there were statistically differences between the two groups (P values were 0.042, 0.007 and 0.039, respectively). The Cobb angle of injured vertebrae one year after operation was statistically decreased in both groups compared with that before surgery (P<0.001). One year after surgery, the excellent and good rate of Macnab scores was 96.15% in the experimental group and 92.86% in the control group, and there was no statistical differences between the two groups (P=0.648). There was one patient in the control group suffering superficial wound infection on the third day, which was cured by dressing change and anti-infection treatment. There were no postoperative screw loosening and broken in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The two surgical methods have the advantages of less trauma, less pain and quicker recovery, which can restore the height of the injured vertebra, reconstruct the spinal sequence and reduce the fracture of the vertebral body. Transpedicular autogenous bone grafting can increase the stability of the fractured vertebra and maintain the height of the vertebra better after surgery, thus reducing the possibility of complications such as kyphosis, screw loosening and broken.

Usefulness of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Treatment of Lower Lumbar Burst (A3-A4) Fractures: Comparative Study with Thoracolumbar Junction Fractures

Background

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) without fusion has been recently recommended in the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture to reduce the adverse effects associated with the conventional open approaches and to restore range of motion. However, those studies report on the thoracolumbar junction, and there is no report on lower lumbar fracture.

Purpose

To assess effectiveness of PPSF without fusion for treating lower lumbar burst (A3 and A4) fractures.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was made to evaluate consecutive 50 patients with AO type A3 and A4 thoracolumbar fracture underwent PPSF. Patients were divided into a thoracolumbar junction (TLJ) group (T11-L2) and lower lumbar (LL) group (L3-5). The following items were measured and compared between the two groups. Vertebral height and consolidation, retropulsed fragment, sagittal curve and fixation failure were assessed with certain interval regularly.

Results

The average height at pre- and post-reduction were 56.2% (36.2-74.3), 95.3% (84.2-98.3) in TLJ group and 65.7% (45.7-86.2), 91% (73.1-100) in LL group. The average canal area occupancy rate at pre- and post-reduction were 46.1% (37.4%-67.5%), 38.1% (31.3%-40.8%) in TLJ group and 40.4% (15.0-65.7), 19.3% (9.4-26.6) in LL group. Consolidation was completed within 12 months after surgery in both groups. There was no significant difference between two groups in clinical and radiographic parameters except cobb angle loss.

Conclusion

Patients with lower lumbar fracture can be effectively managed with PPSF without fusion. PPSF following the implant removal can restore the movement of the lower lumbar spine, which is essential for daily life.

[Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined expandable tubular retractor in the treatment of spinal metastases]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined expandable tubular retractor in the treatment of patients with spinal metastases.

METHODS

In the study, 12 patients of spinal metastases treated with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined expandable tubular retractor in our hospital were retrospectively reviewed between June 2017 and October 2019. Among the 12 patients, 9 were males and 3 were females; the median age was 62.5 years [(65.1±2.9) years]. The decompression segment of 7 patients was located at the lower thoracic spine (including 1 patient with incomplete paraplegia) and the decompression segment of 5 patients was located at the lumbar spine; Tomita score was 6.0±0.6. Perioperative data of the patients were reviewed. Visual analog scale (VAS score), Karnofsky score, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score were compared before and after surgery. The patient's survival, adjuvant treatment, and internal fixation failure were observed in the follow-up period.

RESULTS

All the 12 patients had a successful operation with percuta-neous pedicle screw fixation combined expandable tubular retractor. The average operative time, blood loss, and blood transfused of the patients were (247.0±14.6) min, (804.2±222.3) mL and (500.0±100.0) mL, respectively. The average amount of drainage was (240.8±79.3) mL. Drainage tubes were pulled out early postoperative [(3.2±0.3) d], allowing early mobilization. The patients discharged (7.8±0.8) d postoperative. All the patients were followed up for 6-30 months, and the average overall survival time was (13.6±2.4) months. During the follow-up period, 2 patients experienced screw displacement, the internal fixation was stable after conservative treatment and no revision surgery was performed. The VAS of the patients was 7.1±0.2 before surgery, which decreased to 2.3±0.1 and 2.8±0.4 at 3 and 6 months after surgery (P < 0.05). The Karnofsky score of the patients was 59.2±1.9 before surgery, which increased to 75.0±1.9 and 74.2±3.1 at 3 and 6 months after surgery (P < 0.05). The ECOG of the patients was 2.3±0.2 before surgery, which decreased to 1.7±0.1 and 1.7±0.2 at 3 and 6 months after surgery (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For selected patients with spinal metastases, minimally invasive surgical treatment of spinal metastases (percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation combined with expandable tubular retractor) can effectively relieve the clinical symptoms and improve the quality of life, with satisfactory clinical outcome.

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with instability

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PE-TLIF) in patients with L4-L5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) with instability.

METHODS

The clinical data of 27 patients with L4-L5 DLS who underwent PE-TLIF from September 2019 to April 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. A minimum of 12 months of follow-up visits was provided to all patients. The demographics, perioperative, and clinical outcomes were reviewed based on the VAS, ODI, and modified MacNab criteria. Brantigan criteria estimated the result of interbody fusion at 12 months.

RESULTS

The mean age was 70.70 ± 8.91 (55-83) years. The mean ± SD values of the preoperative VAS for back pain, leg pain, and ODI were 7.37 ± 1.01, 7.26 ± 0.94, and 66.22 ± 7.49, respectively. The values improved to 1.66 ± 0.62, 1.74 ± 0.52, and 19.55 ± 5.56 at 12 months postoperatively (P＜0.05). The modified MacNab criteria revealed that 88.89% (24/27) of patients achieved good-to-excellent outcomes. The interbody fusion rate was 100% at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In patients with L4-L5 DLS with instability, PE-TLIF under conscious sedation and local anesthesia could be an effective supplement for open decompression and fusion.

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar metastatic tumors

Background and Aim

With the greatly prolonged survival of cancer patients, more and more patients develop bone metastasis, especially spinal metastasis. Therefore, it is very important to choose the best surgical plan for patients with spinal metastasis in different conditions. This paper aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar metastatic tumors.

Methods

Forty patients with thoracic and lumbar metastatic tumors were treated with PPSF combined with PVP and followed up for 6-33 months. The visual analog scale (VAS) and the Barthel Index of activities of daily living (BIADL) were used to evaluate the pain intensity and quality of life before surgery and at 7 days, 3 months, and 6 months after the treatment.

Results

In this study, a total of 40 patients were followed up for 6-33 months (the mean time was 14.87 months). The VAS scores of all patients were significantly decreased, while the BIADL scores were significantly increased. No patients suffered from complications such as infection, pedicle screw loosening, or polymethylmethacrylate leakage. Spine stability was observed in all surviving patients during the follow-up.

Conclusions

PPSF combined with PVP is a new and viable treatment for thoracolumbar metastases in patients with a poor systemic condition, patients who refuse to undergo a conventional open procedure such as en bloc corpectomy, and in patients with vertebral instability or pathological fracture without significant spinal compression.

Relevance for Patients

Patients with spinal metastases have a great risk of spinal instability and even spinal cord compression while enduring pain. Therefore, timely and appropriate surgical treatment is an effective means to stabilize the spine and avoid spinal cord compression. PPSF combined with PVP is an effective new surgical method for the treatment of multilevel spinal metastases.

Endoscopic Decompression Combined with Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Treating Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures with Neurological Deficits: Technical Note and Early Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to introduce surgical technique of endoscopic decompression combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) for thoracolumbar burst fractures (TLBFs) with neurological deficits and evaluate its efficacy.

METHODS

A total of 32 patients with TLBFs and neurological deficits who were treated by endoscopic decompression combined with PPSF from June 2018 to August 2019 were included in this study. The effect of decompression was analyzed using canal encroachment ratio, while deformity correction was assessed using the sagittal Cobb angle and the percentage of anterior vertebral height. We also analyzed other clinical outcomes such as visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale dose.

RESULTS

The patients were followed up for an average of 16 months. Our data showed that the patients' mean operation time was 153.75 minutes, the mean intraoperative blood loss was 48.84 mL, and the mean incision length was 7.78 cm. The canal encroachment ratio decreased from 55.91% ± 12.27% to 12.44% ± 3.91% (P < 0.05), sagittal Cobb angle decreased from 17.09° ± 5.46° to 5.72° ± 3.68° (P < 0.05), while the percentage of anterior vertebral height increased from 53.72% ± 8.99% to 83.22% ± 8.21% (P < 0.05). In addition, there was a significant improvement in the visual analog scale score, Oswestry Disability Index, and American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale classification (P < 0.05). Screw fracture occurred only in one patient during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic decompression combined with PPSF in the treatment of TLBFs with neurological deficits is safe and effective, which is a new minimally invasive method for the treatment of such diseases.

Hidden blood loss between percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and the mini-open Wiltse approach with pedicle screw fixation for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of hidden blood loss (HBL) in patients treated with minimally invasive surgery, and to compare the HBL between patients treated with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) and the mini-open Wiltse approach with pedicle screw fixation (MWPSF).

METHODS

From January 2017 to January 2019, a total of 119 patients with thoracolumbar fractures were included in the analysis, of which 58 cases received PPSF and 61 cases received MWPSF. The clinical information and demographic results were collected and compared. And the HBL of the patients is calculated by the combination formulas of Nadler, Gross and Sehat.

RESULTS

Compared with the PPSF group, operation time of MWPSF is shorter. The fluoroscopy times are 13.6 ± 3.0 in PPSF group and 5.6 ± 1.6 in MWPSF group (p < 0.001). As shown in Table 3, the intraoperative blood loss in PPSF group is 31.9 ± 9.6 ml, which is significantly less than that in the MWPSF group (44.0 ± 14.9 ml). The HBL (445.7 ± 228.9 ml), and HBL% (91.2 ± 7.7%) of the PPSF group are significantly higher than that in the MWPSF group (P < 0.05). And the total blood loss (TBL) of the PPSF group (477.6 ± 228.8 ml) is also more than that in the MWPSF group (401.0 ± 171.3 ml).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that in the minimally invasive surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures, the perioperative HBL is much higher than visible blood loss (VBL). Although PPSF has less intraoperative blood loss, it has higher TBL and HBL than those of MWPSF. Compared with MWPSF, we should pay more attention to the postoperative anemia status of patients with thoracolumbar fractures undergoing PPSF surgery.

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation without arthrodesis of 368 thoracolumbar fractures: long-term clinical and radiological outcomes in a single institution

PURPOSE

Traumatic thoracolumbar (TL) fractures are the most common vertebral fractures. Although a consensus on the preferred treatment is missing, percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) has been progressively accepted as treatment option, since it is related to lower soft tissues surgical-injury and perioperative complications rate. This study aims to evaluate the long-term clinical-radiological outcomes after PPSF for TL fractures at a single tertiary academic hospital.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study. Back pain was obtained at preoperative, postoperative and final follow-up using Visual Analog Scale. Patient-reported outcomes, the Oswestry Disability Index and the 36-Item Short Form, were obtained to asses disability during follow-up. Radiological measures included Cobb angle, mid-sagittal index, sagittal index (SI) and vertebral body height loss. A multivariate regression analysis on preoperative radiological features was performed to investigate independent risk factors for implant failure.

RESULTS

A total of 296 patients with 368 TL fractures met inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 124.3 months. The clinical and radiological parameters significantly improved from preoperative to last follow-up measurements. The multivariate analysis showed that Cobb angle (OR = 1.3, p < 0.001), SI (OR = 1.5, p < 0.001) and number of fractures (OR = 1.1, p = 0.05), were independent risk factors for implant failure. The overall complication rate was 5.1%, while the reoperation rate for implant failure was 3.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

In our case series, PPSF for TL injuries demonstrated good long-term clinical-radiological outcomes, along with low complication and reoperation rates. Accordingly, PPSF could be considered as a valuable treatment option for neurologically intact patients with TL fractures. Additionally, in this cohort, number of fractures ≥ 2, Cobb angle ≥ 15° and sagittal index ≥ 21° were independent risk factors for implant failure.

Outcome of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for traumatic thoracic and lumbar fractures -six years experience

OBJECTIVES

This study discusses the experience at our centre with treating traumatic thoracolumbar fractures using percutaneous pedicle screw fixation.

METHODS

We reviewed the case notes and imaging retrospectively between January 2013 and June 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 257 patients were included, 123 males and 134 females aged between 17 and 70; the mean age was 47.6 years. The majority of injuries were from fall from significant height. The fractures involved the thoracic and lumbar vertebra in 98 and 151 of the cases respectively. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation was performed either one or two levels above and below the fracture depending on the level of injury. Forty two cases were treated with additional short pedicle screws at the level of fracture. More than 15% (39) of the patients presented with a neurological deficit; more than 80% (32) of those showed post-operative improvement in their neurology as per Frankel Grading system. The mean operative time was 117 min ± 45 min; mean length of hospital stay was 7.2 days ± 3.8 days, with significant improvement in pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is a safe surgical option with comparable outcomes to open surgery and a potential reduction in perioperative morbidity.

The Efficiency and Reliability of Minimally Invasive Anterior Corpectomy and Percutaneous Posterior Stabilization for the Treatment of Unstable Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiological and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive anterior corpectomy and percutaneous posterior stabilization for treating unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures.

METHODS

Patients with unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures who underwent minimally invasive anterior corpectomy and percutaneous posterior stabilization between 2012 and 2019 at a tertiary hospital were enrolled. Radiological outcomes such as endplate subsidence and fusion status were identified on preoperative and postoperative plain radiographs and computed tomography images. Preoperative and postoperative neurological statuses were evaluated using the American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale. Furthermore, operation-related parameters were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 21 patients (mean follow-up period, 21.7 months) were included in this study. Of them, 17 (80.95%) patients exhibited complete fusion according to the Bridwell's criteria at the final follow-up, and only 1 patient exhibited nonunion at the surgical level. Endplate subsidence was observed in 6 (28.57%) patients; however, there were no definite symptoms that would have necessitated a revision surgery. Of 15 patients with preoperative neurological impairment, 7 exhibited neurological improvement during follow-up. None of the patients experienced postoperative neurological deterioration. Regarding operation-related parameters, the mean operative time and intraoperative blood loss were 266.19 ± 51.54 min and 520.71 ± 190.86 ml, respectively. The mean length of hospital stays and days to postoperative ambulation were 12.14 and 4.20 days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive anterolateral corpectomy with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is a reliable surgical treatment option for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Comparison of monoplanar and polyaxial screw fixation systems in percutaneous intermediate fixation for thoracolumbar fractures

Background

The newly developed monoplanar pedicle screws (MPPSs) can mobile in axial plane but fixed in the sagittal plane, which holds potential to combine ease of rod placement with sagittal plane strength theoretically. So far, few clinical studies focused on the outcomes of MPPSs for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures (TLFs). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of MPPSs to polyaxial pedicle screws (PAPSs) in percutaneous intermediate fixation of TLFs.

Methods

Seventy-eight patients who sustained TLFs without neurological deficits and underwent percutaneous intermediate fixation using MPPSs (40 patients) or PAPSs (38 patients) with a minimum 1-year follow-up were included in this study. The operation time, blood loss, local Cobb angle (LCA), vertebral wedge angle (VWA), anterior body height ratio (ABHR), visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were collected.

Results

No significant differences were observed in baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, operation time or blood loss between the two groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative LCA, VWA and ABHR were significantly corrected compared to these parameters preoperatively in both groups (^#P < 0.05). The postoperative LCA, VWA and ABHR in the MPPS group were significantly better corrected than those in the PAPS group (*P < 0.05). Furthermore, the correction loss of LCA, VWA and ABHR in the MPPS group was significantly lower than that in the PAPS group (*P < 0.05). However, no significant difference in VAS and ODI scores was observed between the two groups.

Conclusions

MPPSs showed similar efficiency as PAPSs in percutaneous intermediate fixation surgical procedures. More importantly, MPPSs achieved better radiological performance than PAPSs in the correction of TLFs and the prevention of correction loss.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05129-8.

Postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation for treatment of unstable pathologic neoplastic fractures

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Case Series.

OBJECTIVES

Minimally invasive techniques have emerged as a useful tool in the treatment of neoplastic spine pathology due to decrease in surgical morbidity and earlier adjuvant treatment. The objective of this study was to analyze outcomes and complications in a cohort of unstable, symptomatic pathologic fractures treated with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF).

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on consecutive patients with spinal stabilization for unstable pathologic neoplastic fractures between 2007 and 2017. Patients who underwent PPSF through a minimally invasive approach were included. Surgical indications included intractable pain, mechanical instability, and neurologic compromise with radiologic visualization of the lesion.

RESULTS

20 patients with mean Tomita Score of 6.3 ± 2.1 points [95% CI, 5.3-7.2] were treated with constructs that spanned a mean of 4.7 ± 1.4 [95% CI, 4.0-5.3] instrumented levels. 10 (50%) patients were augmented with vertebroplasty. Majority of patients (65%) had no complications during their hospital stay and were discharged home (60%). Four patients received reoperation: two extracavitary corpectomies, one pathologic fracture at a different level, and one adjacent segment disease.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive PPSF is a safe and effective option when treating unstable neoplastic fractures and may be a viable alternative to the traditional open approach in select cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

A real-time 3D electromagnetic navigation system for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in traumatic thoraco-lumbar fractures: implications for efficiency, fluoroscopic time, and accuracy compared with those of conventional fluoroscopic guidance

PURPOSE

Navigation is becoming more useful in percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF). The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency, fluoroscopic time, accuracy, and clinical outcomes of PPSF with a novel electromagnetic navigation (EMN) system for thoraco-lumbar (TL) fractures with those of PPSF with conventional C-arm fluoroscopic (CF) guidance.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted. A total of 162 screws were implanted in 29 patients with the assistance of the EMN system (EMN group), and 220 screws were inserted in 40 patients by using CF guidance (CF group). The duration of surgery, placement time per screw, fluoroscopic time per screw, accuracy of pedicle screw placement, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The duration of surgery and placement time per screw in the EMN group were significantly lower than those in the CF group (P < 0.05). The fluoroscopic time per screw in the CF group was significantly longer than that in the EMN group (P < 0.05). The learning curve of PPSF in the EMN group was steeper than that in the CF group. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the EMN group was more precise than that in the CF group (P < 0.05). The VAS scores in the EMN group were significantly lower than those in the CF group at one-week postoperatively (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with PPSF by using conventional fluoroscopic guidance, PPSF with the aid of the EMN system can increase the efficiency and accuracy of pedicle screw placement and reduce the fluoroscopic time.

Minimally invasive posterior pedicle screw fixation versus open instrumentation in patients with thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis

BACKGROUND

Due to the aging society, the incidence of pyogenic spondylodiscitis is still rising. Although surgical treatment for spondylodiscitis in general is increasingly accepted, an optimal surgical strategy for treatment of pyogenic spinal infection has not yet been established. The aim of this study was to investigate the suitability of percutaneous posterior pedicle screw fixation for surgical treatment in patients with spondylodiscitis of the thoracolumbar spine.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing surgical treatment for spondylodiscitis of the thoracolumbar spine between January 2017 and December 2019. We assessed intraoperative and clinical data, comparing for the classic open and the percutaneous approach. In total, we analyzed 125 cases (39 female, 86 male). The mean age was 69.49 years ± 12.63 years.

RESULTS

Forty-seven (37.6%) patients were operated on by a percutaneous approach for pedicle screw fixation, and 78 (62.4%) received open surgery. There was no significant difference in the mean age of patients between both groups (p= 0.57). The time of surgery for percutaneous fixation was statistically significantly shorter (p= 0.03). Furthermore, the estimated intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the minimally invasive group (p < 0.001). No significant difference could be observed regarding the recurrence rate of spondylodiscitis and the occurrence of surgical site infections (p= 0.2 and 0.5, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous posterior pedicle screw fixation appears to be a feasible option for the surgical treatment of a selected patient group with spondylodiscitis of the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Early loss of angular kyphosis correction in patients with thoracolumbar vertebral burst (A3-A4) fractures who underwent percutaneous pedicle screws fixation

Purpose

Percutaneous trans-pedicle screws represent a surgical option frequently performed in patients affected by thoracolumbar vertebral burst fractures (A3-A4). The aim of the study was to evaluate the early loss of kyphosis correction and its clinical correlations in a cohort of patients affected by burst spinal fracture treated with percutaneous trans-pedicle screws fixation.

Methods

The present investigation consists in a retrospective one center analysis. The primary outcome was the evaluation of the early loss of correction. Secondary outcomes were the bi-segmental kyphosis change, the clinical outcome and the correlation between clinical outcome and the loss of correction.

Results

Among 435 patients 97 were included in the study. A mean 3.3° of early loss of correction was observed between postoperative and 1 month follow-up evaluations. The mean anterior vertebral body height change was 3.8 mm. No statistical differences were found in clinical and functional outcomes between patients with >2° or <2° of kyphosis loss of correction.

Conclusion

No statistical differences were found between 1 e 6 months postoperative kyphosis loss of correction. The amount of loss of correction seems not to influence clinical outcomes after percutaneous trans-pedicle screw fixation in patients with vertebral burst fractures.

Is it sufficient to treat adult lumbar spinal deformity using anterior lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation?

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has been performed for lumbar spinal restoration and stabilization without extensive paraspinal muscle damage or massive bleeding. The authors retrospectively investigated surgical results of multilevel ALIF followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) in adult lumbar spinal deformity (ALSD). This study included 28 patients with degenerative lumbar spinal deformity, who underwent selective multilevel ALIF and PPSF between January 2013 and August 2016 at our hospital. Standing X-rays were performed and coronal Cobb angle (CCA) of scoliosis, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS) were measured. Pain and functional assessment were performed using visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for low back pain and leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. CCA, SVA and LL were significantly improved immediately after surgery and relatively well maintained until the last follow-up. After surgery, PT was significantly decreased and SS was increased, respectively. However, cases with SVA > 95 mm or PT > 30° showed a loss of correction in sagittal balance parameters to a greater extent at the last follow-up compared to the group of patients with minor sagittal imbalance. VAS scores for back and radicular pain, and ODI score were significantly decreased at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). Multilevel ALIF with PPSF yielded favorable clinical and radiological outcomes in coronal and sagittal balance without severe surgical mortality or morbidity in patients with ALSD. However, correction loss in sagittal balance was observed in cases with SVA > 95 mm or PT > 30˚.

[Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined with vertebroplasty for the treatment of Genant Ⅲ degree osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical effect of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation(PPSF) combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in the treatment of Genant Ⅲ degree osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).

METHODS

The hospitalized 83 patients with Genant Ⅲ degree OVCFs treated by PPSF combined with PVP from June 2015 to June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed, and 83 patients treated by PVP alone from January 2013 to June 2016 were randomly selected as the control group. There were 19 males and 64 females with an average age of (73.6±11.0) years in combined group with treatment of PPSF and PVP. There were 15 malesand 68 females with an average age of (75.5±10.6) years in control group. The anterior edge height of the vertebral body and Cobb angle before operation, 1 day, and 6, 12, 24 months after operation were compared between two groups. Visual analogue scale(VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to assess the pain level and daily lumbar dysfunction for patients, respectively. The complications were observed.

RESULTS

The follow-up time of all patients was more than 2 years. The combined group and control group were (24.3±10.2) months and (27.5±14.8) months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the anterior edge height of the vertebral body and Cobb angle at 1 day after surgery between two groups (P>0.05), and there were statistically significant differences at 6, 12, 24 months after surgery between two groups (P<0.01). The difference in ODI and VAS scores at 6 and 12 months after operation between two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). Postoperative complications incontrol group were higher than those in the combined group.

CONCLUSION

PPSF combined with PVP for the treatment of Genant Ⅲ degree OVCFs is superior to PVP alone in terms of vertebral height loss, patient satisfaction, and complications.

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined with selective transforaminal endoscopic decompression for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture

Background

The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, efficacy, and indications of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) combined with selective transforaminal endoscopic decompression (TED) in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture (TBLF).

Methods

From August 2015 to October 2018, a total of 41 patients with single-segment TLBF (28 men and 13 women) were enrolled in this study. X-ray and computed tomography were obtained before surgery, 1 week after surgery, and 1 year after surgery to evaluate spinal recovery. In addition, we used the visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA), and the Frankel classification of neurological deficits to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatments.

Results

The average follow-up time was 22.02 ± 8.28 months. The postoperative Cobb angle, vertebral body compression ratio, vertebral wedge angle, mid-sagittal canal diameter compression ratio, and Frankel grade were significantly improved. There were also significant improvements in the VAS (7.61 ± 1.41 vs. 1.17 ± 0.80, P < 0.001), ODI (89.82 ± 7.44 vs. 15.71 ± 13.50, P < 0.001), and JOA (6.90 ± 2.91 vs. 24.90 ± 3.03, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our results showed that PPSF combined with selective TED in the treatment of TLBF had excellent efficacy, high safety, less secondary injury than other treatments, and a wide range of indications and that it could accurately distinguish patients who did not need spinal canal decompression after posterior fixation. PPSF combined with selective TED is therefore a good choice for the treatment of TLBF.

Effect of RTS versus percutaneous conventional pedicle screw fixation on type A thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

This study aims at evaluating the effects of RTS (rotation softened trauma fixation system) compared with PCPSF (percutaneous conventional pedicle screw fixation) on type A thoracolumbar fractures.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 116 patients with type A thoracolumbar fractures from March 2014 to June 2018 were enrolled. PCPSF was performed in 60 patients, meanwhile the other 56 patients accepted RTS. VAS scores, Cobb angle, anterior vertebral height (AVH) and perioperative data were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Both groups were consistent with baseline on demographic and clinical characteristics. No significant difference was observed in VAS score between-group before and after operation. One year after surgery, the VAS score of RTS group was lower than that of PCPSF group (0.7 ± 0.3 vs. 1.5 ± 0.4). The postoperative AVH (%) in PCPSF was 82.3% (95%CI, 81.7-84.6), and 91.78% (95% CI, 91.1-92.4) in RTS. The postoperative improvement rate of AVH (%) in RTS was higher than that in PCPSF (30.6 ± 5.0 [95% CI, 29.2-32.0] vs. 22.0 ± 7.3 [95% CI, 20.2-24.2]). The postoperative Cobb angle (°) in PCPSF was 2.6 ± 3.4 (95%CI,11.7-13.5), and 7.5 ± 2.0 (95%CI,7.0-8.0) in RTS. The postoperative correction of Cobb angle (°) in RTS was higher than that in PCPSF (16.1 ± 3.8 95%CI,15.1-17.1] vs. 11.6 ± 5.2 95%CI,10.3-13.1]).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with PCPSF, RTS has advantages in restoring the anterior vertebral height and reducing local kyphosis.

Standalone oblique lateral interbody fusion vs. combined with percutaneous pedicle screw in spondylolisthesis

Background

To compare standalone oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) vs. OLIF combined with posterior bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF combined) for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent standalone OLIF or combined OLIF between 07/2014 and 08/2017 at two hospitals in China. Direct decompressions were not performed. Visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), satisfaction rate, anterior/posterior disc heights (DH), foraminal height (FH), foraminal width (FW), cage subsidence, cage retropulsion, fusion rate, and complications were analyzed. All imaging examinations were read independently by two physicians and the mean measurements were used for analysis.

Results

A total of 73 patients were included: 32 with standalone OLIF and 41 with combined OLIF. The total complication rate was 25.0% with standalone OLIF and 26.8% with combined OLIF. There were no differences in VAS and ODI scores by 2 years of follow-up, but the scores were better with standalone OLIF at 1 week and 3 months (P < 0.05). PDH and FW was smaller in the combined OLIF group compared with the standalone OLIF group before and after surgery (all P < 0.05). There were significant differences in FH before surgery and at 1 week and 3 months between the two groups (all P < 0.05), but the difference disappeared by 2 years (P = 0.111). Cage subsidence occurred in 7.3% (3/41) and 7.3% (3/41) of the patients at 3 and 24 months, respectively, in the combined OLIF group, compared with 6.3% (2/32) and 15.6% (5/32), respectively, in the standalone OLIF group at the same time points (P = 0.287). There was no cage retropulsion in both groups at 2 years. The fusion rate was 85.4%(35/41) in the combined OLIF group and 84.4% (27/32) in the standalone OLIF group at 3 months(P = 0.669). At 24 months, the fusion rate was 100.0% in the combined OLIF group and 93.8% (30/32) in the standalone OLIF group (P = 0.066).

Conclusion

Standalone OLIF may achieve equivalent clinical and radiological outcomes than OLIF combined with fixation for spondylolisthesis. The rate of complications was similar between the two groups. Patients who are osteoporotic might be better undergoing combined rather than standalone OLIF. The possibilty of proof lies within a future prospective study, preferably an RCT.

Percutaneous endoscopic debridement with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis: a preliminary study

PURPOSE

To access the feasibility and efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic debridement (PED) combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) in the treatment of lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

METHODS

Forty-five patients diagnosed as pyogenic spondylodiscitis underwent PPSF followed by PED. A drainage catheter was left in place for negative pressure drainage. Adequate systematic antibiotics were administered empirically or based on bacterial culture results. Clinical outcomes were assessed by physical examination, regular serologic testing, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and imaging studies.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 110.1 ± 21.2 minutes (range 80-165 minutes), with intra-operative blood loss 47.8 ± 21.0 ml (range 20-120 ml). All patients reported relief of back pain, able to sit up, and partially ambulate the next day. Causative pathogens were identified in 32 of 45 biopsy specimens, staphylococcal bacteria being the most prevalent strain. However, there were 13 patients with post-operative complications. During 6-12 months' follow-up, inflammatory markers showed infection controlled. VAS and ODI values were significantly improved.

DISCUSSION

Satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes were achieved in our patients post-operatively. It is recommended that PED plus PPSF can be another alternative for spondylodiscitis.

CONCLUSION

PED supplementing PPSF offers a valid option in treating spondylodiscitis, as it is minimally invasive, shortens hospital stay, and avoids prolonged bed rest with an optimistic outcome.

Quantitative analysis of paraspinal muscle atrophy after oblique lateral interbody fusion alone vs. combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in patients with spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND

There is no available literature for comparison on muscle atrophy between the "stand-alone" oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and regular OLIF (i.e., combined with percutaneous pedicle screws fixation (PPSF) in patients with spondylolisthesis). This study aimed to identify changes in back muscle atrophy between the two surgeries.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent OLIF or OLIF+PPSF at Beijing Jishuitan Hospital and Shanghai ChangZheng Hospital between 07/2014 and 10/2017. Computed tomography (CT) was used to measure functional cross-sectional area (FCSA) and fat infiltration percentage (FIP) of the multifidus and erector spinae before and 24 months after surgery.

RESULT

There were no differences in FCSA and FIP between OLIF (n = 32) and OLIF+PPSF (n = 41) groups before surgery. In the OLIF group, the multifidus and erector spinae FCSA and FIP did not change at 24 months (FCSA: multifidus: from 8.59 ± 1.76 to 9.39 ± 1.74 cm², P = 0.072; erector spinae: from 13.32 ± 1.59 to 13.55 ± 1.31 cm², P = 0.533) (FIP: multifidus: from 15.91 ± 5.30% to 14.38 ± 3.21%, P = 0.721; erector spinae: from 11.63 ± 3.05% to 11.22 ± 3.12%, P = 0.578). In the OLIF+PPSF group, the multifidus and erector spinae FCSA decreased (multifidus: from 7.72 ± 2.69 to 5.67 ± 1.71 cm², P < 0.001; erector spinae: from 12.60 ± 2.04 to 10.15 ± 1.82 cm², P < 0.001), while the FIP increased (multifidus: from 16.13 ± 7.01% to 49.38 ± 20.54%, P < 0.001; erector spinae: from 11.93 ± 3.22% to 22.60 ± 4.99%, P < 0.001). The differences of FCSA and FIP between the two groups at 24 months were significant (all P < 0.001). The patients in the standalone OLIF group had better VAS back pain, and JOA scores than the patients in the OLIF combined group (all P < 0.05) at 1 week and 3 months after surgery. There were two cases (4.9%) of adjacent segment degeneration in the OLIF combined group, while there was no case in the OLIF alone group.

CONCLUSIONS

Standalone OLIF had better clinical outcomes at 1 week and 3 months than OLIF+PPSF in patients with spondylolisthesis. OLIF may not result in paraspinal muscle atrophy at 24 months after surgery.

Surgeon's and patient's radiation exposure during percutaneous thoraco-lumbar pedicle screw fixation: A prospective multicenter study of 100 cases

HYPOTHESIS

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixations (PPSF) are increasingly used in spine surgery, minimizing morbidity through less muscle breakdown but at the cost of intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance that generates high radiation exposure. Few studies have been conducted to measure them accurately.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The objective of our study is to quantify, during a PPSF carried out in different experimented centers respecting current radiation protection recommendations, this irradiation at the level of the surgeon and the patient. We have prospectively included 100 FPVP procedures for which we have collected radiation doses from the main operator. For each procedure, the doses of whole-body radiation, lens and extremities were measured.

RESULTS

Our results show a mean whole body, extremity and lens exposure dose per procedure reaching 1.7±2.8μSv, 204.7±260.9μSv and 30.5±25.9μSv, respectively. According to these values, the exposure of the surgeon's extremities and lens will exceed the annual limit allowed by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) after 2440 and 4840 procedures respectively.

CONCLUSION

Recent European guidelines will reduce the maximum annual exposure dose from 150 to 20mSv. The number of surgical procedures to not reach the eye threshold, according to our results, should not exceed 645 procedures per year. Pending the democratization of neuronavigation systems, the use of conventional fluoroscopy exposes the eyes in the first place. Therefore they must be protected by leaded glasses.

LEVEL OF PROOF

IV, case series.

[Effect observation of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical effects of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation(PPSF) combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP) for the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures.

METHODS

The clinical data of 94 patients with osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures treated from January 2014 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 31 males and 63 females, aged from 65 to 70 years old with an average of 67.2 years. Fracture level was T₁₁ on 15 cases, T₁₂ on 32 cases, L₁ on 29 cases and L₂ on 18 cases. The patients were divided into two groups according to different therapeutic methods. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty were applied in 43 patients(group A) and percutaneous vertebroplasty was applied to 51 patients(group B). Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, bone cement volume, postoperative in-bed time were recorded; preoperatively, 3 d, 1 year after the operation, the ratios of anterior border heights, sagittal Cobb angles, visual analogue scale(VAS) scores were compared between two groups. The condition of postoperative complication in two groups was analyzed.

RESULTS

All the patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months with an average of 18.5 months. Operation time of group A [(96.2±28.7) min] was longer than that of group B [(31.8±10.6) min]. Intraoperative blood loss of group A[(62.2±25.5) ml] was more than that of group B [(25.4±10.9) ml]. Bone cement volume of group A [(5.5±0.5) ml] was larger than that of group B [(4.9±1.1) ml]. Postoperative in-bed time of group A[(5.1±1.8) d] was longer than that of group B[(1.8±0.7) d]. There were significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, bone cement volume, postoperative in-bed time between two groups(P<0.05). Three days, 12 months after the operation, the ratios of anterior border heights and Cobb angles in two groups were significantly improved. At final follow-up, the ratio of anterior border height and Cobb angle of group A[(85.6±3.5)%, (11.9±5.3)°] were better than of group B[(84.2±4.5)%, (15.3±3.4)°](P<0.05). Three cases in group B had re-collapse of cemented vertebral bodies. Postoperative at 3 d, 1 year, VAS score of all patients had significantly decreased(P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between two groups(P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to simple PVP, PPSF combined with PVP in treating osteoporotic thoracolumbar fracture can obtain stronger vertebral strength and stiffness, furthermore to improve vertebral reduced effect, keeping vertebral heights, and preventing vertebral re-collapse.

Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation with Bone Cement Augmentation Under Epidural Anesthesia for Treatment of Kümmell Disease in Extremely Old Age

BACKGROUND

In cases of Kümmell disease without neurologic deficit, percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty has achieved short-term favorable outcomes. In the long term, recollapse of the augmented vertebral body and aggravation of kyphosis at the index level is often reported. Owing to medical comorbidities, elderly patients are often unsuited for extensive open spine surgery under general anesthesia.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 95-year-old man presented with a 1-month history of intractable back pain and gait disturbance. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed intravertebral avascular necrosis with fluid collection at the L4 vertebra. After postural reduction using a pillow in the supine position for 2 days, percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with bone cement augmentation was performed at the L3-5 level including L4 fracture under epidural anesthesia. Additional posterior column compression was performed to achieve restoration of spinal canal and lumbar lordosis. Severe back pain was reduced after surgery, and the patient was able to walk the day after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first case of Kümmell disease in an extremely elderly patient in whom good clinical result was obtained after postural reduction, vertebral augmentation, and short segment percutaneous pedicle screw fixation under epidural anesthesia.

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for multiple-level isthmic spondylolisthesis

OBJECTIVE

Multiple-level lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis is rarely reported. Here, we report 23 consecutive patients who underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPF) for multiple-level isthmic spondylolisthesis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From June 2008 through December 2014, multiple-level lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis was diagnosed in 23 patients (6 men, 17 women) at Wooridul Spine Hospital (Busan, South Korea). Isthmic spondylolisthesis occurred at three spinal levels in 2 patients and at two levels in 21 patients. All patients underwent ALIF with PPF. We used the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale scores to evaluate the preoperative and postoperative functional outcome, low back pain, and radicular pain. We also evaluated segmental lordosis and the fusion status using radiographs and data from computed tomography.

RESULTS

Isthmic spondylolisthesis occurred from L3 to S1 and mostly occurred at two consecutive spinal levels (i.e., L4-L5 and L5-S1). Significant improvements in the ODI and visual analog scale were observed in patients at final follow up (p<0.05). The mean segmental lordosis significantly increased after operation (from 22.7° to 32.7°). The mean lumbar lordosis significantly increased after operation (from 45.8 to 53.1). Radiographs of all of the patients showed solid fusion at the last follow-up. There was one case of screw fracture at the S1 level; however, in this case the last follow-up radiograph exhibited solid fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with PPF can be an effective treatment choice and yield good clinical outcomes in patients with multiple-level isthmic spondylolisthesis.

[MINIMALLY INVASIVE PASSAGE IN POSTERIOR LAMINOTOMY DECOMPRESSION AND INTERVERTEBRAL BONE GRAFTING COMBINED WITH PERCUTANEOUS PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION FOR TREATMENT OF Denis TYPE B THORACOLUMBAR BURST FRACTURES]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and the effectiveness of minimally invasive passage in posterior laminotomy decompression and intervertebral bone grafting combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of Denis type B thoracolumbar burst fractures.

METHODS

Between January 2013 and March 2015, 53 patients with Denis type B thoracolumbar burst fractures were treated by minimally invasive passage in posterior laminotomy decompression and intervertebral bone grafting combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. There were 37 males and 16 females with a mean age of 43 years (range, 16-57 years). The causes included falling injury from height in 23 cases, traffic accident injury in 15 cases, heavy pound injury in 7 cases, and falling injury in 8 cases. The time between injury and operation was 7 hours to 12 days (mean, 6.7 days). The involved segments included T₁₁ in 2 cases, T₁₂ in 7 cases, L₁ in 20 cases, L₂ in 18 cases, and L₃ in 6 cases; based on the neurological classification of spinal cord injury by American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), 3 cases were rated as grade A, 5 cases as grade B, 12 cases as grade C, 24 cases as grade D, and 9 cases as grade E. The operation time, bleeding volume, and postoperative drainage were recorded; postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) was used for pain evaluation, and ASIA for neurological function assessment; CT and X-ray films were taken to observe fracture healing, bone fusion, and grafted bone absorption; The vertebral canal patency rate was calculated; the relative height of fractured vertebrae and Cobb angle were measured.

RESULTS

The operation was successfully completed in all patients; the average operation time was 150 minutes (range, 90-240 minutes); the average bleeding volume was 350 mL (range, 50-500 mL); the average postoperative drainage was 80 mL (range, 20-150 mL); and the average VAS score was 2.3 (range, 1.5-4.7) at 3 days after operation. The incisions healed primarily. All the patients were followed up 12-19 months (mean, 15 months). All fractures healed at 3-9 months (mean, 6 months). No complications of broken nails, broken rod, and screw loosening occurred. At last follow-up, the vertebral canal patency rate was significantly improved when compared with preoperative value (t=27.395, P=0.000). The Cobb angle, and the anterior and posterior heights of of traumatic vertebra were significantly improved at 1 week, 1 year, and last follow-up when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between different time points after operation (P>0.05). The neurological function was improved in different degrees; 1 case was rated as grade A, 4 cases as grade B, 7 cases as grade C, 15 cases as grade D, and 26 cases as grade E, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative one (Z=-5.477, P=0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive passage in posterior laminotomy decompression, bone graft in the injured vertebrae combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is an effective method to treat Denis type B thoracolumbar burst fractures, which not only can fully decompression, but also can effectively maintain the postoperative injured vertebral height, reduce the postoperative failure risk of internal fixation and decrease operation trauma.

Effect of the percutaneous pedicle screw fixation at the fractured vertebra on the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation at the fractured vertebra in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

METHODS

Thirty-two consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. All patients received percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, and they were randomly divided into two groups to undergo either the placement of pedicle screws into the fractured vertebra (fractured group) or not (control group). The operation time and intra-operative blood loss were recorded. Oswestry disability index (ODI) questionnaire and visual analogue scale (VAS) as clinical assessments were quantified. Radiographic follow-up was defined by the vertebral body index (VBI), anterior vertebral body height (AVBH), and Cobb angle (CA).

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed in the operation time and intra-operative blood loss between the two groups. Clinical results (VAS and ODI scores) showed no significant difference during all the follow-up periods. In the fractured group, there were better correction and less loss of AVBH and VBI compared with the control group. However, post-operative correction of the CA immediately after surgery and the correction loss at the final follow-up showed no significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous screw fixation combined with intermediate screws at the fractured vertebra could more effectively restore and maintain fractured vertebral height, and is an acceptable, minimally invasive surgical choice for patients with type A thoracolumbar fractures.

Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Avulsion treated with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

The optimal treatment for thoracolumbar fractures (TLF) without neurological deficit remains controversial. Majority of the systematic reviews and meta-analyses have evaluated open operative approaches but have yet to compare the outcomes of minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle fixation (MIPPF) versus non-operative treatment. A retrospective cohort study was performed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes between MIPPF and conservative groups for TLF AO Type A1 to Type B2 during a 2-year follow-up period. Pre-operative plain and CT films were evaluated and decision made for short segment (non-fusion) MIPPF. Patients who refused operation were treated conservatively with three months of body cast, brace, or corset. MIPPF group showed earlier Visual Analog Score(VAS) improvement at six months post-injury (0 vs 6.0- p<0.001), as well as better functional and radiological outcomes (p<0.050) at final follow-up. Progressions of regional kyphosis (RK) were noted in both groups but there was no significant difference within and between them(p>0.050). MIPPF as a method of internal bracing can be pursued in the treatment of TLF, with larger future cohorts and RCTs being called for to support and explore new findings.

A minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion using percutaneous long arm pedicle screw system for degenerative lumbar disease

The aim of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of patients with lumbar degeneration and instability treated with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion. Twenty-one patients were selected in our hospital from November, 2012 to March, 2013. The patients with an average age 55.62 years, including 8 vertebral spondylolisthesis, 4 lumbar intervertebral disc herniation, and 9 lumbar spinal canal stenosis cases. All the patients were managed to take the lumbar MRI and radiographs. The comparison of preoperative and postoperative (3 days, 2 weeks, 3 months) VAS and ODI score were analyzed. The results indicated that VAS scores were 7.14 ± 0.79 before operation, and 5.19 ± 0.81 in 3 days after operation, 4 ± 0.84 after 2 weeks, and 2.67 ± 0.66 after 3 months. The pain was relieved, and the postoperative VAS score was lower than that before treatment (P < 0.05). ODI score was 55.8 ± 11.4 before operation, 47.38 ± 9.38 after 3 days, 41.38 ± 8.09 after 2 weeks, 35.76 ± 4.50 after 3 months. ODI score was obviously decreased (P < 0.05). In conclusion, percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined with minimally invasive interbody fusion is a safe, effective, feasible minimally invasive spine operation, with worthy for spreading.