Which implant is better for the fixation of posterior wall acetabular fractures: A conventional reconstruction plate or a brand-new calcaneal plate?

BACKGROUND

Increased posterior wall acetabular fractures among older adults, require precise treatment to restore stability to the joint, lower the risk of degenerative arthritis, and enhance overall functional recovery. The purpose of this study was to compare the fixation stability and mechanical characteristics of calcaneal buttress plate and conventional reconstruction plate under different loading condition.

METHODS

Typical acetabular posterior wall fractures were created on twenty synthetic hemipelvis models. They were fixed with calcaneus plate and reconstruction plate. Dynamic and static tests were performed. Displacements of fracture line and stiffness were calculated.

FINDINGS

After dynamic loading, calcaneus plate fixation has significantly less displacement than the reconstruction plate on the superior posterior wall. Under static loading condition, the calcaneus plate group has significantly less displacement than the reconstruction plate group on the inferior posterior part of the fracture. The average stiffness values of the calcaneus plate group and the reconstruction plate group were 265.16±53.98 N/mm and 167.48±36.87 N/mm, respectively and a statistically significant difference was found between the two groups.

INTERPRETATION

The calcaneal plate group demonstrated better stability along the fracture line after dynamic and static loading conditions. Especially when the fragment was on the acetabulum's superior posterior, inferior posterior, and inferior rim, Calcaneal buttress plates offer biomechanically effective choices.

Outcomes of associated both-column acetabular fractures with and without a posterior wall fracture- A retrospective observational cohort study

Aims & objectives

Our study sought to determine if posterior wall (PW) involvement in associated both-column acetabular fractures (ABCAFs) is associated with different clinical outcomes, primarily rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), in comparison to ABCAFs with no PW involvement.

Materials & methods

This retrospective observational cohort study was performed at two academic Level 1 trauma centers. Two study groups were identified. The first study group consisted of 18 patients who sustained an ABCAF with PW involvement (+PW). The second study group consisted of 26 patients who sustained an ABCAF with no PW involvement (-PW). All patients achieved a minimum 12-months of follow-up and/or received a THA conversion procedure at a time remote to their index open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) procedure. The primary outcome of this study was subsequent conversion to THA on the injured hip. The secondary outcome was the presence of post-operative pain at ≥6 months and/or complications.

Results

No difference in rate of conversion to THA between + PW (n = 4, 22.2%) and -PW (n = 3, 11.5%) groups was demonstrated (p = 0.419). Similarly, no differences were seen between groups regarding complication rate (p = 0.814) and post-operative pain (p = 0.142).

Conclusion

Involvement of the PW does not appear to create worse clinical outcomes in comparison to no involvement in ABCAFs particularly as it relates to ipsilateral joint replacement.

Posterior hip fracture-dislocation associated with posterior wall fracture of the acetabulum and ipsilateral comminuted trochanteric fracture of the femur: A case report

Introduction and importance

Traumatic posterior dislocation of the hip is often associated with fractures of the femoral head and posterior wall of the acetabulum. However, hip fracture-dislocation that includes the posterior wall of the acetabulum and the ipsilateral femoral trochanter is rare. There is no consensus on the bone that should be operated on first, the operative position, and the choice of implant for femoral fixation.

Case presentation

A 67-year-old man was brought to our emergency department after a 2-m fall. He was diagnosed with a hip fracture-dislocation associated with posterior wall acetabular fracture and ipsilateral femoral trochanteric fracture. Surgical reconstruction was performed with intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation of the femoral trochanteric lesion, followed by anatomically rigid acetabular fixation in the lateral decubitus position. At the 5-year follow-up after the injury, the patient showed good objective and subjective clinical outcomes.

Clinical discussion

Fixing the femur first could allow an easier reduction and traction. The lateral decubitus position was useful, because fixation of the femur and the acetabulum could be performed without changing the position. When fixing the femoral trochanteric lesion, attention was paid to reduce the anteromedial cortex of the proximal fragment extramedullarly to the distal fragment to prevent complications such as cutout and implant breakage.

Conclusion

Anatomically rigid fixation of the posterior wall of the acetabulum secondary to IMN fixation of the femur, with anteromedial cortical support in the lateral decubitus position, could achieve good objective and subjective clinical outcomes.

•

We report a case of posterior hip fracture-dislocation with fractures of posterior wall and ipsilateral femoral trochanter

•

This is a rare clinical presentation

•

For treatment, femoral intramedullary nail fixation is performed first

•

Then, acetabular posterior wall fixation is performed in lateral decubitus position

•

Anteromedial cortex of proximal fragment is reduced extramedullarly to distal fragment

Mapping of acetabular posterior wall fractures using a three-dimensional virtual reconstruction software

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to analyze and describe the fracture patterns of the acetabular posterior wall based on quantitative measurements of the fracture characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Computed tomography images of 51 patients with acetabular posterior wall fractures from an initial cohort of 216 acetabular fractures were imported into a three-dimensional (3D) virtual software. The reconstructed 3D images were utilized to evaluate the following: (i) fracture line mapping on the inner articular and retro-acetabular surfaces, (ii) common zones of fracture and marginal impaction, and (iii) categorization by location and pattern of comminution. The clock-face position was applied for description: the midpoint of the transverse acetabular ligament served as the +180° reference point, and the 0° reference point was set perpendicular to the ligament. The fracture angle on the articular surface was defined as the intersection between the start and end points. The fracture span on the retro-acetabular surface was defined as the ratio of the perpendicular distance, which is between the fracture beak and acetabular rim, to the entire length, which is from the edge to the rim. Quantitative measurements were performed, and the fracture patterns were analyzed. A color scale bar was used to visualize the common and marginal impaction zones.

RESULTS

The articular surface mapping of all the cases demonstrated that the average starting point of the fracture line was +6.2° (±12.8°) and the endpoint was 96.7° (±13.3°), and the average fracture angle was 119.6° (±7.6°) with 80.6% of the fragments having angles within 18.7-117°. The retro-acetabular surface mapping demonstrated that the average fracture span was 0.65 ±0.20, and 61.7 % of the fracture lines were located within 0.6 to 0.9. Marginal impaction was found in 21 cases (21/51, 41.2%; range: between +7° and +105°).

CONCLUSION

The fracture maps showed fracture patterns and recurrent fracture zones on the articular and retro-acetabular surfaces. However, there was no remarkable pattern of marginal impaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort study.

Posterior wall acetabular fracture in a 13-year-old boy treated by open reduction and mini-plate internal fixation: long-term follow-up of 17 years

BACKGROUND

Acetabular fractures are uncommon in children and adolescents, mainly because of predominant cartilaginous component and strong surrounding ligaments. Although acetabular fractures at this age can lead to significant disability, there is no consensus regarding management, which continues to be controversial. Particularly, long-term outcome after operative management has not been evaluated.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of a 13-year-old boy skeletally immature who presented with an isolated acetabular fracture involving the posterior wall secondary to a traumatic hip dislocation. A Kocher-Langenbeck approach with a surgical luxation of the hip was used for reduction and mini-plate internal fixation of the fracture. Long-term (17-year) follow-up showed a good clinical outcome and a good congruence of the. The patient has bilateral beginning osteoarthritis due to a cam configuration of both hips CONCLUSION: We describe a case of successful operative management of an acetabulum fracture in a skelettaly immature child with a long-term follow-up. Aggressive management of this rare type of fractures may lead to durable positive outcome.

Precontoured buttress plate vs reconstruction plate for acetabulum posterior wall fractures: A biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of open reduction and internal fixation of acetabulum posterior wall fractures is to restore anatomical structure and stability of the hip joint, in order to start weight bearing as soon as possible and prevent hip arthrosis; restoration of the anatomy should preserve function of the joint as well. Although “special shaped precontoured plates” have been developed in recent years for surgical treatment of this region, studies comparing the traditional plates with the newly designed precontoured plates are lacking.

AIM

To evaluate the biomechanical properties of precontoured anatomic buttress and conventional curved reconstruction plates (CCRPs) for posterior wall acetabulum fracture treatment.

METHODS

Twelve pelvis models were created for testing plate treatment of fracture in the posterior wall of the acetabulum. These 12 pelvis models were used to create 24 hemipelvis models (experimental) by cutting from the sagittal plane and passing over the center of gravity, after which the posterior wall acetabular fractures (of similar type and size) were created. In these experimental models, the right acetabulum was fixed with a 5-hole CCRP, while the left was fixed with a precontoured anatomic buttress plate (PABP). Samples were placed through the test device and were subjected to static load testing, with a constant testing velocity of 2 mm/min until the load reached 2.3 kN or the acetabular fixation failed. Dynamic tests were also performed with sinusoidal wave load, with a maximal load of 2.3 kN and a load ratio of 0.1.

RESULTS

The average stiffness values were 460.83 ± 95.47 N/mm for the PABP and 291.99 ± 118.58 N/mm for the 5-hole CCRP. The precontoured anatomic acetabulum buttress plates had significantly higher rigidity than the CCRPs (P = 0.022). There was a statistically significant difference between the unloaded and 2.3 kN-loaded values of AL (posterosuperior fracture line vertical to the ground surface) and CL (posteroinferior fracture line vertical to the ground surface) parameters for both the PABPs and the 5-hole CCRPs (P = 0.036 and P = 0.045, respectively). According to the static tests, the amount of total displacement was significantly less in the PABPs than in the CCRPs. Comparative analysis of the displacement in the BL (posterior wall fracture line horizontal to the ground) parameter yielded no statistically significant differences between the PABP and the 5-hole CCRPs (P = 0.261).

CONCLUSION

PABP provides more stable fixation in acetabulum posterior wall fractures than 5-hole CCRP, allowing for proximal or distal fracture line screw application without reshaping.

Biomechanical comparison of fixation systems in posterior wall fracture of acetabular by finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of reconstruction plates and lag screws has been recommended for fractures to the posterior wall of the acetabulum. However, little information about the rigidity of recommended forms of fracture fixation is available. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical difference among the fixation systems.

METHODS

A posterior wall fracture, which is represented by softer elements with lower elastic modulus, was created along an arc of 40-90° about the acetabular rim. Three different fixation systems: screws alone, reconstruction plate with screws, reconstruction plate with T-shaped plates were used to fix the posterior wall fractures to the acetabulum.

RESULTS

All three fixation system can be used to obtain good functional outcomes. The reconstruction plate with T-shaped plates was beneficial to increasing the effective stiffness, decreasing the stress concentration and enhancing the rigidity of fracture fixation. So this fixation system served an ideal result in the analysis.

CONCLUSION

Theoretically, the reconstruction plate with T-shaped plates system may reduce many of the risks and limitations compared to the other fixation systems. This fixation system may result in a clinical benefit.

Comparative study of comminuted posterior acetabular wall fracture treated with the Acetabular Tridimensional Memory Fixation System

BACKGROUND

Posterior wall fractures are one of the most common acetabular fractures. However, only 30% of these fractures involve a single large fragment, and comminuted acetabular posterior wall fractures pose a particular surgical challenge. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between patients who received fixation for comminuted posterior wall fracture using the Acetabular Tridimensional Memory Fixation System (ATMFS) and patients who underwent fixation with conventional screws and buttress plates (Plates group).

METHOD

Between April 2003 and May 2007, 196 consecutive patients who sustained a comminuted posterior wall fracture of acetabulum were treated with ATMFS or conventional screws and buttress plates. Operative time, fluoroscopy time, blood loss, and any intra-operative complications were recorded. Plain AP and lateral radiographs were obtained at all visits (Matta's criteria). Modified Merle d' Aubigne-Postel score, and Mos SF-36 score were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included in the analysis with 26 in the ATMFS group and 24 in the Plates group. The mean follow-up time was 57.5 months, ranging from 31 to 69 months. All patients had fully healed fractures at the final follow-up. There was no difference in clinical outcomes or radiological evaluations between groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with comminuted posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum treated with the ATMFS or conventional screws and buttress plate techniques achieve a good surgical result. Both techniques are safe, reliable, and practical. Use of the ATMFS technique may reduce blood loss and improve rigid support to marginal bone impaction. The use ATMFS may need additional support when fractures involve the superior roof.

Reconstruction of acetabular posterior wall fractures

Background

The results after acetabular fracture are primarily related to the quality of the articular reduction. We evaluated the results of internal fixation of posterior wall fractures with using three-step reconstruction.

Methods

Thirty-three patients (mean age at the time of injury, 47.9 years; 28 males and 5 females) were followed for a minimum of 2 years after surgery. The three-step reconstruction included 1) preservation of soft tissues and reduction of the marginally impacted osteochondral (articular) fragments using screws, 2) filling the impacted cancellous void with a bone graft, and 3) reinforcement with buttress-plating. Clinical evaluation was done according to the criteria of D'aubigne and Postel, while the radiological criteria were those of Matta. The associated injuries and complications were evaluated.

Results

The clinical results were excellent in 15 (45.5%) patients and they were good in 5 (15.2%), (i.e., satisfactory in 60.7%), while the radiologic results were excellent in 10 (30.3%) and good in 14 (42.4%) (satisfactory in 72.7%). Heterotopic ossification was common, but this did not require excision, even without prophylactic treatment with indomethacin. Deep infection was the worst complication and this was accompanied by a poor outcome.

Conclusions

This study confirms that three-step reconstruction facilitates accurate and firm reduction of displaced posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum. Therefore, we anticipate less long-term arthrosis in the patients treated this way.