Who may benefit from an increased gonadotropin dosing in predicted poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI? A secondary analysis assessing treatment selection markers of a randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether we can identify patient characteristics that serve as treatment selection markers to distinguish which women with expected poor response benefit from increased dosing of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in terms of improving the cumulative live birth rate compared to standard FSH dosing and which women.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a secondary analysis of an RCT performed between March 2019 and October 2021 comparing cumulative live birth after increased dosing (N = 328) who received 225 or 300 IU/day according to their antral follicle count (AFC) and standard dosing (N = 333) who received 150 IU/day of gonadotropin.

RESULTS

The MFPI analysis showed the benefit of the increased dosing of FSH on cumulative live birth starts to emerge when women were older than 30 years (women > 30 years: 46.5 % vs. 34.2 %; adjusted relative risk (aRR) 1.32, 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI) 1.05-1.66; women ≤ 30 years: 54.7 % vs. 58.6 %; aRR 0.91, 95 % CI 0.72-1.14; p for interaction 0.019). Only those who had AFC between 1 and 3 benefited from the increased FSH dose (AFC 1-3: 38.5 % vs. 6.5 %; aRR 5.88, 95 % CI 1.50-23.15; AFC 4-9: 50.3 % vs. 46.0 %; aRR 1.08, 95 % CI 0.92-1.27; p for interaction 0.023). Expected poor responders defined by the Bologna criteria and POSEIDON criteria did not significantly benefit from the increased dosing of FSH.

CONCLUSIONS

Women who are aged >30 years or have AFC 1-3 are likely to benefit from increased dosing of FSH by having a higher cumulative live birth rate.

Effects of letrozole co-treatment on outcomes of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles in POSEIDON groups 3 and 4 expected poor responders

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of adjuvant letrozole administration on outcomes of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cycles with intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection in POSEIDON groups 3 and 4 expected poor responder women.

METHODS

This study was conducted by retrospective analysis of patients with expected poor ovarian response (POSEIDON groups 3 and 4) that underwent GnRH antagonist cycles with intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection between 2010 and 2020. A total of 488 patients with letrozole co-administration and 2564 patients without any adjuvant treatment that underwent GnRH antagonist cycles within the selected period of time were included in the study.

RESULTS

Implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates and live birth delivery rates were significantly higher in letrozole administered patients in comparison to controls among POSEIDON group 3 women (0.39 ± 0.46 vs 0.27 ± 0.40, p = 0.01; 46.1% vs 33%, p = 0.014; 42.7% vs 31.5%, p = 0.034, respectively). Mean total doses of gonadotropins required per cycle were significantly lower in letrozole administered patients among both POSEIDON groups 3 and 4 women (2864.65 ± 878.47 IU vs 3757.27 ± 1088.89 IU, p < 0.001; 3286.06 ± 770.16 IU vs 3666.48 ± 959.66 IU, p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant letrozole co-administration in intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection cycles following GnRH antagonist protocol appears to improve implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth delivery rates in women with POSEIDON group 3 expected poor ovarian response.

6M50LSG Scoring System Increased the Proportion of Adequate Excess Body Weight Loss for Suspected Poor Responders After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Asian Population

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the predictive tool, 6M50LSG scoring system, to identify suspected poor responders after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

METHODS

The 6M50LSG scoring system has been applied since 2019. Suspected poor responders are defined by EBWL at 1 month < 19.5% or EBWL at 3 months < 37.7% based on the 6M50LSG scoring system. Our analysis included 109 suspected poor responders. Based on the date of LSG, the patients were separated into two groups: the 2016-2018 group (before group, BG, with regular care) and the 2019-2020 group (after group, AG, with upgrade medical nutrition therapy).

RESULTS

At the end of the study, the AG group had a significantly higher proportion of adequate weight loss, which was defined as EBWL ≥ 50% at 6 months after LSG, than that in the BG group (18.92% in BG vs. 48.57% in AG, p = 0.003). The AG group demonstrated significantly more 3-months-TWL (BG: 15.22% vs. AG: 17.54%, p < 0.001) and 6-months-TWL (BG: 21.08% vs. AG: 25.65%, p < 0.001). In multivariate analyses and adjustments, the scoring system (AG) resulted in significantly higher chances of adequate weight loss in suspected poor responders (adjusted OR 3.392, 95% CI = 1.345-8.5564, p = 0.010). One year after LSG, suspected poor responders in AG had a significantly higher weight loss than those in BG (BG vs. AG: TWL 27.17% vs. 32.20%, p = 0.014) .

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed that the 6M50LSG scoring system with upgraded medical nutrition therapy increased the proportion of suspected poor responders with adequate weight loss after LSG.

The Follicular Output Rate (FORT) as a method to evaluate transdermal testosterone efficacy in poor responders

Objective:

Follicular Output Rate (FORT) is an efficient quantitative and qualitative marker of ovarian responsiveness to gonadotropins. Transdermal testosterone (TT) has been used as adjuvant therapy to gonadotrophins in order to improve ovarian response in poor responders (PR). The aim of this study was to analyze whether TT can improve follicular sensitivity to gonadotropins using FORT.

Methods:

This retrospective study, held in a tertiary-care university hospital included 90 PR patients, according to the Bologna criteria. Patients in Group 1 (n = 46) received transdermal application of testosterone preceding gonadotrophin ovarian stimulation under pituitary suppression. In Group 2 (n = 44) ovarian stimulation was carried out with high-dose gonadotrophin in association with minidose GnRH agonist protocol. We analyzed ovarian stimulation parameters and IVF outcomes. We determined antral follicle count (AFC) (3-8 mm) before ovarian stimulation, pre-ovulatory follicle count (PFC) (16-22 mm) and the day of hCG administration. We calculated the FORT using the PFCx100/AFC ratio.

Results:

Baseline characteristics and ovarian reserve parameters were similar in both groups. FORT and oocytes retrieved were significantly higher in group 1 vs group 2. There were no significant differences in pregnancy rates. In group 1 there was a significant correlation between FORT and AFC.

Conclusions:

This study suggests that the potential beneficial mechanism of TT in poor responder patients may be based on increasing the antral follicle sensitivity to gonadotrophin. FORT is an excellent tool to demonstrate this.

Effects of using letrozole in combination with the GnRH antagonist protocol for patients with poor ovarian response: A meta-analysis

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist/letrozole protocol with those of the conventional GnRH antagonist protocol for poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). We searched for relevant articles in PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and retrieved 452 records. Eventually, we selected five eligible trials with data for 564 patients characterized as poor ovarian responders. Our meta-analysis revealed that the clinical pregnancy rate (per cycle) with administration of letrozole might be a higher than that in the control groups (risk rate [RR]: 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-2.44, p = 0.05). .Moreover,it indicated that the total dose of gonadotrophin was significantly decreased with the administration of letrozole compared to control groups(mean difference [MD]: -529.37, 95% CI: -1207.45 to -111.25, p = 0.001),.However, there was no statistical difference in the number of retrieved oocytes(MD: 0.59, 95% CI: -0.36-1.54, p = 0.22), cycle cancelation rate (RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.58-1.12, p = 0.20), or estradiol concentration on the day of HCG administration(MD: -28.19, 95% CI: -77.71-21.33, p = 0.26) in the presence or absence of letrozole combination in the GnRH antagonist protocol. In conclusion, letrozole administration might improve clinical pregnancy rate in conventional GnRH antagonist protocol for poor responders. Moreover, letrozole co-treatment aslo can reduce the economic burden of poor responders during the GnRH antagonist cycle. Nevertheless, large-scale and multi-center randomized controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the efficacy of adjunctive letrozole administration in the GnRH antagonist protocol.

Natural Cycle Results in Lower Implantation Failure than Ovarian Stimulation in Advanced-Age Poor Responders Undergoing IVF: Fertility Outcomes from 585 Patients

To compare pregnancy rate and implantation rate in poor responder women, aged over 40 years, who underwent natural cycle versus conventional ovarian stimulation. This is a retrospective single-center cohort study conducted at the GENERA IVF program, Rome, Italy, between September 2012 and December 2018, including only poor responder patients, according to Bologna criteria, of advanced age, who underwent IVF treatment through Natural Cycle or conventional ovarian stimulation. Between September 2012 and December 2018, 585 patients were included within the study. Two hundred thirty patients underwent natural cycle and 355 underwent conventional ovarian stimulation. In natural cycle group, both pregnancy rate per cycle (6.25 vs 12.89%, respectively, p = 0.0001) and pregnancy rate per patient101 with at least one embryo-transfer (18.85 vs 28.11% respectively, p = 0.025) resulted significant reduced. Pregnancy rate per patient managed with conventional ovarian stimulation resulted not significantly different compared with natural cycle (19.72 vs 15.65% respectively, p = 0.228), but embryo implantation rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent natural cycle rather than patient subjected to conventional ovarian stimulation (13 vs 8.28% respectively, p = 0.0468). No significant difference could be detected among the two groups in terms of abortion rate (p = 0.2915) or live birth pregnancy (p = 0.2281). Natural cycle seems to be a valid treatment in patients over 40 years and with a low ovarian reserve, as an alternative to conventional ovarian stimulation.

Euploidy rates of embryos in young patients with good and low prognosis according to the POSEIDON criteria

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does an association exist between ovarian reserve, ovarian response and embryonic euploidy in female patients under age 35 years?

DESIGN

This was a retrospective analysis of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies cycles among patients enrolled at Bahceci Fulya IVF Center between January 2016 and August 2019. A total of 133 patients in POSEIDON group 1 (suboptimal responder; female age <35 years, antral follicle count [AFC] ≥5, number of oocytes retrieved <10) (group A), 133 patients in POSEIDON group 3 (expected low responder; female age <35 years, AFC <5) (group B) and 323 in the non-low-prognosis group (female age <35 years, AFC ≥5 and number of oocytes retrieved >9) (group C) were included.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in euploidy rate per embryo among the three groups (61.7% [145/235] for group A versus 53.5% [68/127] for group B versus 62% [625/1008] for group C; P = 0.13). The cancellation rate in cycles without a euploid blastocyst was significantly lower in group C than groups A and B (8.4% versus 12.8% and 16.5%; P = 0.034). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that the ovarian response group did not significantly affect the probability of obtaining a euploid embryo. Trophectoderm score 'C' (odds ratio 0.520, P = 0.007) and inner cell mass score 'C' (odds ratio 0.480, P < 0.001) were associated with a decreased probability of obtaining a euploid embryo.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm that POSEIDON group 1 and group 3 and non-low-prognosis patients have different probabilities of euploid embryos being obtained per cycle. However, euploidy rates per embryo are not affected by the patient's ovarian reserve and response.

The risk of poor ovarian response during repeat IVF

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the incidence and risk factors for poor ovarian response (POR) during repeat IVF?

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of 1224 consecutive patients who underwent at least two IVF stimulations in a single centre over a 6-year period. Risk factors from the initial treatment were assessed for association with POR during repeat IVF using logistic regression analysis. A simple, practical predictive model was constructed and evaluated for accuracy and calibration, based on the factors that demonstrated significant association with subsequent POR. POR during repeat IVF was defined as ≤3 retrieved oocytes or cancellation before retrieval following recruitment of ≤3 mature follicles.

RESULTS

The risk of POR during repeat IVF was approximately 11.5%. A higher POR risk during repeat IVF is associated with a reduced oocyte yield during the initial treatment (≤3 oocytes: odds ratio [OR] 14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.42-30.24; 4-9 oocytes: OR 4.13, 95% CI 2.00-8.54; 10-15 oocytes: OR 1) and low ovarian reserve (anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH] <5.4 pmol/l: OR 3.54, 95% CI 2.24-5.59; AMH 5.4-25 pmol/l: OR 1). Women with low ovarian reserve who experience POR during the initial IVF have the highest risk of suffering POR again during repeat IVF (57% within 1 year). Other groups, such as women with unexpected POR or expected poor responders with suboptimal ovarian response during the initial IVF, are also at risk of exhibiting POR during a subsequent treatment (28% within 1 year).

CONCLUSIONS

As there is a clear association between POR and lower live birth rates, this practical model may help manage patients' expectations during repeat IVF treatment.

Results of in vitro fertilization versus intrauterine insemination in patients with low anti-Müllerian hormone levels. A single-center retrospective study of 639 + 119 cycles

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) in a population of infertile women with low AMH levels, in whom both techniques were possible.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 462 patients treated over 24 months in a single center comparing the live birth rates after 176 IUI and 639 IVF attempts in infertile couples. The women had AMH levels ≤ 1.2 ng/mL and at least one patent tube and their partner's sperm was of sufficient quality for IUI.

RESULTS

The live birth rate after IVF was not sufficiently higher than after IUI, or than after IVF attempts converted to IUI for low response (odds ratios in multivariate analysis with respect to IVF: 0.61, p = 0.15 for IUI and 0.73, p = 0.6 for conversions). The pregnancy rates after IVF (13.0 %) and IUI (13.3 %) were similar (p = 0.4), and were non-significantly higher than the pregnancy rate in the IUI conversion group (8.8 %, p = 0.9). Nearly half (43.8 %) of all IVF cycles did not lead to embryo transfer.

CONCLUSION

In this group of women with AMH levels ≤ 1.2 ng/mL, IVF did not lead to a higher live birth rate than IUI, and more than 40 % of all IVF attempts did not lead to embryo transfer, suggesting that diminished ovarian reserve is not an indication for IVF over IUI.

Cumulus cell gene expression in luteal-phase-derived oocytes after double stimulation in one menstrual cycle

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does double stimulation (DuoStim) affect cumulus cell gene expression in luteal-phase-derived oocytes?

DESIGN

This prospective observational study included 39 patients with reduced ovarian reserve. Fifteen patients (group 1) underwent IVF with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist in the follicular phase and 24 patients (group 2) underwent DuoStim. A total of 149 cumulus cell samples were divided into two groups according to the phase of the cycle: group 1 included 55 follicular-phase-derived oocytes and group 2 included 94 luteal-phase-derived oocytes. The expression levels of the following genes were assessed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction: HAS2, VCAN, ALCAM, PTGS2, GREM1, ITPKA, TRPM7, SDC4, CALM2, SPSB2, TP53I3, PGR and PFKP.

RESULTS

The expression of 10 out of 13 genes in cumulus cells was similar between DuoStim luteal-phase-derived oocytes and follicular-phase-derived oocytes. A significant increase in the mRNA levels of VCAN (15.542 ± 6.8 versus 20.353 ± 10.58; P = 0.001), SDC4 (1.016 ± 0.65 versus 1.318 ± 0.97; P = 0.013), and TP53I3 (0.185 ± 0.09 versus 0.270 ± 0.11; P = 1.19E-05) was observed in group 2. The number of oocytes collected (5.57 ± 2.3 versus 5.7 ± 2.7; P > 0.05) and the number of blastocysts were comparable between the groups (2.1 ± 2.1 versus 2.7 ± 2.2; P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The DuoStim approach leads to changes in the follicular environment. It affects the expression levels of VCAN, SDC4, and TP53I3 in the cumulus cells of luteal-phase-derived oocytes. These results, however, did not correlate with oocyte maturation, embryo quality and pregnancy rate.

The different impact of stimulation duration on oocyte maturation and pregnancy outcome in fresh cycles with GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders and normal responders

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of stimulation duration on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) - embryo transfer (ET) outcome in poor and normal responders during controlled ovarian stimulation using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study. There were 1481 women undergoing ICSI-ET cycles. Women with ovum pick-up number ≤3 were defined as poor responders (n = 235), and those with a number ≥4 were normal responders (n = 1246).

RESULTS

The mean stimulation duration was shorter in poor responders with pregnancy group as compared with normal responders with pregnancy group (7.8 ± 2.2 vs. 9.2 ± 1.6 days, p < 0.01). Poor responders with a shortest stimulation duration (≤6 days) appeared a higher live birth rate (≤6 days: 33.3%, 7-8 days: 20.0%, 9-10 days: 15.9%, and ≥11 days: 11.1%, p = 0.18). Normal responders with a shortest stimulation duration (≤6 days) appeared a lowest live birth rate (≤6 days: 28.6%, 7-8 days: 35.8%, 9-10 days: 33.6%, and ≥11 days: 29.3%, p = 0.61). Oocyte maturation rate was significantly lower at stimulation durations ≤6 days group (≤6 days: 67%, 7-8 days: 80%, 9-10 days: 85%, and ≥11 days: 87%, p = 0.02) in normal responders.

CONCLUSION

In ICSI-ET cycles, stimulation duration appears to have different impact on oocyte maturation, clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates in both poor and normal responders.

Serum and follicular fluid Stem Cell Factor assay in IVF poor responder and normal responder patients: a predictive biomarker of oocyte retrieval

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to investigate serum stem cell factor (SCF) concentrations as potential biomarker for oocyte retrieval efficiency in IVF patients with poor prognosis.

METHODS

A pilot case-control study was performed on 30 poor and 30 normal responders that were stimulated with antagonist protocol. SCF concentrations were evaluated in samples of serum and follicular fluid obtained by all patients on the day of oocyte retrieval. At the time of oocyte retrieval, follicular fluid from at least two follicles ≥ 14 mm and two follicles < 14 mm was collected for SCF determination.

RESULTS

We did not find any statistical difference when comparing serum and follicular fluid levels of SCF in both poor- and normal-responder patients, the same results were achieved when poor-responder patients were stratified according to the number of MII oocytes retrieved. Moreover, levels of SCF (OR 1.000, 0.994-1.006) or in follicular fluid from ovarian follicles ≥ 14 mm (OR 0.995, CI 0.989-1.001) or from ovarian follicles < 14 mm (OR 1.003, CI 0.999-1.0069), were not significantly associated with the chances of ongoing pregnancies in poor-responder patients.

CONCLUSION

SCF was unable to predict oocyte retrieval efficiency or the chances of reaching embryo transfer.

Bologna criteria are predictive for ovarian response and live birth in subsequent ovarian stimulation cycles

PURPOSE

The ESHRE Working Group on Poor Ovarian Response defined a set of variables to define poor responders, named as the Bologna Criteria, but several concerns have been raised regarding their applicability and prognostic significance. In order to evaluate the clinical relevance of the criteria, we retrospectively analyzed the ovarian response and live birth rates in women who had consecutive IVF attempts, according to their fulfillment of the criteria.

METHODS

The study group comprised 1153 and 288 women who had two and three consecutive ovarian stimulation (OS) cycles between May 2010 and January 2017, respectively. We compared the ovarian response and live birth rates in subsequent IVF attempts of Bologna criteria-defined poor responder women and women who did not fulfill the Bologna criteria.

RESULTS

Women who fulfilled the criteria achieved higher rates of poor ovarian response (76.2% vs 14.3% and 60.3% vs 13.4%) and lower live birth rates (14.6% vs 33.3% and 12.9% vs 34.3%) in their second and third OS cycles, respectively (both p < 0.001) compared to women who did not fulfill the criteria. The former group also had lower number of oocytes and lower likelihood of having embryo transfer in their subsequent OS cycles. The criteria were able to predict both ovarian response and clinical outcome in the subsequent cycle in < 40-year-old women, whereas they were predictive only for the ovarian response but not for the clinical outcome in women over 40 years of age, who exhibited very low live birth rates regardless of the fulfillment of the criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that the Bologna criteria are clinically relevant in terms of prediction of ovarian response and clinical outcome in subsequent OS cycles.

Risk factors for inadequate response to ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction cycles: systematic review

PURPOSE

Controlled ovarian stimulation is a fundamental part of a successful assisted reproduction treatment, and recognizing patients at risk of a poor response allows the development of targeted research to propose new treatment strategies for this specific group. The objective of this systematic review was to determine risk factors for poor ovarian response (POR) to controlled stimulation in assisted reproduction cycles described in the literature.

METHODS

The primary databases MEDLINE, Cochrane, LILACS, and SciELO were consulted, using specific terms with a restriction for articles in English or Portuguese published in the last 10 years.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that environmental endocrine disruptors, tobacco, genetic mutations, endometriomas, ovarian surgery, chemotherapy, and short menstrual cycles are factors that influence stimulation in assisted reproduction cycles. Further studies are necessary for characterizing patients with prior risk factors.

Autologous stem cell ovarian transplantation to increase reproductive potential in patients who are poor responders

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate effects of autologous stem cell ovarian transplant (ASCOT) on ovarian reserve and IVF outcomes of women who are poor responders with very poor prognosis.

DESIGN

Prospective observational pilot study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Seventeen women who are poor responders.

INTERVENTION(S)

Ovarian infusion of bone marrow-derived stem cells.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Serum antimüllerian hormone levels and antral follicular count (AFC), punctured follicles, and oocytes retrieved after stimulation (controlled ovarian stimulation) were measred. Apheresis was analyzed for growth factor concentrations.

RESULT(S)

The ASCOT resulted in a significant improvement in AFC 2 weeks after treatment. With an increase in AFC of three or more follicles and/or two consecutive increases in antimüllerian hormone levels as success criteria, ovarian function improved in 81.3% of women. These positive effects were associated with the presence of fibroblast growth factor-2 and thrombospondin. During controlled ovarian stimulation, ASCOT increased the number of stimulable antral follicles and oocytes, but the embryo euploidy rate was low (16.1%). Five pregnancies were achieved: two after ET, three by natural conception.

CONCLUSION(S)

Our results suggest that ASCOT optimized the mobilization and growth of existing follicles, possibly related to fibroblast growth factor-2 and thrombospondin-1 within apheresis. The ASCOT improved follicle and oocyte quantity enabling pregnancy in women who are poor responders previously limited to oocyte donation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02240342.

A comparison of treatment results of the different treatment protocols in patients with poor ovarian response

To compare the effect of the different protocols in patients receiving in vitro fertilization treatment due to poor ovarian response. Seventy-seven of the patients included in the study were treated with gonadotropin (450 IU) + GnRH antagonist (group 1), 84 of the patients were treated with gonadotropin (450 IU) + microdose GnRH analog (group 2), and 53 of the patients were treated with clomiphene citrate (100 mg/day) + gonadotropin (300 IU) + GnRH antagonist (Group 3). In assessing total gonadotropin dosage, patients in Group 3 detected significantly less gonadotropin as compared to the other two groups (p < .001). Group 1 were superior to the other two groups with respect to retrieved oocytes, meiosis II oocytes and number of embryos obtained at the end of the treatment. As for the evaluation of clinical pregnancy, although the highest pregnancy rate was in Group 3, this finding was not of statistical significance. Although increasing the dosage of gonadotropins for ovarian hyper stimulation treatment in patients with poor ovarian response is beneficial with respect to retrieved oocytes, meiosis II oocytes and number of embryos, the increased dosage does not provide a statistically significant increase in clinical pregnancy rates.

Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Responders: Have We Made Progress?

BACKGROUND

Poor ovarian responders (POR) pose a challenge to a physicians' ability to choose a stimulation protocol that maximizes the number of oocytes harvested and their chances of conception with multiple protocols aimed at improving pregnancy rates in this poor prognosis population. The Bologna criteria standardized the diagnosis of POR and allows for a more homogenous patient population in clinical trials.

METHODS

A structured review of the literature, which encompasses research on Bologna-defined POR, identified several proposed protocols to optimize pregnancy rates in poor responders. In addition, we reviewed the utility of utilizing oocyte quality enhancers such as luteal pre-treatment, coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), dihydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and growth hormone (GH).

CONCLUSION

Controlled ovarian stimulation strategies with adjuvant aromatase inhibitors and clomiphene citrate have shown similar pregnancy outcomes to higher dose gonadotropin in GnRH antagonist protocols. While the standardization of Bologna defined POR has allowed for more comparable patient populations to study the effectiveness of different protocols for ovarian stimulation, there is currently no convincing data that has determined the ideal protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation in this patient population. Further research is needed to identify optimal treatment strategies.

Controlled ovulation of the dominant follicle using progestin in minimal stimulation in poor responders

BACKGROUND

The use of progestin (P) during ovarian stimulation is effective in blocking the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge in women with normal ovarian reserve, however, its effects have not been determined in poor responders. This study aimed to explore the follicular dynamics in P-primed minimal stimulation in poor responders.

METHODS

A total of 204 infertile women with diminished ovarian reserve were allocated into the medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) group or the natural-cycle control group in an alternating order. MPA (10 mg) was administered daily beginning from the early follicular phase and a low dose of hMG was added in the late follicular phase if the serum FSH level was lower than 8.0mIU/ml. When a dominant follicle reached maturity, triptorelin 100 μg and hCG 1000 IU were used for trigger, and oocytes were retrieved 34-36 h later.All viable embryos were cryopreserved for subsequent frozen embryo transfer. Natural cycle IVF was used as controls.

RESULTS

Compared with the natural cycle group, the MPA group exhibited a larger pre-ovulatory follicle (18.7 ± 1.8 mm vs 17.2 ± 2.2 mm), a longer follicular phase (13.6 ± 3.6 days vs 12.3 ± 3.2 days), and higher peak oestradiol values (403.88 ± 167.16 vs 265.26 ± 122.16 pg/ml), while maintaining lower LH values (P < 0.05). The incidences of spontaneous LH surge and premature ovulation decreased significantly (1.0% vs 50%; 2% vs. 10.8%, respectively; P < 0.05). A greater number of oocytes and viable embryos were harvested from the MPA group than from the natural cycle group (P < 0.05). Moreover,the clinical pregnancy rate was slightly higher in the MPA group than in the natural cycle controls, but the difference was not significant (11.8% vs 5.9%, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study supported the hypothesis that P-primed minimal stimulation achieved ovulation control of the dominant follicle and did not adversely affect the quality of oocytes in poor responders. Therefore, P-priming is a promising approach to overcome premature ovulation in minimal stimulation for poor responders.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR-OCH-14004176 . Registered on January 8, 2014.

Pregnancy outcome of "delayed start" GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders: A clinical trial study

BACKGROUND

Management of poor-responding patients is still major challenge in assisted reproductive techniques (ART). Delayed-start GnRH antagonist protocol is recommended to these patients, but little is known in this regards.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was assessment of delayed-start GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomized clinical trial included sixty infertile women with Bologna criteria for ovarian poor responders who were candidate for IVF. In case group (n=30), delayed-start GnRH antagonist protocol administered estrogen priming followed by early follicular-phase GnRH antagonist treatment for 7 days before ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin. Control group (n=30) treated with estrogen priming antagonist protocol. Finally, endometrial thickness, the rates of oocytes maturation, , embryo formation, and pregnancy were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

Rates of implantation, chemical, clinical, and ongoing pregnancy in delayed-start cycles were higher although was not statistically significant. Endometrial thickness was significantly higher in case group. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of oocyte maturation, embryo formation, and IVF outcomes between two groups.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference between delayed-start GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol.

Microdose Flare-up Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist Versus GnRH Antagonist Protocols in Poor Ovarian Responders Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection

BACKGROUND

Microdose flare-up GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist have become more popular in the management of poor ovarian responders (POR) in recent years; however, the optimal protocol for POR patients undergoing in vitro fertilization has still been a challenge.

METHODS

In this observational study design, two hundred forty four poor ovarian responders were retrospectively evaluated for their response to GnRH agonist protocol (group-1, n=135) or GnRH antagonist protocol (group-2, n=109). Clinical pregnancy rate was the primary end point and was compared between the groups. Student t-test, Mann Whitney U test and χ (2)-test were used to compare the groups. The p<0.05 was considered to show a statistically significant result.

RESULTS

The mean total gonadotropin doses were 3814±891 IU in group 1 and 3539±877 IU in group 2 (p=0.02). The number of metaphase-II oocytes (3.6±2.4 vs. 2.8±1.9, p=0.005) and implantation rates (27.8% vs. 18.8%, p=0.04) in group 1 and group 2, respectively were significantly different. The fertilization rate in group 1 and group 2 was 73% vs. 68%, respectively (p=0.5) and clinical pregnancy rate was 19.8% vs. 14.4%, respectively (p=0.13).

CONCLUSION

The GnRH agonist microdose flare-up protocol has favorable outcomes with respect to the number of oocytes retrieved and implantation rate; nevertheless, the clinical pregnancy rate was found to be similar in comparison to GnRH antagonist protocol in poor ovarian responders. GnRH antagonist protocol appears to be promising with significantly lower gonadotropin requirement and lower treatment cost in poor ovarian responders.

The effects of fresh embryo transfers and elective frozen/thawed embryo transfers on pregancy outcomes in poor ovarian responders as defined by the Bologna criteria

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of fresh embryo transfers (ET) and elective frozen/thawed embryo transfers (eFET) on implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates in poor ovarian responders, as defined by the Bologna criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All electronic databases of embryo transfers between January 2011 and January 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Two hundred fifty-nine of all the fresh ET and 96 of all eFET were included into the study. An antagonist protocol with letrozole was used for the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in all participants.

RESULTS

The mean age was 36.9 years (range, 21-43 years) in the fresh ET arm and 37.2 years (range, 21-43 years) in the eFET arm (p=0.45). The clinical pregnancy rate was 35% (90/259) versus 29% (28/96); the abortion rate was 27% (20/75) versus 36% (9/25); and the live birth rate was 21% (55/259) versus 17% (16/99). There were no significant differences between groups and p values were 0.32, 0.52, and 0.42, respectively. The mean E2 level was 389 (range, 50-2055 pg/mL) in the fresh ET group (on hCG day) and 418 pg/mL (range, 121-3073 pg/mL) in the eFET group (on day 14 of cycle) (p=0.122). No differences were found between the two groups with respect to the total number of retrieved oocytes (p=0.55) and number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes (p=0.81). The number of embryo transfers was statistically different (p=0.005). The effects of age, total number of retrieved oocytes, number of MII oocytes, type of treatment, number of ET, and the day of ET and E2 level to live birth outcomes were investigated using binary logistic regresion analyses, and no stastical effect was determined by any of the parameters. P values were p=0.50, 0.66, 0.45, 0.30, 0.30, 0.08, and 0.90, respectively.

CONCLUSION

E2 levels tend to be lower in poor responders, thus the receptivity of the endometrium may be damaged less than normal, which may explain why pregnancy results are the same between eFET and ET groups.

The effect of aromatase inhibitor letrozole incorporated in gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist multiple dose protocol in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether letrozole incorporated in a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist multiple dose protocol (MDP) improved controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and in vitro fertilization (IVF) results in poor responders who underwent IVF treatment.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 103 consecutive IVF cycles that were performed during either the letrozole/GnRH antagonist MDP cycles (letrozole group, n=46) or the standard GnRH antagonist MDP cycles (control group, n=57) were included in 103 poor responders. COS results and IVF outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Total dose and days of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (rhFSH) administered were significantly fewer in the letrozole group than in the control group. Duration of GnRH antagonist administered was also shorter in the letrozole group. The number of oocytes retrieved was significantly higher in the letrozole group. However, clinical pregnancy rate per cycle initiated, clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer, embryo implantation rate and miscarriage rate were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The letrozole incorporated in GnRH antagonist MDP may be more effective because it results comparable pregnancy outcomes with shorter duration and smaller dose of rhFSH, when compared with the standard GnRH antagonist MDP.

Does dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation really affect IVF-ICSI outcome in women with poor ovarian reserve?

OBJECTIVES

It is difficult to choose the correct fertility treatment in women with poor ovarian reserve. Although various methods have been used, the management of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation is not easy in poor responders. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) outcome of poor responders.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a randomized, prospective controlled trial. Women with serum antimullerian hormone<1 ng/ml or serum follicle-stimulating hormone>15 IU/l and antral follicle count <4 on day 2 of the menstrual cycle were considered to have poor ovarian reserve. All women were treated with a microdose induction protocol. Women in the study group received IVF-ICSI and DHEA 75 mg daily for 12 weeks. Women in the control group received IVF-ICSI without DHEA supplementation.

RESULTS

In total, 208 women with diminished ovarian reserve was enrolled in the study, 104 in the study group and 104 in the control group. The number of oocytes retrieved and the fertilization rate were slightly higher in the study group, but the pregnancy rate was higher in the control group. The differences were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The results failed to show that DHEA supplementation enhances IVF-ICSI outcome in women with poor ovarian reserve.

Comparison of the ultrashort gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-antagonist protocol with microdose flare -up protocol in poor responders: a preliminary study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the potential effect of the ultrashort gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist/GnRH antagonist protocol versus the microdose GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The patients in the Agonist-Antagonist Group (n=41) were administered the ultrashort GnRH-agonist/ antagonist protocol, while the patients in the Microdose Group (n=41) were stimulated according to the microdose flare-up protocol. The mean number of mature oocytes retrieved was the primary outcome measure. Fertilization rate, implantation rate per embryo and clinical pregnancy rates were secondary outcome measures.

RESULTS

There was no differenc between the mean number of mature oocytes retrieved in the two groups. There were also no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of peak serum E2 level, canceled cycles, endometrial thickness on hCG day, number of 2 pronucleus and number of embryos transferred. However, the total gonadotropin consumption and duration of stimulation were significantly higher with the Agonist-Antagonist Group compared with the Microdose Group. The implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Despite the high dose of gonadotropin consumption and longer duration of stimulation with the ultrashort GnRH agonist/ antagonist protocol, it seems that the Agonist-Antagonist Protocol is not inferior to the microdose protocol in poor responders undergoing ICSI.