Mucinous adenocarcinoma arising from a tailgut cyst: A case report

BACKGROUND

Retrorectal hamartomas or tailgut cysts (TCs) are rare. In most cases, they are asymptomatic and benign; however, rarely, they undergo malignant transformation, mainly in the form of adenocarcinoma.

CASE SUMMARY

A 55-year-old woman presented to our hospital with lower back pain. On magnetic resonance imaging, a large pelvic mass was found, which was located on the right of the ischiorectal fossa, extending to the minor pelvis. The patient underwent extensive surgical resection of the lesion through the right buttock. Histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of a retrorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma originating from a TC. Surgical resection of the tumour was complete, and the patient recovered without complications. The pilonidal sinus was then excised. One year later, semi-annual positron emission tomography-computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans did not reveal any evidence of local recurrence or metastatic disease.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative recognition, histological diagnosis, and treatment of TCs pose significant challenges. In addition, the possibility of developing invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma, although rare, should be considered.

Does a retrorectal tumour remain a challenge for surgeons?

Background: Retrorectal tumours are lesions with a wide range of histological differentiation that are often diagnostic and clinical challenges due to their rare occurrence. Many cases of this pathology are treated in regional hospitals, which results in serious complications because physicians fail to recognize this pathology. We present our experience in treating these tumours. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed using the Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics patient database. Thirty-five cases were identified. Results: Occurrence of retrorectal tumours was higher in women than in men and accounted for 82.86% and 17.14%, respectively. Computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were the main methods used to confirm diagnosis and plan surgical treatment. We have used a laparotomy, perineal or combined approach for tumour extirpation. The laparotomy approach was the most used, followed by perineal extirpation. The most common histological type was cystic hamartoma, accounting for 20% of cases. In 80% of cases, the histological findings greatly varied. Hospital stays varied from 3 to 21 days with a mean of 11.6 ± 5.83 days. The postoperative complication rate was 17.14% and was present in six cases. Overall survival was 85.17%, with an average follow-up period of 71.83 months. There were no recurrent tumours diagnosed during follow-up. Conclusion: Retrorectal tumours are a very rare pathology with high histological heterogeneity and problematic diagnostics. Patients should be referred to a tertiary centre that has experience and diagnostic capabilities for the best diagnostic and treatment options.

A rare retrorectal presentation of a bronchogenic cyst: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Bronchogenic cysts are rare abnormalities and a retrorectal presentation is exceptional. Its natural history is not known, but malignant transformation is quite rare. Retrorectal bronchogenic cysts are usually asymptomatic.

PRESENTATION OF THE CASE

We present the case of a 36-year-old young man with a past medical history of HIV seropositivity who underwent a procedure to excise a sacral coccyx cyst at another surgical center in February 2009. A histological examination confirmed it was a sacral cyst that was resected in sano. The patient presented with a recurrence of the cyst, and this report describes the combined surgical procedure using a double sacrococcygeal and abdominal approach.

DISCUSSION

A complete excision without cyst rupture is recommended to reduce the risk of local recurrence and malignant transformation, as previously reported. Resection can ben performed using multiple approaches depending on the cyst's location

CONCLUSION

Herein, we report the case of a retrorectal bronchogenic cyst in a 36 years old man who was initially treated for a pilonidal cyst. A double surgical approach (abdominal and Kraske) resulted in complete resectioning with no reccurrence.

Progress in the management of retrorectal tumours

AIM

Tumours in the retrorectal space are rare and pathologically heterogeneous. The roles of imaging and preoperative biopsy, nonoperative management and the indications for surgical resection are controversial. This study investigated a series of retrorectal tumours treated in a single institution with the aim of producing a modern improved management algorithm.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted of the management of all retrorectal lesions identified between 1998 and 2013 from a radiology database search. Patient demographics, presenting symptoms, imaging, biopsy, management and the results were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients with a confirmed retrorectal tumour were identified. The median age was 50 (36-67 interquartile range) and 42 (56%) were female. Twenty (29%) of the tumours were malignant: 4 of 41 cystic lesions were malignant (12.9%) vs. 16 of 28 solid (or heterogeneous) lesions (57.1%) (P < 0.0001). Imaging demonstrated a 95% sensitivity and 64% specificity for differentiating benign from malignant tumours. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was significantly better at distinguishing between benign and malignant tumours than computed tomography (94% vs. 64%, P = 0.03). Percutaneous biopsy was performed in 16 patients and only 27 underwent resection. There was no evidence of local recurrence associated with biopsy. Solid lesions were associated with a nonsignificant decreased overall survival (P = 0.348).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that MRI should be the investigation of choice for retrorectal lesions. Biopsy of solid lesions is safe and useful for guiding neoadjuvant and surgical therapy. Cystic lesions without suspicious radiological features can be followed by serial imaging without resection.

Management approach and surgical strategies for retrorectal tumours: a systematic review

AIM

The management strategy for retrorectal tumours is complex. Due to their rarity, few surgeons have expertise in management.

METHOD

A systematic literature review was conducted using the PubMed database. English language publications in the years 2011-2015 that assessed preoperative management, surgical strategies and chemoradiotherapy for presacral tumours were included. Two hundred and fifty-one abstracts were screened of which 88 met the inclusion criteria. After review of the full text, this resulted in a final list of 42 studies eligible for review.

RESULTS

In all, 932 patients (63.2% female, 36.8% male; P < 0.01) with a retrorectal tumour were identified. Most were benign (65.9% vs. 33.7%, P < 0.01). Imaging distinguished benign from malignant lesions in 88.1% of cases; preoperative biopsy was superior to imaging in providing an accurate definitive diagnosis (91.3% vs. 61.4%, P < 0.05) with negligible seeding risk. Biopsy should be performed in solid tumours. It is useful in guiding neoadjuvant therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumours, sarcomas and desmoid type fibromatosis and may alter the management strategy in cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and metastases. Biopsies for cystic lesions are not recommended. The gold standard in imaging is MRI. The posterior Kraske procedure is the most common surgical approach. Overall, the reported recurrence rate was 19.7%.

CONCLUSION

This review evaluated the management strategies for retrorectal tumours. A preoperative biopsy should be performed for solid tumours. MRI is the most useful imaging modality. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment. There is limited information on robotic surgery, single-port surgery, transanal endoscopic microsurgery, chemoradiotherapy and reconstruction.