Congenital metatarsus varus: early diagnosis and conservative treatment in 112 patients

PURPOSE

To describe a conservative treatment algorithm to manage Congenital Metatarsus Varus.

BACKGROUNDS

Congenital Metatarsus Varus is a congenital disorder with an estimated incidence of 1/1000 newborns. Despite the deformity being mostly an aesthetic problem, residual and incorrect forms may be responsible for abnormal in-toe gait and shoe-wearing issues. No consensus has still been gathered regarding its correct treatment algorithm.

METHODS

Between May 2019 and September 2020, 2156 newborn patients underwent an orthopedic examination at birth. Patients affected by Congenital Metatarsus Varus were classified according to Bleck's classification as flexible, semi-flexible or non-flexible deformity. A conservative treatment algorithm was followed, based on the application of manipulations, Bebax-type braces or plaster cast. All patient were followed until the clinical resolution of the deformity. Complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

One-hundred twenty-four patients were diagnosed Congenital Metatarsus Varus, with an overall prevalence of 5/1000. One-hundred twenty-two patients presented with a flexible or semi-flexible foot deformity and were firstly treated with manipulations: 52 patients reported good results, while 70 required additional treatment with Bebax-type braces for achieving correction. Two patients presented a non-flexible deformity at birth: one required plaster cast due to a non-flexible deformity, and one patient was firstly managed with Bebax-type braces due to a severe semi-flexible deformity. Only two patients presented superficial skin ulcerations, healed within a week. Two patients were lost during the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

An early diagnosis allowed by an orthopedic examination in all newborns may be a valid instrument to avoid Congenital Metatarsus Varus misdiagnosis. Early treatment with manipulation and orthosis resulted in good clinical outcome, with only few complications.

Comparison of two different ways to apply a circular plaster cast for distal radius fractures: biomechanical study

INTRODUCTION

Although conservative treatment with circular plaster cast is the most commonly used method in distal radius fractures, the best method to apply it remains unclear.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two frequently used configurations of circular plaster cast (with and without a splint) were selected to compare. Group C was applied only with circular bandages (three units) and group S with a splint (one unit) and over it, a circular bandage (two units). Both configurations had the same weight. Five prototypes of each group were built and mechanically tested. Three-point flexural tensile strength and maximum deflection were measured and compared.

RESULTS

The previously splinted prototypes (group S) obtained higher tensile strength with the same weight (p < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

No other study regarding strength and configuration of circular casts for distal radius fractures immobilization has been previously published, leading to a high variability in construction among orthopedic surgeons. Data confirms that applying a splint before circular bandage offers more mechanical resistance to the cast in flexion, with the same weight.

CONCLUSION

Applying a splint before circular bandage for plaster casts used for distal radius fractures make them more resistant to usual forces.

A systematic review of displaced paediatric distal radius fracture management: Plaster cast versus Kirschner wiring

Displaced distal radius fractures involving the metaphysis are common childhood injuries requiring intervention. Patients frequently undergo operative treatment for these injuries. The aim of our study was to systematically review the literature comparing manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) and Kirschner wire fixation(K wire). PRISMA guidelines were followed throughout. Medline and Cochrane databases were searched for comparative randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. Quality assessment was undertaken using the Jadad score, Cochrane assessment of bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data extraction was performed with customised forms. 2 RCTs and 4 cohort studies were included. There was significant variation in their methodologies, which included their inclusion criteria and threshold for remanipiulation. Re-operation rates for MUA varied from 14% to 91%. There were no recorded re-operations following K-wiring. There was a 2.2% infection rate and 4.5% rate of wire migration. There were no adverse long-term sequelae reported. All studies showed a higher re-operation rate with MUA alone. Further studies are required to identify which fracture subtypes are most susceptible to re-displacement. Current evidence suggests the use of a k-wire to stabIlise these fractures following manipulation.

Does operative fixation of isolated fractures of ulna shaft results in different outcomes than non-operative management by long arm cast?

OBJECTIVE

The optimal treatment for isolated fractures of ulnar shaft is debatable. The purpose of this study was to compare functional outcomes and radiological union in patients treated for isolated fractures of the ulnar shaft by open reduction and internal fixation and a long arm cast.

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted at level I trauma center from November 2014 to March 2016. 30 patients with isolated fractures of ulnar shaft were randomized to two groups to receive treatment by open reduction and internal fixation by plates and screws and a long arm cast. Outcome assessment was done by Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, range of motion at wrist and elbow, grip strength and radiological union. Quantitative variables were summarized Mean or Median. Normality was assessed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Independent samples t-test and Mann-Whitney test were used for normally distributed variables and non-normally distributed variables respectively. Categorical variables were summarized as proportions. Effect of the intervention for categorical variables was assessed using Chi-square test.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the groups for pain on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), grip strength, DASH score, and union at the end of 12 months. There was no difference between the groups for range of motion at the elbow and wrist. 12 (85.7%) patients in the ORIF group and 15 (93.7%) in the cast group united at the end of 12 months. The mean time to union was 13 weeks in the ORIF group and 18 weeks in the cast group.

CONCLUSION

Open reduction and internal fixation results in anatomical restoration of ulna, but this does not translates to better functional outcomes in short term (12 months).

[Pediatric clubfoot : Treatment of recurrence]

Over the last 10 years the Ponseti method has become established as the gold standard for initial treatment of clubfeet nearly worldwide. Nevertheless, there are considerable fluctuations regarding the authenticity and quality in the application of the Ponseti method. Especially the efforts to ensure and promote compliance with the foot abduction brace and subsequently the recurrence rate show great variation. As a result, we are still faced with a significant number of recurrent or residual clubfeet. In recent years it has been shown in high-volume clinics that even these can almost always be successfully treated with recasting and with minor interventions, such as anterior tibial tendon transfer and lengthening of the Achilles tendon. More invasive surgical procedures are only very rarely indicated and are reserved for severe recurrence in previously surgically treated and secondary clubfeet.

[Conservative treatment of congenital patellar dislocation]

This article presents the rare case of a boy who was born in our hospital with valgus deformity and external rotation of the right lower leg because of congenital patellar dislocation. In the case presented a stable repositioning of the patella could be achieved by redressment with a plaster cast and leg brace. During a 4-year follow-up there were no tendencies towards dislocation during the clinical examination and no dislocation events were documented. In selected cases an attempt at conservative repositioning and retention treatment appears to be worthwhile before surgical treatment is indicated.

Radiographic results after plaster cast fixation for 10 days versus 1 month in reduced distal radius fractures: a prospective randomised study

Background

The aim of this study was to examine whether reduced distal radius fractures can be treated with early mobilisation without affecting the radiographic results.

Methods

In a prospective randomised study, 109 patients (mean age 65.8 (range 50–92)) with moderately displaced distal radius fractures were treated with closed reduction and plaster cast fixation for about 10 days (range 8–13 days) followed by randomisation to one of two groups: early mobilisation (n = 54, active group) or continued plaster cast fixation for another 3 weeks (n = 55, control group).

Results

For three patients in the active group (6%), treatment proved unsuccessful because of severe displacement of the fracture (n = 2) or perceived instability (n = 1). From 10 days to 1 month, i.e. the only period when the treatment differed between the two groups, the active group displaced significantly more in dorsal angulation (4.5°, p < 0.001), radial angulation (2.0°, p < 0.001) and axial compression (0.5 mm, p = 0.01) compared with the control group. However, during the entire study period (i.e. from admission to 12 months), the active group displaced significantly more than the controls only in radial angulation (3.2°, p = 0.002) and axial compression (0.7 mm, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Early mobilisation 10 days after reduction of moderately displaced distal radius fractures resulted in both an increased number of treatment failures and increased displacement in radial angulation and axial compression as compared with the control group. Mobilisation 10 days after reduction cannot be recommended for the routine treatment of reduced distal radius fractures.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrail.gov, NCT02798614. Retrospectively registered 16 June 2016.

Scaphoid Waist Internal Fixation for Fractures Trial (SWIFFT) protocol: a pragmatic multi-centre randomised controlled trial of cast treatment versus surgical fixation for the treatment of bi-cortical, minimally displaced fractures of the scaphoid waist in adults

Background

A scaphoid fracture is the most common type of carpal fracture affecting young active people. The optimal management of this fracture is uncertain. When treated with a cast, 88 to 90 % of these fractures unite; however, for the remaining 10-12 % the non-union almost invariably leads to arthritis. The alternative is surgery to fix the scaphoid with a screw at the outset.

Methods/Design

We will conduct a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of 438 adult patients with a “clear” and “bicortical” scaphoid waist fracture on plain radiographs to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of plaster cast treatment (with fixation of those that fail to unite) versus early surgical fixation. The plaster cast treatment will be immobilisation in a below elbow cast for 6 to 10 weeks followed by mobilisation. If non-union is confirmed on plain radiographs and/or Computerised Tomogram at 6 to 12 weeks, then urgent surgical fixation will be performed. This is being compared with immediate surgical fixation with surgeons using their preferred technique and implant. These treatments will be undertaken in trauma units across the United Kingdom. The primary outcome and end-point will be the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (a patient self-reported assessment of wrist pain and function) at 52 weeks and also measured at 6, 12, 26 weeks and 5 years. Secondary outcomes include an assessment of radiological union of the fracture; quality of life; recovery of wrist range and strength; and complications. We will also qualitatively investigate patient experiences of their treatment.

Discussion

Scaphoid fractures are an important public health problem as they predominantly affect young active individuals in the more productive working years of their lives. Non-union, if untreated, can lead to arthritis which can disable patients at a very young age. There is a rapidly increasing trend for immediate surgical fixation of these fractures but there is insufficient evidence from existing RCTs to support this. The SWIFFT Trial is a rigorously designed and adequately powered study which aims to contribute to the evidence-base to inform clinical decisions for the treatment of this common fracture in adults.

Trial registration

The trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Register (ISRCTN67901257). Date registration assigned was 13/02/2013.

Can foot compression under a plaster cast prevent deep-vein thrombosis during lower limb immobilisation?

We hypothesised that adjuvant intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) beneath a plaster cast would reduce the risk of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) during post-operative immobilisation of the lower limb. Of 87 patients with acute tendo Achillis (TA) rupture, 26 were prospectively randomised post-operatively after open TA repair. The treatment group (n = 14) received two weeks of IPC of the foot for at least six hours daily under a plaster cast. The control group (n = 12) had no additional treatment. At two weeks post-operatively all patients received an orthosis until follow-up at six weeks. At two and six weeks the incidence of DVT was assessed using colour duplex sonography by two ultrasonographers blinded to the treatment. Two patients withdrew from the study due to inability to tolerate IPC treatment. An interim analysis demonstrated a high incidence of DVT in both the IPC group (9 of 12, 75%) and the controls (6 of 12, 50%) (p = 0.18). No significant differences in incidence were detected at two (p = 0.33) or six weeks (p = 0.08) post-operatively. Malfunction of the IPC leading to a second plaster cast was found to correlate with an increased DVT risk at two weeks (ϕ = 0.71; p = 0.019), leading to a premature abandonment of the study. We cannot recommend adjuvant treatment with foot IPC under a plaster cast for outpatient DVT prevention during post-operative immobilisation, owing to a high incidence of DVT related to malfunctioning of this type of IPC application.

Neuromuscular electrostimulation viathe common peroneal nerve promotes lower limb blood flow in a below-kneecast: A potential for thromboprophylaxis

Objectives

We aimed to examine the characteristics of deep venous flow in the leg in a cast and the effects of a wearable neuromuscular stimulator (geko; FirstKind Ltd) and also to explore the participants’ tolerance of the stimulator.

Methods

This is an open-label physiological study on ten healthy volunteers. Duplex ultrasonography of the superficial femoral vein measured normal flow and cross-sectional area in the standing and supine positions (with the lower limb initially horizontal and then elevated). Flow measurements were repeated during activation of the geko stimulator placed over the peroneal nerve. The process was repeated after the application of a below-knee cast. Participants evaluated discomfort using a questionnaire (verbal rating score) and a scoring index (visual analogue scale).

Results

The geko device was effective in significantly increasing venous blood flow in the lower limb both with a plaster cast (mean difference 11.5 cm/sec^-1; p = 0.001 to 0.13) and without a plaster cast (mean difference 7.7 cm/sec^-1; p = 0.001 to 0.75). Posture also had a significant effect on peak venous blood flow when the cast was on and the geko inactive (p = 0.003 to 0.69), although these differences were less pronounced than the effect of the geko (mean difference 3.1 cm/sec^-1 (-6.5 to 10)). The geko device was well tolerated, with participants generally reporting only mild discomfort using the device.

Conclusion

The geko device increases venous blood flow in the lower limb, offering a potential mechanical thromboprolylaxis for patients in a cast.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2013;2:179–85.