Cortical activity in patients with high-functioning ischemic stroke during the Purdue Pegboard Test: insights into bimanual coordinated fine motor skills with functional near-infrared spectroscopy

After stroke, even high-functioning individuals may experience compromised bimanual coordination and fine motor dexterity, leading to reduced functional independence. Bilateral arm training has been proposed as a promising intervention to address these deficits. However, the neural basis of the impairment of functional fine motor skills and their relationship to bimanual coordination performance in stroke patients remains unclear, limiting the development of more targeted interventions. To address this gap, our study employed functional near-infrared spectroscopy to investigate cortical responses in patients after stroke as they perform functional tasks that engage fine motor control and coordination. Twenty-four high-functioning patients with ischemic stroke (7 women, 17 men; mean age 64.75 ± 10.84 years) participated in this cross-sectional observational study and completed four subtasks from the Purdue Pegboard Test, which measures unimanual and bimanual finger and hand dexterity. We found significant bilateral activation of the sensorimotor cortices during all Purdue Pegboard Test subtasks, with bimanual tasks inducing higher cortical activation than the assembly subtask. Importantly, patients with better bimanual coordination exhibited lower cortical activation during the other three Purdue Pegboard Test subtasks. Notably, the observed neural response patterns varied depending on the specific subtask. In the unaffected hand task, the differences were primarily observed in the ipsilesional hemisphere. In contrast, the bilateral sensorimotor cortices and the contralesional hemisphere played a more prominent role in the bimanual task and assembly task, respectively. While significant correlations were found between cortical activation and unimanual tasks, no significant correlations were observed with bimanual tasks. This study provides insights into the neural basis of bimanual coordination and fine motor skills in high-functioning patients after stroke, highlighting task-dependent neural responses. The findings also suggest that patients who exhibit better bimanual performance demonstrate more efficient cortical activation. Therefore, incorporating bilateral arm training in post-stroke rehabilitation is important for better outcomes. The combination of functional near-infrared spectroscopy with functional motor paradigms is valuable for assessing skills and developing targeted interventions in stroke rehabilitation.

People with Long Covid and ME/CFS Exhibit Similarly Impaired Dexterity and Bimanual Coordination: A Case-Case-Control Study

PURPOSE

Dexterity and bimanual coordination had not previously been compared between people with long COVID and people with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS). Therefore, this study determined dexterity and bimanual coordination in people with long COVID (∼16 month illness duration; n=21) and ME/CFS (∼16 year illness duration; n=20), versus age-matched healthy controls (n=20).

METHODS

Dexterity, and bimanual coordination was determined using the Purdue pegboard test.

RESULTS

The main findings of the present investigation were that people with ME/CFS and people with long COVID were generally comparable for Purdue pegboard tests (p>0.556 and d<0.36 for pairwise comparisons). It is worth noting however, that both these patient groups performed poorer in the Perdue pegboard test than healthy controls (p<0.169 and d>0.40 for pairwise comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that both people with long COVID and people with ME/CFS have similarly impaired dexterity, and bimanual coordination. Therefore, there is an urgent need for interventions to target dexterity and bimanual coordination in people with ME/CFS, and given the current pandemic, people with long COVID.

Effects of home-based manual dexterity training on cognitive function among older adults: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The relationship between manual dexterity and cognitive function among older adults is well known; however, few studies have focused on manual dexterity training that confirms cognitive load of training in older adults through functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and verifies the effect of training. This study examined the effects of home-based manual dexterity training on cognitive function in older adults using a digital trail-making peg test device combining two conventional assessment tools namely, the peg and trail-making tests.

METHODS

For 12 weeks, 57 healthy older adults aged 65-88 years participated in a parallel-group, randomized controlled trial, wherein home-based manual dexterity training was performed for approximately 20 min daily. To quantify the cognitive load in different manual dexterity conditions, we assessed the cortical activation patterns of the prefrontal cortex via a wearable four-channel fNIRS device. Participants in the control group were asked to continue their usual daily routines during the intervention period. Cognitive function was assessed using the Stroop Color and Word and Cognitive Impairment Tests. Manual dexterity was assessed using the Purdue Pegboard Test. All outcomes were estimated before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

We observed significant differences in prefrontal cortical activation between the different manual dexterity conditions. Only the intervention group showed a significant improvement in Stroop interference (169.0-108.9 ms, p = 0.032) and an executive function and assembly task of the Purdue Pegboard Test (22.5-26.4 counts, p < 0.001). Additionally, except the clock drawing task, cognitive function had a larger effect size (Cohen's d) in the intervention group (d = 0.26-0.45) than in the control group (d = 0.11-0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Home-based manual dexterity training can improve performance in a complex manual dexterity task and executive functioning in older adults.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial, UMIN000047203. Registered 17 March 2022 - Retrospectively registered, https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr.cgi?function=brows&action=brows&recptno=R000053844&type=summary&language=E.

Effect of glove use on manual dexterity of nursing students

Background

Manual dexterity is vital in nursing. Nurses need to carry out applications requiring manual dexterity in the quickest and most accurate way. However, gloves are also necessary during such applications as a precaution against infections. Therefore, manual dexterity and the effect of gloves on manual dexterity are essential subjects to be investigated in the nursing field.

Aims

This study aims to determine the effect of using gloves on the manual dexterity of nursing students.

Materials and Method

The sample of the semi-experimental study consisted of 80 nursing students. The data were collected using a questionnaire and Purdue Pegboard Test.

Results

The participants were 22.03 ± 1.35 years of age on average; 61.2% of them were 22 years of age or above, 50% were female, 50% were male, 50% were in the third grade, 50% were in the fourth, 80% were high school graduates, and 97.5% did not work in any job. As a result, 47.5% reported that gloves impacted their manual dexterity, 52.5% reported only a partial effect, 12.5% indicated that gloves increased their manual dexterity, 66.3% stated that it reduced their manual dexterity, and 21.2% reported no change. The right-hand and assembly scores were found to be significantly higher in the tests performed with bare hands than in the tests performed with gloves (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Using latex gloves impacts the dominant-hand dexterity and assembly dexterity. Therefore, designing more ergonomic gloves, increasing nurses' habit of working with gloves already in school, and supporting the improvement of their manual dexterity with gloves are recommended.

Reduction in manual asymmetry and decline in fine manual dexterity in right-handed older adults with mild cognitive impairment

Research in Parkinson's or Alzheimer's disease suggests that hand function is affected by neurodegenerative diseases. However, little is known about the relationship between hand function and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Therefore, we conducted a kinematic analysis of unimanual hand movements in MCI patients to answer whether manual asymmetries and manual dexterity are affected or preserved in this condition. Forty-one MCI patients and fifty healthy controls were tested with the Purdue Pegboard test. All participants were right-handed. Kinematic analyses (by hand) were calculated for path length, angle, and linear and angular velocities during reaching, grasping, transport and inserting. Group differences were tested by with factorial MANOVAs and laterality indexes (LI) were assessed. Groups were compared on "Right-Left" hand correlations to identify kinematics that best single-out patients. Kinematics from grasping and inserting were significantly more deteriorated in the MCI group, while outcomes for reaching and transport denoted superior performance. LIs data showed symmetry of movements in the MCI group, during reaching and transport. Comparisons of "Right-Left" hand correlations revealed that kinematics in reaching and transport were more symmetrical in patients. This study showed a deterioration of fine manual dexterity, an enhancement in gross dexterity of upper-limbs, and symmetrical movements in MCI patients.

Role of Manual Dexterity on Mechanical and Chemotherapeutic Oral Hygiene Regimens

Purpose:Effective use of mechanical plaque control devices can depend on individual manual dexterity levels. The purpose of this component of a 12-week, virtually-supervised clinical trial was to investigate the role of manual dexterity on clinical outcomes for gingivitis, as measured by the relationship between manual dexterity scores on the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT) and the effects of various mechanical and chemotherapeutic oral hygiene regimens.Methods:This was a single-center, examiner blinded, randomized, four-treatment arm, parallel group, 12-week plaque and gingivitis study. At baseline, healthy adult volunteers with evidence of gingivitis were assessed for manual dexterity and were then examined for plaque, gingivitis and bleeding. After a dental prophylaxis, participants were randomized into four treatment groups: brush only (BO); brush/rinse (BR); brush/floss (BF); and brush/floss/rinse (BFR). The flossing groups received instruction in flossing. The PPT was used to assess manual dexterity and was performed by a licensed occupational therapist. Virtual supervision was required once each weekday and the oral hygiene regimen was unsupervised on evenings and weekends.Results:Of the 213 subjects enrolled, 209 completed the trial. Improvements from baseline to week 12 in interproximal percent nonbleeding healthy sites (Expanded Bleeding Index (EBI)=0 and Modified Gingival Index (MGI)=0 or 1) were dependent on the participant's dexterity score. Participants with the lowest dexterity scores (9 or lower) in the BFR treatment group demonstrated the greatest improvement interproximally based on the indices (EBI and MGI). In comparison, the BF test group subjects with dexterity scores 9 or lower had limited change in improvement interproximally. There was a direct correlation between flossing effectiveness and dexterity scores.Conclusions:Less manual dexterity can limit dental flossing effectiveness. Flossing is a difficult daily task that requires functional bilateral dexterity to be perform correctly. Individuals with lower levels of manual dexterity were shown to benefit from the addition of an essential oil mouthrinse to a regimen of toothbrushing and flossing in this clinical trial. The addition of an essential oil mouthrinse improved interproximal gingival health and mitigated the manual dexterity variable.

Gamma-transcranial alternating current stimulation on the cerebellum and supplementary motor area improves bimanual motor skill

BACKGROUND

Bimanual movements require sophisticated coordination of both hands. For improving bimanual motor skills, previous studies employed non-invasive brain stimulation methods to evaluate their effects on symmetrical and/or gross bimanual motor skills. However, asymmetrical and elaborate movements were not sufficiently improved. Studies using non-invasive brain stimulation have examined the effects of stimulation on the primary and supplementary motor areas (SMA),) but not on the cerebellar regions.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether the transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), which modulates oscillations in the cerebral cortex, of the cerebellum and SMA improves bimanual movements.

METHODS

Bimanual movements were assessed in 22 healthy young adults (mean age: 21.3 ± 1.5 years) via 13 trials of the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT). A DC stimulator delivered 70Hz tACS (γ-tACS) at 1mA intensity via electrodes placed over the SMA, cerebellum and left shoulder in 5s fade in/out cycles of 5s for a total stimulus duration of 60s for in each trial. Four stimulation conditions were applied and compared for statistical differences.

RESULTS

The γ-tACS of the cerebellum, γ-tACS of the SMA and simultaneous stimulation of both regions caused significant improvement in PPT performance scores. The γ-tACS of the cerebellum improved PPT performance in all subjects and was more effective than the γ-tACS of the SMA.

CONCLUSION

The γ-tACS of the cerebellum effectively and reliably improves complex bimanual motor skills. Although the neural mechanisms of the stimulation effect remain unclear, these results can guide the future development of new stimulation methods for improving bimanual motor skills.

Purdue manual dexterity testing: A cohort study of community-dwelling elderly

INTRODUCTION

The Purdue Pegboard Test is a manual dexterity test that requires the manipulation of pegs, washers, and collars. Our population for this research study focused on the geriatric community owing to the lack of recent available normative data.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The purpose of this study was to provide updated normative data for hand therapists to use in clinical practice to determine if seniors have dexterity deficits.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a cohort study.

METHODS

This study was completed through a convenience sample which included 128 participants. Participants were stratified into three age groups (60-69, 70-79, and 80+). Participants were asked to complete the Purdue Pegboard Test. Mean scores were analyzed using an independent-sample t-test and one-way analysis of variance to compare the mean scores of each designated age group.

RESULTS

A one-way analysis of variance reported statistically significant differences between the 3 age groups (F = 15.03, P < .00). The results supported that those individuals who were younger (60-69) scored better on the assessment than those aged 80+ years. There was not a statistically significant difference between PPT mean scores of males and females.

DISCUSSION

Mean scores for the PPT for community-dwelling seniors were established.

CONCLUSION

The findings from this study support that dexterity may decline with age, which can affect occupational performance over time.

Predictors for Clinical Outcomes Related to Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders in a Healthy Working Population

A wide range of endpoints and methods of analysis can be observed in occupational health studies in the context of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). Comparison of study results is therefore difficult. We investigated the association between different clinical endpoints and the presence of upper extremity WMSDs in a healthy working population. Furthermore, the influence of socio-demographic, work-related, and individual predictors on different endpoints was examined. Two self-administered questionnaires were distributed to 70 workers and employees. In addition, a standardized physical examination and an industry test were performed in this cross-sectional study. Correlations between WMSDs and clinical endpoints were analyzed with the Spearman method and prediction ellipses. Multiple regression models were used to study the strength of associations with a pre-defined set of potential influencing factors. The prevalence of WMSDs was 56% (39/70). Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score/pain under strain showed the strongest correlations with WMSDs. When analyzing the correlation between WMSDs and pre-selected predictors, none of the predictors could be identified as a risk factor. The DASH score remains a close candidate for best surrogate endpoint for WMSDs detection. Standardized analysis methods could improve the methodological quality of future occupational health studies.

Effects of stimulating the supplementary motor area with a transcranial alternating current for bimanual movement performance

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can regulate the frequency of neuronal activity in the cerebral cortex. Beta (β) activity in the supplementary motor area (SMA) is involved in motor planning and maintenance while gamma (γ) activity is involved in updating motor plans. We investigated the effect of tACS in the β- and γ-bands (β-tACS and γ- tACS) applied to the SMA on bimanual movement performance. This study included 32 right-handed healthy participants performing a Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT) during the administration of either β-tACS (20 Hz), γ-tACS (80 Hz), or sham stimulation over the SMA. Each participant performed nine PPT trials during each stimulation condition. The linear approximation of the number of parts and their differences for the 9 trials performed by each participant was calculated. A significant positive correlation was found between the difference from linear approximation for the β-tACS condition and the intercept of the linear approximation (p = 0.007, Pearson's r = 0.464), and significant negative correlation was found for the γ-tACS condition (p = 0.012, Pearson's r = -0.438). In the low-performance subgroup, the mean values of the difference from linear approximation under the γ-tACS condition was significantly larger than that under the β-tACS condition (p = 0.048). These results were opposite for the high-performance subgroup (p = 0.002) and sham group (p = 0.014). We demonstrated that the effect of tACS over the SMA depended on the stimulus frequency and the participant's motor performance and may modulate the maintenance and updating of motor plans.

Is Repetitive Workload a Risk Factor for Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders in Surgical Device Mechanics? A Cross-Sectional Analysis

To assess the prevalence of upper extremity work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) among surgical device mechanics compared to a control group, a total of 70 employees were included and assigned to three occupational groups (grinders, packers, and control). Personal factors, work exposure, manual skill, and complaints were assessed by two self-administered questionnaires and an industry test. WMSDs were diagnosed in a standardised clinical examination. The two-one-sided t-tests (TOST) procedure was used to test the clinical equivalence of the respective grinding and packaging groups vs. the control group in terms of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. Thirty-nine study participants (56%) experienced at least one WMSD at the elbow, forearm, and/or wrist, mainly with signs of epicondylitis and nerve entrapment at the medial elbow. The risk of grinders developing upper extremity WMSD was about 2.5-times higher and packers had an 8.6-fold higher risk of a clinically relevant DASH > 29 compared to the control group. However, these differences were not statistically significant. The groups were also proven to be clinically equivalent in terms of DASH score. Surgical device mechanics do not seem to have worse DASH values or be at higher risk of upper limb WMSDs compared to a control group. This is the first study to analyse and compare different workplaces in this industry that are also common in other industries.

Bimanual task performance: Adults who do and do not stutter

Research has demonstrated children who stutter score significantly lower than children who do not stutter on the Purdue Pegboard Test. Past data also suggest performance on this task may be associated with stuttering frequency (Choo et al., 2016; Mohammadi et al., 2016). The purpose of this study was to explore whether these performance differences and the relationship to stuttering frequency are present in adults who stutter (AWS). Forty-eight participants (AWS = 24, and AWNS = 24) matched for age, gender, education, and handedness completed all four tasks of the Purdue Pegboard Test. There were no significant between group differences and stuttering frequency did not predict performance. These findings suggest previous differences may only be applicable to subgroups and/or that, with development, the manual tasks unique to the Purdue Pegboard Test may not be sensitive enough to reveal differences.

Manual dexterity and brain structure in patients with schizophrenia: A whole-brain magnetic resonance imaging study

The Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT) is a motor coordination task used to assess manual dexterity. Although several brain regions are thought to be involved in PPT performance, the relationship of the task with decreased insular volume has not been investigated. The PPT was administered to 83 subjects diagnosed with schizophrenia (mean ± standard deviation age: 38.6 ± 11.2 years; 47 males, 36 females) and 130 healthy controls (42.1 ± 15.2 years; 67 males, 63 females). All subjects were Japanese and right-handed. Gray matter volume was analyzed using voxel-based morphometry in statistical parametric mapping, while white matter measures were analyzed using diffusion tensor imaging in tract-based spatial statistics. For the patients with schizophrenia, the left-hand scores positively correlated with the right insular and bilateral operculum volumes, while the summation score (sum of left-, right-, and both-hands scores) positively correlated with the right insular volume, and the summation and assembly (number of assemblies completed) scores correlated with the diffuse white matter fractional anisotropy, axial diffusivity, and radial diffusivity values. In contrast, no significant correlations were found for the controls. These results suggested that decreased insular volume and white matter measures contributed to the impairments in manual dexterity observed in subjects with schizophrenia.

Bimanual coordination positively predicts episodic memory: A combined behavioral and MRI investigation

Some people remember events more completely and accurately than other people, but the origins of individual differences in episodic memory are poorly understood. One way to advance understanding is by identifying characteristics of individuals that reliably covary with memory performance. Recent research suggests motor behavior is related to memory performance, with individuals who consistently use a single preferred hand for unimanual actions performing worse than individuals who make greater use of both hands. This research has relied on self-reports of behavior. It is unknown whether objective measures of motor behavior also predict memory performance. Here, we tested the predictive power of bimanual coordination, an important form of manual dexterity. Bimanual coordination, as measured objectively on the Purdue Pegboard Test, was positively related to correct recall on the California Verbal Learning Test-II and negatively related to false recall. Furthermore, MRI data revealed that cortical surface area in right lateral prefrontal regions was positively related to correct recall. In one of these regions, cortical thickness was negatively related to bimanual coordination. These results suggest that individual differences in episodic memory may partially reflect morphological variation in right lateral prefrontal cortex and suggest a relationship between neural correlates of episodic memory and motor behavior.

Single session of dual-tDCS transiently improves precision grip and dexterity of the paretic hand after stroke

BACKGROUND

After stroke, deregulated interhemispheric interactions influence residual paretic hand function. Anodal or cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can rebalance these abnormal interhemispheric interactions and improve motor function.

OBJECTIVE

We explored whether dual-hemisphere tDCS (dual-tDCS) in participants with chronic stroke can improve fine hand motor function in 2 important aspects: precision grip and dexterity.

METHODS

In all, 19 chronic hemiparetic individuals with mild to moderate impairment participated in a double-blind, randomized trial. During 2 separate cross-over sessions (real/sham), they performed 10 precision grip movements with a manipulandum and the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT) before, during, immediately after, and 20 minutes after dual-tDCS applied simultaneously over the ipsilesional (anodal) and contralateral (cathodal) primary motor cortices.

RESULTS

The precision grip performed with the paretic hand improved significantly 20 minutes after dual-tDCS, with reduction of the grip force/load force ratio by 7% and in the preloading phase duration by 18% when compared with sham. The dexterity of the paretic hand started improving during dual-tDCS and culminated 20 minutes after the end of dual-tDCS (PPT score +38% vs +5% after sham). The maximal improvements in precision grip and dexterity were observed 20 minutes after dual-tDCS. These improvements correlated negatively with residual hand function quantified with ABILHAND.

CONCLUSIONS

One bout of dual-tDCS improved the motor control of precision grip and digital dexterity beyond the time of stimulation. These results suggest that dual-tDCS should be tested in longer protocols for neurorehabilitation and with moderate to severely impaired patients. The precise timing of stimulation after stroke onset and associated training should be defined.

Validity of the Purdue Pegboard Test in assessing patients after traumatic hand injury

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study were first, to determine the validity of the Purdue Pegboard Test in differentiating between groups of healthy adults and adults who suffered from traumatic hand injury. Second, to determine criterion validity of the Purdue Pegboard Test with the Functional Dexterity Test (FDT). Third, to test the correlations between the Purdue Pegboard Test and several functional hand activities.

STUDY DESIGNS

Fifty-four post-traumatic hand injury participants who were treated in the Occupational Therapy Clinic at the Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. Forty-three healthy participants with no history of hand injury or disease formed the control group. All subjects were assessed with the Purdue Pegboard Test, PDT and five functional hand activities.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The Purdue Pegboard Test differentiated between the healthy population and the post-traumatic hand injury population. No significant differences were found between the dominant hand-injured group and the non-dominant hand-injured group on three scores (both hands, assembly and the summarizing of the first three sub-tests). Correlations between the Purdue Pegboard Test and the PDT were moderate to high suggesting the two tests should be used in combination when assessing patients. Correlations between the Purdue and hand activities (e.g. button, laces) were moderate. Further studies are needed to examine the relationships between types of hand injuries, ROM, pinch grip and performance on the Purdue Pegboard Test.