Evaluation of the progression of non-azotemic proteinuric chronic kidney disease in dogs

Proteinuria is a recognized risk factor for progression of canine chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the prognosis of non-azotemic proteinuric CKD in dogs has been studied only to a limited extent. Moreover, the degree to which proteinuria should be decreased to delay CKD progression remains unknown. The purposes of this study were (1) to identify factors associated with disease progression and (2) to investigate the degree of proteinuria, albuminuria, and blood pressure during the course of treatment associated with the progression using time-averaged urine protein:creatinine ratio (UPC) and urine albumin:creatinine ratio (UAC) in canine non-azotemic proteinuric CKD. Twenty-one dogs with non-azotemic proteinuric CKD were included in the study. High UPC and UAC were associated with CKD progression (P < .05). Time-averaged high UPC and UAC were significantly related to progression (P < .05). The cutoff values of these time-averaged parameters for predicting the progression were 4.1 and 2.0, respectively. In dogs with non-azotemic proteinuric CKD, more severe proteinuria and albuminuria were associated with progression. The present study suggests that because UPC ≥ 4.1 and UAC ≥ 2.0 during treatment were associated with a faster progression of non-azotemic proteinuric CKD, therapeutic intervention is warranted.

Comparison between Urine Protein: Creatinine Ratios of Samples Obtained from Dogs in Home and Hospital Settings

Background

The urine protein:creatinine ratio (UPC) is used to quantify urine protein excretion and guide recommendations for monitoring and treatment of proteinuria.

Hypothesis/Objectives

Home urine samples will have lower UPCs than hospital samples. The objectives were to compare UPCs of samples collected in each setting and to determine whether environment of sample collection might affect staging, monitoring or treatment recommendations.

Animals

Twenty‐four client‐owned dogs.

Methods

Prospective, nonmasked study. Clients collected a urine sample from their dog at home and a second sample was collected at the hospital. Dogs receiving corticosteroids or angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors were excluded, as were those with urine samples of inadequate volume, no protein on dipstick analysis, or active urine sediment. Samples were refrigerated after collection, dipstick and sediment evaluations were completed and each sample was frozen at −80°C within 12 hours. UPCs were performed on frozen samples within 2 months.

Results

From 81 paired samples, 57 were excluded. Of the remaining 24, 12/24 (50%) had higher hospital sample UPCs, 9/24 (38%) had identical UPCs, and 3/24 (12%) had lower hospital UPCs. The UPCs of hospital samples were higher than home samples for the total population (P = .005) and the subset with UPC > 0.5 (P = .001).

Conclusions

Setting and related circumstances of urine collection in dogs is associated with UPC differences; results are usually higher in hospital than in home samples. This difference has the potential to affect clinical interpretation.

Consensus recommendations for standard therapy of glomerular disease in dogs

Standard therapy forms the basic foundation for care of dogs with glomerular disease, as it is herein recommended for use in all affected animals regardless of causation of the disease. Consensus recommendations target the evaluation and management of proteinuria, inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, modification in dietary intake with special consideration for those nutrients with renal effects, diagnosis and treatment of systemic hypertension, and evaluation and management of body fluid volume status in dogs with glomerular disease.