Surgical outcomes in instrumented surgery for dumbbell type spinal cord tumor -the comparison with non-instrumented surgery for spinal cord tumor

BACKGROUND

There is little information on outcomes for spinal cord tumor treated surgically with instrumentation. Analysis of surgical outcomes and complications in such cases is needed to develop generalizable conclusions and to help inform patients.

METHODS

The subjects were 41 patients treated with instrumentation surgery for dumbbell type tumor resection. Demographic data; tumor histology, level, and location; number of fused vertebra; use of a bilateral or hemilateral screw; operative time; EBL; TcMEP monitoring; lumbar subarachnoid drainage; duration of subfascial drainage; postoperative motor and sensory deficits; CSF leakage, implant-related complications; time for union of fused vertebra; salvage surgeries, and pre-/postoperative McCormick scale were obtained from medical records. Significant factors related to postoperative motor deficits were identified.

RESULTS

Postoperative motor deficit occurred in 9 cases (22.0%) and all recovered in 30 days after surgery. CSF leakage at 7 days and 2 years after surgery was subfascial (n = 31, n = 6) and subcutaneous (n = 3, n = 4). Cases with postoperative motor deficits more commonly had lower cervical lesions; those with CSF leakage had longer operative times; and those with delayed union had more use of hemilateral instrumentation.

CONCLUSION

In this study in 41 spinal cord tumors treated surgically with instrumentation, the rate of postoperative motor deterioration was 22.0%, and CSF leakage was found in 17.1%.

Continuous dural suturing for closure of grade 3 leaks after tumor removal via an endoscopic endonasal approach

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a major complication after extended endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETSS), which is commonly used in the treatment of anterior skull base tumors. Dural suturing and graded reconstruction are promising techniques to further decrease the incidence of postoperative CSF (poCSF) leakage. The effect of continuous dural suturing in endoscopic surgery was investigated in this retrospective study. A total of 79 EETSS patients were included; the procedures were performed for subdural tumor removal by a single endoscopic neurosurgical team. Comparisons were applied between patients who did and did not undergo endoscopic dural suturing after tumor removal. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables that significantly influenced the incidence of poCSF leakage. In all, 79 adult patients developed Esposito's grade 3 intraoperative high-flow CSF leakage. Ten patients (12.7%) experienced poCSF leakage. One of the 36 patients who underwent intraoperative dural suturing developed poCSF leakage, compared with nine of 43 patients who did not undergo dural suturing (p = 0.016). Regression analysis showed that dural suturing could significantly decrease the incidence of poCSF leakage (p = 0.049, OR 0.108, 95% CI 0.013-0.899). Prophylactic lumbar drainage could also help decrease the CSF leakage rate. Dural suturing under endoscopy is a promising and effective method for application in skull base reconstruction after subdural skull base tumor removal. With future progress, lumbar drainage and even nasoseptal flap placement could be replaced in certain groups of patients undergoing EETSS.