Intermittent access cocaine self-administration produces psychomotor sensitization: effects of withdrawal, sex and cross-sensitization

RATIONALE

With repeated administration, the psychomotor activating effects of drugs such as cocaine or amphetamine can change in very different ways-showing sensitization or tolerance-depending on whether they are administered more or less intermittently. This behavioral plasticity is thought to reflect, at least in part, changes in dopamine (DA) neurotransmission, and therefore, may provide insights into the development of substance use disorders. Indeed, the most widely used preclinical model of cocaine addiction, which involves Long Access (LgA) self-administration procedures, is reported to produce tolerance to cocaine's psychomotor activating effects and effects on DA activity. In contrast, Intermittent Access (IntA) cocaine self-administration is more effective than LgA in producing addiction-like behavior, but sensitizes DA neurotransmission. There is, however, very little information concerning the effects of IntA experience on the psychomotor activating effects of cocaine.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether IntA experience produces psychomotor sensitization with similar characteristics to that produced by the intermittent, noncontingent administration of cocaine.

RESULTS

IntA to cocaine did indeed produce psychomotor sensitization that (1) was greater after a long (30 days) vs. short (1 day) period of withdrawal, (2) was greater in females than males, and (3) resulted in cross-sensitization to another psychomotor stimulant drug, amphetamine.

CONCLUSION

The tolerance sometimes associated with LgA cocaine self-administration has been cited in support of the idea that, in addiction, drug-seeking and drug-taking is motivated to overcome a DA deficiency and associated anhedonia. In contrast, the neurobehavioral sensitization associated with IntA cocaine self-administration favors an incentive-sensitization view.

Gender differences in the behavioral and subjective effects of methamphetamine in healthy humans

RATIONALE

Methamphetamine (MA) use is steadily increasing and thus constitutes a major public health concern. Women seem to be particularly vulnerable to developing MA use disorder, as they initiate use at a younger age and transition more quickly to problematic use. Initial drug responses may predict subsequent use, but little information exists on potential gender differences in the acute effects of MA prior to dependence.

OBJECTIVE

We examined gender differences in the acute effects of MA on subjective mood and reward-related behavior in healthy, non-dependent humans.

METHODS

Men (n = 44) and women (n = 29) completed 4 sessions in which they received placebo or MA under double-blind conditions twice each. During peak drug effect, participants completed the monetary incentive delay task to assess reaction times to cues signaling potential monetary losses or gains, in an effort to determine if MA would potentiate reward-motivated behavior. Cardiovascular and subjective drug effects were assessed throughout sessions.

RESULTS

Overall, participants responded more quickly to cues predicting incentivized trials, particularly large-magnitude incentives, than to cues predicting no incentive. MA produced faster reaction times in women, but not in men. MA produced typical stimulant-like subjective and cardiovascular effects in all participants, but subjective ratings of vigor and (reduced) sedation were greater in women than in men.

CONCLUSIONS

Women appear to be more sensitive to the psychomotor-related behavioral and subjective effects of MA. These findings provide initial insight into gender differences in acute effects of MA that may contribute to gender differences in problematic MA use.